Tuesday, September 08, 2009

On Bogus and Subversive Jewish Apologetics Referring to the "Synagogue of Satan" and the Khazarian Origins of the Ashkenazim

Christopher Jon Bjerknes



Jewish apologists often tout the Torah as if it were a beautiful and humane religious work, when it clearly is not, instead placing full blame on the Talmud as if the first source of the known horrors of Judaism; and they often attempt to convince us that modern Jews are descendants of the Khazars, and therefore not the Jews of the Bible, specifically not the Jews who murdered Jesus Christ and are therefore not to blame for Christ's murder. Both of these lies originate in Karaite Jewish sources, who attempted to subvert the Czars of Russia and trick them into believing that there were good Jews they could trust, the Jews of the Crimea.

Relying upon well known passages in the Old Testament, which state that only the Jewish god makes Jewish law, and that no one is entitled to add to that law or subtract from it, the Karaites rejected the Rabbinical claims that the Talmud and Maimonides could add to and subtract from Jewish law. This is similar to the position of the ancient Sadducees who, like Jesus Christ, combated the "Scribes and Pharisees" whose traditions adding to and subtracting from the law became the Talmud based upon the mythology of the "Oral Law of Moses".

The Torah states in Deuteronomy 4:1-2 that the Jewish god forbids additions to, or subtractions from the law:

"1 Now therefore hearken, O Israel, unto the statutes and unto the judgments, which I teach you, for to do them, that ye may live, and go in and possess the land which the LORD God of your fathers giveth you. 2 Ye shall not add unto the word which I command you, neither shall ye diminish ought from it, that ye may keep the commandments of the LORD your God which I command you."

Maimonides was at first rejected for such attempts to broaden the law. Joshua stated that all that Moses had known had been written down and could be read, thereby excluding the possibility of the authenticity of the "Oral Law" which forms the basis of the Talmud and much of the Cabalah. Joshua 8:34-35:

"34 And afterward he read all the words of the law, the blessings and cursings, according to all that is written in the book of the law. 35 There was not a word of all that Moses commanded, which Joshua read not before all the congregation of Israel, with the women, and the little ones, and the strangers that were conversant among them."

Far from being a trustworthy Jew, notorius forger and fabricator, the Karaite Jew Avraham Firkovich traveled the World collecting and fabricating Jewish writings and artifacts, which he used to convince the Czar that Karaite Jews were the good Jews and could be trusted because they rejected the Talmud and because they descended from Khazarians and were not descended from the Jews who murdered Jesus Christ, and therefore were not cursed to wear Christ's blood (Matthew 27:25). Modern agents of the Jews, posing as if "anti-Semites" repeat Avraham Firkovich's dogma both to excuse the Ashkenazim for deicide, and to confuse and render pointless opposition to World Jewry, and further to apologize for the ancient Jews in order to keep Christians on the Jewish hook.

The Czars paid with their lives for allowing these Jews to influence Russian life. We today suffer from the arguments over semantics which Firkovich's spiritual descendants deliberately introduce in order to subvert the organization and empowerment of those who would defend themselves from Jewry. It is beyond dispute that their dogma comes from the subversive and deceitful Jewish liar Avraham Firkovich.

Firkovich also railed against the Talmud so as to excuse the horrific Old Testament and so as to ingratiate himself to the Gentiles. Shabbataian successor Jacob Frank had done exactly the same thing to the Roman Catholic Church, causing his fellow Jews much grief, but ultimately and in a short time infiltrating and subverting both the Catholic Church and Polish aristocracy thereby breaking apart and destroying the once great Polish Empire. The Slavs paid dearly for believing in Jews who promoted a "True Torah" system and complained about the Talmud.

The same Jewish apologists who seek to confuse the issue of the Jewish attack on humanity by provoking us to debate semantics also falsely claim that Jesus Christ (John of Patmos, see: Revelation 1:9) was referring to Khazarian Jews when he stated in Revelation 2:9:

"I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan."

and Revelation 3:9:

"Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee."

The Khazarian Kingdom did not yet exist when John of Patmos wrote down those words. Therefore, the phrase "synagogue of Satan" could not possibly have referred to the Khazarian conversion to Judaism promoted by the Karaite Jew Avraham Firkovich as if an excuse to trust his faction of Jewry.

Though the possibility that John of Patmos was referring to Khazarian Jews can be absolutely excluded, his true intentions are a matter upon which much disagreement can logically and legitimately take place. There were many divisions in Judaism in Christ's time, including the struggles between the Sadducees and the Pharisees, and even among Hillel and Shammai Pharisees which spilled over into the Talmud. There were also the Essenes and others. Christ opposed the Sadducees who opposed his "blasphemous" proclamations. Christ also opposed the Pharisees who sought to add to, and subtract from the law with their traditions that became the Talmud, which, as shown above, was a violation of the Torah and precluded by the accounts of Joshua. Therefore, it is likely that John of Patmos was referring to either the Scribes and Pharisees, whom Jesus condemned and against whose modification of the law he spoke, in among other places, Matthew 5:17-20:

"17 Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil. 18 For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled. 19 Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven. 20 For I say unto you, That except your righteousness shall exceed the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees, ye shall in no case enter into the kingdom of heaven."

Or, John of Patmos was referring to the Sadducees who condemned Jesus to death, or perhaps both power centers.

The Jewish apologists of today, who seek to infiltrate and subvert anti-Jewish movements, spread the same lies as their predecessors and are leading you down the path not to the garden, but to the graveyard where the Poles and Russian lie buried in those same lies and heaps of dung. The Torah is even worse than the Talmud. The Jews of old acted exactly like the Jews of today. The Ashkenazim are the spiritual descendants of the terrible Judeans, which makes them infinitely worse than the genetic descendants of the Judeans who are dispersed around the World and most of whom know nothing of their partial Jewish descent.