Monday, July 06, 2009

An Addendum to "An Additional Response to 'Judenfrei'"

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

http://www.jewishracism.com

http://www.jewishracism.blogspot.com

In considering why my statements were misunderstood by "Judenfrei", I believe that the word "taxpayer" caused the confusion. I had said,

"Gottfried Feder, for but one example, focused on the real economic necessities of building a viable economy, as opposed to Carmack's proposals, which appear only to profit the rich at the expense of the taxpayer. Paying off the debt to the debt holders without recouping what has been deliberately stolen denies the taxpayers loan capital and real assets with which to build and maintain the economy, and thereby comes at their expense. If the government gives Peter trillions of dollars, and leaves Paul with nothing, than Paul has been shortchanged by his government. In addition, Paul is expected to fight, or provide children to fight, to protect Peter and the land and holdings Peter has. This comes at Paul's expense."

"Judenfrei" correctly noted that the monies used to make the rich richer would not be derived through taxes, but I did not mean to imply that they would. Rather, I was stating that the use of newly created money to make the rich richer came at the expense of the taxpayers who have been paying into the system all of their lives. "Judenfrei" has agreed that Carmack's proposal does not attempt to recover anything from the Jews generally, or the Jewish financiers specifically.

The national debt (and to a large extent personal debt) exists because of the Jews. Taxpayers have been paying the debt all of their lives. The Jews should not continue to profit from the debt. The taxpayers, and by this I refer to those who are not super rich, should be the first to receive cash. However simply doling out cash without fixing the underlying problems of our economy will only generate inflation and profit our foreign competitors. I do not see Carmack's proposal fixing any of these problems, and therefore it is a program to make the rich richer at the expense of the taxpayer and it leaves the Jews in control of money as masters of the banks, loan capital and international finance.

There are many reasons why the existence and direction of loan capital are so vital to our survival. One of them is that it is largely loan capital which finances growth, keeps business running, finances housing, finances State projects, etc. If the State merely prints money and hands it out without regulating both the supply, through taxes and/or other means, and the direction, then there will be powerful inflationary pressures on the value of the currency. Cashing out the debt will not of necessity put all of that money into the banks and out of circulation, and there will be massive inflation if such a plan is implemented. Even if it did, it would be foolish to allow the bankers to continue to control our destiny through the control of our money.

My proposals, which call for Autarky, regulate both the supply and direction of money generally, and loan capital specifically. If you can read German, I suggest you read Gottfried Feder's works.

We should not be paying off the national debt. The Jews who created the national debt should be paying it off. The value of money is a factor of its supply and acceptence. There is a loss to its value when it is given to the rich and not more evenly and equitably distributed, and that price is paid by the average citizen, even if taxes are eliminated. Even if there were deflation, that cost would still be a factor in the value of the currency and it would be even "stronger", all other things being equal, if monies were not created to give to the rich.

Putting money into sustainable economic growth benefits the People, though giving it to the rich harms and disadvantages the People.

Sunday, July 05, 2009

An Additional Response to "Judenfrei"

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

http://www.jewishracism.com

http://www.jewishracism.blogspot.com

"Judenfrei" proposes that,

"We didn’t mention 'deliberate sabotage.' We said it was a bad idea. [A reference to my online Einstein book] Yes, Hufschmid could not taint Bjerknes except in the eyes of the weak of mind: if Eric makes plenty of good arguments and exercises a rare bad judgment then it doesn't undermine his credibility, and no reasonable person would assume that if Danner is a liar then Bjerknes, interviewed by Eric, must be too. Again, we’re not contradicting ourselves."

Though "Judenfrei" considers my voluminous text on Einstein and related issues a "bad idea", my book has in fact changed the entire study of Einstein, as well as Zionism and the Holocaust, on a universal, international basis. That "bad idea" has in fact done great good.

Eric Hufschmid does not make "plenty of good arguments" nor does he only rarely exercise "bad judgment". He has in fact thoroughly discredited himself, and constantly whines that everyone ignores him. If I were to associate with Hufschmid after he had discredited himself by promoting an obvious hoax, then many reasonable people would tend to reject my work on that basis alone, especially since Hufschmid has so small an audience as for there to be no rational justification for associating with him merely to reach his audience. Jeff Rense promotes many things that I find to be obvious hoaxes, but he reaches a vast audience, so what he is doing has a positive impact, though it also casts doubt on the legitimate work he does in the minds of many reasonable people. There's the rub. Would it be better for him to risk losing his vast audience and stick only to hard fact, or is it better that he maintain his broad appeal and vast audience and supply them with solid information together with what I consider entertainment. This is not an easy issue for me, I assure you. Hufschmid is thoroughly discredited and to associate with him would only spell disaster with no redeeming gains.

Whether or not someone has an abnormally weak mind, the human mind thinks in terms of images and symbols and associations. This fact, which has powerful beneficial effects, can be exploited as a weakness in all human beings. In fact, Neuro-linguistic programming is generally thought to be most effective on people of above average intelligence. When a person associates with a known hoaxster, that is reasonable evidence that said person cannot be taken seriously. Such evidence can be outweighed by other facts, but it is an uphill climb, for the person has already evinced poor judgement in associating with a known hoaxster.

"Judenfrei" asserts that the Sam Danner incident was a "minor issue". This assertion is made in the context of the Holocaust, and in that sense is legitimate, but not in the sense of the conclusions we should draw about Eric Hufschmid and his colleagues over the years. If memory serves me correctly, this came on the heels of his interview with me, which would have directly impacted upon my credibility if I had let it, as I have already explained. Much more importantly, if memory serves me correctly, this came at the time when Israel had attacked Lebanon and the court of public opinion was against Israel. The Sam Danner hoax served as a terrible distraction at that time when we could have made far greater strides discrediting Israel and exposing their atrocities committed against the Lebanese. The Sam Danner hoax was an obvious hoax and the fact that Hufschmid, Piper and Bollyn were promoting it had a disastrous effect on the momentum we were gaining in exposing Jewish crimes against the human race. It was, therefore, no minor issue.

"Judenfrei" yet again speaks in contradictions when asserting without proof that I promote the "Holocaust hoax". "Judenfrei" knows, as proven by its own statements, that my view is that the Nazis were working in the interests of the Zionists to terrorize Jews and transplant them to Palestine. That is not the "Holocaust narrative" as defined by "Judenfrei" and does not in any way profit Jewry, but rather brings terrible shame on the Jews, while in part exonerating the Germans. "Judenfrei" knowing my beliefs misconstrues my statements about the death of European Jewry which demise is a fact he has not attempted to refute. The "Holocaust hoax" is the unproven assertion that six million Jews were systematically gassed in Nazi death camps. I have not espoused that view. Rather I have pointed out that the claims made by Jews of selective murder, and the survival of only the fittest Jews, would have a eugenic effect and are congruous with the documented Zionist Jews' statements that they only wanted a relatively small number of Jews to survive the war, and then only those who would be fit to contribute to the Zionist cause. To be clear, I have published two books on Einstein which do not address Einstein's racism, the other being Anticipations of Einstein in the General Theory of Relativity which has itself universally and internationally changed the debate regarding Einstein's avowed creation of the general theory of relativity.

"Judenfrei" states, "After World War II, millions of Jews eventually moved to Israel, voluntarily." This statement disregards the horrors to which Jews were subjected in Europe, horrors which were designed, financed, led and enacted by Jews. Stating these facts does not help Jewry. It discredits the official "Holocaust narative" and reveals the vile nature of World Jewry.

I note that "Judenfrei" claims that Christopher Bollyn has been kidnaped, which is an unproven and frankly preposterous claim.

"Judenfrei" misunderstands what I mean when I say I haven't specialized in 9/11 research. For me to assert myself as an authority on 9/11 would require that I engage in intensive novel research and contact credible persons on the issues involved. I have seen the video to which "Judenfrei" has referred me. To add to that body of work would require novel research and tremendous effort. I may make that effort, but have not done so yet nor do I have any immediate plans to do so. I agree with "Judenfrei" that 9/11 has the potential to awaken the masses, but so do many other things, things in which I have done intensive research including my intensive research into the Jewish origins of the Nazis. I think far more attention should be paid to Barack Obama and his ties to Jewry than is being paid, with a focus on his rise to fame, which I have partly documented from a novel and demonstrably factual basis. It is not my duty to do everything nor should I be criticized for not doing everything. I have done far more than you or anyone else you can name and for you to cast aspersions on my character and my motives for not covering 9/11 is ridiculous on its face.

"Judenfrei" states that, "The central issue driving Christian Zionism isn’t the Khazarian issue, but the belief that Jews are the Israelites to whom the holy land was promised. Jewish money and Jewish corruption of organized Christianity have gone toward promoting this belief. It’s this flawed belief then needs to be demolished." I disagree. The Israelites, in Christian doctrine uncorrupted by Jews, were dispersed for disobedience to the Jewish god. They have no claim to the Holy Land because they violated the covenant made with Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and Moses. Jewish law has been fulfilled and the Temple destroyed. Christ is a new covenant. Only a remnant among the tribes is to be restored at the second coming of Christ, in Christian dogma, so your points are false and moot to authentic Christians, and only sponsor Christian Zionist beliefs that Israelites (whom they are convinced are modern Jews, but which group never existed) are entitled to steal Palestine from the natives, in that it reinforces the false claim of the fabricated Torah that any people ever have had the right to genocide the indigenous populations of Palestine. No populace has ever had the right to exterminate the native populations of Palestine or steal their land. Introducing the Khazarian issue would only confuse a powerful presentation to Christians that no one has the right to steal the land of Palestine, that Jews were feared and reviled by Christ and Christians, slew Christ, and hate and want to decapitate Christians today. I will not weaken that powerful presentation with obscure issues, parsing words, or introducing new concepts to an uninformed audience. Again, thanks, but no thanks for your advice.

"Judenfrei" ignores my clarifications as to what is meant by Jesus and Mary being of the Tribe of Judah and I do not intend to ride that unmerry-go-round again.

"Judenfrei" must distinguish what "Judenfrei" is willing to do, and what the World community will be willing to do when led by a political party that informs the World about the truth of the Jewish war on the human race. If the World is willing to form Herzl's World Ghetto, then I think the World will be more than willing and eager to implement more effective and permanent solutions such as those I propose. The impracticality and uncertainty of the solution "Judenfrei" advocates indicate that it is a bait and switch scam meant to fulfill the Zionists' stated desire to use "anti-Semitism" to force Jews to live in Israel. I suspect this is why "Judenfrei" mischaracterizes my stance on the "Holocaust" given that I have exposed the Nazis as working for the same Zionist interests for which "Judenfrei" is obviously working.

There is nothing extreme about defending ones self and the human race from an openly aggressively attack meant to destroy the human race. What would be extreme is to acknowledge this attack and then subvert authentic efforts to counter it by unifying the Jewish People and preserving them for future generations if any there are.

Once again, "Judenfrei" has offered not one scintilla of proof that the banks will have the means to abide by Federal requirements for 100% reserves for the loans which are already outstanding, let alone to write new loans. The American People are deeply in debt, which will soon consume their meager savings, those who have any, that is. American business is failing. Where are the deposits going to come from to create the 100% reserves for the loans which banks must make? Where is the loan capital going to come from, and how are we to direct it so that it does not result in a bubble, nor sail overseas, but instead creates a sustainable economy in America, which at this time does not exist? I still await answers to these questions. Without loan capital directed to investments which create a sustainable economy, we are doomed. Giving the power back to the Jewish controlled banks to regulate loan capital with no intervention from the society or State guarantees that the Jews will remain the masters of the money markets. I think "Judenfrei" fails to understand how an economy functions and does not represent the views nor level of sophistication of Carmack. Money created out of nothing can find its way straight into the pockets of the wealthy, or can find its way into the pockets of a growing middle class and a rising poor, and into the capitalization of projects which build a sustainable economy. Giving the rich money deprives the general taxpayer of that money and puts him at a greater disadvantage to the rich against whom he must compete. I would have thought that would have been easily understood, and rather than try to argue against what I have not said, I suggest "Judenfrei" ask questions so that I can determine where it is that our communications are failing and try to more effectively explain myself to "Judenfrei". If at that point "Judenfrei" wishes to raise objections, then that would be the appropriate time to do so, but I first ask that what I am saying be understood.

How will your proposal guarantee that the money going to the rich will end up as bank reserves, that those reserves will be anywhere near sufficient to meet our national demands, that 100% reserves will offer a viable profit motive, and that the same old Jewish bankers will not remain in control of this loan capital, and thereby the economy of the World? Do you propose we first export the Jews, or first implement Carmack's proposal? If you maintain the banks as masters of loan capital, you maintain the Jews as masters of the economy. If that point eludes you, I will have to take several steps backwards to explain this matter to you, which might not be an unprofitable exercise.

I am not certain whether "Judenfrei's" assertions regarding the valuation of government debt that Carmack wants to close out within one year represent the proposals of Carmack. I think it would be better to receive a response from Carmack as I suspect "Judenfrei" does not understand his proposal and does not speak for it in a way that accurately depicts it. So at this juncture, I will severe the discussion on that point so as not to be unjust to Carmack.

Another Disingenuous Response From "Ognir" of the Disinformation Underground

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

http://www.jewishracism.com

http://www.jewishracism.blogspot.com

"Ognir" of the Disinformation Underground has again exhibited his bad faith by misrepresenting what I have said, what I have offered, and what has otherwise occurred. "Ognir" writes:

"Disinfomation Underground, I suppose was the best he could come up with"

"Ognir's" response is childish and trite, typical of his juvenile personality. He depends upon emotion to distract from the fact that I have raised substantive issues with him which he has failed to address, instead acting like the overaged punk that he is.

"Listen I was nice in my first answer, however you can go and shite

I have very little free time on my hands unlike some."

In fact, "Ognir" was deceptive and deceitful in his answer and failed to meet the conditions which I had set to engage him in the discourse which he, not I, sought. "Ognir", as is typical for him, evaded addressing any of the substantive issues I have raised, but instead wasted my time with his hysterical emotional responses which are devoid of substantive meaning.

"He said he'd do an audio and show me where I am/was going wrong and kick my punk ass or some other of his usual [vulgarity deleted]."

I have already shown where he has gone wrong and given him the rope with which to hang himself. "Ognir" demonstrates in his own words that he is a punk unable to address substantive issues in a substantive fashion. Though he is too stupid and too disingenuous to admit it, I have already "kick[ed his] punk ass", and believe me, it was very easy to do. I needed to only accuse him of something and wait for him to make false and misleading statements and avoid the relevant issues, while instead issuing forth smears and falsehoods. Indeed, it was easy to show him up for what he is and for what he is not. I needed only give him the opportunity to prove me right with his own actions and words.

As is his habit, "Ognir" grossly misrepresents what I have said, which is,

"

Tuesday, June 30, 2009

An Irish Clone of Daryl Bradford Smith

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

http://www.jewishracism.com

http://www.jewishracism.blogspot.com

There is an Irish clone of Daryl Bradford Smith who pretends to be an informed opponent of "Zionism", but who parrots the same garbage as Daryl Bradford Smith, that Zionism has nothing to do with religion, especially not Judaism, nor Jews as a people. Like Smith, this clown contradicts himself by criticizing the highly religious Christian Zionists, and the highest dogma of Judaism, the Talmud; as well as criticizing the Jewish State of Israel which contains some 1/3 of World Jewry, and which is supported by the vast majority of diaspora Jewry.

I am reminded of the thorough infiltration of Ireland by British Intelligence, such as is documented in this article:

Roy the Rat — driver for Gerry Adams, spy for MI5

The Irish have always been handicapped by agents working for British intelligence. Intelligence operatives often engage in smear campaigns, often involving degenerate images and lies. People who sincerely oppose World Jewry face these attacks.

This Daryl Bradford Smith clone tells us nothing new. Instead, like Smith and Hufschmid, he whines about Alex Jones ad nauseam as if that ceaseless mantra is a solution to the Jewish Question. Smith told me he had never read the Bible and never would. I suspect his clone knows next to nothing about Judaism, as well. So on what basis do these ignoramuses conclude that Judaism has nothing to do Zionism? Have they never heard of Abraham, or Moses, or Joshua? Why do they suppose the Jews want to take Palestine and build a temple on the site of the Dome of the Rock?

This clown wrote to me back in May of 2008 requesting an interview. I looked into the interviews he was doing and concluded that he was a new Smith. I warned you about Ron Paul. I warned you about Smith. I warned you about the Timothy McVeigh Team. I am steering clear of this Irish clone of Smith. He contributes no new research. He is painfully ignorant and uninsightful in the topics he pretends to address. He is a smearmonger and a hypocrite. I ignored him before, and am glad I trusted my insticts.

The clown is again soliciting an interview from me. He likes to draw attention to himself. If he agrees, I will interview him on my terms, and delve into the reasons for his parroted delusions of the nature of the Jewish Problem. But first he must demonstrate a measure of good faith and demand that his friend "Muahmmad Rafeeq" tell us his, this "Muhammad's", birth name and the birth names of his grandparents. I also want him to ask "Muhammad" how he came to know such Cabalistic secrets as the process for transmutating the soul of Shabbatai Zevi into the person of a Rothschild, as "Muhammad" has claimed to know.

As is my nature, I will be fair to this snake, who is so unfair to me. Let him explain himself and attempt to justify his parroted Smith routine. I note that Smith and his fellow clown run off lists of names and events, or babble off the same attacks on Jones, or excuses for World Jewry, as if such a recitation constitutes some sort of insight. Such drivel I will not permit. I want to find out what our Irish friend thinks he knows and show him where he is wrong. Then we will discover if he can stop acting like an overage punk and at least try to conduct himself as a decent man, though I do not hold out much hope for that."

"Ognir" has failed to honor the conditions I have set for obliging his desire to speak to me. He has not only failed to act in good faith, he has presented false and misleading accounts of what I have said and has failed to address my substantive complaints against him and his colleagues. He has instead waved his hands without stating anything of value or substance, and shown that he is a childish clown who cannot act in a serious fashion. "Ognir" knows that he has not met the conditions I have set and therefore has backed down from my offer, but he feels obliged to disingenuously fabricate a false history of events to excuse himself and accuse me with falsehoods, which is very childish behavior on his part. He has also failed to retract his previous false statements, which provides yet another instance of his failure to act in good faith, which was one of my requirements.

"Deal with your Ego ya gobshite"

More meaningless emotional smearmongering from "Ognir", which only serves to prove that I was correct in my assessment of his character.

"Put up or shut up"

I have put up, I put up stage and you acted the childish clown on it, instead of seizing the opportunity to refute anything that I have said. You backed out of my offer, "Ognir". You also violated the conditions which I set for acting in good faith. It is you who desire to speak to me, not I who desire to speak to you. I have already long ago disproved your parroted nonsense from Daryl Bradford Smith. You have proven that you are unable to refute what I have said. You have shown yourself for what you are, a disinformation clown. Is that why you beg me to become silent? Keep dreaming, smearmongering, hand waving, disingenuous "Ognir".

Saturday, July 04, 2009

Cynthia McKinney's Credibility Under Attack

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

http://www.jewishracism.com

http://www.jewishracism.blogspot.com

Daryl Bradford Smith's website iamthewitness.com is presently as of this writing linking to two articles which attack Cynthia McKinney's credibility. I again urge someone who knows McKinney to inform her of these facts. These links appear as:

GENUINE OPPOSITION CAMPAIGN UPDATE

which states, among other things,

"Any intelligent reading of the situation will reveal that the Palestinians are, in actuality, worse off than they were before. Because, while the 'alternative' media focused attention on McKinney's standoff with the Israeli navy, the Israeli government announced the largest seizure of Palestinian land in more than 40 years -- a development of far, far greater consequence to the Palestinian people than whether or not a small consignment of humanitarian aid got into Gaza.

Cynthia, though, made out just fine: although she failed in her mission to Gaza, she has reaped considerable 'street cred,' or popular credibility, within the growing anti-Zionist movement -- without once publicly conceding any of the movement's core grievances. [***] The 'Free Gaza' campaign is theatre."

iamthewitness.com is also presently linking to the following website as of this writing:

GENUINE OPPOSITION: CAMPAIGN UPDATE 2

which states, among other things,

"The Cynthia McKinney-led 'Free Gaza' campaign was meant to direct our resources in support of a side-issue, while the real threats -- Zionist infiltration of national governments and Israeli false-flag terrorism, among others -- go unmentioned.

For us, that just won't fly. Not this time.

As for those accusing us of being Zionist saboteurs intent on distracting attention away from the 'Free Gaza' affair, I say this: . . ."

In Rejoinder to "Judenfrei"

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

http://www.jewishracism.com

http://www.jewishracism.blogspot.com

"Judenfrei" again opens its attack on me with contradictory claims. On the one hand, "Judenfrei" argues that I have deliberately sabotaged my own book The Manufacture and Sale of Saint Einstein with valid arguments that Einstein was a racist and that Jews have always been a racist people; while on the other hand, "Judenfrei" declares that it espouses the views of Eric Hufschmid because they are supposedly legitimate and cares not what anyone thinks of that; and "Judenfrei" declares that Hufschmid could not taint my work by immediately promoting a bogus story on the heels of interviewing me about my book. I, in contradiction to "Judenfrei", am consistent. I tell the full truth about Einstein and am prepared and fully able to defend that truth. Unlike Eric Hufschmid, I have not promoted a hoax. My book on Einstein has been downloaded by hundreds of thousands of readers and received vast attention across the internet. "Judenfrei's" contention that I have somehow made a mistake by presenting a thorough and scholarly account of Einstein's plagiarism and his racism is thereby proven false. In addition, "Judenfrei" discounts the fact that I have published two books and various articles on Einstein's plagiarism, which do not address his racism. Was this also a supposed "trick"?

In respect to the Holocaust, "Judenfrei" has failed to quote where I have stated that the "Holocaust narrative" as defined by "Judenfrei" is true. Instead, "Judenfrei" agrees with what I have said in that "Judenfrei" agrees that European Jewry has been displaced.

Rather than argue with "Judenfrei" over the issue of 9/11 and its importance to exposing the crimes of World Jewry, I welcome the opportunity to discuss the facts regarding the Jewish involvement in 9/11 with someone who has proven themselves knowledgeable and credible on the issue and in general. I in no way seek to cover up the facts regarding the Jewish involvement in 9/11 or the crime in general. I have not addressed it in detail because I have not specialized in this area and do not wish to be associated with the nonsense of Hufschmid, Smith and Jones. I do agree that the facts should be broadly known to all and I agree to facilitate the exposure of these facts by credible means. If "Judenfrei" can facilitate such an opportunity, I would be grateful.

Contrary to "Judenfrei's" contentions, the central issue driving Christian Zionism is Jewish money and the Jewish corruption of Christianity, not the issue of the Khazarian origin of Ostjuden. The Khazarian Jews never had any legitimate claims on Palestine, but nor did or do the Berber or Arab Jews, nor did the Babylonian "Israelites" ever exist, nor did the Babylonian Judeans, by their own admissions, have any claim on the lands in which they were, by their own accounts, "strangers". Giving primary or even secondary importance to the Khazarian question is misrepresentation by omission of the Berber, Arab and Babylonian question, which hold no appeal to Christian Zionist who hold the Jewish Torah to be the written word of their Jewish god. However, quoting that god in the form of Jesus, and quoting the Jews on their hatred of Jesus has been a proven means of shaking Christian support for Jews who would and have subverted Christianity. "Judenfrei" fails to provide any examples where its approach has proven successful, let alone more successful than mine.

"Judenfrei" has understandably misunderstood what occurred between Hufschmid, Smith and me. Smith was booted off of GCN, for, by his accounts, my having raised the issue of Chabad Lubavitch on his show. I suspect it had more to do with his critiques of Alex Jones, but this is unimportant. I suggested to Smith that we start a network including him and Hufschmid, and that the shows we presented be distinct. In this way, should one of us be discredited, the others would not be a part of that specific show. In this way, undiluted points of view could be presented and a broader audience could have been reached. Smith and Hufschmid have misrepresented this fact as if I were trying to drive a wedge between Hufschmid and Smith, when in fact I was trying to create a network to compete with GCN and RBN. Smith wanted to make a certain "Nina" a part of this network and tried to interest me in her, but I found her of no interest. I did indeed first warn Hufschmid that the Sam Danner story was not credible and I then warned Smith that those who aligned themselves with this story would be discredited. "Judenfrei" wonders why someone would be discredited for promoting Sam Danner's story, and for having been interviewed by someone who promoted Sam Danner's story, but "Judenfrei" need only look to the arguments of Hufschmid himself for an answer.

"Judenfrei" fails to understand the natural defenses normal human beings have against the Jews. The stereotypical Jewish phenotype is repulsive to Northern Europeans, who depicted such persons as devils throughout the history of European art. The Christians have always viewed Jews as guilty of deicide. Europeans have always waged campaigns against the aggressive Jews, and until very recently kept the Jews locked away in Ghettoes. There is no sympathy for the Jew, other than in the mad eyes of deluded Christian Zionists, and Rev. Hagee has brought an end to much of that support. The World hates the Jews and always has, because the Jews have always hated the Goyim. The Zionist[s] at "Judenfrei" parrot the same dogma as the Zionists of old, that Jews can be cured of their mental diseases by segregation and nationhood. Just like their Zionist predecessors, "Judenfrei" advocate the segregation and nationhood of the Jews, which has already proven disastrous in the modern world. The Zionists of old lied to us and claimed that the Jews would be cured of their mental disease should a Jewish State be formed somewhere, anywhere. "Judenfrei" repeats this proven false contention. The Jews of Israel are even sicker and more perverted than their predecessors in Europe, America and Asia. "Judenfrei" promotes disproven Zionist theories, while criticizing me for proposing effective solutions. Other than from Zionist "Judenfrei" I am not aware of any criticism of my proposals. "Judenfrei's" arguments echo Herzl's arguments.

"Judenfrei" claims that my proposals mirror the Jewish doctrine of exterminating the human race. "Judenfrei" does not offer any evidence to support such a false claim. Rather, unlike the Jewish aggressor, I propose we solve the issue of Jewish aggression once and for all times. There is no equivalence between the defense from aggressive attack and that aggressive attack. There is no equivalence between the promotion of noble human cultures and people, and the promotion of subversive and perverse Jewish culture and people.

My questions are not answered in the "Monetary Reform Act" promoted by "Judenfrei", though "Judenfrei" claims they have been. Nor have I yet asked all of my questions. Does this reform act propose that the debts of the US be paid in full on a full term basis or prorated, or without any interest at all? Will a bond holder redeem his bonds at full value within one year from the passage of the act, or at a prorated rate, or simply recover his initial investment? I still await proof of any kind that Americans will deposit enough money in banks to cover the 100% deposit requirement made by the act for existing loans, let alone enough to cover the needed loan capital to sustain and grow our economy. "Judenfrei" may be oblivious to these flaws and omissions, but I am not.

Simply producing currency does not create growth. It instead creates inflation, there being more dollars chasing the same goods and services. Loan capital is a very different animal from money supply, though there can be not sufficient loan capital without sufficient money supply in one currency or another, and/or fractional reserve banking. This is why I fault the Utopian proposals which "Judenfrei" advocates. There needs to be addressed how loan capital will be provided and directed at growing the middle class and the economy. Gottfried Feder, for but one example, focused on the real economic necessities of building a viable economy, as opposed to Carmack's proposals, which appear only to profit the rich at the expense of the taxpayer. Paying off the debt to the debt holders without recouping what has been deliberately stolen denies the taxpayers loan capital and real assets with which to build and maintain the economy, and thereby comes at their expense. If the government gives Peter trillions of dollars, and leaves Paul with nothing, than Paul has been shortchanged by his government. In addition, Paul is expected to fight, or provide children to fight, to protect Peter and the land and holdings Peter has. This comes at Paul's expense.

I still await straightforward answers to my questions. I intend to show the inflationary pressures of closing out the debt in the course of one year, while demanding 100% backing to loans in bank reserves. I intend to show that this will give the Jews absolute control over the money markets and the supply of loan capital and afford them the opportunity to ruin America as America has never been destroyed in the past.

On the Disingenuous Responses From "Ognir" of the Disinformation Underground

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

http://www.jewishracism.com

http://www.jewishracism.blogspot.com

I requested a show of good faith from Daryl Bradford Smith's parrot, who calls himself "Ognir". Instead, I received disingenuous denials and false accusations from "Ognir":

An Irish Clone of Daryl Bradford Smith

The overaged punk in effect denies that he has been unfair to me, and states, " I'd love him to post a link where I was unfair to him." This "Ognir" evidently does not consider it unfair or indecent of him to openly and immediately condone and applaud a lewd smear made against me on his unfair thread "Christopher Jon Bjerknes - Zionist Shill?" This "Ognir" evidently does not find it unfair to address the fact that I have complained about his actions and statements, and more importantly those of Daryl Bradford Smith and Muhammad Rafeeq, actions which discredit Cynthia McKinney, among many other detrimental effects; but does not address the substance of my complaints or in any way attempt to refute them, but instead appeals to emotion and declares me "angry" and has even hypocritically and angrily cursed me with vulgarity. Why is not "Ognir" insistent that my complaints be addressed? His silence speaks volumes and is itself unfair.

"Ognir" grossly misrepresents what I have stated, and claims in the thread at the Disinformation Underground An Irish Clone of Daryl Bradford Smith:

"Why is he always bitching about Jews, he seems to HATE ALL OF THEM
yet with this clear violation of International law by this shithole of a country
he says nothing, nothing about the illegal way that the 21 are being held
without access to lawyers"

and:

"You would think that CJB is also pushing the idea that the Jews arrested McKinney because she did a few interviews with us, yet again ignoring the people of Gaza and their urgent needs."

"Ognir" clearly has no regard for the truth, and instead tries to discredit me with falsehoods. I never stated nor did I ever even remotely imply that the Jews arrested Cynthia McKinney because she did interviews with Daryl Bradford Smith or "Ognir". "Ognir" will not be able to provide a single honest quotation from me to substantiate his falsehoods. "Ognir" also tells untruths when he claimed on 4 July 2009 that I have ignored the illegality of the Israeli attack on the Palestinians or their plight. Contrary to the falsehoods of "Ognir", I wrote on this blog:

Thursday, July 02, 2009

Qui veut noyer son chien l'accuse de rage

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

http://www.jewishracism.com

http://www.jewishracism.blogspot.com

Max Nordau stated at the First Zionist Conference in 1897:

"'If you have to drown a dog,' says the proverb, 'you must first declare him to be mad.'"

Jews often accuse their accuser in an effort to avoid the accusation. Note the Israeli spin in the following news reports:

UN expert says Israeli seizure of aid ship a crime

Activists to break Gaza blockade

The Israelis attempt to change the subject of their illegal aggression against the aid ship carrying Cynthia McKinney, to an attack on the motives of its mission. In order to justify drowning the humanitarian mission, the Jews call it mad.

The Jews claim the motivation of the aid shipment was not humanitarian, but rather public relations, as if those two concerns were mutually exclusive. They are not. It is logically consistent for an aid mission to be both the transport of humanitarian aid and a public relations effort to raise international awareness of the plight of a suffering people, which public relations effort is in itself is an humanitarian effort meant to bring relief to a victimized people.

Israelis often defame the Palestinians and try to blame them for what the Israelis are doing to the Palestinians, and the Israelis often deny the suffering they are willfully inflicting on the Palestinians, which unjustly harms the image of the Palestinians in the court of public opinion. To counter Israeli propaganda by drawing attention to the plight of the Palestinians at the hands of the Israelis is in itself an humanitarian effort meant to bring aid and relief to the suffering Palestinians.

It is the Israelis who have brought this story to the headlines by illegally capturing a prominent American who served in the Congress of the United States. I hope that the public relations campaign to expose the plight of the Palestinians is quite successful, as successful as it is just and necessary. The Israelis are helping it along!

Note that the Israelis instinctively believe that a public relations campaign must have a sinister purpose. Why is that?

Prior to that, I wrote on 1 July 2009:

"

Wednesday, July 01, 2009

As I Predicted, Cynthia McKinney's Name Made Mud Due to Her Associations With Daryl Bradford Smith, and His Clone, "Ognir"

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

http://www.jewishracism.com

http://www.jewishracism.blogspot.com

Once again, I really, really, really hate to say I told you so, because Cynthia McKinney deserves better in spite of her lapse in judgement, but as I predicted Cynthia McKinney is being put through the meat grinder for associating with Daryl Bradford Smith and "Ognir":

McKinney Arrested By Israel, Appears on Hate Radio

McKinney on hate radio again

I wonder if and when CNN will pick up on this story. I heard they have connections with the CIA and sometimes put out stories for them. I know they have covered Smith in the past.

I wonder if the media will pick up on Daryl Bradford Smith & Co.'s Apollo moon landings hoax theories and how the "Zionists" allegedly profitted. Should be very entertaining for those in search of ways to discredit McKinney and change the subject from Israel's illegal attack on her.

I wish you well, courageous and selfless Cynthia. You deserve far better than what fate is doling out to you. I suggest you look into who set you up for this.

"

"Ognir" has a hard time confining himself to the truth. Will "Ognir" retract the falsehoods he has told about my statements, or is he just another Smith? Instead of providing the information I requested from him regarding "Muhammad Rafeeq", "Ognir" whines and complains as he so often does. I made a straightforward and simple request. The fact that "Ognir" desires to avoid these issues, while joining in on rampages against Alex Jones and his wife, demonstrates that "Ognir" is tendencious and not interested in the full truth, including the truth about "Muhammad Rafeeq". Everyone who follows "Ognir" already knows who and what Alex Jones is and represents. Let's find out a bit more about "Muhammad" who made an ass of himself yet again and by way of association and comment also made an ass of "Ognir", who did not object to what was said.

"Ognir" must know that I did not state nor imply that he is to blame for Cynthia McKinney's arrest. He must also know that I have dubbed that arrest "illegal" and condemned it, as well as the Israel oppression of the Palestinians. So why is "Ognir" spreading falsehoods about what I have said, instead of answering my simple and straightforward questions? Why does not "Ognir" address the real accusations I have made against him and Daryl Bradford Smith, and the intermediary who arranged their interviews with Cynthia McKinney? Why has not "Ognir" addressed the fact that he had an irrationally negative response to one of his interviews with McKinney? Why has not "Ognir" addressed the fact that he, together with Daryl Bradford Smith and "Muhammad Rafeeq" made Cynthia look bad by making themselves look bad by addressing old issues regarding accusations that the Apollo moon landing was a hoax? Why does not "Ognir" tell us the name of the intermediary who arranged these interviews with Cynthia McKinney? Why is the Disinformation Underground pushing this Apollo moon landings nonsense, including "Ognir" himself in his unfair attack on me by quoting a letter from Scott Summers on this issue, and also including the intermediary who calls himself "Lord Lindsey"?

"Ognir" pretends that I have not already refuted his nonsensical claims that Zionism has nothing to do with religion or the Jewish People. Let him respond to what I have already said with new facts and arguments, if he is able. Thus far he has only endorsed lewd smears against me, deceitfully misrepresented what I have clearly stated, and backed away from confronting "Muhammad Rafeeq".

"Ognir" is not for real. He is another Smith, and I predict that he will continue to disappoint you at critical times in our fight against World Jewry.

Friday, July 03, 2009

On the Attempt at a Critique of My Work by the Zionist Website "Judenfrei"

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

http://www.jewishracism.com

http://www.jewishracism.blogspot.com

A website which promotes the views of Eric Hufschmid, has attempted to besmirch me and criticize my work. In so doing, the author(s) of the openly personal attack raise a few points worth addressing.

I will start off by demonstrating the Eric Hufschmid style sophistical attacks against me which are meant to raise doubts about me, so that the relevant arguments regarding my work appear to be somehow justified and legitimate, when they are not. On the one hand I am criticized for putting too much into my book The Manufacture and Sale of Saint Einstein, while on the other I am accused of putting too little on my webpage about Christian Zionism. This is one of several obvious contradictions in the attack by my critics which demonstrates that they are out to demonize me with whatever petty attacks they can fabricate from whole cloth, rather than engage in a civil and fair discussion meant to arrive at the truth.

The more a view contradicts the common view, the more the proof that is required to refute the common view. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. Demonstrating that Albert Einstein was a racist Jew and that Jews have always generally been a racist people was, in 2006, an extraordinary claim to make in America, and it required extraordinary proof, which I provided. Instead of thanking me for this tremendous and productive effort which cost me much time and funds, I am instead attacked for making this effort by the Zionists at "Judenfrei". Here again, we see that they are not out to be fair or civil, but instead to try make my virtues and the virtues of my work appear to somehow be weaknesses and flaws. Theirs is a common Jewish tactic. Whereas they should be thanking me and praising me, they are instead attacking me–a clear "tell" as to their motivations. "Judenfrei" misrepresents my views when it states, "He maintains the Holocaust narrative as true!" What is that narrative and where did I state that it is true?

Would "Judenfrei" have me discredit myself by denying the fact that Jews were genocided from Europe, in the sense that a people is dislocated, which is one of the definitions of genocide. Where are the prewar populations of Jews in Europe today? Would "Judenfrei" have me discredit myself by denying that there were concentration camps and discriminatory laws against Jews, or that Jews were rounded up against their will?

"Judenfrei" correctly points out that I do not much address 9/11. I do not wish to be associated with clowns like Eric Hufschmid and Daryl Bradford Smith who dominate that arena, nor do I wish to be associated Alex Jones and his crowd, or the dialectic created between these factions of "Truthers". I do believe that the Jews were behind the attack, and have never criticized anyone for making that claim. Again, instead of thanking me for the monumental and unequalled efforts I have made to expose the crimes of Jewry, Zionist "Judenfrei" searches for reasons to find fault with what I haven't done. If I found a cure for cancer "Judenfrei" would probably claim that I am working against humanity because I didn't cure heart disease. Their attitude reveals their motives.

While attacking me for pointing out how Christian Zionism is a contradiction in terms, again as opposed to thanking me for providing this useful and often copied work, the "Judenfrei" attack proposes that the page is somehow a diversion from other more important issues–more important than proving that Christians cannot be Zionists, issues which are obscure, to say the least, to the average Christian Zionist. Rather than have me quote the Bible which is at hand to the vast the majority of Christian Zionists, and which clearly states that Jesus is of the tribe of Judah through his descent through David making him a Jew by usual definition, rather than make a sound analysis based on readily understood and available concepts and materials, "Judenfrei" claims that I am deceptive because I do not confuse the audience with references to Khazars nor delve into the etymology of the word "Jew". Thanks but no thanks for your unsolicited advice! I prefer to show Christians what their Bible tells them about the Jews, and what the Jews' Talmud and other writings tell the Jews about Christ and Christians. This has a proven record of making Christians look with suspicion upon the Jews, whereas the Khazarian theories and Christian Identity arguments have never proven successful against the Jews.

I have addressed the Khazarian question (and the Berber and Arab origins of modern Jews and Babylonian origins of ancient Jews--where has "judenfrei" ever addressed these? what proof does "Judenfrei" offer that any tribe of Israelite ever existed outside of Jewish mythology meant to justify the theft of Palestine? why does "Judenfrei" push Jewish religious mythology on the Goyim? where are the mytholgical Israelites in the writings of the Egyptians, or for that matter where are the Jews in the writings of the Greek historians prior to or concurrent with the fabrication of the Torah?) in my books, my lectures and my articles, in contradiction to "Judenfrei's" false contentions to the contrary. I guess while searching for something to attack, "Judenfrei" overlooked those inconvenient facts.

"Judenfrei" claims that I tried to sow the seeds of discord between Eric Hufschmid and Daryl Bradford Smith. What I did do is tell Smith I did not want to be a part of his skunk spraying contests, and that I wanted to take an intellectual approach. I suggested to them that Eric do a show of his own, and that Daryl do a show of his own and let each grow their own audience and start a network. "Judenfrei" fails to point out that Hufschmid was at that time criticizing me for attacking Zionism. It was Hufschmid, not I, who thought that it was a mistake to go full bore against the Zionists. I did tell Hufschmid that his association with Sam Danner would discredit him and I also told Smith that it would be a bad idea to be associated with Danner's story. Of course, instead of being thanked for providing this proven sound advice, I am instead attacked for it. When Hufschmid continued down the path toward discrediting himself (note that his Danner interview came immediately on the heels of his interview with me about my Einstein book and was certainly likely to taint me by association if I let it) I cut off all contact with him. Likewise, as Smith acted out in soap opera fashion instead of taking an intellectual approach to the problem, and took actions of which I did not approve and suggested things to me which made no sense to me, I cut off all contact with him. How wise history is proving me to have been!

"Judenfrei" asserts without proof that my proposed legal measures to defeat Jewry would backfire and never be accepted by Northern Europeans, on the basis that "Judenfrei" instead wants to satisfy its Zionist desire for an ingathering of the Jews in Israel. I have for a very long time, much longer than parrot proposals of some others, advocated that the Palestinians, Lebanese, and virtually all other peoples sue the Jews for their aggression and illegal acts. These measures are finally beginning to be taken and they are very effective, as evinced by the Israelis' response:

Israel worries over intense 'legal war'

"Judenfrei" would instead have us fear the retaliation of the bankers and pay them off, in addition to fulfilling the Zionist dream of gathering all the Jews of the World together in Israel.

"Judenfrei" correctly observes that I am not Zionist and I do not want the Jews to segregate and perpetuate the Jewish people. "Judenfrei" considers this a trick of some kind, and asserts without proof or logical demonstration that Northern Europeans could never be convinced of the efficacy, morality or practicality of my approach to solving the Jewish problem. History contradicts "Judenfrei's" claims. As the Nazis rounded up the Jews, most if not all of the societies welcomed the purges. There was no genuine mass sympathy for the Jews even in America and Great Britain and the Jews had to work overtime to manufacture an artificial appearance of a mere semblance of such sympathy. Informed citizens have never been sympathetic to Jewry.

Human nature is to despise an aggressive enemy. Human beings will embrace my proposals, because my proposals solve the problem, rather than fulfill Jewish messianic prophecy as "Judenfrei" would have us do. "Judenfrei" accuses with the statement, "Again, Bjerknes slyly espouses the Holocaust lie." There are many Holocaust lies, not one of which have I ever knowingly espoused. It appears that "Judenfrei" is trying to bait me into discrediting myself with general statements. Be specific "Judenfrei". Do you deny that the Nazis changed Jewish demographics in Europe in profound ways? One of the definitions of genocide is remove a people from a place. This took place, unless you can prove otherwise. If you can prove otherwise, offer the proof, but do not speak in vagaries and accusations for which you offer no proof.

"Judenfrei's" arguments on banking and economic matters are a bit more interesting and better thought out, though still fatally riddled with contradictions, misrepresentations, omissions, apologetics and other flaws which defeat them. Numerous unproven assumptions appear in the presentation and there are even more alternative outcomes which are left unacknowledged and unaddressed. What proof is there that paying off debt holders will result in banks being able to maintain 100% reserves and still offer enough credit to prevent deflation and economic collapse? What proof is there that banks will remain solvent under these proposals, or that there will be the profits needed to create such banks, or that citizens and businesses will make such substantial deposits as would be need to grow the economy? On what basis is the claim made that no economic growth will be needed merely because our money will become debt free? While it is true that we will not need to create value to pay interest, this does not imply that will not need to create economic growth. Do we not wish to better our society? Do we not wish to out compete our international competitors? Do we not need to become more self sufficient?

Before redressing the attacks made against me, I ask "Judenfrei" to substantiate the unproven assumptions made in the proposals offered, and to quote directly where I have made the assertions "Judenfrei" claims I have made. If and when that it is done, I believe I will have an easy time pointing out the necessary consequences and alternative scenarios left out of "Judenfrei's" borrowed utopian proposals that leave the Jews as absolute masters of the money markets and the World economy.

What, if any, is the relationship between "Judenfrei" and the original author of the banking reform proposals which "Judenfrei" advocates? What, if any, is the relationship between "Judenfrei" and Eric Hufschmid? Why do you, "Judenfrei", want to fulfill the Zionists' fondest wish and ingather the Jews to Palestine? Please don't obfuscate the issue with tired lectures about who and what Jews, Israelites and Judahites are and were, other than to let us know whether you are pushing Christian Identity, or British Israel, or some other such Jewish manufactured theories or theory. Just answer the question. Why do you want to help the Zionists to place all Jews alive today in the Nation of Israel? I have responded to your concerns. Kindly respond to mine.

Thursday, July 02, 2009

Qui veut noyer son chien l'accuse de rage

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

http://www.jewishracism.com

http://www.jewishracism.blogspot.com

Max Nordau stated at the First Zionist Conference in 1897:

"'If you have to drown a dog,' says the proverb, 'you must first declare him to be mad.'"

Jews often accuse their accuser in an effort to avoid the accusation. Note the Israeli spin in the following news reports:

UN expert says Israeli seizure of aid ship a crime

Activists to break Gaza blockade

The Israelis attempt to change the subject of their illegal aggression against the aid ship carrying Cynthia McKinney, to an attack on the motives of its mission. In order to justify drowning the humanitarian mission, the Jews call it mad.

The Jews claim the motivation of the aid shipment was not humanitarian, but rather public relations, as if those two concerns were mutually exclusive. They are not. It is logically consistent for an aid mission to be both the transport of humanitarian aid and a public relations effort to raise international awareness of the plight of a suffering people, which public relations effort is in itself is an humanitarian effort meant to bring relief to a victimized people.

Israelis often defame the Palestinians and try to blame them for what the Israelis are doing to the Palestinians, and the Israelis often deny the suffering they are willfully inflicting on the Palestinians, which unjustly harms the image of the Palestinians in the court of public opinion. To counter Israeli propaganda by drawing attention to the plight of the Palestinians at the hands of the Israelis is in itself an humanitarian effort meant to bring aid and relief to the suffering Palestinians.

It is the Israelis who have brought this story to the headlines by illegally capturing a prominent American who served in the Congress of the United States. I hope that the public relations campaign to expose the plight of the Palestinians is quite successful, as successful as it is just and necessary. The Israelis are helping it along!

Note that the Israelis instinctively believe that a public relations campaign must have a sinister purpose. Why is that?

Wednesday, July 01, 2009

Three Tricks of the Jewish Controlled "Alternative Media" Trade

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

http://www.jewishracism.com

http://www.jewishracism.blogspot.com

The "alternative media" often causes people harm by discrediting people through agents provocateur who sucker their victims into associating with them in some way, while, unbeknownst to the victim, they act in an outrageous manner which is bound to discredit everyone who has associated with them. Sometimes smearmongers will bite their victims in the rump and claim that they don't go far enough in condemning the "Zionists". In this way, the victim is smeared in the mainstream media, and loses all support among dissidents and dissenters who would otherwise support them.

Another game played is when the mainstream media condemns someone, and then the "alternative media" claims that person is a "Zionist agent". In this way, the person is condemned by the general public, and loses all support among those who would otherwise support him or her.

A third means to double team a person working against the Jews is for the mainstream media to ignore whistleblowers, while the "alternative media" condemns them for participating in the first place, or not coming forward sooner. Here again, the victim is universally condemned for attempting to rescue humanity from the Jewish attack.

As I Predicted, Cynthia McKinney's Name Made Mud Due to Her Associations With Daryl Bradford Smith, and His Clone, "Ognir"

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

http://www.jewishracism.com

http://www.jewishracism.blogspot.com

Once again, I really, really, really hate to say I told you so, because Cynthia McKinney deserves better in spite of her lapse in judgement, but as I predicted Cynthia McKinney is being put through the meat grinder for associating with Daryl Bradford Smith and "Ognir":

McKinney Arrested By Israel, Appears on Hate Radio

McKinney on hate radio again

I wonder if and when CNN will pick up on this story. I heard they have connections with the CIA and sometimes put out stories for them. I know they have covered Smith in the past.

I wonder if the media will pick up on Daryl Bradford Smith & Co.'s Apollo moon landings hoax theories and how the "Zionists" allegedly profitted. Should be very entertaining for those in search of ways to discredit McKinney and change the subject from Israel's illegal attack on her.

I wish you well, courageous and selfless Cynthia. You deserve far better than what fate is doling out to you. I suggest you look into who set you up for this.