Christopher Jon Bjerknes
A Zionist website (a website which promotes Eric Hufschmid, and which promotes the obvious lie that Christopher Bollyn was kidnaped, and further which engages in smearmongering) has failed to retract its smear campaign against me despite the fact that I have proven that the attack on me was based upon lies, fabrications and falsehoods. "Judenfrei's" unprovoked attack came just as I was exposing what Daryl Bradford Smith and his team were doing to discredit Cynthia McKinney. A coincidence? Have Hufschmid and Smith really parted ways, or are they two sides of a parted sea which work together to drown innocents caught in their wake?
WhatReallyHappened.com has compiled some interesting articles on the unconstitutional FBI COINTELPRO program, which Cynthia McKinney sought to reinvestigate. In Brian Glick's article "COINTELPRO Revisited - Spying & Disruption", Glick writes, inter alia:
"The FBI secretly instructed its field offices to propose schemes to "misdirect, discredit, disrupt and otherwise neutralize "specific individuals and groups.
What They Do: Some informers and infiltrators quietly provide information while keeping a low profile and doing whatever is expected of group members. Others attempt to discredit a target and disrupt its work. They may spread false rumors and make unfounded accusations to provoke or exacerbate tensions and splits. They may urge divisive proposals, sabotage important activities and resources, or operate as "provocateurs" who lead zealous activists into unnecessary danger. In a demonstration or other confrontation with police, such an agent may break discipline and call for actions which would undermine unity and detract from tactical focus.
Infiltration As a Source of Distrust and Paranoia: While individual agents and informers aid the government in a variety of specific ways, the general use of infiltrators serves a very special and powerful strategic function. The fear that a group may be infiltrated often intimidates people from getting more involved. It can give rise to a paranoia which makes it difficult to build the mutual trust which political groups depend on. This use of infiltrators, enhanced by covertly-initiated rumors that exaggerate the extent to which a particular movement or group has been penetrated, is recommended by the manuals used to teach counter-insurgency in the U.S. and Western Europe.
Covert Manipulation to Make A Legitimate Activist Appear to be an Agent: An actual agent will often point the finger at a genuine, non-collaborating and highly-valued group member, claiming that he or she is the infiltrator. The same effect, known as a "snitch jacket," has been achieved by planting forged documents which appear to be communications between an activist and the FBI, or by releasing for no other apparent reason one of a group of activists who were arrested together. Another method used under COINTELPRO was to arrange for some activists, arrested under one pretext or another, to hear over the police radio a phony broadcast which appeared to set up a secret meeting between the police and someone from their group."--Brian Glick, "COINTELPRO Revisited - Spying & Disruption"
One of the methods a COINTELPRO-style operation employs to create dissensions and otherwise disrupt movements is to provoke them to argue over terms and engage in endless semantical arguments. This is why we are told to call Jews instead "Zionists", "criminals", or etc. thereby rendering our movement obscure, esoteric and ultimately pointless. "Judenfrei" encourages such pointless arguments over semantics and has attacked me for not engaging in them. "Judenfrei" would substitute my article which demonstrates clearly that Zionism and Christianity are mutually exclusive, with the pointless, esoteric, obscurantist and grossly misleading article "Judenfrei" has published:
Every Christian Zionist knows that Jesus was a Jew, which word means to them a member of the Tribe of Judah, which meaning is also the standard definition and etymological root of the word "Jew". "Judenfrei" would mislead us to have us engage Christian Zionists with a pile of false history and bogus semantics, which most if not all Christian Zionists would immediately reject as patently false. "Judenfrei" throws this stumbling stone on our path and accuses us of being "agents" when we produce meaningful and effective statements against Christian Zionism.
Contrary to the false arguments of "Judenfrei", the Bible is crystal clear as to the lineage of Jesus Christ. Jesus is identified as a Judahite, and no other, in the opening statement of the New Testament, Matthew 1:1, 6:
"1 The book of the generation of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham. 2 Abraham begat Isaac; and Isaac begat Jacob; and Jacob begat Judas and his brethren; 3 And Judas begat Phares and Zara of Thamar; and Phares begat Esrom; and Esrom begat Aram; 4 And Aram begat Aminadab; and Aminadab begat Naasson; and Naasson begat Salmon; 5 And Salmon begat Booz of Rachab; and Booz begat Obed of Ruth; and Obed begat Jesse; 6 And Jesse begat David the king; and David the king begat Solomon of her that had been the wife of Urias; 7 And Solomon begat Roboam; and Roboam begat Abia; and Abia begat Asa; 8 And Asa begat Josaphat; and Josaphat begat Joram; and Joram begat Ozias; 9 And Ozias begat Joatham; and Joatham begat Achaz; and Achaz begat Ezekias; 10 And Ezekias begat Manasses; and Manasses begat Amon; and Amon begat Josias; 11 And Josias begat Jechonias and his brethren, about the time they were carried away to Babylon: 12 And after they were brought to Babylon, Jechonias begat Salathiel; and Salathiel begat Zorobabel; 13 And Zorobabel begat Abiud; and Abiud begat Eliakim; and Eliakim begat Azor; 14 And Azor begat Sadoc; and Sadoc begat Achim; and Achim begat Eliud; 15 And Eliud begat Eleazar; and Eleazar begat Matthan; and Matthan begat Jacob; 16 And Jacob begat Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ. [colored emphasis added]"
Jesus is never called a Levite, Reubenite, Benjamite, or etc. Judahites are Israelites, and Jesus came for Israel because such was the prophecy of the messiah, who was to ingather the lost tribes of Israel. References to Israel and Israelites are made to identify Jesus as the redeemer of all Israel because such was the role of the Messiah who was to ingather the tribes. Jesus is again named a Judahite in Luke 1:32 (see also 3:23-34):
"He shall be great, and shall be called the Son of the Highest: and the Lord God shall give unto him the throne of his father David:"
and in Revelation 5:5:
"And one of the elders saith unto me, Weep not: behold, the Lion of the tribe of Juda, the Root of David, hath prevailed to open the book, and to loose the seven seals thereof."
Jesus had to be of the Tribe of Judah as a descendant of David (Genesis 29:35, 35:23. II Samuel 2). Psalm 132:11 states:
"The LORD hath sworn in truth unto David; he will not turn from it; Of the fruit of thy body will I set upon thy throne."
"Judenfrei" erroneously states that,
"Prior to the 4th century A.D., it’s anachronistic to talk about Jews or Judaism."
I must ask "Judenfrei", then to what was Jesus referring when he referred to the traditions of the Pharisees (Matthew 15:3, 6. Mark 7:8-9, 13. Colossians 2:8)?
So why would "Judenfrei" have us discredit ourselves by claiming to Christian Zionists that Jesus was not a Jew? Why does "Judenfrei" not state that Jesus is of the Tribe of Judah, and that the word Jew comes from the word Judah? Why does "Judenfrei" want us to argue over semantics?
The Jews have always hated Jesus. It would be to their delight to have Christians not identify Jesus with the Jews or with their Jewish god. The Jews would also love to have their name removed from all the statements in the New Testament which condemn "the Jews". The Jews would also delight in the idea that Christians continue to believe that the Israelites have a divine claim to the Palestinians' land. Jews believe they are descended from Israelites and plan an ingathering of all of the tribes. Jews are already welcome so the semantical arguments of "Judenfrei" only increase the number of foreigners the Jews would have invade the ancestral homelands of the Palestinians and others. The effect of "Judenfrei's" attack is to unite Christian Zionists behind the Jews and expand their claims to all "Israelites"; to disunite those opposed to Christian Zionism by inspiring arguments over semantics which resemble the old arguments over how many angels can dance on the head of a pin; and to render opposition to Christian Zionism obscure, repugnant and pointless, because the Jews have already invaded Palestine. In addition, "Judenfrei" would stigmatize those who present legitimate arguments against Christian Zionism as if "agents" of World Jewry.
We know that "Judenfrei" offers up worn out and disproven arguments from old school Zionism, falsely claiming that segregation will cure the Jews of their mental maladies and is the answer to the Jewish problem; by promoting the Herzlian notion of a "World Ghetto" for the Jews; and by promoting the idea that the unity of the Jews is secular, or at least not of the anti-Christ of Christian New Testament dogma, and does not constitute the fulfilment of Christian prophecies of the emergence of the Jewish, in the Israelitish sense, anti-Christ. "Judenfrei" is a neo-Zionist front trying to foment discord and confusion among those opposed to Jewry, and attempting to attack legitimate work done to oppose World Jewry with "Judenfrei's" bogus and misleading arguments.
Take note of the fact that "Ognir" promotes "Judenfrei". Funny how these people use childish pseudonyms. Reminds one of the crypto-Jews who adopt Muslim names, does it not?