Christopher Jon Bjerknes
I predicted that there would be a false flag attack meant to discredit the Anti-Zionist Movement, in, among other places, a blog I posted way back on 17 June 2008:
I still expect the attack is coming, probably several, but I do not believe that von Brunn's alleged assault on the Holocaust Museum was a false flag attack. I again repeat that I do NOT condone von Brunn's alleged illegal acts.
There are some strange things about the story coming out of the media. The media claim that von Brunn used an ancient slide/pump action rimfire .22 cal. shooting gallery type rifle--hardly an assault rifle! But, if true, a .22 (long rifle?) is very light recoiling, especially in such a rifle--just what such an old man would need. A pump is somewhat difficult for an 88 year old man to operate, especially under stress, but those old Winchesters were smooth out of the factory and loosen up even more with time.
Brunn is a convicted felon, which would make it difficult for him to obtain a firearm, which may explain the rifle. He is also quite old and unlikely to have contacts in the gangbanging community who could supply him with arms. Perhaps we will learn how he acquired the gun, why he chose it, etc. My guess is it was an unregistered antique (clearly pre-1968) an old man could pick up, or store for decades, without any red flags going up. If von Brunn was out to make a statement, anything that went bang would suffice.
A .22 rimfire has been known to drop deer, but is not a particularly lethal round, especially in long, or short versions, as opposed to some of the hot new .22 long rifle high velocity loads. Before the days of antibiotics, people used to dread being shot by the dirty greased bullets typical of a twenty-two because they could kill days later from infection, rarely having the power to make it through the body. Quick kills with a .22 rimfire are rare even with the magnum version, which was not what von Brunn used. This opens up a can of worms, but the death of the security guard may explain many other anomalies and I have learned to wait for further reports and not rely on news reports or the first thing the cops say. I hope there is a trial and we hear what von Brunn has to say.
Contrary to the legend some of the Jews (not Hoffman) who claim von Brunn was an agent of Jewry want to build, von Brunn did not appear from nowhere. He attempted to arrest members of the Fed decades ago, and was well known for his anti-Jewish sentiments for a very long time and was known for his book which was copyrighted in 1999. He served a long stretch in prison. Was his prior attempt to arrest members of the Fed a false flag attack? I doubt it. The website featuring his writings is typical of such websites belonging to, or dedicated to old men who did most of their work before the age of the internet, again contrary to the legends the Jews are attempting to craft of a supposed contrived website meant to deceive. It is not surprising that it was immediately taken down given the heat was turned up to solar degrees.
The Jew Michael Hoffman calls von Brunn a "Manchurian Candidate" and quotes, in full, one of von Brunn's anti-Christian writings, which has since been pulled off the web by the Ron Paul supporter who had originally allowed it on his website:
which includes von Brunn's article CHRISTIANITY and the HOLOCAUST that originally appeared here:
A good many highly intelligent German scholars have agreed with von Brunn in this article both as to the subversive nature of Christianity and the heinous nature of Jewry. Hoffman's shallow and disappointing analysis is contradicted by an eminent Jew named Disraeli, whose freely given statements vouched for every one of von Brunn's main contentions and arguments against the Jews and the child of Judaism which destroyed Rome and held back all of Europe, Christianity. Disraeli wrote, in contradiction to the shallow sophistry and converted Christian religious fanaticism of the Jew Hoffman:
"Nor is it indeed historically true that the small section of the Jewish race which dwelt in Palestine rejected Christ. The reverse is the truth. Had it not been for the Jews of Palestine the good tidings of our Lord would have been unknown for ever to the northern and western races. The first preachers of the gospel were Jews, and none else; the historians of the gospel were Jews, and none else. No one has ever been permitted to write under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit except a Jew. For nearly a century no one believed in the good tidings except Jews. They nursed the sacred flame of which they were the consecrated and hereditary depositories. And when the time was right to diffuse the truth among the ethnicks, it was not a senator of Rome or a philosopher of Athens who was personally appointed by our Lord for that office, but a Jew of Tarsus, who founded the seven churches of Asia. And that greater church, great even amid its terrible corruptions, that has avenged the victory of Titus by subjugating the capital of the Cæsars and has changed every one of the Olympian temples into altars of the God of Sinai and of Calvary, was founded by another Jew, a Jew of Galilee.
They may be traced in the last outbreak of the destructive principle in Europe. An insurrection takes place against tradition and aristocracy, against religion and property. Destruction of the Semitic principle, extirpation of the Jewish religion, whether in the Mosaic or in the Christian form, the natural equality of man and the abrogation of property, are proclaimed by the secret societies who form provisional governments, and men of Jewish race are found at the head of every one of them. The people of God co-operate with atheists; the most skilful accumulators of property ally themselves with communists; the peculiar and chosen race touch the hand of all the scum and low castes of Europe! And all this because they wish to destroy that ungrateful Christendom which owes to them even its name, and whose tyranny they can no longer endure.
When the secret societies, in February 1848, surprised Europe, they were themselves surprised by the unexpected opportunity, and so little capable were they of seizing the occasion, that had it not been for the Jews, who of late years unfortunately have been connecting themselves with these unhallowed associations, imbecile as were the governments the uncalled for outbreak would not have ravaged Europe. But the fiery energy and the teeming resources of the children of Israel maintained for a long time the unnecessary and useless struggle. If the reader throws his eye over the provisional governments of Germany, and Italy, and even of France, formed at that period, he will recognise everywhere the Jewish element. Even the insurrection, and defence, and administration of Venice, which, from the resource of statesmanlike moderation displayed, commanded almost the respect and sympathy of Europe, were accomplished by a Jew—Manini, who by the bye is a Jew who professes the whole of the Jewish religion, and believes in Calvary as well as Sinai, 'a converted Jew', as the Lombards styled him, quite forgetting, in the confusion of their ideas, that it is the Lombards who are the converts—not Manini.
Is it therefore wonderful, that a great portion of the Jewish race should not believe in the most important portion of the Jewish religion? As however the converted races become more humane in their behaviour to the Jews, and the latter have opportunity fully to comprehend and deeply to ponder over true Christianity, it is difficult to suppose that the result will not be very different. Whether presented by a Roman or Anglo-Catholic, or Geneveve, divine, by pope, bishop, or presbyter, there is nothing one would suppose very repugnant to the feelings of a Jew when he learns that the redemption of the human race has been effected by the mediatorial agency of a child of Israel; if the ineffable mystery of the Incarnation be developed to him, he will remember that the blood of Jacob is a chosen and peculiar blood, and if so transcendent a consummation is to occur he will scarcely deny that only one race could be deemed worthy of accomplishing it. There may be points of doctrine on which the northern and western races may perhaps never agree. The Jew, like them, may follow that path in those respects which reason and feeling alike dictate; but nevertheless it can hardly be maintained that there is anything revolting to a Jew to learn that a Jewess is the queen of heaven, or that the flower of the Jewish race are even now sitting on the right hand of the Lord God of Sabaoth.
Perhaps too in this enlightened age as his mind expands and he takes a comprehensive view of this period of progress, the pupil of Moses may ask himself, whether all the princes of the house of David have done so much for the Jews as that prince who was crucified on Calvary? Had it not been for Him, the Jews would have been comparatively unknown, or known only as a high oriental caste which had lost its country. Has not He made their history the most famous in the world? Has not He hung up their laws in every temple? Has not He vindicated all their wrongs? Has not He avenged the victory of Titus and conquered the Cæsars? What successes did they anticipate from their Messiah? The wildest dreams of their rabbis have been far exceeded. Has not Jesus conquered Europe and changed its name into Christendom? All countries that refuse the cross wither while the whole of the new world is devoted to the Semitic principle and its most glorious offspring the Jewish faith, and the time will come when the vast communities and countless myriads of America and Australia, looking upon Europe as Europe now looks upon Greece and wondering how so small a space could have achieved such great deeds, will still find music in the songs of Sion and solace in the parables of Galilee.
These may be dreams, but there is one fact which none can contest. Christians may continue to persecute Jews and Jews still persist in disbelieving Christians, but who can deny that Jesus of Nazareth, the Incarnate Son of the Most High God, is the eternal glory of the Jewish race?"--B. Disraeli, Lord George Bentinck: A Political Biography, Chapter 24, Third Revised Edition, Colburn, (1852), pp. 485, 497-498, 505-507.
I do not condone what von Brunn has done, and it has thus far proven to have been counter-productive especially with the help of the Jews who have attacked his historical arguments, but between Hoffman and the other Jews, and von Brunn, von Brunn clearly has the better mind and more lucid and historically accurate arguments. But as I predicted, any kind of illegal action will prove counter-productive.
Those Jews aside, I suspect there are some who do not want von Brunn to become a martyr or to spark any kind of mass movement. I suspect there are some who do not want von Brunn's written work to become popular–quoting it to attack it does not tend to make it more popular, though it does afford one the opportunity to read it!
Much more interesting than the Holocaust Museum incident was von Brunn's attempt to make a citizen's arrest. I do not condone it. It does, however, raise interesting questions. When, as is the case, a hostile and alien power subverts the nation and controls the law enforcement powers of the State, what recourse does a citizen have to secure the interests of the nation, and defend the nation from illegal attack?
I think rather than acting alone as individuals, we should pass laws which empower the People to indict by means of a million signature or more petition. Any person so indicted must then be subjected to a trial by the People and be sentenced by the People. Since a corrupting organization which has subverted the State has the means to prevent the enactment of laws which proscribe its criminal behavior, the People shall have the power to make law in the Petition for Indictment and the power to enforce it and to sentence by it, and the accused shall be denied recourse to an ex post facto defense.