Friday, July 29, 2016

A Response to the Khizr Con

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

I would like to respond to Khizr Khan, who raised the Constitution of the United States of America as a weapon of war against an American Presidential candidate, Donald Trump. The Declaration of Independence states, inter alia:

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."

While all men are declared equal under this statement, it is nevertheless a declaration of the independence of one group of men from that of another for the purpose of self-determination and independent sovereignty, and the group declaring its independence was a group of White men who threw in their lot together to stand against all others.

The fundamental right to life includes the right and duty to safeguard White DNA and preserve Whites from miscegenation across generations, thereby securing the rights of our ancestors and our current generation from the loss of their White DNA down through the generations including our descendants. The diversification of America to include non-Whites threatens the right to life by creating a diversity of blood loyalties leading to national dissensions which favor non-White life over White life both domestically and globally. Donald Trump has stated that it is the duty of the American President to safeguard the lives of Americans from Muslim terrorists, and the Constitution agrees with Trump.

The fundamental right of liberty includes the right to eliminate a criminally prone class of non-Whites whose behaviors provoke a State response to diminish the liberties of Whites who do not generally so act as to prompt the revocation of liberty. It includes the right to self-determination from non-Whites, whose cultures and traditions deviate from ours and subvert our notions of liberty. Muslims are causing some in government to call for the restriction of our rights to keep and bear arms, and the Islamic propaganda of the deed is working to undermine White liberty at home and abroad. It is the President's constitutional duty to oppose this enemy of our liberty.

The fundamental right to the pursuit of happiness incorporates of necessity the preservation of cultural exclusivity and decency, traditionally accepted standards of societal etiquette, etc. It secures the self interests of Whites against the encroachment of non-Whites through the unequal burden non-Whites place on the State and society by failing to perform to the standards Whites achieve, thereby placing an unnecessary and unwanted yoke on the necks of Whites. Whites cannot pursue happiness in a climate of fear where Muslim terrorists mass murder our citizens. Those the Muslims murder are not happy, they are dead.

The Preamble to the Constitution of the United States declares:

"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."

A heterogeneous society discourages domestic tranquility, produced the Civil War, permits our enemies to subvert our nation in an unjust manner through disproportionate influence that defeats our common defense; defeats the general welfare by, among other means, allowing the jews to control our banking and money supply mechanism placing Whites in a usurious debt cycle which the jews have sought for 2,500 years to control the World; allows the jews to subvert our liberties through their participation in our political and public opinion institutions by taking Muslim terrorism as an example why our rights must be eliminated in favor of security. Therefore, the Constitution is not consistent with non-White and anti-White influence and citizenship.

The arguments leading to the Constitution, and the traditions including the Magna Carta, recognize only Whites as citizens. The Magna Carta recognized the fact that jews were hostile to Whites and used usury to destroy Whites' rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness:

"10. If one who has borrowed from the Jews any sum, great or small, die before that loan be repaid, the debt shall not bear interest while the heir is under age, of whomsoever he may hold; and if the debt fall into our hands, we will not take anything except the principal sum contained in the bond.

11. And if anyone die indebted to the Jews, his wife shall have her dower and pay nothing of that debt; and if any children of the deceased are left under age, necessaries shall be provided for them in keeping with the holding of the deceased; and out of the residue the debt shall be paid, reserving, however, service due to feudal lords; in like manner let it be done touching debts due to others than Jews."

The Federalist Papers, at No. 54, did not consider Blacks "men", but rather partial property, partial human, and not citizens:

"To the People of the State of New York:

THE next view which I shall take of the House of Representatives relates to the appointment of its members to the several States which is to be determined by the same rule with that of direct taxes. It is not contended that the number of people in each State ought not to be the standard for regulating the proportion of those who are to represent the people of each State. The establishment of the same rule for the appointment of taxes, will probably be as little contested; though the rule itself in this case, is by no means founded on the same principle. In the former case, the rule is understood to refer to the personal rights of the people, with which it has a natural and universal connection.

In the latter, it has reference to the proportion of wealth, of which it is in no case a precise measure, and in ordinary cases a very unfit one. But notwithstanding the imperfection of the rule as applied to the relative wealth and contributions of the States, it is evidently the least objectionable among the practicable rules, and had too recently obtained the general sanction of America, not to have found a ready preference with the convention. All this is admitted, it will perhaps be said; but does it follow, from an admission of numbers for the measure of representation, or of slaves combined with free citizens as a ratio of taxation, that slaves ought to be included in the numerical rule of representation? Slaves are considered as property, not as persons. They ought therefore to be comprehended in estimates of taxation which are founded on property, and to be excluded from representation which is regulated by a census of persons. This is the objection, as I understand it, stated in its full force. I shall be equally candid in stating the reasoning which may be offered on the opposite side. 'We subscribe to the doctrine,' might one of our Southern brethren observe, 'that representation relates more immediately to persons, and taxation more immediately to property, and we join in the application of this distinction to the case of our slaves. But we must deny the fact, that slaves are considered merely as property, and in no respect whatever as persons. The true state of the case is, that they partake of both these qualities: being considered by our laws, in some respects, as persons, and in other respects as property. In being compelled to labor, not for himself, but for a master; in being vendible by one master to another master; and in being subject at all times to be restrained in his liberty and chastised in his body, by the capricious will of another, the slave may appear to be degraded from the human rank, and classed with those irrational animals which fall under the legal denomination of property. In being protected, on the other hand, in his life and in his limbs, against the violence of all others, even the master of his labor and his liberty; and in being punishable himself for all violence committed against others, the slave is no less evidently regarded by the law as a member of the society, not as a part of the irrational creation; as a moral person, not as a mere article of property. The federal Constitution, therefore, decides with great propriety on the case of our slaves, when it views them in the mixed character of persons and of property. This is in fact their true character. It is the character bestowed on them by the laws under which they live; and it will not be denied, that these are the proper criterion; because it is only under the pretext that the laws have transformed the negroes into subjects of property, that a place is disputed them in the computation of numbers; and it is admitted, that if the laws were to restore the rights which have been taken away, the negroes could no longer be refused an equal share of representation with the other inhabitants. 'This question may be placed in another light. It is agreed on all sides, that numbers are the best scale of wealth and taxation, as they are the only proper scale of representation. Would the convention have been impartial or consistent, if they had rejected the slaves from the list of inhabitants, when the shares of representation were to be calculated, and inserted them on the lists when the tariff of contributions was to be adjusted? Could it be reasonably expected, that the Southern States would concur in a system, which considered their slaves in some degree as men, when burdens were to be imposed, but refused to consider them in the same light, when advantages were to be conferred? Might not some surprise also be expressed, that those who reproach the Southern States with the barbarous policy of considering as property a part of their human brethren, should themselves contend, that the government to which all the States are to be parties, ought to consider this unfortunate race more completely in the unnatural light of property, than the very laws of which they complain? 'It may be replied, perhaps, that slaves are not included in the estimate of representatives in any of the States possessing them. They neither vote themselves nor increase the votes of their masters. Upon what principle, then, ought they to be taken into the federal estimate of representation? In rejecting them altogether, the Constitution would, in this respect, have followed the very laws which have been appealed to as the proper guide. 'This objection is repelled by a single observation. It is a fundamental principle of the proposed Constitution, that as the aggregate number of representatives allotted to the several States is to be determined by a federal rule, founded on the aggregate number of inhabitants, so the right of choosing this allotted number in each State is to be exercised by such part of the inhabitants as the State itself may designate. The qualifications on which the right of suffrage depend are not, perhaps, the same in any two States. In some of the States the difference is very material. In every State, a certain proportion of inhabitants are deprived of this right by the constitution of the State, who will be included in the census by which the federal Constitution apportions the representatives.

In this point of view the Southern States might retort the complaint, by insisting that the principle laid down by the convention required that no regard should be had to the policy of particular States towards their own inhabitants; and consequently, that the slaves, as inhabitants, should have been admitted into the census according to their full number, in like manner with other inhabitants, who, by the policy of other States, are not admitted to all the rights of citizens. A rigorous adherence, however, to this principle, is waived by those who would be gainers by it. All that they ask is that equal moderation be shown on the other side. Let the case of the slaves be considered, as it is in truth, a peculiar one. Let the compromising expedient of the Constitution be mutually adopted, which regards them as inhabitants, but as debased by servitude below the equal level of free inhabitants, which regards the SLAVE as divested of two fifths of the MAN. 'After all, may not another ground be taken on which this article of the Constitution will admit of a still more ready defense? We have hitherto proceeded on the idea that representation related to persons only, and not at all to property. But is it a just idea?

Government is instituted no less for protection of the property, than of the persons, of individuals. The one as well as the other, therefore, may be considered as represented by those who are charged with the government. Upon this principle it is, that in several of the States, and particularly in the State of New York, one branch of the government is intended more especially to be the guardian of property, and is accordingly elected by that part of the society which is most interested in this object of government. In the federal Constitution, this policy does not prevail. The rights of property are committed into the same hands with the personal rights. Some attention ought, therefore, to be paid to property in the choice of those hands. 'For another reason, the votes allowed in the federal legislature to the people of each State, ought to bear some proportion to the comparative wealth of the States. States have not, like individuals, an influence over each other, arising from superior advantages of fortune. If the law allows an opulent citizen but a single vote in the choice of his representative, the respect and consequence which he derives from his fortunate situation very frequently guide the votes of others to the objects of his choice; and through this imperceptible channel the rights of property are conveyed into the public representation. A State possesses no such influence over other States. It is not probable that the richest State in the Confederacy will ever influence the choice of a single representative in any other State. Nor will the representatives of the larger and richer States possess any other advantage in the federal legislature, over the representatives of other States, than what may result from their superior number alone. As far, therefore, as their superior wealth and weight may justly entitle them to any advantage, it ought to be secured to them by a superior share of representation. The new Constitution is, in this respect, materially different from the existing Confederation, as well as from that of the United Netherlands, and other similar confederacies. In each of the latter, the efficacy of the federal resolutions depends on the subsequent and voluntary resolutions of the states composing the union. Hence the states, though possessing an equal vote in the public councils, have an unequal influence, corresponding with the unequal importance of these subsequent and voluntary resolutions. Under the proposed Constitution, the federal acts will take effect without the necessary intervention of the individual States. They will depend merely on the majority of votes in the federal legislature, and consequently each vote, whether proceeding from a larger or smaller State, or a State more or less wealthy or powerful, will have an equal weight and efficacy: in the same manner as the votes individually given in a State legislature, by the representatives of unequal counties or other districts, have each a precise equality of value and effect; or if there be any difference in the case, it proceeds from the difference in the personal character of the individual representative, rather than from any regard to the extent of the district from which he comes. 'Such is the reasoning which an advocate for the Southern interests might employ on this subject; and although it may appear to be a little strained in some points, yet, on the whole, I must confess that it fully reconciles me to the scale of representation which the convention have established. In one respect, the establishment of a common measure for representation and taxation will have a very salutary effect. As the accuracy of the census to be obtained by the Congress will necessarily depend, in a considerable degree on the disposition, if not on the co-operation, of the States, it is of great importance that the States should feel as little bias as possible, to swell or to reduce the amount of their numbers. Were their share of representation alone to be governed by this rule, they would have an interest in exaggerating their inhabitants. Were the rule to decide their share of taxation alone, a contrary temptation would prevail. By extending the rule to both objects, the States will have opposite interests, which will control and balance each other, and produce the requisite impartiality.

PUBLIUS. [Written by Alexander Hamilton or James Madison]"

The Constitution of the United States, Article I, Section 2, does not grant Blacks citizenship nor confer on them a status equal to that of Whites:

"Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons."

In order to protect us from politically motivated Khanartists, the US Congress passed An act to establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization 26 March 1790:

"Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, That any Alien being a free white person, who shall have resided within the limits and under the jurisdiction of the United States for the term of two years, may be admitted to become a citizen thereof on application to any common law Court of record in any one of the States wherein he shall have resided for the term of one year at least, and making proof to the satisfaction of such Court that he is a person of good character, and taking the oath or affirmation prescribed by law to support the Constitution of the United States, which Oath or Affirmation such Court shall administer, and the Clerk of such Court shall record such Application, and the proceedings thereon; and thereupon such person shall be considered as a Citizen of the United States. And the children of such person so naturalized, dwelling within the United States, being under the age of twenty one years at the time of such naturalization, shall also be considered as citizens of the United States. And the children of citizens of the United States that may be born beyond Sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural born Citizens: Provided, that the right of citizenship shall not descend to persons whose fathers have never been resident in the United States: Provided also, that no person heretofore proscribed by any States, shall be admitted a citizen as aforesaid, except by an Act of the Legislature of the State in which such person was proscribed."

The United States Congress then reaffirmed the intentions of the Founding Fathers with An act to establish an uniform rule of Naturalization; and to repeal the act heretofore passed on that subject 29 January 1795:

" SEC.1. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, That any alien, being a free white person, may be admitted to become a citizen of the United States, or any of them, on the following conditions, and not otherwise:"

The Unites States Supreme Court affirmed that Blacks were not citizens, that citizenship is not necessarily the same as free man, and that we have the right to define who may become a citizen and who may not. See:

U.S. Supreme Court, DRED SCOTT v. SANDFORD, 60 U.S. 393 (1856)

After murdering President Lincoln, who wanted to ship the Blacks back to Africa and who vehemently opposed miscegenation as racial degeneration, the jews sought to subvert this decision with the "reconstruction amendments" 13, 14 and 15. The 14th Amendment to the US Constitution ( July 9, 1868), states, among other relevant things:

"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

The 15th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America:

"The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude."

These passages could be interpreted in the tradition of American government to mean that only those who do not infringe upon the rights of Whites to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness are to be considered "persons" for the purposes of citizenship in the United States of America, and those who as a group destroy the rights of Whites have by their actions repudiated their citizenship in our nation. The jews manufactured the Civil War as means to divide us against ourselves. After destroying White civilization in the South, the jews sought to guarantee that it would not return, and those amendments which opposed the beliefs and intention of the Founding Fathers are the product of a deliberate attack on White liberty.

Muslims are migrating to places where White civilization flourished in search of a better standard of living. They move en masse to White countries, which they quickly rot out to the detriment of Whites.

These non-Whites have infringed on the fundamental rights of Whites to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, as well as our fundamental rights to self determination and group survival in measurably significant and disproportionate ways. These fundamental rights include the right to sovereignty in addition to self-determination.

The Curb Your Enthusiasm Conventions and Political Race: We Must Make America American Again!

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Willfully withholding any plausible and thoughtful solutions to the problems which plague us, and facing the dislike of the American People for both clowns running for the Presidency, both parties are instead trying to curb the enthusiasm of the voters of the opposing party, so that they do not turn out to vote. It is truly pathetic watching this civil war to shoot each other down rather than build up America. And this is the next civil war, where a campaign to make America American again is being pitted against a campaign to destroy our national sovereignty and give away everything we have to our enemies.

Both parties held conventions which mock the Founding Fathers and their beliefs. The democrats pretend to celebrate America, but instead celebrate the destruction of America and the replacement of the decedents of the Founding Fathers by our enemies. Instead of promoting our strength, the democrats held a parade of the disabled and jewish hippies. They miscast the Constitution as if the Founding Fathers would have wanted us to welcome in an invasion of Muslims, when nothing could be further from the truth. They call it progress that the descendants of the Founding Fathers are being replaced by the enemies of the Founding Fathers.

We should indeed demand progress. We should demand a functioning economy that allows women to care for our children. We should demand an economy where every family can afford to pay for private schools for their children which teach a program that conforms to their beliefs and aspirations. We should demand that our society promote and foster a dramatic increase in the birth rate of the American People, those the Founders defined as Americans. That would be progress. What the democrats and republicans propose is not progress, it is death and defeat! And these stooges celebrate our destruction and throw it in our faces calling upon us to clamor for more and worse!

I know real solutions to our problems, and I name the source of our problems, the jews. If we want to make America American again, it will be easy to do, and Trump's half measures, if he follows through on them, will get us half way there, but there is much more that must be done to reform the economy and monetary policies of the USA, and Reaganomics and deregulation won't do it. We should steal Trump's thunder and instead of selling out to bolshevik Putin, work with Western Europe to free the White Race. We should steal Bernie Sanders' thunder and instead of promoting the disabled and brown skinned peoples, celebrate ourselves. Contrast the conventions we just witnessed which eulogize the White Race with scorn and contempt, with the promotion of White power and strength expressed here:

We must demand real progress from government, increased birth rates, healthier children, better jobs for Americans, more opportunities for Americans, cleaner water, air and land for Americans, less traffic, less crowded and more beautiful cities, a better economy for Americans, better income distribution for Americans, etc. Real progress for us, not the advancement of enemy armies on our soil and into our homes, which the democrats propose as if progress.

Force Whites to ask and answer these pressing questions, "What is real progress for us? Is our Race better off than it was in 1776? In what sense is extinction progress?"

The Pack Attack Mentality of Women

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

In order to compensate for their comparative physical weakness, females of many types of animals including human beings have evolved to form packs when attacking males. They support one another and bond with humor, insult and a compulsion to agree to identify a common enemy. The democrats and liberals in general have exploited this facet of human nature to manipulate the opinions of women. They contravene normalcy and nature and go one step further in their aggression employing homosexuals of both sexes to emphasize the feminine nature of their attack, so that women will instinctively and reflexively flock to the group to mob the victim of the group assault.

The democrats and their media often pool women together to psychologically control their audience and the emotions of their audience, so that liberal men feel a drive of white knighthood to come to their defense, and females respond by unquestioningly siding with their sex against the male target. It has been very effective, and the republicans offer no counter force.

Thursday, July 28, 2016

The NSDAP's 25 Point Plan versus Bernie Sanders' 12 Steps Forward

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Old jewish hippie communists are taking over the democratic party and proposing the policies of Karl Marx's Communist Manifesto. They are openly calling for a communist revolution in America. Their Socialism has failed wherever and whenever it has been implemented.

National Socialist Gottfried Feder proposed a proven effective approach to Socialism which is vastly superior Bernie Sanders' jewish approach. Feder's program follows:

"1. We demand the unification of all Germans in the Greater Germany on the basis of the right of self-determination of peoples.

2. We demand equality of rights for the German people in respect to the other nations; abrogation of the peace treaties of Versailles and St. Germain.

3. We demand land and territory (colonies) for the sustenance of our people, and colonization for our surplus population.

4. Only a member of the race can be a citizen. A member of the race can only be one who is of German blood, without consideration of creed. Consequently no Jew can be a member of the race.

5. Whoever has no citizenship is to be able to live in Germany only as a guest, and must be under the authority of legislation for foreigners.

6. The right to determine matters concerning administration and law belongs only to the citizen. Therefore we demand that every public office, of any sort whatsoever, whether in the Reich, the county or municipality, be filled only by citizens. We combat the corrupting parliamentary economy, office-holding only according to party inclinations without consideration of character or abilities.

7. We demand that the state be charged first with providing the opportunity for a livelihood and way of life for the citizens. If it is impossible to sustain the total population of the State, then the members of foreign nations (non-citizens) are to be expelled from the Reich.

8. Any further immigration of non-citizens is to be prevented. We demand that all non-Germans, who have immigrated to Germany since the 2 August 1914, be forced immediately to leave the Reich.

9. All citizens must have equal rights and obligations.

10. The first obligation of every citizen must be to work both spiritually and physically. The activity of individuals is not to counteract the interests of the universality, but must have its result within the framework of the whole for the benefit of all Consequently we demand:

11. Abolition of unearned (work and labour) incomes. Breaking of rent-slavery.

12. In consideration of the monstrous sacrifice in property and blood that each war demands of the people personal enrichment through a war must be designated as a crime against the people. Therefore we demand the total confiscation of all war profits.

13. We demand the nationalization of all (previous) associated industries (trusts).

14. We demand a division of profits of all heavy industries.

15. We demand an expansion on a large scale of old age welfare.

16. We demand the creation of a healthy middle class and its conservation, immediate communalization of the great warehouses and their being leased at low cost to small firms, the utmost consideration of all small firms in contracts with the State, county or municipality.

17. We demand a land reform suitable to our needs, provision of a law for the free expropriation of land for the purposes of public utility, abolition of taxes on land and prevention of all speculation in land.

18. We demand struggle without consideration against those whose activity is injurious to the general interest. Common national criminals, usurers, Schieber and so forth are to be punished with death, without consideration of confession or race.

19. We demand substitution of a German common law in place of the Roman Law serving a materialistic world-order.

20. The state is to be responsible for a fundamental reconstruction of our whole national education program, to enable every capable and industrious German to obtain higher education and subsequently introduction into leading positions. The plans of instruction of all educational institutions are to conform with the experiences of practical life. The comprehension of the concept of the State must be striven for by the school [Staatsbuergerkunde] as early as the beginning of understanding. We demand the education at the expense of the State of outstanding intellectually gifted children of poor parents without consideration of position or profession.

21. The State is to care for the elevating national health by protecting the mother and child, by outlawing child-labor, by the encouragement of physical fitness, by means of the legal establishment of a gymnastic and sport obligation, by the utmost support of all organizations concerned with the physical instruction of the young.

22. We demand abolition of the mercenary troops and formation of a national army.

23. We demand legal opposition to known lies and their promulgation through the press. In order to enable the provision of a German press, we demand, that: a. All writers and employees of the newspapers appearing in the German language be members of the race: b. Non-German newspapers be required to have the express permission of the State to be published. They may not be printed in the German language: c. Non-Germans are forbidden by law any financial interest in German publications, or any influence on them, and as punishment for violations the closing of such a publication as well as the immediate expulsion from the Reich of the non-German concerned. Publications which are counter to the general good are to be forbidden. We demand legal prosecution of artistic and literary forms which exert a destructive influence on our national life, and the closure of organizations opposing the above made demands.

24. We demand freedom of religion for all religious denominations within the state so long as they do not endanger its existence or oppose the moral senses of the Germanic race. The Party as such advocates the standpoint of a positive Christianity without binding itself confessionally to any one denomination. It combats the Jewish-materialistic spirit within and around us, and is convinced that a lasting recovery of our nation can only succeed from within on the framework: common utility precedes individual utility.

25. For the execution of all of this we demand the formation of a strong central power in the Reich. Unlimited authority of the central parliament over the whole Reich and its organizations in general. The forming of state and profession chambers for the execution of the laws made by the Reich within the various states of the confederation. The leaders of the Party promise, if necessary by sacrificing their own lives, to support by the execution of the points set forth above without consideration."

Bernies Sanders' 12 Steps Forward is a step backward into the abyss of marxism. It does not address the failed nature of the jewish system of capitalism, rather it tries to put patches on the wounds, which only produce infections and scars that retard healing. Sanders wants to make the current system work, rather than create a working system. A healthy system would not need the measures Sanders proposes, because he only address problems produced by a defective base structure.

Sanders does not address the basis of currency and loan capital. For Socialism to be effective, it must provide the loan capital and currency needed to produce the economic activity necessary to produce the near classless society Feder proposed. Setting wages and restricting trade deals does not go far enough to secure national and racial sovereignty which produce the conditions necessary to achieve proper wealth distribution. A State which is not based on the traditional homogeneity of the society cannot claim a right to impose social equity on unequal peoples. Such a State must repress the superior and unfairly bolster the inferior. The artificial means needed to accomplish this process stifles economic activity and produces debt.

I do not endorse Socialism, but if that is the course the majority chooses, let us at least go with a viable and proven method, rather than the tried and failed communism of Bernie Sanders.

How Did "Progress" Come to Be Defined By That Which Is Unnatural?

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

The jews trot out transsexuals at the Democratic National Convention and claim that they represent "progress". The jews present speakers speaking in Spanish, and call that "progress". They claim that "diversity" is "progress" and impose a Mullato on us to be our President, as if that is an emblem of "progress".

The jews have confused technological progress with social progress. We develop and change machines to accomplish new tasks, and to accomplish old tasks more efficiently. That is technical progress.

The jews are bringing about our destruction by misleading us to accept the irrational proposition that this same process of technological progress applies to social progress. Changing males into females is not progress, it is the perversion of the fundamental nature of human beings and all mammals. Mixing the races is not progress, it is ruination and genetic corruption. Our fundamental natures and longest standing traditions oppose the mixing of the races and the invasion of our territory by other races. It is not progress to set aside our natures and destroy ourselves. That is death, not progress.

Progress would be to improve our race and apply methods of assuring our survival and improving our status over other races. Perverting our natures is not progress, it is defeat.

Giving over our country to foreigners and their cultures and languages does not advance our struggle to survive and thrive. We are not progressing by allowing others to replace, corrupt and destroy us.

Real progress will accomplish a better life for our people. We do not need to disappear to accomplish this end, and cannot attain an improvement by defeating ourselves or cutting our own throats for the benefit of others.

History Has Proven that the Character of a Person Is the Most Important Quality Needed to Be a Great President, and Hillary Clinton Is an Anti-American Subversive

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

The democrats are creating a false history of Hillary Clinton to make her seem appealing and normal, when she is in fact a lifetime radical communist chomping at the bit to seize the reins of power, so that she can destroy America. They point out that she has endured unending attacks on her character, but stays in the fight to achieve her goals. This rings true, but it is what we have to fear most about her.

Clinton cannot wait to take power, so that she can exact her revenge on a nation that has disparaged her and everything she represents and that for which she unceasingly strives, a communist revolution. Clinton has made it her life's ambition to gain power and use it to destroy all of the foundational principles of the United States of America and supplant them with marxist internationalism. She also wants to replace White Europeans with other races.

America was founded as a sanctuary for the White Race to safeguard our rights and opportunities. Clinton has made it her highest calling to strip us of our rights, ruin our opportunities and breed us out of existence. She will do all she can to ensure that Whites have no opportunities and that our rights are taken away with the full force of the State.

Last night's convention speeches and propaganda videos at the convention focused heavily on a gun grabbing agenda. The democrats are thrusting disabled people onto the stage. The message is the last will come first, and the first will come last, which is a recipe for extinction that contravenes all the laws of nature for survival.

They are making a hero out of Obama, who broke nearly every promise he made and served the interests of the bankers who put him in power, not the American People and especially not the blacks who elected him. They celebrate the fact that he has abused his office to open our borders and has violated the constitution in countless other ways to effectively grant amnesty and sanctuary to an invasion.

There is no school one can attend to become a great President. Nor is there a career path one can follow which will assure success as President. The democrats are creating a myth of qualifications and certifications, which history itself has disproved. The most important qualification for President is the nature of the person in office, and Hillary is woefully wanting. She has failed over and over again, because deep down inside she is a bad person and a traitor, who hates America and the nature of our country, which she would alter to conform to her sour nature and communist worldview, a worldview which history has discredited.

Obama is the cheerleader in chief pushing this false narrative that Hillary has a diploma on the wall qualifying her to be our greatest President. Her DNA and her cold heart disqualify her, and no pile of credentials or BS can make up for the failure of her nature to make her a great leader. Add to that the fact that her ambition is to undermine the best of what our founding fathers created, and we face an unprecedented disaster if she becomes President.

Much the same is true of Trump. So we have left ourselves with no choice but to try to limit the power of the Presidency itself under either one, unless and until they prove worthy of the office. The first line of defense is the People. We must not encourage their power to harm us. The press is in the enemy's hands. The next line of defense is the Congress. The next real danger are the courts, especially the Supreme Court. One of the first acts it took was to grant itself unconstitutional powers, which has increased the power of the President to the extent that the President nominates Justices. Thankfully, the Congress has some power there, as well. But the Congress has utterly failed to protect us from Obama's abuses of power, so there is little hope that they will pressure Clinton or Trump, unless the People pressure them.

I Saw This Coming

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Back in 2010, before Putin staged a coup in the Ukraine and had his little green men steal the Crimea; long before Brexit and before Turkey began flooding Europe with Muslims; and six years before America became Balkanized with Black Lives Matter and relentless Islamic terror, and six years before Donald Trump pledged to make NATO the defender of Israel and enemy of Turkey, I wrote:

"The European Union, which has been devastating Europe, and which is littered with leaders who are Jewish puppets or Jews, was the dream of Rothschild agent Richard Nikolaus von Coudenhove-Kalergi and Robert Schuman, a darling of the Turks who are today seeking to open up the borders of Arab nations surrounding the Mediterranean and to join the EU and thereby to flood Europe with Muslims and further internationalize the World pursuant to the Jewish model, which the Turks call the "European" model. See the following two articles: [***] Turkey is the bridge which will serve to shuttle the Muslims into Europe [***] Where will we be when Europe is a part of the Muslim world under the control of the Jews and most of the World's energy is in their hands? Where will we be with our ever increasing debts and endless wars as the Jews destroy our currency, Balkanize our country and pit the World against us, scapegoating us for their crimes, as they did to Russia, Germany, the Ottoman Empire, etc.? Where will be when the Jews have thoroughly poisoned our air, water and land, and have destroyed our food supply with mutant plants that will die out and which alter our genes? I'll tell you where, in the graveyard of history. We must take this opportunity not to help Turkey Muslimize Europe"--Explaining the Seemingly Inexpicible: This Is Why Israel Is Shooting Itself in the Foot, 12 June 2010

"The Jews then set up Russia to reestablish itself in the Black Sea and dominate the Ukraine, again threatening Turkish interests--note the many wars the Jews have created between Turks and Russians in the past and the price the Armenians, as well as the Turks and Russians, have paid for these wars. It appears to me that the Jews are setting up America and Europe to face a massive energy crisis which will shatter the economies of these nations. If Russia and Turkey cooperate, then the Arabs and Iranians will fall completely under their influence, as opposed to American influence. Such combined Muslim power, covertly under Jewish control, can wipe away the West and lead the West to counter-attack with nuclear weapons against this 'Gog and Magog'. [***] The Jews are alienating Turkey from NATO by absurdly making NATO the defender of Israel and enemy of Turkey. In the process, they are alienating Europe and America from the Middle East and creating enemies against us in Latin America. [***] And, now that the Jews are driving a wedge between Turkey and the West, who will the Europeans and Americans be told is their only ally in the Middle East, if not dirty little Israel?"--Recep Tayyip Erdogan and Vladimir Putin, Friends or Foes?, 9 June 2010

The Two Coup de Grace Candidates for President and What It Says About the Troubled State of Our Union

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

There is a terrible sense of unease and foreboding in America that no matter which of the two trouble makers running for President wins, we are doomed. We have to effectively choose between Vladimir Putin and the Stalinization of Europe and America, and Angela Merkel and the cultural marxist death of Europe and America. But why are we so fearful that either of these monsters can destroy us? It is because we realize that we have allowed the Office of President of the United States of America to take on far too much power domestically and internationally.

Because we are so desperate for change that will benefit us, we allow the President the power to ruin us in hopes that he or she will instead use the throne to save us from our enemies. Is there no power we have to save ourselves, perhaps by taking away the disproportionate power the Presidency has assumed for itself and against our best interests? Can we not attach a voting right for the People to every major decision that will change the course of our nation and the world? Why is it that Trump and Clinton pretend to be our dictators, and we allow them this delusion to the point where it becomes a fait d'accompli? Why are we submitting to this tyranny that we have to succumb to campaign promises and fear that they will or will not be honored, promises which assume powers for the Presidency which the Presidency ought not to have?

Why have we allowed Obama to open our borders and disregard the law? Would it not be better to curb his power, rather than grant even great powers to Trump to potentially remedy the damage, or potentially make things even worse? Why do we succumb to one abuse of power only to grant more power to tyrants, as if the resolution of our failure to maintain our own power?

We are allowing mercenaries to take control of the country and are electing those who pledge to become even more powerful as if that will remedy the problem of the concentration of power in one set of hands. Obama has abused his powers, which he should not have, to subvert our national interests. Trump pledges not to restrict the powers of the Presidency but to expand them so that he can remedy the abuse. Am I the only person to see the danger in this, with each election cycle promising worse and more abusive tyranny under a dictatorship Presidency? Why are we signing off on this bolshevization of American power?

It is because the jews have made us scared. When people are scared, they want to hide behind leaders who appear powerful and on their side. But what we are now most afraid of is the power of the other side to destroy us. So why do we not take a more rational approach to our fears and restrict the power of the State to ruin our lives? Why do we not apply reason and factual information and empower ourselves?

It is because the jews have made our nation so heterogeneous that we feel obliged to tribe up into gangs and pray to gods for our salvation. Though we truly make ourselves weaker, we pretend that the strength of numbers adds up to one, and so we submit the force of our mass to a mercenary who seeks power for the purpose of exploiting us and serving his or her master.

We should not be in a position of such weakness where one person has the power to rescue us or ruin us. That is the position of Germany and Russia, but should never be the position of America.

We have to rethink the powers of the Presidency and restrict them to Constitutional bounds. Why are we gambling the survival of our nation on two lunatics when we should instead make it impossible for either of them to wreak our country?

Wednesday, July 27, 2016

Putin Needs to Create a Diversion: Expect a Major Terrorist Attack

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Putin has an even bigger ego than Donald Trump. He does not like the media exposing the fact that he is a creepy peeping Tom violating the privacy of everyone in the world. Putin is a KGB thug. He does not like getting caught, being seen for what he is, but instead prefers to creep around in the shadows spying on others.

Putin controls ISIS. Expect that the KGB is designing a massive terrorist attack at this very moment to change the subject of the news in a way that will favor Donald Trump, and draw attention away from Putin and Russia.

And don't be surprised if Putin attempts to blame for Saudi Arabia for what he has done. The KGB always tries to scapegoat others for their crimes. They are mostly composed of jews, and it is in their KGB DNA.

Benedict Donald, Traitor Trump Again Commits Treason

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Dangerous Donald Trump has again betrayed our nation and put Russia first. He called upon the Russians--whom he assumes have already hacked Hillary Clinton's server, which Trump knows contained classified information, perhaps information, which if made public could put lives in danger--called upon the Russians to make public the 30,000 emails Hillary deleted.

Trump is soliciting federal felonies from a foreign enemy of the United States of America. Trump is calling for the public violation of privacy and potential disclosure of classified information. His crimes are even worse than Clinton's, because he is deliberately demanding the public disclosure of classified and private information, not merely placing it at risk of disclosure through gross and criminal negligence.

How would Trump happen to know what the Russians have hacked? Is he so eager to become president that he would jeopardize our national secrets to gain election? Why is it then that he wants to become president and open up our intelligence agencies to foreign countries, if not to further betray us to them? Trump is a running a treason campaign to sell us out to Russia and Israel!

We have another Benedict Arnold, the Donald.

If this does not prompt the FBI and CIA to investigate Trump's ties to Israel and Russia, then there is no hope for us.

The Real Reason both Parties Are Talking About Free College for All

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Karl Marx called for free education for all in his Communist Manifesto. He also called for the elimination of all nations.

Both parties are now talking about forgiving student loans and making college free for two reasons. First, if the government pays for education, it has the opportunity to dictate what is taught, by whom and to whom. If you do not toe the line, your institution will be nixed, or your free ride will be over, or your teaching career will end.

Second, it will not be a majority of Americans who are accepted into colleges and universities. Instead, the American taxpayer will pay for Chinese, Indians and Pakistanis to come into our nation and overtake our institutions of higher learning. The American taxpayer will become a slave to government taxes to pay for foreign enemies to come into our country and receive a free education, then overtake our professions and political system.

Beware this new turn. It is not being done for the benefit of our future or our youth, but rather to ensure that we have no future. It is marxism at its worst and part of the plan to rob us of our nation and our future.

Apply tremendous pressure on our politicians to restrict foreign students, to charge them exorbitant fees for education in our country, and use the money to subsidize the education of Americans.

The Ugly Spectacle of a Former President Posing as First Lady

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Former President Bill Clinton came out in political drag before the world and rehearsed his role as first lady in a speech to the Democratic National Convention. He strove to humanize his communist wife, to defrost the frigid witch. It was surreal.

The democratic party continued to trot out the disabled to celebrate the misfortunate, rather than make a show of American strength. In their vision, we are a crippled and dying nation.

Clinton's history of infidelity compounded the reversal of his role from national alpha male to first wife, making it an even more shocking reminder of the damage jewish cultural marxism, which finds a voice in Hillary's mouth, has wrought on America and Western Civilization. Bill did not speak much about his own politics. Hillary was more politically active as first lady, than first wife Bill.

Adding to this night of horrors was the continuation of Jewfest 2016, where the 2 percenters, the jews, take all, with speakers Barbara Boxer and the genocidal crypto-jew Madelaine Albright, who once publicly tried to justify the murder of hundreds of thousands of Iraqi children. Albright, of all people, openly discussed Trump's disloyalty and the danger he posed to the free world. Albright revealed that Trump is Putin's puppet, and the press has been silent on this massive story of tremendous importance to the American People!

What next? It worries me to wonder.

The Press that Will Pick Apart Everything Trump, Won't Touch Allegations He Is Putin's Puppet. Why?

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

The same communist press that for days made front page news of charges that Melania Trump plagiarized Michelle Obama, that for weeks broadcast denunciations for a retweet of a star, won't mention allegations that Trump is a puppet for bolshevik Vladimir Putin. This reality is even more alarming than it is strange.

The same communist press was largely silent as Putin lied to the world, invaded the Ukraine and stole the Crimea. It does not report on Putin's involvement in ISIS and ignores the fact that the heads of ISIS come from the Soviet Union, chiefly Chechnya, which is still a part of the Russian Federation. Instead, they scapegoat Saudi Arabia, Russia's chief rival, among others.

Why is the press covering up Putin and Trump's crimes? I suspect the following reasons: The press is afraid of where a federal investigation into Russia's subversion of American politics will lead, including exposure of the complicity and involvement of top people in the press. The communist press is sympathetic to bolshevism and always covered up for the Soviet Union especially under Stalin and Putin.

In addition, the communist press share Putin's hatred of America, Europe, the White Race and Western Civilization. They want to see all of Europe consumed in an expanded Soviet Union, where the bolsheviks can immediately slaughter the best gentiles, enslave the rest, and then breed them out with a foreign invasion and the forced displacement of indigenous populations. Putin owns not only Trump, but the American communist press.

The communist press has been increasingly soft on Trump and played up divisions in the democratic party, ever since his love of Putin became obvious and he declared that he would destroy NATO.

Tuesday, July 26, 2016

The Democrats Wrap Themselves in the Declaration of Independence and US Constitution. . . as They Recite Karl Marx's Communist Manifesto

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Ask yourselves if these themes from Karl Marx's Communist Manifesto sound familiar, echoed at the Democratic National Convention:

"1. Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to public purposes.

2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.

3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance.

4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.

5. Centralization of credit in the banks of the state, by means of a national bank with state capital and an exclusive monopoly.

6. Centralization of the means of communication and transport in the hands of the state.

7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the state; the bringing into cultivation of waste lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.

8. Equal obligation of all to work. Establishment of industrial armies, especially for agriculture.

9. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries; gradual abolition of all the distinction between town and country by a more equable distribution of the populace over the country.

10. Free education for all children in public schools. Abolition of children's factory labor in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production, etc.

[***]

Let us now take wage labor.

The average price of wage labor is the minimum wage, i.e., that quantum of the means of subsistence which is absolutely requisite to keep the laborer in bare existence as a laborer. What, therefore, the wage laborer appropriates by means of his labor merely suffices to prolong and reproduce a bare existence. We by no means intend to abolish this personal appropriation of the products of labor, an appropriation that is made for the maintenance and reproduction of human life, and that leaves no surplus wherewith to command the labor of others. All that we want to do away with is the miserable character of this appropriation, under which the laborer lives merely to increase capital, and is allowed to live only in so far as the interest of the ruling class requires it.

[***]

Abolition of the family! Even the most radical flare up at this infamous proposal of the Communists.

On what foundation is the present family, the bourgeois family, based? On capital, on private gain. In its completely developed form, this family exists only among the bourgeoisie. But this state of things finds its complement in the practical absence of the family among proletarians, and in public prostitution.

The bourgeois family will vanish as a matter of course when its complement vanishes, and both will vanish with the vanishing of capital.

Do you charge us with wanting to stop the exploitation of children by their parents? To this crime we plead guilty.

But, you say, we destroy the most hallowed of relations, when we replace home education by social.

And your education! Is not that also social, and determined by the social conditions under which you educate, by the intervention direct or indirect, of society, by means of schools, etc.? The Communists have not intended the intervention of society in education; they do but seek to alter the character of that intervention, and to rescue education from the influence of the ruling class.

The bourgeois claptrap about the family and education, about the hallowed correlation of parents and child, becomes all the more disgusting, the more, by the action of Modern Industry, all the family ties among the proletarians are torn asunder, and their children transformed into simple articles of commerce and instruments of labor.

But you Communists would introduce community of women, screams the bourgeoisie in chorus.

The bourgeois sees his wife a mere instrument of production. He hears that the instruments of production are to be exploited in common, and, naturally, can come to no other conclusion that the lot of being common to all will likewise fall to the women.

He has not even a suspicion that the real point aimed at is to do away with the status of women as mere instruments of production.

For the rest, nothing is more ridiculous than the virtuous indignation of our bourgeois at the community of women which, they pretend, is to be openly and officially established by the Communists. The Communists have no need to introduce free love; it has existed almost from time immemorial.

Our bourgeois, not content with having wives and daughters of their proletarians at their disposal, not to speak of common prostitutes, take the greatest pleasure in seducing each other's wives. (Ah, those were the days!)

Bourgeois marriage is, in reality, a system of wives in common and thus, at the most, what the Communists might possibly be reproached with is that they desire to introduce, in substitution for a hypocritically concealed, an openly legalized system of free love. For the rest, it is self-evident that the abolition of the present system of production must bring with it the abolition of free love springing from that system, i.e., of prostitution both public and private.

The Communists are further reproached with desiring to abolish countries and nationality.

The workers have no country. We cannot take from them what they have not got. Since the proletariat must first of all acquire political supremacy, must rise to be the leading class of the nation, must constitute itself the nation, it is, so far, itself national, though not in the bourgeois sense of the word."

Jewfest 2016: Jewish Privilege on Full Display at the Democratic National Convention

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Bernie Sanders, Al Franken, Sarah Silverman, Paul Simon, etc. Jews, blacks and latinos dominated the first day of the Democratic National Convention, so it is no surprise that it was filled with communist rhetoric demanding that we sink to the lowest common denominator and subvert America's best interests in favor of strengthening the weak by dragging down the strong. But their cultural marxist rhetoric, their recital of the planks of the communist manifesto, rang very hollow and no one wanted to hear it, because all know that their policies only affect greater misery on most Americans. I would hazard a guess that jews, 2% of our population, took up the greatest share of time at the convention of any group, and they used it to slam Whites, the majority population of our Nation from its founding.

In so doing, they openly declared themselves to be our enemy. They further declared that it is the function of government to serve only the interests of the unfit at the expense of the fittest. They have turned natural selection on its head and are leading us down the path to extinction. Nature quickly weeds out the weakest. Democrats pluck out the strongest and cast them roots and all into the fire.

First Negress Michelle Obama shamed the Founding Fathers by rubbing their noses in the fact that her black children play on the White House lawn. Most of the speakers misrepresented the Founders and the phrase "all men are created equal." The Constitution specified that they are not, and so do the democrats and their convention, where they rallied against normal Whites and granted the lion's share of the time to the jews and jewish propaganda against us.

But no one is buying the shoddy jewish goods. We all know that cultural marxism does not benefit society, that heterogeneity makes us weaker and breeds violence and discord. Whites are beginning to awaken to the fact that they do not want grandchildren who do not resemble them. We know that the democrats are lying to us to serve our enemies' interests, not ours. And who do they cheer as if their savior from the lies? A communist jew openly calling for a marxist revolution, Bernie Sanders!

It was a very sad day for our nation, very sad. At least we can take some concilation in the fact that everyone knows that the democrats offer no viable solutions for our problems.

And the republicans, too, are reverting back to failed Reaganomics. Neither side will solve our problems, because both sides are misled by jews who want us to fail. The only solutions that will work must address the jewish problem and solve it, which solutions the jews and the jews' puppets will never propose.

We need to sink the Chinese by repudiating our debts by fining them for their war against us. We must sink the jews by excluding them from public life and taking over control of our currency, by charging the debt to them and paying it through confiscating their wealth, including their Federal Reserve Notes and the bonds used to back them.

We ought to have a White People's Convention and speak for ourselves, instead of listening to the political parties demean us and attack our nation with programs that work against us. We ought to have a racial convention to reign over the political conventions and drown out their anti-White voice.

Bolshevik Pervert Vladimir Putin Is a Peeping Tom

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

KGB Putin heads a global surveillance State which, together with the communist Chinese, spies on every aspect of our lives. They steal our industrial and military secrets. They infest our educational institutions. They listen in on our cellphones and watch us through our computers. They have a creepy communist army waging war on us relentlessly by watching and reporting on our every move.

Of course, the situation is even worse inside the borders of Bolshevik Russia, Communist China and now Marxist Turkey. Donald Trump wants to expand those bolshevik borders to include all of Europe and Islam and wall them in with an iron curtain for ultimate elimination following their absolute oppression. Donald Trump wants us to aid their surveillance of our people, our government and our military secrets. He wants us to open up American intelligence agencies to foreign enemies in the name of "America first!" and will have us reveal all of our secrets to them, to "keep us safe."

This is yet another example of Trump's Reaganlike treachery against America, with Trump putting Israel and Russia first against America's best interests. Seymore Hersh describes how the Carter administration put Israel first and gave them unprecedented access to our KH-11 military satellite information, and the Israeli treachery that followed.

Commie Ronny Reagan took it a step a further and essentially put the Israelis in charge of this, our most valuable intelligence system. Hersh wrote in his book The Samson Option,

"A former high-ranking NSA official recalled his anger upon subsequently learning early in the Reagan administration that Israeli military officers were permitted to attend Pentagon meetings at which future missions and orbital flight paths for the KH-11 were discussed. 'People who knew about it wanted to puke,' the former official said. 'With the care this [the KH-11] got everywhere else, this blew our minds.' [***] Ariel Sharon concluded after the cabinet room meeting that the United States was not a reliable strategic ally. He turned to a clandestine Israeli intelligence agency controlled by his defense ministry, whose operations at the time were not fully understood by Washington, and stood by as it intercepted intelligence on the Middle East and Soviet Union from the most sensitive agencies in America--the kind of intelligence that Israel had been told it would no longer be able to get. An American Jew working in the U.S. intelligence community had volunteered his services to the agency several years earlier; he would soon be put to work spying on his country for Israel."–S. Hersh, The Samson Option, Random House, New York, (1991), pp. 14, 16.

The Stockholm Syndrome

I have been warning for years, a decade now, that the alternative media is pushing a bolshevik agenda on us and wants us to welcome in bolshevik oppression in America. With disinformation and relentless anti-Americanism, they have brainwashed Americans to cheer Russia on as it attacks America. The KGB has thoroughly "demoralized" our dissident community to the point where their false and self destructive beliefs cannot be shaken by facts or logic. On the contrary, any confrontation with reality only serves to reinforce their devised delusions that their enemy is their salvation.

The very same people who decry the American surveillance State, cheer on the global surveillance State of KGB Putin and the communist Chinese. They do not care that Putin is peeping at them and violating the privacy of every American, American business and the American government. That, their enemy's spying on them is just great! They are so deluded as to believe that the communists spying on them keeps them safe!

How soon they have forgotten the 100 million the bolsheviks have mass murdered, the slavery they imposed on the White Race in Eastern Europe and the tens of millions of Germans the bolsheviks killed, enslaved and gang raped. Far from condemning the global bolshevik surveillance State, not merely gleefully submitting to it, these useful idiots want Putin to rule America through his puppet Donald Trump who is calling for Israel to take over our intelligence agencies, so that American intelligence is pooled with bolshevik surveillance to our detriment.

Look at how the people who put their faith in Putin have suffered in the Crimea, and that is where he has tried to make appear that he is doing good. The fate of America and Western Europe will be far worse when the jews take their vengeance on us with the full force of the bolshevik State behind them. Spying on us is only the first step. The next is into the grave they will have us dig for ourselves.

I wish someone would ask Trump what he thinks of Jonathan Pollard and whether or not Pollard put America first.

Monday, July 25, 2016

Casus Belli

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

If it can be proven that the Russian Government has been involved in hacking the democratic party in order to corrupt internal American presidential politics to favor their puppet candidate, that would constitute an act of war. It is established that Putin's internet troll army has been trying to sway Americans to vote for Trump.

The goldbugs are cheerleading for Putin to sway the election. The Reaganistas are cheerleading for Putin to sway the election. This is easily proven. The Green Party, at least in Germany, had strong ties to the communists. Are they trying to sway the election to favor Trump?

These are very serious issues and there ought to be strong federal investigations into this. The congress should conduct hearings to investigate the Russians' deliberate corruption of our internal politics to subvert them in favor of their interests.

The Russians are waging war on us and we must fight back. We must identify and prosecute those traitors who are working for the Russians. The Russians are using asymmetric warfare to effect regime change in America.

America is not the only target of this attack. Russia has been active in French, British, Hungary, etc. internal politics, with the goal of destroying NATO and creating internal chaos.

Kaine's NOT Able

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Tim Kaine is close to the Jesuits and has been for a long time. Pope Francis is the first Jesuit Pope. The Jesuits have a long and troubled past beginning with their founder, crypto-jew Ignatius Loyola. The Church itself once suppressed them. It is interesting that the same child who sang for Jesuit Pope Francis was chosen to sing the national anthem at the Democratic National Convention. Here he is singing for the Pope:

Bobby Hill performs for Pope Francis

The Pope is a marxist internationalist. The Jesuits have always been globalists. The Jesuits infiltrated the Ching dynasty in China with painters and others, including China's greatest painter the Jesuit Giuseppe Castiglione who was one a very few allowed to live in the palace. The Jesuits corrupted the Chinese with superior European culture, painting and architecture. Today, the Jesuits are corrupting the United States of America with inferior third world cultures.

So why did Hillary Clinton choose this Jesuit who is not able to challenge Trump or Pence? What possible motivation could there be, other than to supplement her globalist agenda and win the full support of the Jesuits to import foreign invaders into America? The large purse of the Pope will be put towards sending third worlders from Latin America, Mexico, Asia and Africa into the USA. That, and Clinton is pandering to Hispanics, rather than trying to appeal to Americans.

Team China versus Team Russia: America Loses

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

I have been addressing Trump's traitorous ties to Russia, but let me not neglect the Clintons' traitorous ties to China. Bill and Hillary Clinton, together with Al Gore, sold us out to China in many ways, including providing the communist Chinese with rocket and nuclear weapons technology so that the Chinese can reach out and kill your family. Both Clintons belong in prison, not the White House under any circumstances.

I suggest you investigate the COX REPORT, not the one about the cigar, the one about the Clintons' treason which allowed the Chinese to make serious advances towards their goal of killing us all off:

TIMELINE OF THE COX REPORT

House's Cox Report itself

I have not heard Trump touch upon this yet, but maybe I missed it.

A Good Article About the Left's Defense of Russia Over America in Response to Trump's Treason

Chrisotpher Jon Bjerknes

Here is a fairly good article discussing the left's attraction to Trump as magnet for anti-Americanism:

Why Some Leftists Are Defending Donald Trump's Ties to Russia

One major point is being missed while trying to determine whether or not there is sufficient evidence to indict Trump of being Putin's puppet. Trump is running on an America first policy. Yet, he advocates for Russian interests, has a conflict of interests between Russia and America, and seemingly bashes everyone in the world except Putin and the Russians.

I suspect Hillary Clinton will make much of Trump's ties to Russia in her speech at the convention. This will force Trump to respond. As the article points out, he should release his tax returns so that we can see any conflicts of interest the "America first" man may have. But it should not end there, rather there should be a full investigation of his ties to Russia by the FBI and CIA after his treasonous attack on NATO which has already caused our nation so much irreparable damage.

Trump has a moral obligation to disclose his international relations, all the more so because he is running as an America first candidate. He should also fully disclose his ties to jewry and Israel, given that it is the only nation he and his running mate singled out for praise and protection and special treatment at the convention. Trump is obviously NOT putting America first. We have a right to know why.

Goldman Sachs Cronies Falling to Leave Trump the Last Man Standing

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

In an extraordinary turn of events, the press is starting to favor Trump and soften their support for Hillary Clinton. They are making a hero out of communist jew Bernie Sanders. Ted Cruz and Clinton herself are helping to elect Trump, Cruz by making Trump appear to be a victim, and Clinton by making Bernie out to be a victim and by her poor choice of VP running mate, a Jesuit lapdog.

The amazing streak of Goldman Sachs crony candidates falling to leave banker boys standing continues. Trump has now made Reagonomics his policy and that of the republican party. And Trump has set out to destroy environmental protection regulations. Next he will sabotage the unions, just like Reagan. That will certainly benefit the Goldman Sachs crowd, will it not? Reaganistas Larry Kudlow and Art Laffer are boasting that they will change Trump's mind on immigration. A key figure behind Reaganomics, Paul Craig Roberts has been going off on the internet for years apologizing for Putin and Russia and bashing American policy. I wonder if he will be offered a post in Putin's Trump administration.

Traitor Trump Thinks Treason Is a Joke

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Trump is finally being forced to confront his treason to America in favor of Russia. But he is doing so by calling it a "joke", an extraordinarily poor response. It shows that he does not want to talk about Russia at all, let alone in a negative way. It shows that he has no logical explanation for his treachery and won't even attempt one.

Now, this Russian espionage may involve the complicity of high ranking American jews who are also working with the Russians to sabotage America. Debra Wasserman-Schultz is the second jew female to help Putin hurt us and our interests with damaging statements. The first being Victoria Nuland. Is it just a coincidence that these jews are the victims of espionage that makes them and the USA look bad? Or, are they working with the Russians for the benefit of Israel?

The press is certainly complicit in covering up Trump's treason, so much so that even Mother Jones is obliged to question what is going on:

Are Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin Really BFFs?

Note that the Nuland espionage benefitted Russia's attack on the Ukraine and theft of the Crimea. The Wasserman Schultz espionage makes poor communist Bernie Sanders a victim and working class hero and helps to put Putin's puppet into office.

The media, both mainstream and alternative, are covering up for Trump and Putin. We are being subverted by communists on all levels, and I am the only person pointing this out.

Sunday, July 24, 2016

In the Battle of Ego Over Disclosure the Longer Trump Waits to Address This, the Bigger the Story Will Grow

See:

Donald Trump's and Vladimir Putin's Shared Agenda Should Alarm Anyone Concerned About Democracy

Why the Jews Want Turkey Out of NATO

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Against all logic and in violation of basic survival instincts, the Western press is trying to push Turkey out of NATO. This includes the alternative media. Israel has historically considered Turkey to be a great ally, second only to the United States of America. See my blogpost of 9 September 2009 where I quote then ADL director Abraham Foxman:

According to Abraham Foxman, Turkey Is Israel's Second Most Important Ally, 9 September 2007

Israel has since made America so weary of war, that they are fearful that we will no longer destroy all of Islam for them. They have adopted another strategy, that of turning to Russia as guardian. This compels them to weaken any opposition to Russia, including America and NATO.

Seeking to accomplish much at once, the jews are pitting America and NATO against Islam so as to weaken all sides and leave the Muslims ripe for communist takeover, bolshevization and integration into the growing Soviet Union. Turkey led the Muslim world for many centuries. Of the three competing forces of Middle Eastern Islam, the Turks, the Arabs and the Persians, the Turks are by far the most modern, Western leaning and are the only member of NATO.

The jews have weakened much of Eastern Islam with relentless attacks on Afghanistan and by pitting Pakistan and India against each other as nuclear powers, in Russia's backyard. China is taking over control of the territories further east.

If the jews can succeed in removing Turkey from NATO, they open the door to war with Russia, which will absorb Turkey and Azerbaijan into the Soviet Union and begin the process of cutting off Europe and America from the Middle East and its energy resources. One way the jews can accomplish this is to spark a war between Azerbaijan and Armenia over the Nagorno-Karabakh region the bolsheviks created for the very purpose of creating fault lines for war. Russia has been arming both Armenia and Azerbaijan, and Israel and Turkey have been supplementing the Azeri arsenal. But like the Iran and Iraq wars, any conflict that erupts may stalemate, perhaps by design. That is likely to draw in Turkey on the side of Azerbaijan and Russia on the side of Armenia. Russia is likely to defeat a Turkey which has lost its NATO allies, and Russians do not give up conquered territory. The bolsheviks will take over Armenia, which is essentially again already theirs, as well as Turkey and Azerbaijan. Kurds and Syrians are likely to enter this conflict and so Russia will also take over Syria and hand a large swath of it over to Israel.

The next Russo-Turk war will probably be brief with communist coups in Turkey and Azerbaijan subverting their effort. Russia will convince them of the beauty of monopolizing the trade routes to Europe and dominating the Eastern Mediterranean. If Putin takes the Baltics, Balkans, Greece, Cyprus, Bulgaria, Hungary, Poland and Romania; then all the rest of Europe will soon be theirs.

This scenario could easily occur under a Trump administration. Israel and America would help Russia take over Islam and bolshevize it, then weakening an energyless Western Europe with no support from America, they would soon take them over, as well.

An interesting wild card in all of this is the position of China. It is almost as if a communist coin is being tossed in this election leaving us with a choice between Putin puppet Trump and China's puppet Clinton. Trump's servitude to Putin is becoming increasingly obvious, and the Clinton's have been taking bribes from the Chinese for decades.

Under Clinton, WW III would pit America, NATO and China against Russia, with China taking Russian territory for its own if anything is left of anything. Under Trump, we are heading toward a Soviet Union taking all of Europe and Islam, an isolated and crippled USA; and China, Pakistan and India branching out into the USA, Africa and then Russia, the Middle East and Europe, and they have the population to do it.

Hillary Clinton is heir to Bill Clinton's relationship with China, his having giving them a nuclear green light to build their nuclear arsenal, and his having empowered their access to our markets, our schools and our industrial and military secrets. Donald Trump is heir to Ronald Reagan and his relationship with Mikhail Gorbachev, the KGB and perestroika, which led to the fake break up of the Soviet Union; which Trump will help Putin rebuild while leading us down Reagan's garden path to amnesty for illegals and the rape of our wealth. We really are in the midst of a coin toss between China's puppet and Russia's puppet, with no hope or representation for ourselves. And the jew sits behind it all unmentioned by anyone in our national political life as the ultimate villain, peril and woe of us all. Instead, our politicians lavish nothing but praise on our worst and most destructive enemy, the jew.

All I can do, failing some authentic candidate, is report the truth and hope that people become so disenchanted with these communist puppets that they will lose much of their power. The fact that no one in government is investigating Trump's ties to Russia and Clinton's ties to China reveals the depth of the communist infiltration of our system, including the press and academia.

The Many Iron Curtains Communist Donald Trump Plans to Drape Over the Coffin of Humanity

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Trump not only wants to shutter up our southern border with an Israeli style wall, he does not merely want to turn Islam into a collection of Soviet Republics locked up behind iron curtains; traitorous Trump wants to push the old Berlin Wall west to engulf not only all of Germany but France as well. Trump has announced that his ban on Muslims includes French and Germans.

Trump has warmly embraced communist Ronald Reagan's economic and tax plans. He rubber stamps these policies handed to him by Reagan's old handlers. Trump is paving the way for the jewish oligarchs he will empower to destroy the last vestiges of the middle class, increase the wealth gap and keep the maximum percentage of their ill gotten gains from raping America's land, air, water and populace by means of deregulation and destruction of the EPA. Remember what happened with the banks under deregulation? That forest fire is coming to our entire nation under dangerous Donald.

At the same time Trump is isolating us from Europe and our energy sources, and them from us, placing them all behind Putin's iron curtain and destroying NATO, Trump is arranging for the "legal" immigration of hundreds of millions of Asians into America with a fast track to citizenship. And by the way, Trump will pull a Reagan on amnesty and the middle class, believe me! He is inviting in all the Reaganistas to fill the planning void left by his bolshevik training by the Russians.

Dangerous Donald, traitorous Trump is poison for America and Europe. But hey, he thumps the Bible he has never read and bashes Muslims for the sake of the jews, so he must be on our side, right? Funny, he is making all Whites Muslims by association. That is neat new trick in his bolshevik playbook.

It was inevitable that his deception would take this turn. He surrounds himself with the worst kind of jews and glorifies their corruption. He pledges our nation, our military, our national secrets and all of NATO to Israel, as well as his children and grandchildren to the jews. Our White Nationalists should stop cheerleading for Trump and restrict themselves to advocating pro-American policies, but they won't because most of them are on the Putin jew pay role, and the remainder are blinded by KGB brainwashing to subvert their own interests for the interests of Russia and Israel, and no amount of facts or logic can dissuade them from their brainwashed beliefs.

We still need a candidate. Even though he or she cannot win, they can point out that Trump and Clinton are subverting America and that we cannot win with either one of them. Jesuit Pope Francis and Jesuit tool Tim Kaine are playing on White guilt and altruism to undermine White interests. The Jesuits, crypto-jews from their founding under Ignatius Loyola, are dedicated to a world government run from Israel, but it won't be the Pope of Rome who heads it, rather the anti-christ jewish messiah.

The jews are completing the work of their 2,500 year long struggle to genocide us. What are you doing other than cheering for their puppet communist Donald Trump?

Saturday, July 23, 2016

Reagan's Economic Gurus Lawrence Kulow and Arthur Laffer Are Subverting Trump's Most Important Positions

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Larry Kudlow and Art Laffer were boasting on the radio today how they are undermining Donald Trump's most important policy positions in favor of their open trade and open immigration agenda. They claim that they are coaching him to drop his policy of imposing tariffs on China and other nations as sanctions for their unfair trading practices. They want the trade to continue as is it and praise the Walmart model for providing us with the best goods at the lowest prices.

They do not address the importance of economic independence for the USA to increase our ability to produce for ourselves all that we need, so as to be able to weather wars or other causes which would leave us vulnerable to foreign nations for our goods should we remain dependent on them. They do not speak to the fact that producing goods for ourselves sponsors American research and development to build our industry and educational systems, as opposed to our competitors. Producing for ourselves increases our capital base and the real wealth, as opposed to paper wealth, or our nation. No, all they seemed to care about was profits to be had from trade. And they claimed that Trump is turning their way against our best interests and soon would be fully on board with their internationalist agenda.

These two Reagan men also said that they are working on Trump with regards to immigration telling him that it is best to allow in foreigners, but rather to make it easier for them to come in legally so that they will have no reason to try to come in illegally, in other words to capitulate to the invasion rather than end it. They claimed that San Diego County is the best place to live because nothing is done to stop illegal immigration and the labor is of good quality and cheap. They claim that Trump is moving in their direction and has abandoned his call for house to house expulsions of illegals. They are trying to convince him that it will be good for our incomes to have more immigrants because they spend the money they earn. They do not address the costs to our hospitals and prison system. They do not address the disease and foreign cultures these immigrants bring in with them. They do not touch upon the fact that they increase the labor pool and drive down wages.

One has to wonder if these men and their fellows were the ones to convince Reagan to grant amnesty to illegals. Why is Trump turning to them for advice, knowing what Reagan did and its negative consequences for our country? Is Trump so stupid as to be baffled by their BS? Surely, he is not!

I suspect their boasts do not accurately reflect what has occurred, but their claims that Trump no longer talks about 40% tariffs and rounding up illegals appears to be true.

Trump has stated repeatedly that he is bothered by currency manipulation and the trade imbalance. He further states that he knows the best negotiators in the world. He can solve both problems very quickly by making trade actual trade, whereby goods must be exchanged for goods, and he can use his court jews to negotiate the best deals and fire them if they betray him and the nation. I fear, though, that Trump pretends to be lost in the woods and is taking tax, trade and immigration advice from Reagan dinosaurs and will abandon the only redeeming policies that would cause me to vote for him.

Trump states that his is our voice, so why are monied jews like Larry Kudlow blowing in his ears telling him what to say?

She Goat Hillary Clinton Opts for Jesuit Lapdog Instead of Presidential Pit Bull to Soft Sell the Invasion

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

The Catholic Church, especially the Pope, having been encouraging and sponsoring an invasion of third worlders into White countries. Clinton has chosen Catholic Tim Kaine to raise Cain on the issue of immigration and draw in the hispanic vote to her ticket.

Kaine speaks Spanish and has worked with Jesuits in Latin America. He is a groomed subversive who has been corrupting the American Government for decades to change our immigration laws to favor the invasion.

Usually, presidential candidates choose a VP who will viciously berate the opposition to preserve the dignity of the presidential candidate. They will also try to choose a running mate from a swing State.

Catholic subversive Kaine glorifies his Jesuit past in the following video:

Things are getting worse. Clinton would put this Jesuit tool one heart beat from the presidency. He offers her nothing other than a charge to a massive Latin American invasion.

Clinton has again chosen to put the interests of invaders over the best interests of Americans! Her relationship with Satanist jew Saul Alinsky gains clarity in view of her choice of a Jesuit tool to run with her over the cliff into the abyss of open borders. These two will bury us with Mexicans and other Latinos and fast track them into citizenship!

The Jesuits were founded by crypto-jew Ignatius Loyola. They have pushed an internationalist agenda on our children and our governments for centuries.

Are the Jews Getting Nervous About Chinese Nationalism and Power?

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

For a very long time, the jews have been bolstering the communist Chinese and setting them up to replace the Europeans as the jews' chosen slave race. But recently, there appears to be a shift in jewish policy at the uppermost levels towards the Chinese.

I wonder if the Chinese are beginning to take control of their own affairs, and see an opportunity to dump the jews as the Europeans consume themselves fighting each other and the Muslims? The jews made several false promises to the Chinese and set them up with BRICS to fail. The Chinese now see Trump rising and the resentment Americans have towards them and their exploitation of America. The Chinese have to be concerned about the American debt they hold and if we might repudiate it in some way.

We shut down the Soviet Union by lowering oil prices and cutting off grain. The Chinese are also highly reliant on others for trade and food and we could make their situation very bad, so bad that the nation would collapse within a year.

I suspect the jews want the Chinese to flood European based countries and create a massive diaspora of a billion or more people. This will forward their goal of internationalizing the world, promoting miscegenation, and weakening the racial and national identity of Whites.

It will also knock down the growing might of the Chinese. Perhaps, the jews are beginning to realize that they have built up the Chinese a little too high and risk having created a rival they cannot control 100%. The Chinese are exceptionally racist and ethnocentric, like the jews. But they outnumber the jews greatly and are united by race, language, history and territory. Perhaps, the jews are about to attack their homogeneity and power.

Russia and the USA combined control by far the largest percentage of nuclear weapons in the world. The jews can clamp down the Chinese with the combined might of America and Russia squeezing it like a bursting boil, and at the same time destroy Western Civilization by exploding the Chinese population across the globe in a shower of race mixing and the creation of a vast, unprecedented Chinese diaspora. What a nightmare that would be!

But if my anecdotal experience traveling the country is an example of what is taking place around the globe, the Chinese diaspora is already expanding, exponentially. The colleges and universities are crawling with hordes of invading Chinese, and they are clannish and controlling. From the inner cities to the sticks, the Chinese can be seen everywhere.

Let us hope that friend Trump is not planning to let in a hundred million of them, "leeeeeegally! Believe me!"

Donald Trump Thinks and Talks Like an Anti-American Soviet Propagandist

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Even the New York Times is obliged to acknowledge that Donald Trump expresses himself like a Soviet propagandist, a fact I earlier noted:

Mr. Trump was asked about orders from President Recep Tayyip Erdogan of Turkey to detain tens of thousands of Turkish citizens. Asked whether he would press Mr. Erdogan 'to make sure the rule of law applies,' Mr. Trump did not emphasize the delicate nature of criticizing a strategically important ally. Instead, he focused inward, saying that 'when it comes to civil liberties, our country has a lot of problems, and I think it's very hard for us to get involved in other countries when we don't know what we are doing and we can't see straight in our own country.'

The problems he had in mind were 'policemen being shot in the streets, when you have riots, when you have Ferguson. When you have Baltimore.' The United States needs 'to focus on those problems,' he said.

This argument -- that the United States could not be a model because of its domestic problems -- was made during the early years of the Cold War, when racial segregation and violence against civil rights demonstrators generated international criticism. But this case was made by Soviet propagandists, not American presidential Candidates."--Mary L. Dudziak, "Donald Trump and America's Moral Authority", The New York Times, (22 JULY 2016).

I have heard several personalities in the White Nationalist movement degrading the concept of human rights and attacking both the constitution generally, and the bill of rights specifically. Trump does not criticize the constitution, but he does disregard human rights, just like a good bolshevik. The Israelis are eager to join forces with the Russians, because they, too, have no regard for human rights. The communist Chinese also seek to destroy the notion that human beings have inherent rights which no State can lawfully violate. Trump is in league with this line of thought, and we must ask why, and is it mere coincidence that he so consistently advances the Russian communist agenda, together with Le Pen and others of their ilk.

The FBI and CIA ought to take a long hard look at Trump's connections to Russia and Israel and investigate why he puts their interests above those of America. Has Trump ever had contact with known members or assets of the KGB/FSB?

We ought to have full disclosure of all of Trump's business and personal connections so that his conflicts of interest are open to view and subject to immediate scrutiny. He has proudly boasted of his business ties to communist Chinese, but he is always very terse and defensive when it comes to Russia and Putin. Something is going on there, and it is our right and our duty to get to the bottom of it, before it is too late.

It is also interesting to note that Trump acted like a RINO while expressing his love for the LGBT community. He expressed surprise, delight and approval that "Republicans" were accepting of, and enthusiastic about, his stance. I believe he is exploiting Republicans so that he can put in place judges and laws which will enable his robber baron jewish friends to rape the nation in the name of the constitution and freedom. He is also exploiting evangelical Christian zionists for the benefit of Israel. Trump does not think or act like a Christian and is largely ignorant of the religion. Ironically, even his exploitation of the faith is unchristian.

All of this phoniness and closet resentment of America is terribly troubling, most especially so because we have allowed ourselves to be backed into a corner with no alternative to Trump.

It is worth noting that Trump evidently is concerned about the civil liberties of the police in the most basic form of their lives. Hopefully that is not a pretext to implement a police State.