Christopher Jon Bjerknes
http://www.jewishracism.com [CENSORED FOR TELLING THE TRUTH]
If you want to understand the White political animal and how the jews are attacking us in America today, then you should read Aristotle's Politics, Book V:
This work has provided the jews with all they need to know to destroy America. The jews are eternal revolutionaries. The jews are creating a climate in America which they believe will force the Goy cattle into a revolt. The jews are not employing one strategy to the exclusion of all others, rather they are hitting us with every classical means of generating a revolution in a White Constitutional Democracy, and in a White Oligarchy, found in Aristotle's definitive treatise on the subject of revolution.
The jews have destroyed our middle class, which Aristotle claimed is the foundation of stability. The jews have enacted tyrannical laws which destroy our Constitution, thereby deliberately provoking a revolutionary spirit and simultaneously providing fodder for their demagogues to propose the destruction of all laws through revolution, as opposed to the restoration of original constitutional law. The jews have arranged for the jewish oligarchy to raise up demagoging military leaders for a coup in the name of restoring the Constitution by obliterating it and combating the jews by putting in power the very tyrant who will fully empower the jews after the Constitution is abandoned.
The jews are pitting White oligarchs against the People, by teaching them the Ayn Rand psychopathology that because they are superior in wealth they are therefore superior in all things and have the right to absolute rule. The jews are pitting the growing American impoverished class against the White oligarchs by teaching them that because they are equal in law, they are equal in all things and therefore have a right to an equal share of all wealth and power.
The jews are doing all they can to drive American Whites to revolution. One of our Founding Fathers John Jay wrote in The Federalist Papers, Number 2, that America was strong because its territory was diverse, but its people were racially and ethnically homogenous:
"It has often given me pleasure to observe that independent America was not composed of detached and distant territories, but that one connected, fertile, widespreading country was the portion of our western sons of liberty. Providence has in a particular manner blessed it with a variety of soils and productions, and watered it with innumerable streams, for the delight and accommodation of its inhabitants. A succession of navigable waters forms a kind of chain round its borders, as if to bind it together; while the most noble rivers in the world, running at convenient distances, present them with highways for the easy communication of friendly aids, and the mutual transportation and exchange of their various commodities.
With equal pleasure I have as often taken notice that Providence has been pleased to give this one connected country to one united people -- a people descended from the same ancestors, speaking the same language, professing the same religion, attached to the same principles of government, very similar in their manners and customs, and who, by their joint counsels, arms, and efforts, fighting side by side throughout a long and bloody war, have nobly established general liberty and independence.
This country and this people seem to have been made for each other, and it appears as if it was the design of Providence, that an inheritance so proper and convenient for a band of brethren, united to each other by the strongest ties, should never be split into a number of unsocial, jealous, and alien sovereignties. [***] It is worthy of remark that not only the first, but every succeeding Congress, as well as the late convention, have invariably joined with the people in thinking that the prosperity of America depended on its Union. To preserve and perpetuate it was the great object of the people in forming that convention, and it is also the great object of the plan which the convention has advised them to adopt. With what propriety, therefore, or for what good purposes, are attempts at this particular period made by some men to depreciate the importance of the Union? Or why is it suggested that three or four confederacies would be better than one? I am persuaded in my own mind that the people have always thought right on this subject, and that their universal and uniform attachment to the cause of the Union rests on great and weighty reasons, which I shall endeavor to develop and explain in some ensuing papers. They who promote the idea of substituting a number of distinct confederacies in the room of the plan of the convention, seem clearly to foresee that the rejection of it would put the continuance of the Union in the utmost jeopardy. That certainly would be the case, and I sincerely wish that it may be as clearly foreseen by every good citizen, that whenever the dissolution of the Union arrives, America will have reason to exclaim, in the words of the poet: 'FAREWELL! A LONG FAREWELL TO ALL MY GREATNESS.' "
Aristotle informs us that race mixing leads to revolution and brought down many an ancient State:
"Another cause of revolution is difference of races which do not at once acquire a common spirit; for a state is not the growth of a day, any more than it grows out of a multitude brought together by accident. Hence the reception of strangers in colonies, either at the time of their foundation or afterwards, has generally produced revolution; for example, the Achaeans who joined the Troezenians in the foundation of Sybaris, becoming later the more numerous, expelled them; hence the curse fell upon Sybaris. At Thurii the Sybarites quarrelled with their fellow-colonists; thinking that the land belonged to them, they wanted too much of it and were driven out. At Byzantium the new colonists were detected in a conspiracy, and were expelled by force of arms; the people of Antissa, who had received the Chian exiles, fought with them, and drove them out; and the Zancleans, after having received the Samians, were driven by them out of their own city. The citizens of Apollonia on the Euxine, after the introduction of a fresh body of colonists, had a revolution; the Syracusans, after the expulsion of their tyrants, having admitted strangers and mercenaries to the rights of citizenship, quarrelled and came to blows; the people of Amphipolis, having received Chalcidian colonists, were nearly all expelled by them."
It seems all the jews are doing is provoking revolution because they hate our Constitutional Democracy. It is our duty to defend our nation, not by demagoging as our enemies do, but by upholding our true Nationalism as opposed to their subversive revolts. The demagogues tell us that the Pauls are our saviors because they uphold the Constitution, but the Pauls are internationalists and fronts for the jewish oligarchs, and have themselves become dynastic oligarchs. They want to undermine our currency by calling it worthless paper and thereby bring us into a disastrous gold standard. They want to eliminate all the power of the State to control the oligarchs and so make us slaves of the wealthy. Aristotle described their subversive tactics and strategies perfectly.
Another strain of revolutionary demagogue is the neo-Fascist White Nationalist, who claims that any moderate voice is expressing only "weakness". These subversive demagogues openly declare war on our Constitution and our rights, but have the unmitigated gall to claim to be Nationalists! They openly preach tyranny, but as Aristotle informs us, the type of tyranny they will impose is that of the oligarchs who are using them to cause a change of government that strips the People of their power and establishes absolute inequality in all things including the law, rendering the oligarchs all powerful in physical reality, in the name of making the abstract State the guardian of the People against these very same oligarchs who are generating the discontent which empowers the demagogue.
The jews want to strip us of our Constitutional Democracy and they want to trick us into clamoring for the abolishment of this magnificent State that is far greater than any that has ever preceded it. They even want us to clamor for secession and apply every pressure they can manage to make this disastrous plan appear as if a solution to the problems they are deliberately creating and compounding.
Aristotle advises us that Constitutional Democracy is the most stable and just system and that to preserve it we must build a strong middle class. Aristotle also lays special emphasis on the fact that the Counter-Revolutionary must only elect into public office those who are loyal to the Constitution:
"Still democracy appears to be safer and less liable to revolution than oligarchy. For in oligarchies there is the double danger of the oligarchs falling out among themselves and also with the people; but in democracies there is only the danger of a quarrel with the oligarchs. No dissension worth mentioning arises among the people themselves. And we may further remark that a government which is composed of the middle class more nearly approximates to democracy than to oligarchy, and is the safest of the imperfect forms of government. [***] We have next to consider what means there are of preserving constitutions in general, and in particular cases. In the first place it is evident that if we know the causes which destroy constitutions, we also know the causes which preserve them; for opposites produce opposites, and destruction is the opposite of preservation.
In all well-attempered governments there is nothing which should be more jealously maintained than the spirit of obedience to law, more especially in small matters; for transgression creeps in unperceived and at last ruins the state, just as the constant recurrence of small expenses in time eats up a fortune. The expense does not take place at once, and therefore is not observed; the mind is deceived, as in the fallacy which says that 'if each part is little, then the whole is little.' this is true in one way, but not in another, for the whole and the all are not little, although they are made up of littles.
In the first place, then, men should guard against the beginning of change, and in the second place they should not rely upon the political devices of which I have already spoken invented only to deceive the people, for they are proved by experience to be useless. [***] There are three qualifications required in those who have to fill the highest offices -- (1) first of all, loyalty to the established constitution; (2) the greatest administrative capacity; (3) virtue and justice of the kind proper to each form of government; for, if what is just is not the same in all governments, the quality of justice must also differ. There may be a doubt, however, when all these qualities do not meet in the same person, how the selection is to be made; suppose, for example, a good general is a bad man and not a friend to the constitution, and another man is loyal and just, which should we choose? In making the election ought we not to consider two points? what qualities are common, and what are rare. Thus in the choice of a general, we should regard his skill rather than his virtue; for few have military skill, but many have virtue. In any office of trust or stewardship, on the other hand, the opposite rule should be observed; for more virtue than ordinary is required in the holder of such an office, but the necessary knowledge is of a sort which all men possess.
It may, however, be asked what a man wants with virtue if he have political ability and is loyal, since these two qualities alone will make him do what is for the public interest. But may not men have both of them and yet be deficient in self-control? If, knowing and loving their own interests, they do not always attend to them, may they not be equally negligent of the interests of the public?
Speaking generally, we may say that whatever legal enactments are held to be for the interest of various constitutions, all these preserve them. And the great preserving principle is the one which has been repeatedly mentioned -- to have a care that the loyal citizen should be stronger than the disloyal. Neither should we forget the mean, which at the present day is lost sight of in perverted forms of government; for many practices which appear to be democratical are the ruin of democracies, and many which appear to be oligarchical are the ruin of oligarchies. Those who think that all virtue is to be found in their own party principles push matters to extremes; they do not consider that disproportion destroys a state. A nose which varies from the ideal of straightness to a hook or snub may still be of good shape and agreeable to the eye; but if the excess be very great, all symmetry is lost, and the nose at last ceases to be a nose at all on account of some excess in one direction or defect in the other; and this is true of every other part of the human body. The same law of proportion equally holds in states. Oligarchy or democracy, although a departure from the most perfect form, may yet be a good enough government, but if any one attempts to push the principles of either to an extreme, he will begin by spoiling the government and end by having none at all. Wherefore the legislator and the statesman ought to know what democratical measures save and what destroy a democracy, and what oligarchical measures save or destroy an oligarchy. For neither the one nor the other can exist or continue to exist unless both rich and poor are included in it. If equality of property is introduced, the state must of necessity take another form; for when by laws carried to excess one or other element in the state is ruined, the constitution is ruined."
Beware the jewish revolutionaries in whatever disguise they don! We face no Hobson's choice of becoming liberatarians or Nazis. We are Americans and our roots are strong and sound and better than the transitory and largely untested alternatives the jews are tempting us to try.
Become Counter-Revolutionaries and work to restore America to the nation our Founders gave their blood to build. The thought of being a Counter-Revolutionary after the American Revolution was achieved will confuse the dull mind, but any White person of average intelligence or better can see that the Revolution achieved for us a Constitutional Democracy for Whites to live in an homogenous society in liberty and security. Our nation is a White Supremacist nation in the sense that it carefully balances equality in abstract law with inequality in real nature, by making the society as homogenous as possible so that the concept of equality has some attainable meaning, and by denying non-Whites membership in the form of citizenship.
The jews fear and loathe Counter-Revolutionaries. The jews' stock and trade is chaos. They want a revolution in America and are doing everything they can to make it inevitable. Ignore their mirage and look to America, an America without jews and their subversive clowns, both the open internationalists and the pseudo-nationalists who want us to pretend to be something we are not so that we surrender what we are and lose everything, forever.