Sunday, March 24, 2019


Christopher Jon Bjerknes

I have just released a new book which is certain to shake things up. I am interested in doing interviews to discuss this new work Adolf Hitler: Bolshevik and Zionist Volume I Communism:

Volume I of a planned multi-part series compiles mountains of evidence, including scarce sources and new translations, to explain:

Why Hitler hid the fact that he worked for Kurt Eisner's revolutionary government and was an elected liaison and propagandist for the Communist Soldiers' Councils of the Bavarian Soviet Republic.

Why Hitler was a Communist informant, intelligence agent for the Reichswehr and spy.

Why Captain Karl Mayr and General Erich Ludendorff chose Lance Corporal Adolf Hitler to lead an anti-Semitic and anti-Bolshevik National-Socialist party, and how they made him into a "German Joan of Arc", dangerous demagogue and belligerent dictator.

Why Hitler infiltrated the German Workers' Party, changed its name to the National Socialist German Workers' Party and replaced its leader Anton Drexler.

Why Hitler let the British escape at Dunkirk, why he lost the Battle of Britain and why he opposed Operation Sea Lion.

Why Hitler collaborated with the Soviet Union, then attacked it and ensured his own defeat.

Why Hitler, who never declared wars, declared war on America.

Why Hitler wanted Lebensraum in the East as living space for his dead German soldiers.

Why Hitler let Hermann Goering deliberately lose the war he helped Hitler deliberately start.

Why Hitler repeatedly sacrificed his soldiers to the Soviets and provided Stalin with foreknowledge of his plans.

Why Hitler refused to negotiate a peace at war's end and instead issued the Nero Order calling for the suicidal destruction of Germany by Germans.

Find the unexpected answers to these and countless other conundrums in Adolf Hitler: Bolshevik and Zionist.

Saturday, March 16, 2019

Maria Butina and Brenton Tarrant, the Two Faces of the Russian 2nd Amendment Dialectic for American Civil War

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Russian agent Maria Butina sought a relationship with the pro-gun NRA and the Republican Party. The Russians have a proven recent history of insinuating themselves into American internal politics through the issue of the Second Amendment.

Along comes the terrorist Brenton Tarrant, who openly advocates an anti-Western and anti-NATO political platform, and murders 49 innocent Muslims for the express purpose of creating an American civil war over the issue of the Second Amendment. Tarrant is working for the Russian government.

On one side, there was Maria Butina cheerleading for the NRA. On the other side, Brenton Tarrant committed acts of propaganda of the deed so that the American government would contravene the Second Amendment and provoke Americans into civil war.

Who benefits from this? Who, like Tarrant, has been trying to provoke war and revolution in America for the purposes of Balkanization for more than 150 years? The Communists, and since they took over Russia, the Russians. The links are all there, so why am I the only person drawing attention to these links and where they point?

The CIA Should Investigate Brenton Tarrant's Ties to Russian Agents

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Brenton Tarrant's manifesto The Great Replacement might as well have been crafted by the FSB/KGB. As I explain in my book Putin's Reign of Terror Putin is behind ISIS and has sponsored global terrorism to sway elections and provide him with a pretext to invade other countries. Putin wants to drive a wedge between Turkey and NATO. Putin wants to Balkanize America and is behind the separatist movements in California and Texas. Putin wants a revolution in America and sponsored the alt-right versus antifa wars in our streets. Putin is pitting Muslims against Whites and Whites against Muslims, for the benefit of Israel. Putin sponsors the Zionist cause by agitating for anti-Semitism in the West to inspire Jews to either emigrate to Israel or Russia. Putin has called for Jews to come to Russia, where they will be safe. Russian Jews want Israel to shift its main alliances from America to Russia.

Brenton Tarrant is a globe trotter, and therefore an ideal candidate for Russian influence. Tarrant's terrorist attack was an attack on the American political system by a foreign agent. Tarrant openly stated in his manifesto that it is his aim to drive America into a civil war and Balkanize the nation. He attacked Muslims to accomplish his ends, so as to drive a wedge between Muslims and Whites in their common cause to end Jewish oppression. Tarrant is Zionist who want Jews to move to Israel. Tarrant is an anti-Capitalist Communist who admittedly engages in propaganda of the deed. Tarrant claims to be a "Fascist" and Communists have long created the false opposition of Fascism to serve as their Bogeyman.

Tarrant engineered his attack to drive a wedge between Turkey, America and NATO. Tarrant's manifesto takes a page directly out of the FSB/KGB playbook, when it states:

"To add momentum to the pendulum swings of history, further destabilizing and polarizing Western society in order to eventually destroy the current nihilistic, hedonistic, individualistic insanity that has taken control of Western thought. To drive a wedge between the nations of NATO that are European and the Turks that also make a part of the NATO forces, thereby turning NATO once more into a united European army and pushing the Turkey once more back to the true position of a foreign, enemy force. Finally, to create conflict between the two ideologies within the United States on the ownership of firearms in order to further the social, cultural, political and racial divide within the United states. This conflict over the 2nd amendment and the attempted removal of firearms rights will ultimately result in a civil war that will eventually balkanize the US along political, cultural and, most importantly, racial lines. This balkanization of the US will not only result in the racial separation of the people within the United States ensuring the future of the White race on the North American continent, but also ensuring the death of the 'melting pot' pipe dream. Furthermore this balkanization will also reduce the USA's ability to project power globally, and thereby ensure that never again can such a situation as the US involvement in Kosovo ever occur again(where US/NATO forces fought beside muslims and slaughtered Christian Europeans attempting to remove these Islamic occupiers from Europe).

Tarrant's terrorist attack was NOT a White Nationalist attack. It was a Russian Communist attack on Western Civilization. He is a Russian agent trying to destabilize the West, especially America, for the interests of Russia and Israel. If the CIA scratches around a little, they will certainly turn up a nest of Russians who crafted Tarrant's agenda and set him up to knock us down.

So why am I telling you all this surrended by a sea of silence from the media and our government? These things are obvious! Just as I warned the world that Trump was working for the Russians and publicly called for the CIA, FBI and Congress to investigate Trump and the alternative media years before they did so, I am publicly calling for the CIA, FBI and Congress to investigate Brenton Tarrant with a special emphasis on turning up the Russian influence that created his terrorism and anti-American agenda. Tarrant definitely had Russian advisors.

I have heard the same anti-Western Russian agenda iterated by several "alt-right" stooges for the FSB/KGB. They generate self defeating hatred of Muslims. They say all Jews should move to Israel. They want Turkey to leave NATO and become a Russian ally. They demand the Balkanization of America, which would spell the death of Whites, etc. Why isn't our government protecting us from all of this, instead of using it as a pretext to strip us of our rights?

Whites and Muslims, if you think Putin is your friend, you are sadly deluded. He is pitting you against each other so that you destroy each other.

Friday, March 15, 2019

Brenton Tarrant's Propaganda of the Deed

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Brenton Tarrant murdered 49 people in an attempt to take away our gun rights. Tarrant anticipates that his terrorism will provoke the government to deprive us of our rights to keep and bear arms. He believes that this will prompt the American people to revolt against an increasingly tyrannical government. He is engaging in classic communistic and anarchistic "propaganda of the deed." His manifesto The Great Replacement is Zionist, anti-Capitalist and calls for the Balkanization of America.

The New Zealand government has taken the bait and done exactly what Tarrent wanted them to do. They are moving to take away their people's rights to keep and bear arms. His attack has been a complete success.

He is following the Communist playbook to gin up revolutions and provoke a race war. Putin must be delighted by all of this. If Tarrant is not working directly for the Russians, he is working indirectly for them by succumbing to their agenda and forwarding it. He is also a Zionist who wants all Jews to move to Israel. And Tarrant claims to be a member of the Knights Templar, all of which recalls Anders Breivik and his rampage of murder. It is also reminiscent of Charles Manson's false flag murders meant to spark a race war.

The mass media are responding exactly as Tarrant predicted they would. There will probably be more book burnings and social media is already becoming more discriminatory against Whites. The more restrictive they make the means of communication to achieve political parity and representative government, the more the media and corporations will inspire such insane acts of violence. As they make it impossible for politics to succeed in giving Whites a voice, the more they will drive Whites to engage in public violence in acts of desperation and protest, despite the fact that it is morally wrong and politically counterproductive to do so. John F. Kennedy said, "Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable."

The media are in love with the story because it fits in perfectly with their agenda, but only because Tarrant wanted it to fit their oppressive agenda and deliberately engineered his violence to achieve that end. The mass media will never discuss how censorship and repression are inspiring these horrible acts and are in part to blame for this horrific mayhem. They also falsely and generally accuse White Nationalists, as if they are collectively to blame for Tarrant's insane acts, this as they violently oppose generalizations which collectively blame Muslims for acts of terrorism committed by insane individuals.

The media are also not addressing the violence in movies and video games, which is turning masses of people into psychopaths. They want easy answers which strip of us our rights and impose government and corporate tyranny on Whites, which only compounds the problem, and which will inevitably inspire more violence as a response to the increasing repression. That is what Tarrant wants. He wants Whites to face increasing restrictions on their rights, so that they will violently rebel against the increasing oppression in a self feeding cycle of violence and tyranny.

Instead of restricting our means of communication and political activity, corporations and the mass media should be affording us greater freedom of communication and augmenting the public debate with a level and fair playing field. Every human being shares the same rights to freedom of expression, self determination and representative government. If the corporations and mass media continue to presume they have the right to selectively silence individuals with differing views, those with pro-White views, then they will increasingly inspire unstable individuals to express themselves through violence because they will not have the option of civil discourse. The hysterical mass media and the corrupt corporations make Brenton Tarrant's propaganda of the deed a success, and therefore encourage more of it to the detriment of us all.

In order to better understand how "propaganda of the deed" works, consider the increase in Muslim terrorism that would occur if the Koran were banned from all the major booksellers. Further image that Muslims were banned on all major social media outlets and artificial intelligence was used to delete anything and everything they wrote and said. What would happen if every foul act committed by a Muslim was used to justify the elimination of civil rights for all Muslims. That is exactly what governments, the mass media and corporations are doing to Whites. Since they are making it impossible for Whites to engage in civil public discourse about their own destiny and rights, they are inspiring unstable Whites to express themselves with violence, having no other public means to express themselves. It is a predictable response and Tarrant predicts more to come. The media, despite their pretense of sophistication, has been taken in by a sick terrorist and was outclassed. They have no clue as to what just really happened, but Brenton Tarrant does. His propaganda of the deed was a stunning success, most unfortunately.

Monday, March 04, 2019

Contact Information for the Federal Trade Commission

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

The FTC investigates potential antitrust violations. The Federal Trade Commission has published a brochure in pdf format which you can download here:

Page seven of the brochure provides the following contact information:


If you wish to submit confidential information, send it by mail and mark it "Confidential."

Mail: Federal Trade Commission

Bureau of Competition-H374

Washington, D.C. 20580

Telephone: 1-202-326-3300

Everyone is equally free to confidentially inform the FTC of potential monopolies and other antitrust violations which obstruct free and fair trade.

Friday, March 01, 2019

Kindle's Whimsical Approach to Burning Books

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Kindle has yet again refused to state the specific reasons why it has banned my book E = mc2 and the Jewish Question. Though Kindle claims that the "subject matter" of my work is in violation of its "guidelines", Kindle will not and cannot tell me which guideline has been violated because Kindle does not have a guideline which covers the subject of "subject matter". Furthermore, Kindle has refused to define the "subject matter" of my book, and since it has no definition of the subject matter of my book, the subject matter of my book cannot serve as a justification for banning my book. Instead of answering my questions, Kindle has confirmed my assertion that they are selectively and arbitrarily banning my book without due cause based solely on their assumption of the power to whimsically ban books without any means of appeal and without any notice as to the reasons why the book has been banned. That is quite a capricious and cavalier approach to the historically dangerous practice of burning books. Would they banish or burn heretics with an equal lack of policy and process to the way they ban arbitrarily declared heretical books? That type of murder at the stake is what is at stake in our society if we permit this reckless discrimination, persecution and censorship to stand.

Thursday, February 28, 2019

An Open Letter to Jeff Bezos

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

I would like to call your attention to the historical persecution and censorship of Jews, because that will probably pique your interest and it is a safe space for you to rest in without worry that your financial interests are in jeopardy. I won't ask you to think too hard, as I would not want to tax your mind the way heretical books would. The Jews enjoy special privileges in our society, especially as relatable victims, so perhaps portrayals of Jewish victimization will form understandable images in your mind, where the persecution of Whites is a taboo subject banned from your cybershelves. The persecution and censorship of Whites only appears to capture your imagination when your companies engage in it.

The Jews excommunicated the now famous Jewish philosopher Spinoza with the following vicious decree,

"The Lords of the ma'amad, having long known of the evil opinions and acts of Baruch de Espinoza, have endeavoured by various means and promises, to turn him from his evil ways. But having failed to make him mend his wicked ways, and, on the contrary, daily receiving more and more serious information about the abominable heresies which he practised and taught and about his monstrous deeds, and having for this numerous trustworthy witnesses who have deposed and borne witness to this effect in the presence of the said Espinoza, they became convinced of the truth of the matter; and after all of this has been investigated in the presence of the honourable chachamin, they have decided, with their consent, that the said Espinoza should be excommunicated and expelled from the people of Israel. By the decree of the angels, and by the command of the holy men, we excommunicate, expel, curse and damn Baruch de Espinoza, with the consent of God, Blessed be He, and with the consent of all the Holy Congregation, in front of these holy Scrolls with the six-hundred-and-thirteen precepts which are written therein, with the excommunication with which Joshua banned Jericho, with the curse with which Elisha cursed the boys and with all the curses which are written in the Book of the Law. Cursed be he by day and cursed be he by night; cursed be he when he lies down, and cursed be he when he rises up; cursed be he when he goes out, and cursed be he when he comes in. The Lord will not spare him; the anger and wrath of the Lord will rage against this man, and bring upon him all the curses which are written in this book, and the Lord will blot out his name from under heaven, and the Lord will separate him to his injury from all the tribes of Israel with all the curses of the covenant, which are written in the Book of the Law. But you who cleave unto the Lord God are all alive this day. We order that no one should communicate with him orally or in writing, or show him any favour, or stay with him under the same roof, or within four ells of him, or read anything composed or written by him."—Steven M. Nadler, Spinoza's Heresy: Immortality and the Jewish Mind, Oxford University Press, New York, (2001), p. 225.

I am sure you will agree that those Jews who censored Spinoza were following the norms and mores of their time and were just as convinced as you that they were morally superior to the man they sought to silence. After all, the rabbis did not want their fellow Jews to have a bad experience reading the works of Spinoza, so they justifiably banned his works, isn't that so? I could bring up the censorship of Galileo Galilei, but somehow the persecution of Whites does not draw instant sympathy to the extent that tales of the poor suffering Jew do. And while we are all shedding tears for the long dead Spinoza and the injustice done to him, let us bring up the obligatory persecution of the Jews under the Nazis. I could refer instead to the mass murder of the 30 million souls and nearly complete destruction of the intelligentsia of Gentiles in the Soviet Union under the Bolshevik Jews, but who cares about them, right? After all, they were White. So let's talk about the tyranny and censorship imposed on Jews by Germans, so that you can relate to the danger of engaging in censorship.

In May of 1933, the German Student Union set about to burn books as an "Action against the Un-German Spirit", and take note of the fact that it is now considered "un-American" to be pro-White despite the fact that the Founding Fathers specified that America is a White nation and limited immigration to Whites of good character. These Nazis most famously burned books by Jews, because they were convinced by the norms and mores of their society that they were morally superior to the authors whose subversive books they burned. They probably felt just like your workers who banned my book E = mc2 and the Jewish Agenda, and Greg Johnson's book The White Nationalist Manifesto, in order to prevent a bad reading experience by your customers. No, it was not a time to try to argue the issues raised with more free speech, it was time to use the brutal and heavy handed force of absolute censorship, lest society crumble under deceived masses who bothered to read such tripe and were unable to think for themselves, but instead were better off surrendering their right to know to the censors.

As another example of the well meant censorship of Jewish works, the false Jewish messiah Jacob Frank led the Catholic Bishop to demand the destruction of the Talmud, which was far more precious to many Jews than the Torah, itself. And this happened in an open court, unlike the banning of my book by your companies. The Talmud was banned for offending Christians, who did not want to have a bad reading experience while discovering the Jewish view that the Virgin Mary whored herself to Roman soldiers and other such gems of Jewish lore.

So who are you, Mr Bezos? A bookseller, promoter of free speech and purveyor of knowledge vital to the public interest; or a book burner who succumbs to the bullying of special interest groups to silence heretics who dare to speak truths which cannot be refuted by the free exchange of ideas?

Amazon/Kindle's Evasive Non-Response

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Kindle/Amazon has responded by simply repeating themselves without answering my questions. Their redundant statement is so thoroughly generic and non-descriptive that it could apply with equal force to every book that has ever been written, and therefore offers no explanation at all as to why they have banned my book.

Further Examples of the Book Burning Purge at Amazon

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Proof is mounting that Amazon has engaged in a politically motivated purge of a specific class of books, those which advocate the best interests of White People:

In each instance, they have attempted to justify banning these books due to their "subject matter" without further explanation, and directed the authors to their "guidelines" which are not guidelines but simply a statement that Amazon has the power to censor books. Amazon sells countless products which produce negative customer experiences, as evinced by the many millions of negative reviews of products Amazon continues to sell. Their "guidelines" are being employed as a sham device for Amazon to hide behind as it censors books for political reasons.

The Nazis also burned books that they believed would produce a negative customer experience. The Nazis also presumed that they knew best which books to allow the public to read, and also had no regard for the public's right to know facts and opinions which offend special interests. The slippery slope leads to the abyss and we are tumbling down it. Amazon has the power to influence politics and deny us a level playing field to obtain representative government and exercise our fundamental human rights. Amazon is violating our fundamental human rights by selectively discriminating against us.

Kindle burns books! It is my new mantra.

Wednesday, February 27, 2019

Is Kindle's Censorship of My Book Part of an Expanding Purge?

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Amazon has just recently banned Greg Johnson's book The White Nationalist Manifesto:

Like Mr. Johnson, I am unable to determine the basis for the ban of my book. As he has done, I have requested that the ban of my book be lifted. Are amazon and Kindle engaged in selectively enforcing the vaguest of decrees, which though they style them "guidelines" are not guidelines at all, but simply a statement that they have the power to censor?

Does anyone know of other books that have been purged?

This is truly outrageous and very dangerous.

KINDLE Burned My Book Due to Its "Subject Matter"

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

The ebook publisher with the ironic name "Kindle" has effectively burned my book E = mc2 and the Jewish Agenda. The most dangerous monopoly is a monopoly over the marketplace of ideas. Heinrich Heine famously iterated the admonition, "Dort, wo man Bücher verbrennt, verbrennt man am Ende auch Menschen" "Where they burn books, they will also burn people in the end."

Kindle's selective discrimination against my work due to its "subject matter" inhibits my ability to engage in free and fair trade and compete with other authors and booksellers on a level playing field. It also creates a monopolistic hurdle that I cannot overcome, which restricts my ability to engage in interstate and international commerce as effectively as those who have not been censored.

Instead of attempting to refute what I have written with facts and logic, Kindle is censoring me by banning the "subject matter" of my book. Why? Are my words irrefutable? If so, why do they keep the public from knowing what I have said? They are not only violating my fundamental human rights to free speech and my rights to engage in free and fair trade in an open marketplace, they are violating the public's rights to know what I have to say.

But Kindle has not only burned my book, they have also lit a fire in me. I now have an increasingly burning desire to reveal the truth to millions of people, which they cannot extinguish by burning my book.

It is quite disappointing that they have burned my book, rather than kindle ideas.

If anyone knows of publishers who will not censor my book's "subject matter" please let me know.

Wednesday, February 06, 2019

The Disuniting State of America: Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham Wants New Mexico to Live Up to Its Name

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

I do not have much time for writing blog posts these days, but I cannot resist the temptation to comment on New Mexican Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham's opportunistic withdrawal of National Guard troops from the border of the United States of America, which was synchronized with Trump's State of the Union address. Grisham evidently takes the title of her State very seriously. She may have to Balkanize the State into New Guatemala, New El Salvador, New Honduras, etc. At some point, the "New" will become meaningless, and sovereignty will be completely lost. Grisham is disuniting the state of America.

New Mexico is a beautiful State. It is a foolish mistake to give it away or allow it to remain a port for illegal entry into the USA.

Saturday, February 02, 2019

Our Rights to Free and Representative Government Versus Orwellian "Quarantine" and "Inoculation"

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

The recent documentary Alt-Right: Age of Rage discusses two extremely troubling and dehumanizing tactics used to subvert our democratic political process. These subversive methods are given the Orwellian labels "Quarantine" and "Inoculation" which liken a certain class of human beings to diseases. The false presumption which is tacitly made by those who ply these subversive arts is that Americans have unequal rights to free and fair representation and this presumption is made under the bizarre pretext that this orchestrated denial of rights to representative government to some, even to a majority, is necessary to ensure free and fair representation for all people in government which has thereby already and deliberately been denied by the forces supposedly seeking its enforcement.

Assuming as a tacit basis for obstructing the rights of some to speak, and the rights of the public to know what they are saying. . . presuming that there exist two classes of human beings, those who agree with those who control the flow of public information and those who disagree with those who control the public flow of information, and that those who control the public flow of information are monolithic at least in their relevant views, organized efforts have been made to limit the public's access to politically relevant information. When those who control the public flow of information wish to censor the views of others with whom they disagree, they believe they are entitled to either "quarantine" their opponents by deliberately preventing exposure of their existence and views in the media, or engage in an unfair and biased propaganda effort through the media to control the minds of the public so as to generate conforming disagreement as an indoctrinated response to favor their biased view. They create a totalitarian mindset through the process of brainwashing the public with an intentionally one sided exposure of the facts and logical arguments, as well as emotional displays of propaganda.

The process of human thought depends upon exposure to information. Neural pathways are formed and the subconscious mind is controlled by the exposure of the brain through the senses to information, which in this instance is controlled by a group that by no means represents the independent views of each and every American. Under our system of government, each and every citizen is entitled to pursue representative government that favors his or her views. Under the law, no citizen has a greater individual right to governmental representation of his views than any other citizen.

Yet this condescending clique, mostly Jewish, presumes that they have the right to limit public discourse to only their views, or the deliberate criticism of the views of their political opponents. They presume that only they have the right to divine the course of government and so abuse the fundamental rights of free speech, private property and public assembly to deny those same rights to others through active collusion to suppress their views from public discourse and thereby deny them representative government. At the same time, they have corrupted the American government and laws to prevent segregation into communities of like-minded individuals who could then seek local representative government that obeyed the views and rights of the segregated community to self determination. In so doing they have monopolized the press, public discourse, public opinion and government to favor their totalitarian control to the fullest extent possible.

We need to start demanding our rights to representative government. We need to take action in the courts to demand remedies to the suppression of our rights to engage in the political process. We need to create our own outlets for public expression and take action in the courts against the monopolies and illegal and underhanded methods employed to suppress our public voice and deny us government representation.

The Myth of the "YouTube Community" Is a Sham Device to Enable Censorship and Selective Enforcement of Sham TOS Agreements

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

YouTube has deleted the popular channel TheRapeofJustice which featured many videos which brought my work to hundreds of thousands of viewers:

For example, the channel, which had about fifty thousand subscribers at the time, mirrored my video presentation

When last I checked, the number of subscribers to TheRapeOfJustice channel had eclipsed fifty thousand. The video as a mirror had achieved more than forty thousand views in a few weeks and was going viral. At that point, utilizing the sham device of the "YouTube Community" as a pretext, YouTube censored the video with a blank screen warning viewers against watching it, and blocking those features which enable videos to go viral.

By falsely attributing their independent action to a mythical "YouTube Community" whose supposed existence contradicts the raw numbers of viewers, likes and subscribers who in fact represent the real community of YouTube, YouTube creates the false impression of a democratic process to cover up what it is in reality corporate collusion with a censorship lobby to regulate the public disclosure of politically important information. The massive numbers of subscribers, likers and viewers rights are denied and their vote through their participation in YouTube and its features as real members of a community is relegated to the trash heap by an organized minority of censors and gatekeepers, who style themselves watchdogs of their perceived self interests. No numbers are publicly tallied to count the representation of voluntary viewers, likes and subscribers versus organized censors who have been schooled on how to obstruct the public disclosure of information through social media. There is no open disclosure of who it is alleged constitutes the "YouTube Community" of (professional?) censors or the nature of their complaints. No explanation is given as to why the rights of the majority are denied or what numerical basis there is for the allegation that the "community" has ruled against what are often millions of members of the verified and counted actual community of viewers and subscribers.

YouTube is fostering a tyranny of an hostile minority over the fundamental human rights of the majority of the verifiable YouTube community. Under the pretext and farce of the sham shadow "YouTube Community" they have violated not only my fundamental human rights to speak freely and the public's fundamental rights to know what I have say; but given that I was promoting my book for sale, they have violated my rights to compete in a free and fair marketplace across State and International lines, thereby violating the spirit of interstate commerce and the Sherman Anti-Trust Act. They have also violated my fundamental human rights to express my political opinions in a fair and free forum and in so doing have corrupted the American political process to render it unrepresentative.

In identifying the effects of the Russian sabotage of the American political process through the means of social media, the American government has officially recognized the fact that social media is a part of the American political system and affords the owners of social media the ability to sway elections to favor those who produce, censor and control its content. The censorship taking place affects the political process, but YouTube does not provide due process to those they victimize with censorship. No fair or equitable process exists for a democratic and open determination of the facts and law which regulate their exercise of dictatorial power to censor. No compensation is given to those whose work is destroyed and who incur damages as a result of the censorship that occurs behind closed doors without public scrutiny or open public disclosure or public process. This organized campaign of censorship is corrupting our political process rendering it unfair and unrepresentative. Our fundamental human rights of representative government, due process, free speech, self determination, public assembly, and free and fair election processes are being trampled by the tyranny of censorship of a monopolistic group of social media barons and fund raising services. Our democracy has been subverted.

What is my government doing to defend my rights and the rights of the public to know my thoughts?

Not only has YouTube censored my work, not only have journals which publish dishonest attacks on me refused to publish my responses, but foreign governments are actively censoring my works and blocking public access to websites which feature them. We live in dangerous times.

Sunday, December 09, 2018

Source Sought for Picture of Jewish Bankers Carrying Signs Stating "Hinaus mit uns!"

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Douglas Reed wrote in Disgrace Abounding, Jonathan Cape, London, (1939), pp. 249, 251,

"Oblivion for a few years, and then came the Kapp Putsch in Germany, the first of the Nationalist conspiracies to overthrow the democratic liberal regime that was so kind to the Jews, and reinstate the big business men, big landlords, monarchists, militarists, in the seats of the mighty in Germany. Who was a leading figure in this short-lived seizure of power? Trebitsch Lincoln, now a German die-hard. Among the other sympathizers was a relatively unknown man, one Adolf Hitler. Trebitsch Lincoln on the side of the anti-Semites? Of course, he was a Christian. [***] If you doubt me, think of Trebitsch Lincoln leading the anti-Semites down the Wilhelmstrasse to the seat of power. But I can show you the modern counterpart of Trebitsch Lincoln, and I don't mean those pro-Hitler Jews who were said by rumour to have marched round Berlin in the early Nazi days carrying a banner with the legend 'Hinaus mit uns!'—'Chuck us out!'"

Eustace Mullins stated on Daryl Bradford Smith's radio program The French Connection, that the German-Jewish bankers Warburg and Oppenheimer marched with the Nazis carrying signs that read "throw us out". I remember seeing pictures of this, perhaps in one of Reed's or Mullins' books. Or maybe it was Kardel's book, I cannot remember. Anyone know the source? I seem to recall a man in a hat carrying a white sign, not a banner, with a smile on his face and those words on his sign. If you happen to know where I can find that picture, please email that information to me at

Friday, December 07, 2018

Time, Space and Survival

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

I am making a documentary about time, space and the survival of the White Race. I believe our minds deceive us with various conceptions of time and space that permit us to survive moments, while ignoring the consequences of our decisions across broader spans of time. When we establish beginnings, endings and existences, we look for mile markers on the side of the road.

But there is so much more of which we are not aware than that which can conceive, and these conditions affect our future, as they affected our past. All of our images of past and future are in the present. Therefore, we place far greater primacy on what is, than what might be and what is likely to occur. This creates a sort of a mental mouse trap. We seek to feed ourselves in the moment, rather than gauge time across a thousand generations of our genes.

It is common practice to praise the Chinese for the wisdom of their patience and their understanding that time will pass and bring with it its changes. They take small steps on an infinite journey and we commend them for it. But when Whites look to their future with hope and desire, they are roundly condemned as if murderous monsters. In a way, we ought to be flattered that we are so feared for the superiority of our past. But they are trying to kill us off and so vanity is not a sane option.

The Jews are trying to erase our memories of ourselves, our ancestors and what it is to be a White human being. They know that if we forget ourselves we will be lost, merely moments which they define in our consciousness as hatred of ourselves. They hope that the White elders will die off and bury with their old bones all knowledge of the race. And then human children will know nothing of us or those who carried our genes across thousands of years and thousands of miles. We will be as forgotten and irrelevant in the minds of men as are the billions of fossils trapped under the seas.

The Jews bear witness to the extinction of the peoples they have exterminated and to the animals and plants disappearing from the earth, and they celebrate their demise. The Jews seek to exterminate Whites and ruin creation, which they believe is polluted, poisoned with our existence. But that is the Jews and their twisted minds.

What of us? What do we hold in the cupped hands of our minds which entitles us to fence off a bit more time for us? What chronicles of was will be written in the minds of our great, great grandchildren, so that we do not perish like yesterday’s winds? So that they do not wander alone without us seeking for answers only to find them in Jewish lies of what we were.

In the desert the mountains shed their fallen flesh around their knees in a massive pile of sand. Only their headstone bones stand after millions of years warring against the winds and rain. But the earth does not let the specks and grit which once scraped the clouds float away to the stars. She carries her children with her, pulling them close to her breast for billions of days. She tugs at time and draws its strings tighter towards her heart. So it is with the soil of the race. The old which ate the soil as it danced in the light and clothed itself in green robes, return to that same ground after casting off their seeds which wonder the garden and harvest from it their lives. This is how the plants and animals of earth spend time and cross space. The soil must be sound, or the life it yields will wilt.

So we must mark the passage of the race not merely with momentary fragments on the face of a clock or abstract images on a computer monitor, but with real things of vital importance to us and with ourselves, each White person an elemental part of the whole. How many of us are there? Where are we? How are we ensuring the survival of each other? How are we being separated from each other and how is the race being mixed and diluted by the presence of others? These things are as much a part of time as are the positions of the earth with respect to the sun. Our moment is our form not just as individuals but as parts of the race. Just as we know there was a was and will be a next, we must look at what is and assess our situation individually and collectively.

Who are our enemies and why and what would they make of us? What are we to do about it? What did our ancestors do which gave us the gift of our existence? How have conditions changed and what must we do to adapt to them? How do we define ourselves and how can we erase the hostile and negative images our enemies cast upon us and our ancestors like shovel fulls of filth to cover our graves?

In this moment we must celebrate ourselves, acknowledge our worth and praise our ancestors. We must also love that which will come from us for a thousand generations if we do our part in time to make it so. That is a part of time, of being, of not forgetting and losing the wealth carried in our genetic code. A seed cannot grow on a dry stone. Our people cannot stride through time if we do not draw from all that is all that is ours, all that we must have.

The Jews want us to focus only on the moment as if it existed outside the chain of time, as if we have no links to our past or bonds to our future that make us what we are what we were and what we will to be. They trick us into giving away our soil and our children to our enemies. They poison our ground and our blood. And they hope that we will disappear as they atomize and disperse us amongst others.

But that is the Jews. We can and must act for ourselves unfettered from their lies about us. We must come to better understand space and time and how to mark them on the map of the race. We must learn again to trust in ourselves more than abstractions and myths. We are here and will stay as long as we will to live and do what we must to survive. We should not fear the future in the awareness that it is irrational to fear the past.

The borders of maps are very important to our conception of time and space, and this is why the Jews are so insistent that we erase them and our notions of our territories and with them detach ourselves from time and place and become dead. We look at a map and say to ourselves, this was our people’s place at such a time, and then we moved here and there. But what will our great, great grandchildren use to form their bearings on this earth should the Jews erase all memories of us and mix our blood with all others as they surround each of us with non-Whites? They will look upon a map of the earth and see only a reflection of what is not theirs. They will never grasp the ground and know that those who brought them to life held it, too. The map will not be a mirror of their past or guide to their future. Instead it will mean only that there are a million places they cannot go because the Jews forbid it.

It is important to consider the distant past. Think of the White Race in the remote past. Imagine each White person as a part, an elemental unit of the whole. They were always in groups breeding with one another. In a crowd, they would only bump into another White person. That was the nature of the race at that time. Then they began to take foreign labor and face conquest. The blood mixed and often the genius and beauty disappeared.

Now imagine each White person separated from the others by non-White neighbors, then family members, dispersed and heterogeneous like particles of white paint mixed with a thousand different colors growing increasingly diluted on an increasingly messy palette. It becomes more and more difficult to ever reunite male and female of the race to produce offspring of the race. That is what Jews are doing to Whites. And it is not merely taking place in time and space, but also in the abstract, where images that only have meaning in our minds of mixed children are displayed on public billboards and in advertisements. The Jews are erasing the White Race even in our thoughts. We look upon these two dimensional images which capture our thoughts in time and limit our actions in space and we do not see ourselves or our ancestors. We have been erased from consciousness. Instead we see and think about our replacements as our reality. Why do we tolerate this?

I will have a great deal more to say about time, space and survival and hope my documentary will soon be completed.

It is important for Whites to surround themselves with other Whites. We must not allow ourselves to be consumed in mixtures where we cannot find one another and see in each other our selves. It is important for us to consider the nature of time, space and survival. If we do not compose that which is time, we are not, and it will be as if we never were. We live in a time of survival of the self aware and the extinction of the self hating.

Russian Kompromat on Mohammad Bin Salman

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Jamal Khashoggi was a Mossad agent and was working with the Russians. Russia has been subverting Turkey and Khashoggi was helping the Russians in this, and assisting the Mossad, Russia and the CIA to bring the Arab Spring to Saudi Arabia.

Saudi Arabia has long assisted the USA to bring Russia to its knees. That being the case, you can be certain that the Russians have long sought compromising material on Saudi royalty. The Russians are intensively surveilling the Saudis, as are the Mossad. Both knew the execution of Khashoggi was planned before it happened, and how and when it would happen. Both have the support of Turkish authorities.

I suspect the reason why Mohammad Bin Salman has so quickly and eagerly jumped into bed with KGB Putin is that the Russians or Mossad sent Khashoggi into the embassy with a wire, or what acted as one, and made recordings of what took place knowing it was about to happen from their snooping on Saudi conversations. I strongly suspect the Russians have Kompromat on Mohammad Bin Salman probably in the form of direct orders from him for the murder.

I can think of no other reason for the Saudis to sacrifice relations with the USA, which has infinitely more to offer Saudi Arabia than Russia ever could, to become an asset of Russia against America and Europe. Add to this the fact that the communist media are squeezing Mohammad Bin Salman and driving him into the arms of Putin, who has this Kompromat which would be used by the media to call for international crimes charges against Mohammad Bin Salman and the seizure of his accounts. There is no other explanation for the ability of the Russians to turn him against us, which is clearly not in his or Saudi Arabia’s best interests.

On top of all that, Trump was about to meet Putin face to face, I suspect to discuss this matter and how to play it. Trump is gently asking the Saudis to keep oil prices down, but does nothing to threaten Mohammad Bin Salman, who is being blackmailed by the Russians. This helps the Russians by making it appear there is a wedge between the USA and Saudi Arabia, without imposing any punishment on the Saudis for climbing into bed with Putin. All the Jewish forces are driving Saudi Arabia to Moscow and Trump does nothing to stop it. Putin almost certainly has this Kompromat on Mohammad Bin Salman.

It Is NOT a Matter of "Zionism Versus Bolshevism". The Reality Is Zionsim and Bolshevism Versus Us!

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Winston Churchill famously published an article "Zionism Versus Bolshevism. A Struggle for the Soul of the Jewish People.", Illustrated Sunday Herald, (8 February 1920), page 5; in which he posed the false dilemma of "Zionism versus Bolshevism" as if the world of Jewry consisted of good Zionist Jews in opposition to bad Bolshevik Jews. Churchill asked us to side with the supposedly good Zionist Jews so as to save ourselves from the bad Bolshevik Jews. This, as the allies were keeping the Bolsheviks in power in Russia and had just fought WW I to put them in power and seize Palestine from the Ottoman Empire.

Many have misunderstood Churchill and wrongly believe that he was an anti-Zionist. In fact, he wrote his article to scare the West into supporting Zionism with all its might and treasure. But neither Churchill nor Zionist Jews ever did any harm to the Bolsheviks. Instead they gave them their full support.

The same Jewish bankers created both Zionism and Bolshevism as a means to fulfil Jewish messianic prophecy. The allies supported the Bolsheviks and the Zionists during and after both world wars.

Zionism sponsors the ingathering of the Jews. Bolshevism sponsors Jewish world government and the theft of all the private property of the Gentiles concomitant with enslavement and the dysgenic murder of the best Gentiles, leaving the Jews as a master race among imbeciles. Consider what this rabbi had to say:

The Jews see no contradiction between Zionism and Bolshevism. 2,500 years ago the Jews declared that they would destroy all Gentile governments and enslave all Gentiles, viz. Bolshevism. 2,500 years ago the Jews declared that they would genocide all the inhabitants of Palestine and steal their land and possessions viz. Zionism. As the Old Testament states:

Genesis 17:8:

"8 And I will give unto thee, and to thy seed after thee, the land wherein thou art a stranger, all the land of Canaan, for an everlasting possession; and I will be their God."

According to the Jews, they had initially stolen the land of Palestine from the Canaanites and others through the process of deliberate and divinely commanded genocide and invasion, or, as the Old Testament puts it:

Deuteronomy 6:10-12:

"And it shall be, when the Lord thy God shall have brought thee into the land which he sware unto thy fathers, to Abraham, to Isaac, and to Jacob, to give thee great and goodly cities, which thou buildedst not, And houses full of all good things, which thou filledst not, and wells digged, which thou diggedst not, vineyards and olive trees, which thou plantedst not; when thou shalt have eaten and be full; Then beware lest thou forget the Lord, which brought thee forth out of the land of Egypt, from the house of bondage."

Deuteronomy 7:1-6:

"When the Lord thy God shall bring thee into the land whither thou goest to possess it, and hath cast out many nations before thee, the Hittites, and the Girgashites, and the Amorites, and the Canaanites, and the Perizzites, and the Hivites, and the Jebusites, seven nations greater and mightier than thou; And when the Lord thy God shall deliver them before thee; thou shalt smite them, and utterly destroy them; thou shalt make no covenant with them, nor shew mercy unto them: Neither shalt thou make marriages with them; thy daughter thou shalt not give unto his son, nor his daughter shalt thou take unto thy son. For they will turn away thy son from following me, that they may serve other gods: so will the anger of the Lord be kindled against you, and destroy thee suddenly. But thus shall ye deal with them; ye shall destroy their altars, and break down their images, and cut down their groves, and burn their graven images with fire. For thou art an holy people unto the Lord thy God: the Lord thy God hath chosen thee to be a special people unto himself, above all people that are upon the face of the earth."

The march toward Jewish world government is a recurrent theme in the Old Testament, summarized in Psalms and Isaiah as:

Psalm 2:8-9:

"Ask of me, and I shall give thee the heathen for thine inheritance, and the uttermost parts of the earth for thy possession. Thou shalt break them with a rod of iron; thou shalt dash them in pieces like a potter's vessel."

Psalm 72:8-11:

"He shall have dominion also from sea to sea, and from the river unto the ends of the earth. They that dwell in the wilderness shall bow before him; and his enemies shall lick the dust. The kings of Tarshish and of the isles shall bring presents: the kings of Sheba and Seba shall offer gifts. Yea, all kings shall fall down before him: all nations shall serve him."

Isaiah 2:2-4:

"And it shall come to pass in the last days, that the mountain of the Lord's house shall be established in the top of the mountains, and shall be exalted above the hills; and all nations shall flow unto it. And many people shall go and say, Come ye, and let us go up to the mountain of the Lord, to the house of the God of Jacob; and he will teach us of his ways, and we will walk in his paths: for out of Zion shall go forth the law, and the word of the Lord from Jerusalem. And he shall judge among the nations, and shall rebuke many people: and they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruninghooks: nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more."

The enslavement of all non-Jews to Jews is stated in Zechariah 8:23::

"Thus saith the LORD of hosts; In those days it shall come to pass, that ten men shall take hold out of all languages of the nations, even shall take hold of the skirt of him that is a Jew, saying, We will go with you: for we have heard that God is with you."

Based upon this Old Testament passage, Jews believe they are each entitled to 2,800 Gentile slaves. The Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Shabbath, Folio 32b:

"Resh Lakish said: He who is observant of fringes will be privileged to be served by two thousand eight hundred slaves, for it is said, Thus saith the Lord of hosts: In those days it shall come to pass, that ten men shall take hold, out of all the languages of the nations, shall even take hold of the skirt of him that is a Jew, saying, We will go with you, etc."--I. Epstein, The Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Shabbath, folio 32b, Volume 7, The Soncino Press, London, (1938), p. 149.

To the Jew, there is no hypocrisy in being an international Bolshevik and a nationalist Zionist. It is simply Jewish privilege, as Albert Einstein the globalist Zionist stated,

"I am against nationalism but for the Jewish cause."--A. Einstein quoted in A. Fölsing, English translation by E. Osers, Albert Einstein, a Biography, Viking, New York, (1997), p. 429.

So it is not a matter of Zionism versus Bolshevism. Both serve the Jews to fulfill their messianic prophecies and to destroy us. Likewise, it is not a matter of Republicans versus Democrats, rather both the Democrats and Republicans are communist Zionists. The Democrats long siding with Lenin and Stalin and the Republicans having been subverted by the Trotskyite neo-Cons.

Both Hillary and Trump are in bed with the communist and Zionist Jews and both work against our best interests. We need a political party and candidates who represent us and serve our best interests.

Simply put, it is Us versus Them and to pretend otherwise is to serve their interests whichever side of the phony fence you land on.

As I Predicted, Our Enemy Vladimir Putin Is Breaking Our Alliances and Raising Our Oil Prices. Where Is Trump, the Traitor? Where Is Israel, Our Supposed Ally?

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

I am lonely voice pointing out to Putin worshiping American dissidents that Donald Trump is a traitor and Putin is a sworn enemy bent on our destruction. I made these points long before the FBI and Congress began to investigate Trump and I have been fully vindicated. I recently predicted that Putin would try to enslave us through escalating energy prices, as he has long done with Germany, through an alliance with Saudi Arabia's new leader:

Jamal Khashoggi Mossad Agent, KGB Agent and Doenmeh Crypto-Jew

Those cheerleaders for the KGB communist have helped the Bolshevik demon dwarf Vlad Putin to start gouging our families on oil prices. They too are traitors to our nation and to Europe. They are costing you money and may eventually cost you your life.

So where is Trump informing the American People that Putin is deliberately hurting us and that our communist controlled media is helping him to ruin our alliances and our economy? Why was it so easy for Putin to muscle in on Saudi Arabia, and where is Israel complaining that it is being surrounded by Russian puppet States? It appears, as I have been saying for more than a decade, that the plan all along was to use the Soviet Union as an excuse to arm Israel, a fake ally of the USA, only to then have Israel flip and surround itself with Muslim Soviet Republics and aid them in destroying America and American interests in the region, as Israel sells our military secrets to Bolshevik Russia and Red China. Both Israel and Trump are silent as Putin squeezes us out and begins the process of gouging us with ever higher energy prices. Not a peep from Israel about Russia's growing influence on its borders.

And what of North Korea, which Russia created and which Russia is supplying with missile and nuclear weapons technology and supplies? What are Trump and his envoys telling the North Koreans, and why has nothing been done to stop our enemy from developing better weapons with which to kill us? Why is our alternative media cheerleading for treason and for Putin as he continues to hurt our people? You can thank them in part for the soon to rise gas prices and the related costs you will be paying for supporting your enemy Putin and the traitor Trump. Those costs are small compared to the build up of nuclear weapons aimed at us as Trump is facilitating the growth of the arsenals of our enemies by causing us to pay for them. You are paying for those weapons at the pump when you effectively donate your earnings to Russian communists through their new near monopoly with OPEC.

Expect Trump to ask us to pump more oil, rather than take action against Russia and put the hurt to Saudi Arabia. Expect Trump to promote more consumption and environmental damage rather than solve our problems in permanent ways. Expect Trump to continue to betray us to Israel and the communists as he hands over the Middle East to Israel and Russia. Consider the fate of America and Europe as the Soviet Union and Israel cut us off from our energy suppliers and Red China begins to war against our Asian allies? How will we fight wars when cannot even fill our tanks or heat our homes?

In the news:

Are Putin and Mohammed bin Salman Getting Ready for Another High-Five?

Debate Me: A New Form of Social Media

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

People often suggest I debate so and so about such and such. Most often their suggestions are sincere and productive. Sometimes, it is obvious that they are provocateurs trying to stir the pot.

I like the idea of debates and the Socratic method. We need a neutral forum which facilitates these debates and I propose a new type of social media in the form of a web service like facebook or YouTube. I also propose it partner with facebook and YouTube and other social media outlets to integrate their services into its service. For example, YouTube could incorporate livestream debates with chats where chatters could issue challenges to each other to open up new debates at the click of a mouse button. Facebook could provide a means for one click challenges to a debate.

Perhaps some university could create an open source project to create this service. I have some ideas to kick it off and help it take shape. It should be an educational tool as well as entertainment for the masses. It should help people learn how to think, how to prove a point and examine evidence, and it should provide a means for an exchange to progress in a documented chain so that the audience can examine the record and arrive at their individual conclusions. It would also be a good forum for White Nationalists, if those with the technical skills are interested in pursuing it.

Someday it might become quite profitable as celebrity debaters and moderators emerge to compete with the talking heads of mass media. It is also bound to become highly politically influential and attract ringers and agents of the parties, as well as agents of big business. At any event, the interplay of ideas should be regulated so that no advantage inherent in the system exists, but it should also offer various means of debating and numerous options for framing the rules under which the debate will take place. Those rules will be amendable by agreement.

I suggest different classes of debate with various options in each. There could be video debate options through YouTube livestream. There could be debates with chats, and those in the chats could challenge one another to create subdebates and new debates. These challenges could be publicly issued with a mere click on the avatar of the person in the chat, which would open up a dialogue box with the means to issue the challenge and suggest one of the types of debates and categories of rules. This would be far better than flame wars and unchallenged declarations of glittering generalities. It would create an atmosphere of excitement and participation.

Users could create homepages listing their debates and their thoughts on debates, with blogs and challenges posted. Text and text to voice would also be categories available. There could be multilingual debates with machine translations checked by the audience and open to challenge and contest. This would be a way to improve translation software with live discussion from numerous countries and dialects.

I suggest various general forums, including “bloodsport” with no rules, cursing, child restrictions, mob support, cheerleaders, dirty tricks and voting; civil, with classical time rules that block the entries and microphone of the opponent when the other’s allotted time is used, but record them on the side for future review. There could also be a column for all the things a debater thinks of later and wishes he had said. We could make that very funny, an option to insert “after thoughts” to record all the things you should have said but did not think of at the time, and other users could add their thoughts as well post debate. Voting would be permitted with a thumbs up or down. The computer would document points made as entered by the contestants and then demand the point be ceded, contested, or a refusal to continue to debate it; so that the debate can proceed without going in circles. I want to improve on past methods to create a truly efficient means of discussion, especially in the civil section.

There should also be a kid friendly general forum with age and skill level classifications, which can be breached by supervised agreements. They should have lots of exciting images and avatar choices. They should be engineered to teach children how to think logically and examine truth, as well as how to fight for their ideas.

I suggest the creation of emojis which when hovered over provide standard definitions of common debate terms and logical definitions, including "strawman", "ad hominem", "non sequitur", "petitio pincipii", etc. which debaters can click on to challenge the statements of their opponents and compel a response. The audience could also enter these in the accompanying chat.

I also would make one of the options a standard dictionary to use for defining terms, with another option to use an emoji to request the opponent to define a term, and then record that term so that no argument is to arise as to definitions. We could create a select and define tool, where one of the contestants could select a word or term used by their opponent and click a button which would show standard definitions and then ask for an alternative. Again, I want to create as efficient a process as possible and make it obvious when a user is using sophistry to win a debate so that the audience is not easily deceived by sophistry. These lessons will carry over into their lives in general and should improve society.

There could be a column where settled points are recorded. Often when people debate, they lie about what they had said and try to change what they said, which would here be recorded. We could have a funny icon that would pop up penalizing lies and misrepresentations. There are all kinds of ways to make debates more effective, efficient, productive and fun.

To promote anonymity and provide fun for kids, we could partner with a voice changing software source to provide the option for a voice changer.

Thursday, December 06, 2018

On South Africa, the Undeclared Communist Country, and George Galloway's Naked Hypocrisy Exposed in His Own Words

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

South Africa is today a communist country that was founded by communists. In order to glorify himself in his own eyes, George Galloway makes much of the support he received from Jews in South Africa, Jews who led the Marxist revolution which displaced South Africa's White leadership:

Like all Jewish led communist nations, South Africa seeks to genocide the best among its non-Jews, those Whites who had made of it a successful modern nation. Killing off the best Gentiles is an ancient Jewish tradition. Soferim, Chapter 15, Rule 10, states, quoting the much celebrated genocidal racist Jew Simon ben Yohai:

"The best among the Gentiles deserves to be killed."--"Gentile", The Jewish Encyclopedia, Volume 5, Funk and Wagnalls Company, New York, (1903), pp. 615-626, at 617. See also: A. Cohen, "Soferim 41a", The Minor Tractates of the Talmud Massektoth Ketannoth in Two Volumes, Volume 1, The Socino Press, London, (1965), pp. 287-288, especially note 50.

The Old Testament book of Obadiah verse 8 teaches the Jews to destroy the intellectual class of non-Jews and deprive the Gentiles of knowledge,

"Shall I not in that day, saith the LORD, even destroy the wise men out of Edom, and understanding out of the mount of Esau?"

Galloway ignored the facts of Jewish involvement in politics in South Africa, facts which were known to him from personal experience, to instead launch a fanatical tirade against a White man speaking the truth, during which self righteous rant Galloway refused to allow an uninterrupted response to his own questions in a prolonged, childish, irrational and uncivilized fit of staged fury:

Galloway shamelessly and expressly praised Karl Marx specifically as a Jew, one of those Jews who according to Galloway was among the exclusively Jewish club of, "the greatest people on the earth." Reminds one of the Jews' self declared status as the chosen people of their genocidal god.

Karl Marx, whom Galloway praises as if a Jew who never would have supported genocidal policies, was in fact was a genocidal maniac. Marx and Engels advocated the genocide of peoples which would not abide communism. One of the more recent and well-known pleas to genocide Whites came in Karl Marx's organ Neue Rheinische Zeitung and was issued by his cohort in genocidal crime Friedrich Engels:

"These remnants of a nation mercilessly crushed in the course of history, as Hegel says, this national garbage will always be, and will remain until their complete extirpation or denationalization, the fanatical bearers of the counter-revolution, just as their whole existence in general is a protest against a great historical revolution. [***] The general war which will then break out will shatter these Slavic special federations and exterminate all these little bull-headed nations right down to their names. The next world war will not only eliminate reactionary classes and dynasties, it will also erase entire reactionary peoples from the face of the earth. And that constitutes an improvement."

"Diese Reste einer von dem Gang der Geschichte, wie Hegel sagt, unbarmherzig zertretenen Nation, diese Völkerabfälle werden jedesmal und bleiben bis zu ihrer gänzlichen Vertilgung oder Entnationalisierung die fanatischen Träger der Kontrerevolution, wie ihre ganze Existenz überhaupt schon ein Protest gegen eine große geschichtliche Revolution ist. [***] Der allgemeine Krieg, der dann ausbricht, wird diesen slawischen Sonderbund zersprengen und alle diese kleinen stierköpfigen Nationen bis auf ihren Namen vernichten. Der nächste Weltkrieg wird nicht nur reaktionäre Klassen und Dynastien, er wird auch ganze reaktionäre Völker vom Erdboden verschwinden machen. Und das ist auch ein Fortschritt."--Friedrich Engels, "Der magyarische Kampf", Neue Rheinische Zeitung, Number 194, (13 January 1849).

Marxists in the Soviet Union displaced untold millions to ruin their ethnic homogeneity, and slaughtered tens of millions of the best Eastern European Christians. Has Galloway no shame in praising Marx? Marxists have deliberately caused the deaths of more than 100 million people. So who are the murderers, George, if not the Marxists? Have you nothing to say about that?

Galloway irrationally shouts down and censors what he cannot refute with facts and reason. His primitive responses remind one of the uncivilized behavior of many genocidal South African blacks towards South African Whites.

What of the people's right to know, George? What of the right of human beings to speak out against their own genocide? Will you have none of it? Lock 'em all up, is that your response to those who speak the truths and opinions you wish to suppress? That is a typical Marxist response to free speech and the public's right to know and it is primitive, uncivilized, brutal and opposed to the finest traditions of Great Britain and Western Civilization.

Galloway, who lamented the imprisonment of the communist Nelson Mandele and his Jewish comrades and handlers, called for the imprisonment of a White South African of German descent for expressing opinions and facts known to Galloway. Galloway was merely toeing the tyrannical Jewish line, stated by the Jewish tyrant Ludwig Boerne almost two centuries ago. Ludolf Holst published Das Judentum in allen dessen Teilen. Aus einem staatswissenschaftlichen Standpunkt betrachtet, Mainz, (1821), which offended Ludwig Boerne. Boerne responded with a negative review of Holst's book and famously stated that he eagerly awaited the day when any statement which offended Jews would bring its author into prison, or the insane asylum.

Galloway's greatest people on the earth are tyrannical and genocidal fanatics. They oppose civil debate and will have none of it. It exposes their agendas and offers a reasoned defense against their attacks. The Jewish Old Testament calls for the enslavement of all non-Jews and advocates for the brothers' wars the communists deliberately cause. Have we no right to defend ourselves with our speech against these genocidal attacks which originate in Jewry? Here is the communist creed of the Jews expressed in their Old Testament:

"And the three hundred blew the trumpets, and the Lord set every man's sword against his fellow, even throughout all the host: and the host fled to Bethshittah in Zererath, and to the border of Abelmeholah, unto Tabbath."--Judges 7:22

"And I will set the Egyptians against the Egyptians: and they shall fight every one against his brother, and every one against his neighbour; city against city, and kingdom against kingdom. And the spirit of Egypt shall fail in the midst thereof; and I will destroy the counsel thereof: and they shall seek to the idols, and to the charmers, and to them that have familiar spirits, and to the wizards."Isaiah 19:2-3

"And I will overthrow the throne of kingdoms, and I will destroy the strength of the kingdoms of the heathen; and I will overthrow the chariots, and those that ride in them; and the horses and their riders shall come down, every one by the sword of his brother."Haggai 2:22

Your Jewish agenda is crystal clear, George. You need not make such a show of bowing down to the Jews. We all recognize your servitude to their cause.

Tuesday, December 04, 2018

Delusions in the Prepper Movement

The Inefficient Methods of War of Empires: How Technologies Can Preserve Us

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

America has adopted the method of warfare known as "regime change". This method is engineered to empower the enemies of America to remain and grow stronger over time. It is a form of capitulation, often to Communism and Zionism. It weakens America as it strengthens our enemies.

In order to create the means to "change regimes" Americans must maintain large global standing Armies and Navies. This policy requires us to place "boots on the ground" in foreign lands and administer them, without ever exploiting the territory or wealth we have conquered by force of arms in a way that makes us more prosperous and independent. It is a self consuming and disastrous process of empire building which results in our own destruction.

It is a mistake to assume from the beginning that we must wage war against "regimes" and not enemies. Tumbling regimes does nothing to destroy enemies. Attacking governments, as opposed to destroying enemies, consumes immeasurable volumes of lives and resources that should be utilized for the benefit of our people.

If we redirected the purpose of our military forces, weapons and infrastructure to the security of our borders and the annihilation of our enemies, we could not only better protect ourselves and ensure our survival, we would then be in a better position to put our resources to work for the benefit of our own, as opposed to the control of our enemies. And no one would dare to challenge us.

Our creative forces, industry, agriculture and other forms of wealth and capital are more than sufficient to provide all of our people with a very high standard of living. Were we to expel those who have invaded our country, these per capita resources would grow. Eliminating our debts to the usurers would free up our capital to make it available for our benefit, rather than the growth of wealth of the usurers.

Technology makes it both cheap and easy for us to ruin our enemies without bankrupting ourselves or murdering our own youth in a dysgenic mass suicide. Technology also provides us with the means to eliminate foreign and slave labor. Empires always import labor which ruins their national genius, destroys their genetic heritage and replaces their population. Robotics and other technologies provide us with a viable means to grow our wealth and provide for our needs without foreign or slave labor.

Our wealthy class is not investing our national capital in these directions. Instead, they are redirecting our national capital to enemy States, bleeding off our vital resources and enslaving us to their usury and to our sworn enemies. Were we to stop this antagonism towards our survival we could quickly grow our wealth and create a far better society for our own people.

Sunday, December 02, 2018

Jamal Khashoggi Mossad Agent, KGB Agent and Doenmeh Crypto-Jew

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

The execution of Jamal Khashoggi has been making headlines around the world for a long time now, but the most important elements of the story have been left out of the mainstream press. Jamal Khashoggi is descended from the Doenmeh crypto-Jews of Turkey. His family gained prominence when his grandfather Muhammad Khashoggi became personal physician of the crypto-Jewish King Abdulaziz Al Saud.

It is no coincidence that Jamal was executed in Turkey. Like the crypto-Jewish Young Turks, Khashoggi sought to secularize and destroy Islam in its very capital.

Jamal is a nephew of the infamous Mossad agent and arms dealer Adnan Khashoggi, known for his involvement in the Iran Contra affair, in which Israel played a key role. Jamal worked for the KGB in Afghanistan and was working to spread the Israeli-KGB-CIA Arab Spring revolutions to Saudi Arabia.

Putin has seized upon the execution to try to leverage Saudi Arabia and with it OPEC away from its Western alliances and into the Soviet fold. Saudi Arabia has always served to weaken the Soviets at critical times by lowering oil prices. If Putin can wrest Saudi Arabia from the West and make it a part of the expanding Soviet Union, as he has done to Turkey, Syria and Iran, it would enable him to grossly raise the price of energy and fuel his military spending. Putin would then be in a position to do to America what he has done to Germany.

This is all part of the Jewish plan to surround Israel with a grossly expanded Soviet Union overtaking all of Middle Eastern Islam and placing it behind an Iron Curtain. Mohammad bin Salman better watch his back with Putin. Putin is a snake who smiles at his victims just before he strikes.

Friday, November 30, 2018



Christopher Jon Bjerknes

The paperback version is $5.99:

The Kindle version is 99 cents:

Mileva Maric was an exceptional young woman in many ways. In an age when most young ladies never dreamed of becoming scientists, Mileva traveled to Switzerland and studied physics. There she met Albert Einstein and married outside her faith. They had already spent many years together working on the Lorentz-Poincare theory of relativity. Mileva and Albert wrote to each other about their team work on the theory of relativity. Albert Einstein served as the sounding board for Mileva's ideas and helped her by scouring the scientific literature for the latest innovations in the theory. Their letters and other abundant evidence proves that Mileva Maric, Albert Einstein's first wife, collaborated with Albert on the production and publication of their most famous papers of 1905. Mileva submitted their paper on the special theory of relativity to Annalen der Physik. She may even have been the sole author of this article given that it was submitted under her name, not his.

I am producing a video introduction for this book and should have it up soon. I have been researching this topic for twenty years and this work contains my latest findings.

Thursday, November 22, 2018

Giving thanks for life on Thanksgiving Day

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

I am giving thanks on Thanksgiving. One year ago, my son almost stepped on a Mojave rattlesnake. His toes were literally an inch from the animal, but it did not strike. I made this video to give my thanks to the rattlesnake and to nature for sparing my son's life. I would also like to express my gratitude to the firemen who took the snake away and safely released it in the woods.

Illegal alien jumps border fence and destroys my property!!!

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Today an illegal alien jumped over the border fence and destroyed my property. At least I was able to capture what happened on my cellphone. Please help! Subscribe to my YouTube channel, and like and share the video:

Sunday, November 18, 2018

Boycott Racist Einstein!

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Please spread the word.

Thursday, November 15, 2018

Christopher Jon Bjerknes Uncensored

You can watch my video response to protest censorship and bias on YouTube here:

Inhibiting My Freedom of Expression and the Public's Right to Know

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

TheRapeOfJustice YouTube channel mirrored my video presentation introducing my book Warnings to the Jews! Premonitions of the Holocaust Thanks to their efforts, my video had accrued more than 42,000 views and 1,700 likes as opposed to fewer than 200 dislikes in just three weeks, when this happened:

Obviously, the public not only has a right to know what I have to say, but a strong desire to hear it and an overwhelming appreciation for my having said it. So why is a stigmata being attached to my factual and truthful statements, one which wrongfully and harmfully imparts fear and discourages participation, as well as deliberately obstructing the dissemination of this information and diminishing the ability of my goods to freely compete in an open marketplace with all others on a level playing field?

These people are not only violating my rights to inform the public and sell my merchandise, they are violating your rights to know and judge your purchases in a fair and free environment, without intimidation or inhibition.

One means to combat this censorship and these unfair trade practices is to broadcast this message as far and wide as possible and attach a price to this discrimination. Please help me to spread the word! I am carrying the flag in this fight, please march with me.

Sunday, November 11, 2018

Mutiny on the Horizon for the Democratic Party

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Nancy Pelosi and Hillary Clinton helped to elect arch-Zionist, Chabad Lubavitch and Russian puppet Donald Trump. Pelosi has long been subverting the Democratic Party. Conveniently, she has declared herself speaker of the House and has effectively taken the impeachment of Trump off the table.

Articles of Impeachment will open up a trial in the Senate. That could reveal a lot Pelosi and the controlled opposition want kept quiet.

But the American People and many Democrats want Trump impeached for his traitorous relationship to Russia and his hush money. There will be loud cries to form a new political party from the ruins of the Democratic Party if Pelosi succeeds in subverting due process of law, obstructs justice and betrays the Democratic base. This will begin with the most openly Marxist, Internationalist and Socialist elements of the Democratic Party and will grow with protests in the streets of America and around the world. Money and an agenda will come pouring in using Trump's treason as a pretext to further betray the best interests of Americans. Subversive elements in the alt right will help this along by playing up their misogyny and degrading the other races so as to antagonize women and non-Whites to unite against Republicans and the subversive leaders of the Democratic Party.

In a trial, the Senate will determine the facts and act as the Jury. The Supreme Court will rule on the law and act as Judge. Both are in the hands of Trump and the Russians. The Russians want to sow the seeds of discord and chaos in America. This will afford them the opportunity to do so.

So where are we? Where is the party representing us and our best interests?

Saturday, September 22, 2018

This could be HUGE!

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

More than a year ago, I pointed out that terms of service agreements are being used as a sham device to discriminate against critics of Jewry and against those whose voices Jewry seeks to suppress by any and all means--and I do mean mean:

GAB Might Want to Consider Filing Antitrust and Discrimination Suits. Sunday, August 20, 2017

Evidently the Trump administration is looking into such potential violations of Federal Law:

The White House is considering an antitrust investigation into 'online platform bias' at Google and Facebook -- read the leaked document here

The discrimination against Holocaust revisionists will be the acid test. How can it be legal to ban them from selling their books or publishing their ads? How can an internet service refuse to service a consumer or seller based on political grounds, without overstepping the narrow boundaries of Federal Law?

Not only do such actions violate the letter and spirit of the First Amendment by censoring voices and obstructing the public's right to know, they violate the ability of citizens to engage in interstate commerce and discourage and prevent free and fair competition in the marketplace. If Trump pursues this, he will win and the fines will be enormous. This is needed to counteract the sanctions the market imposed when the stocks of such companies began to crash after Zuckerberg spoke out on behalf of free speech. It would be a tremendous benefit to have a new Supreme Court Justice who will favor the enforcement of the antitrust laws against the censors who are this very day deliberately obstructing free and fair trade in their pursuit of silencing free speech.

Tuesday, September 11, 2018

The Terrible Toll of 9/11 and the "Birth Pangs of a new Middle East"

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

The staged terror attack of 9/11 was designed to create havoc in the world. The Jews engineered it to provide a pretext for American aggression in the Middle East that would benefit Israel and Russia, while dragging down America, Europe and the Muslim nations

America entered into a series of self-consuming wars that generated only losses for us and those we attacked. Leading Jews profited from these wars which pitted the West against Islam by weakening the Jews' enemies and America, as well as from the arms trade and by bolstering Russia's position in Asia. America is fighting Afghanistan for the benefit of Russia, and destroyed Iraq for the benefit of Israel. A weaker America is a step towards Jewish globalism, as the best country on earth stumbles downward. The Jews have always sought to drag down the nations to the lowest common denominator and 9/11 helped them reduce America to a crumbling empire serving all interests but its own. It also led to the rise of Barack Obama and the loss of American sovereignty.

These are the products of the Jews' Hevlei Mashiach, or the birth pangs of the messianic age. Then U. S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice stated in 2006,

"What we're seeing here, in a sense, is the growing -- the birth pangs of a new Middle East."

Henry Kissinger also referred to the birth pangs of the new age:

The Jews gave birth to a demon on 9/11. It is consuming America, by design, as America consumes the enemies of Israel and Russia, against our own best interests. Werner Sombart famously stated, "wars are the Jews' harvest." Our financial debts to Jewry grow annually. Our spiritual debts to the demon they placed in our midst are infinitely worse and have scarred our immortal soul. The reaper is grim and his scythe, sharp, as it separates us from our roots.