The Prosecution of Brendon O'Connell Must End

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

http://www.jewishracism.com

http://www.jewishracism.blogspot.com

There should be pretrial motions to the dismiss the indictment against Brendon O'Connell on the grounds that the Statute under which the prosecution is brought, and is proceeding, is illegal, void and unenforceable; in that it violates Brendon O'Connell's fundamental constitutional and human rights of free speech, equal protection of the laws, self defense and freedom to engage in normal conduct intended for the public good.

There should be a pretrial motion to dismiss the complaint against Brendon O'Connell on the grounds that it fails to allege that an offense has been committed; in that the complaining allegation has no substance because it depends upon the false assertion that the Jews are a race so as to spuriously allege one of the elements of the offense. Therefore the complaint fails to allege a required element of the offense in fact, and is devoid of any sensible allegation that an offense has occurred, leaving the defendant without any means of preparing a defense to a charge which fails to allege that a crime has occurred.

The prosecution must end at the earliest possible date so as to terminate the illegal harassment and persecution of Brendon O'Connell. In the public interest, the prosecution must end at the earliest possible date so as to lift the chilling cloud it is having on public discourse.

Any denial of such motions should be immediately and directly appealable to the highest court, in that there is a strong and compelling public interest in the free and open public discussion of an enemy attack upon the nation, and the illegal prosecution of Brendon O'Connell is having, and is intended to have, a chilling effect on that discussion.

Why Has Not Daryl Bradford Smith Named the Names of the Alleged Mossad Agents He Knows?

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

http://www.jewishracism.com

http://www.jewishracism.blogspot.com

Daryl Bradford Smith has repeatedly called for the formation of public lists of Zionists. Why has he not started such a list himself and named the Mossad agents he has allegedly identified? Why would Daryl Bradford Smith refuse to cooperate with an investigation into these alleged Mossad agents? Why would Daryl Bradford Smith telephone Eric Hufschmid in August of 2009, whom he has accused of Svengali'ing him, and whom he has called a Zionist Jew? How could Smith arrive at the conclusion that his dear and close friend, a Jewess who served as his patron by his accounts, has nothing to do with the Zionist network when he believes that her brothers are Mossad? Was it not incumbent upon Smith to disclose the fact that he believes her brothers are Mossad when seeking to shield her, and was it not, and is it not, incumbent upon Smith to publicly identify Mossad agents and name names?

"Ognir" made a cop out when I asked him to ask "Muhammad Rafeeq" for his birth name with the pathetic excuse that he lacked "Rafiq's" email address. Noel Ryan then spoke directly to "Rafeeq" on several occasion but did not ask for his birth name. Now that I have begun to hone in on "Muhammad Rafeeq's" birth name, "Ognir" claims that he will finally ask for it from "Rafiq" or is it "Paul" something or other, which "Ognir" now concedes is correct, though he previously attempted to vilify me for raising the issue. Funny how names change with Daryl Bradford Smith & Co. "Ognir" is itself an inversion of "Ringo".

Daryl Bradford Smith pretended that I had no reason to question whether or not "Muhammad Rafeeq" was ever known by any other name, or whether or not he had Jewish blood, studied Cabalah as a practitioner and had Jewish bankers in his family, but it was Smith who first told me of these things, and Smith is only now revealing to "Ognir" that "Muhammad Rafeeq" has had other names, if "Ognir's" accounts are true.

"Muhammad Rafeeq" also pretended that I had no right to inquire of other names he has had. Why did "Rafiq" not immediately tell us any and all other names he has had?

Why did these characters try to vilify me for asking these questions and for pointing out that "Rafeeq's" article falsely claiming that Bernard Madoff is innocent was and is bunk on its face, and why did they pretend that I was in some way challenging "Rafeeq" to draw attention away from his transparently bogus conclusions, when "Rafeeq" knew that I had posed those same questions to him long before he had written his garbage article apologizing for confessed criminal Bernard Madoff? Why has not "Rafiq" since apologized to me and thanked me for pointing out that his article was nonsense on its face, which fact can no longer be denied even by a sophist so talented and practiced as he.

Will Smith now tell his audience everything he told me years ago about "Muhammad Rafeeq", or will Smith continue to try to vilify me with falsehoods for exposing the truth he doesn't want known?

The Charges Against Brendon O'Connell Are Themselves Violations of the Statute Under Which They Are Made

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

http://www.jewishracism.com

http://www.jewishracism.blogspot.com

When the State asserts without proof that the Jews are a race and not a religion, the assertion itself proves that the State and the Jews are racist; in that they seek to prevent and bar by law and common understanding the admission of any Gentile into the class of person identified as the "Jews", or the "chosen people", or as members of the Jewish religion. These facts place the prosecution on the twin horns of a dilemma, because the charges themselves prove the correctness of O'Connell's alleged statements and should the State abandon its racist position and admit that the Jews are not a race, then there is no possibility of an offense of "racial vilification" of Jews ever having occurred.

Therefore, O'Connell is of necessity innocent and it is the prosecution and its Jewish supporters who are guilty of "racial vilification" of both Gentiles and Jews. Anyone, including but not limited to the Jews, the prosecution or any judge who determines that the Jews are a race and not a religion echoes the racist beliefs and racist laws of the Nazi regime. The racially discriminatory determination that the Jews are a race and not a religion prevents Gentiles from becoming Jews and a member of the "chosen people" and is therefore an act of racist discrimination against Gentiles which bars them from the free exercise of their religious right to become religious Jews. This also violates the equal protection clause, in that it arbitrarily creates two classes of persons based upon presumed and false racial distinctions, one class of which enjoys the right to practice the Jewish faith and one of which is barred by the State from entering that faith and people. Said racist determination also subjects any, including former Gentiles, to the determination that their entrance into a religious belief system has rendered them racially distinct from other human beings, a determination which is false and discriminatory in that it, among other things, denies their human right to their heritage and artificially and arbitrarily categorizes such persons as different from other human beings on a genetic level when such distinction does NOT exist in scientific or actual fact, but rather is made as part of a racist and discriminatory policy to separate and segregate Jews and non-Jews.

O'Connell is innocent, but those who accuse him are themselves guilty of the very offense they level at O'Connell by virtue of their accusations which dub the Jews a race.

Forum Needed to Discuss the Legal Issues Involved in O'Connell's Case and a Site Needed to Raise a Defense Fund for Him

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

http://www.jewishracism.com

http://www.jewishracism.blogspot.com

One good idea is enough to free Brendon O'Connell. We need a moderated discussion board so that we can Tom Sawyer lawyers and anyone of good will to contribute ideas and information which will help to win O'Connell's case. He also needs funds to defend himself from the immense powers of the State to steal away his freedom

Such a forum will serve other functions, in that it will spark interest in the case and serve to rehearse and subject to public trial the issues of concern. The forum must be moderated to prevent a muddying of the waters.

The Charges Against O'Connell Must Be Dismissed Immediately, Because They Fail to Allege an Offense

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

http://www.jewishracism.com

http://www.jewishracism.blogspot.com

A statement that the Jews are racist cannot be a reference to race, because racism is not a racial characteristic, but rather a trait of a belief system. Therefore, any statement that the Jews are racist must of necessity have been referring to beliefs and not racial traits. An element of the offense of "racial vilification" must be that a race has been vilified, and it is the State, not O'Connell, which is arbitrarily and with malicious intent falsely designating the Jews as if a race in order to silence O'Connell's accurate depiction of the Jewish religion. In America, the normal procedure would be for the defendant to file a pretrial motion to dismiss for the failure of the indictment to allege an offense.

The defendant would also file motions to dismiss due to the unconstitutional vagueness of the Statute which fails to notify the defendant of what conduct is proscribed by law; a pretrial motion to dismiss due to discriminatory violations of the equal protection clause of the constitution; a pretrial motion to dismiss for constitutional violations of the defendant's fundamental rights to free speech; a pretrial motion to dismiss for constitutional violations of the defendant's right to engage in normal human conduct; pretrial motions to dismiss for prosecutorial misconduct; pretrial motions to dismiss for violations of the defendant's due process rights to preserve evidence; a pretrial motion for a bill of particulars; pretrial motions to suppress any evidence obtained illegally; a pretrial demand for a speedy trial if such is applicable in the jurisdiction of the court; a pretrial motion for discovery of exculpatory evidence and all other matter which the prosecution will or may wish to present at trial; etc. etc. etc.

At trial, the defendant must raise the absolute defenses provided by Statute as well as those secured as his fundamental rights to free speech, political freedom, self defense, defense of country, freedom of religious beliefs and expression, etc. etc. etc. All this must be done to not only win the case in the pretrial or trial phase, but also to preserve the right to raise the same issues in any potential appeal.

If it is an issue of first impression, if this is the first time the courts will address the question, then O'Connell stands a good chance of being able to appeal to the highest courts any violations of his rights or misconduct by the courts and/or prosecution. Have the courts established the elements of "racial vilification"? If not, then O'Connell has not received sufficient notice of what conduct is proscribed by law. If so, then the indictment against O'Connell must claim each element of the offense, which it cannot do, because the allegation necessitates that O'Connell referred to beliefs, not racial traits. Therefore, the prosecution must end at the earliest possible date so as to prevent further harm to the defendant by the unlawful prosecution currently being pursued by the State.

See also my blogs:

Australia's "Racist harassment and incitement to racial hatred" Laws Establish an Authoritarian and Anti-Democratic Government: November 26, 2009

Australia's "Racist harassment and incitement to racial hatred" Laws Violate Several Fundamental Human Rights and Due Process of Law: November 25, 2009

The Brendon O'Connell Case Concerns Us All

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

http://www.jewishracism.com

http://www.jewishracism.blogspot.com

Having watched the following statement by Fredrick Toeben, I would like to make a few observations and comments:

Playing the Race Card in Australia during May-June 2009 - Part I

Though there are certainly weighty historically important questions which will be judged in the case of Brendon O'Connell, his first concern should be to preserve his liberty and win his case. Any defendant should be raising legal issues in his defense and not simply hope to win because he is morally and factually correct. If convicted, a defendant may have waived those rights he did not assert prior to and during trial, and the appeals courts may refuse to consider any issues raised for the first time in post-conviction process. It is important, therefore, for any defendant to vigorously defend himself at the pretrail and trial stage of the prosecution, and throughout the process and assert all of his rights, and not get caught up in the drama and emotion which may blind him to the legal issues which can free him and which can help preserve all of our fundamental rights as human beings against the encroachments of the State.

If the information Toeben presents is correct, then the law which the State seeks to enforce against Brendon O'Connell is fatally defective on its face.

If the determination of whether or not the Jews constitute a race is made after the alleged act of vilifying the Jews occurs, then such a determination, however made, and whether made by a judge or a jury, or some other form of hearing, is made ex post facto and therefore is unenforceable against a defendant who had no prior notice of what conduct is proscribed by law.

The very act of conducting a hearing to determine whether or not Jews are a race demonstrates that the Statute failed to provide sufficient notice to the public of what conduct is proscribed by law, and therefore the Statute is unenforceable and must be struck down.

Since the Statute provides no legal definition of whether or not Jews are a race, the question is an issue of fact, not law, and therefore a defendant so charged ought to be entitled to have the issue of fact determined by a jury, if that is his choice, and not a judge or other non-jury form of hearing. I know nothing about Australian law. It might be that a defendant will have waived his right to have the issue determined by the jury at trial if he fails to assert that right pretrial and instead agrees to have the issue determined by a judge without objecting and taking exception to the violation of his fundamental due process rights. I do not know if the Australian courts honor a defendant's fundamental right to have issues of fact determined by a jury of his peers, as opposed to by a judge who in America is only entitled to determine issues of the law if that is the defendant's choice. This is a very important point to consider and one which the appeals courts may refuse to consider if it is not raised at the pretrial stage.

(1) There is a substantial argument to be made that there are no distinct human races, and therefore any accusation of racial vilification does not, and cannot state an offense and can therefore be dismissed pretrial. (2) This argument can be made in addition to the argument that the Jews are so genetically diverse that they cannot constitute any homogenous and unique biological category, much less constitute a specific race. (3) Beyond this is the argument that the Jews are followers of the Jewish religion, not an homogenous and unique racial biological category. A Jew may become a non-Jew by changing his religion without changing his genes. A non-Jew may become a Jew by conversion and belief. Though such a convert may believe that he is racially superior based on his incorporation through his beliefs into the "chosen people", science provides no evidence that his genes have changed, much less blended with those of a mythological homogenous and unique Jewish genotype which nowhere exists. These are three separate issues and should be heard separately at different hearings or by a jury.

Once again, since the law has not made any such definitions, these are questions of fact best left to the determination of a jury which is more likely to be sympathetic to the defendant's position than the State's by virtue of the fact that a judge is a member of the State. Any defendant should consider whether or not it is in his best interests to raise issues of: fact versus law, jury versus judge; and raise objections and take exceptions should the courts deny his right to have these issues of fact determined by a jury of his peers.

I once again caution O'Connell to use his head, not his heart, to defend his liberty, and his backside, and not martyr himself out of emotion and knowledge that he is in the right. He needs proper legal counsel who defend all of his rights and he needs to assert those rights and make proper and effective legal arguments as well as historical, religious and political arguments. The press, the public and the courts will take a strong interest in well stated legal arguments.

Eric Hufschmid and Daryl Bradford Smith Still at It

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

http://www.jewishracism.com

http://www.jewishracism.blogspot.com

Eric Hufschmid, who openly worked with Daryl Bradford Smith for years, has presented a recording of an alleged conversation he had with Daryl Bradford Smith "in August of 2009". A transcript of this dramatic conversation appears on Hufschmid's website here and one need only search the webpage for the keyword "Daryl" to locate the relevant passages:

http://www.erichufschmid.net/Hufschmid-2009Nov21-transcipt-Part-2.html

The audio recording of the purported conversation appears on Hufschmid's website here:

http://www.erichufschmid.net/Hufschmid-2009Nov21.html

Has Smith addressed the statements presented in his voice in which he purportedly states that the brothers of his good friend are "Mossad"? Why would Smith, who has called Hufschmid a Zionist Jew, call Hufschmid in August of 2009?

Noel Ryan, aka "Ognir", has been confronted with the issue, but as of this writing has not substantively responded:

http://theinfounderground.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=35&t=8891&sid=ff878061e50e68c91339b13abaf96078

Though I requested that "Ognir" ask "Muhammad Rafeeq" for his birth name and the birth names of his, "Muhammad Rafeeq's", grandparents, and though Noel Ryan has had ample opportunity to do so, I have not yet received a response to my inquiry of Ryan and "Rafeeq" as to those names. Nor have I heard "Muhammad Rafeeq" tell us whether or not he has any Jewish blood, or whether or not any of his relatives have been or are involved in the banking industry.

David Pidcock has referred to "Muhammad Rafeeq" as "Rupert", and it is known that his, "Muhammad Rafeeq's" first name is Paul, a fact not denied by "Muhammad Rafeeq" to my knowledge, and recorded in his nonsensical and thoroughly discredited apology for convicted criminal Bernard Madoff, and which has been confirmed by a friend of "Muhammad Rafeeq's". Daryl Bradford Smith and "Ognir" pretend that there is no basis for my enquiries, but it is Smith who first told me that "Muhammad Rafeeq" is a Jew from a banking family, and "Ognir" need only pose the question directly to "Muhammad Rafeeq", or is it "Mohammad Rafiq"? Or is it some other name containing "Paul" and "Rupert"?

Since "Muhammad Rafeeq", Daryl Bradford Smith and Noel Ryan have not responded to my requests for "Muhammad Rafeeq's" birth name, a very simple and straightforward request requiring less time to answer than to dodge, I pose the question also to David Pidcock.

I have recently received an e-mail pointing out to me an article entitled "Forum to examine future of interest free finance United Arab Emirates: Monday, April 01 - 2002". This article names "PAUL RUPERT DeBEER. Monetary and Ethical Investment Specialist." as a speaker at the forum and states "Chairing the sessions will be David M. Pidcock". Dear Mr. Pidcock, kind sir and honest Muslim, would you please tell us who this "Paul Rupert DeBeer" is, what he had written or accomplished which recommended him to the forum which you chaired, and what was "Muhammad Rafeeq's" birth name?

Has "Muhammad Rafeeq" ever retracted his nonsensical and thoroughly discredited article in which he claimed that Madoff is innocent?

It is interesting that Daryl Bradford Smith has told Eric Hufschmid and me that he, Smith, is good friends with prominent Jews in the gold and jewelry business. It is further interesting, as my correspondent has pointed out to me, that Smith had a radio program which broadcast from South Africa, the center of much of the diamond and gold trades. Smith also had programs on RBN and GCN, both of which are involved in the gold trade.

Why has none of this piqued the interest of Noel Ryan, our would be anti-Zionist champion? Why does so dignified and well connected a man as David Pidcock lend his support to Daryl Bradford Smith, a man who makes a point of loudly claiming that the moon landings were a hoax?

On Jews, Venison, Pigeon Meat and Metempsychosis: It Just Keeps Getting Weirder

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

http://www.jewishracism.com

http://www.jewishracism.blogspot.com

One of my original tutors on the Jewish Question was a German man, who believed in Metempsychosis (reincarnation) and advocated a careful diet without most meats. I thought he was simply following in the footsteps of Schopenhauer, Wagner and Nietzsche, who were in turn influenced by the Hindus. But then I conducted my own studies into the Cabalah and its affinity to cults I suspected were of gnostic Jewish origin, such as the Christians, Cathars and Shabbataians. The Lurian Cabalah lays particular emphasis on the doctrine of Metempsychosis.

Another common theme I found in many of these groups and persons was the strong emphasis on the notion that the Talmud and oral tradition of the Rabbis were false and that the Torah had to be reinterpreted, even to the point of doing the exact opposite of the standard interpretation of the text. I believe I have found a missing link in this chain from the gnostics to the Cathars and Shabbataians in one Anan Ben David. In researching this Jew, I find many striking parallels between his life, or at least the standard story of his life and his beliefs and cult, with that of the much later Shabbatai Zevi and the cult he originated. Both Zevi and Ben David were placed on trial. Both then adopted aspects of Islam and were spared. Both called for the reinterpretation of the Torah, the Shabbataians calling for their followers to do the exact opposite of the standard Rabbinical interpretation of the Torah and the rejection of the majority of the Talmud as spurious. The Frankists who were born of the Shabbataians made it a practice to whip up anti-Jewish sentiments by quoting the Talmud and legitimizing accusations of blood libel against fellow Jews.

The weird gets weirder and I have come to suspect that the Germans I have met and those who preceeded them were the (spiritual? biological?) descendants of the cult of Anan Ben David, and not followers of the Hindus. I suspect Theosophy under Blavatsky merely used Hinduism as a guise for this particular strain of viral Judaism. And so the story takes an even odder turn.

One of the famous Germans/Austrians who fit the mold is no less a famous "anti-Semite" than Adolf Hitler. His reputed vegetarianism and the love of Wagner and others who advocated a belief in Cabalistic Metempsychosis, raised my suspicions. But there is more. Hitler did eat meat, in fact he loved pigeon, one of the very few meats which Anan Ben David stated could be eaten while the Jews remained in exile, which should be properly interpreted to mean until such time as the Temple is rebuilt and proper animal sacrifices resumed. The other meat in which Hitler indulged himself was wild game. Venison and turtle dove were the only other two meats which could be eaten. I had once thought that Hitler might have used his famous alleged vegetarianism as a cover to maintain a kosher diet, as I suspected of many other vegetarians who practice a belief in Metempsychosis, state that the Torah has been misunderstood and that the Talmud has led Jews astray from the true meaning of the Torah. And indeed, I still believe they feign vegetarianism on moral or health reasons to cover up their Judaism, but I now suspect that many or all of these persons, some of them quite famous historical figures, were followers of the cult of Anan Ben David.

I am betting that the chain in no way ends with Ben David, and that he was copying a much older cryptic form of Judaism which winds it way back to Ur and back again and again to Mesopotamia and what is today Turkey. It is truly amazing how often the Jews follow a set pattern and repeat it again and again. I am now pursuing the theory that Zevi was deliberately copying the life of Anan Ben David, or at least taking his example as a method of preserving himself and developing his cult. Christianity certainly contains elements of this belief system which predate Ben David. The "resurrection" of Jesus Christ, Christ's "second coming", being "born again" and the doctrine of a second eternal life in a "new heaven" and "new earth" are all forms of the mythology of Metempsychosis. Semi-vegetarianism apparently only became an issue after the destruction of the Temple which occurred after Christ had died, but already in his lifetime, Christ instructs his followers to eat his flesh and drink his blood in order to become God. The Jews believe that if you consume an animal's blood, you transform into the soul of that animal, and so since Christ believed he was God, to eat Jesus would make you God by virtue of the Jewish dietary laws. And what animal did Christ symbolize in the form of the Holy Ghost, the dove. Christ reinterpreted, and more than once reversed, the Torah, and condemned the traditions of the scribes and pharisees, as would Ben David and Jacob Frank.

For years now I have looked with great suspicion upon those who seek to ingratiate themselves to me, then reveal to me that they are vegetarians and ask me what I think of reincarnation (Metempsychosis). As odd as it must appear, I have encountered more than a few such persons, and often discover that they have close ties to the Jewish community.

An Important Book on the Jewish Question

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

http://www.jewishracism.com

http://www.jewishracism.blogspot.com

A pdf facsimile of the improved and enlarged second edition of Jakob Ecker's Der ,Judenspiegel' im Lichte der Wahrheit: Eine wissenschaftliche Untersuchung is available for free on the internet. Though the book is an apology for the Jews, it reveals a great many truths which expose Jewish hatred of the human being and it cites and translates (to German) primary Jewish sources.