Friday, August 23, 2019

Is Donald Trump Planning to Move to Israel and Establish a Chabad Monarchy If He Loses the Election in America?

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

I wonder if Trump is planning to move to Israel if he loses the election. They could provide him with sanctuary from prosecution. He loves to talk about how popular he is in Israel. Chabad could anoint him King with Jared next in line for the throne.

Ivanka Trump could run for President of the USA against Michelle Obama, First Lady Jared Kushner versus First Lady Barack Obama. If Ivanka won and Jared was Prince or King of Israel, it would bind the nations in the old fashioned way of monarchs.

All of this opens up a very important question. How will the nation of Israel respond when some group anoints a King in the coming third Temple? Will there be a revision of the laws? What authority will the monarchy claim immediately over the nation and its people? They will almost need the USA to impose the monarchy on Israel, I suspect.

This could be one way they could create the monarchy in an official State capacity and then hand it over to the real Moshiach. I seem to recall that Netanyahu stated the Talmud is the law of the land in the Jewish State. It has stringent guidelines for the rise of the King.

If Trump Is King of the Jews, Is Jared Kushner the Prince of Israel?

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

The only way Jared Kushner gained the power he has today was through nepotism. Kings form dynasties. Adam Green believes that Jared Kushner is slated to become Moshiach King of the Jews. Will Kushner inherit Trump's throne?

I have a difficult time envisioning Kushner as the Jews' messiah, but if that is what the Jews have planned, just about the only way he could get there is by inheriting the throne from his daddy in law Donald Trump. So this new development of Trump posturing as King of the Jews has led me to reconsider Adam Green's prediction that Kushner is the coming Moshiach. If Kushner is the best the Jews can do, surely we can stop them through political means if only we will try. It is actually a plausible scenario, using Trump to create the dynasty so that Christians will not rebel against it, then shoehorning in the dud of a Jew Kushner to begin the Jewish monarchy. I still think it will be someone else, but this may be the scheme they are working on for now.

Thursday, August 22, 2019

Patrick Byrne Reveals His Ties to Russian Agent Maria Butina

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Former CEO of Overstock Patrick Byrne has revealed that had an affair with Russian agent Maria Butina:

Byrne uses Yiddish expressions including Yenta and Verklempt and refers to Warren Buffet as his "Rabbi". He is pushing crypto-currency and blockchain. Byrne stated that he is a libertarian as is Maria Butina.

The libertarians have been out to destroy the American dollar to benefit their Russian masters for generations. They used to promote the Gold standard to favor the Russians and the Jews. Evidently they are now promoting crypto-currencies as a new way to ruin us and the international advantages the dollar gives us.

The Jews delight in private currencies because it will enable them to ruin any person they choose by denying him the right to use the private currency, just as social media and PayPal have denied access to targeted individuals. The libertarians support this private means of destroying people.

The Gold Standard is an horrible method. First they tried it, and then tried to make an electronic version of it which would become a fractional reserve system with no means of verification. Now, it appears that the Jews and Communists are out to destroy the American dollar with crypto-currencies and blockchain. I am warning about the dangers of allowing private companies to manage currencies. They can exclude you and starve you and your family and the libertarians will cheer them on as exercising their rights.

I suspect the Russians are also out to generate civil war in America over the issue of gun rights. We are being subjected to Communist "propaganda of the deed" in the form of mass shootings and the government is threatening an oppressive response which will generate more mass shootings in a cycle meant to provoke civil unrest and revolution. The Communists are waiting for that happen so they can hit us when we are weakest, when we are at war with one another.

Wednesday, August 21, 2019

The Anti-Christ Versus the Second Coming of Lenin. . . How Can We Win? . . Or, How Can We Lose If We Join Race?

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Must we again slavishly choose between the lesser of two evils in the American Presidential race, the Israel-first anti-Christ Trump or some open borders Communist from the Democratic Party? Are we such a subservient and dysfunctional nation that in yet another Presidential election we must vote either for the Bolshevik or the Zionist? Where is the candidate who represents our best interests, not the Jewish agenda of Bolshevism and Zionism? And do not deceive yourselves, both the Democrat and the Republican will be both Communists and Zionists.

It is pathetic that we do not have a candidate to vote for who pledges to serve American interests. At no point in my life have the American People been so distrusting of the politicians who govern us. Yet, we have not yet fielded a Presidential candidate who is willing and able to seize the opportunity and provide a viable option for functional government that will serve the citizenry, not World Jewry.

We should not allow this opportunity to pass us by. A strong voice can take advantage of the distrust and insecurity generated by the Jeffrey Epstein scandal and the censorship of the social media oligarchs. We have a better chance at victory than at any other time I can recall. The outrageous actions of the government to violate our most precious rights, their pedophilia and other blackmailable crimes, and their open treason to Israel and the International Communists have awoken the American People to our plight.

We are losing by default, because all we are doing is complaining instead of taking control of our destiny. We have a chance today to truly drain the swamp, including the mammon serving Anti-Christ pervert Donald Trump. But instead of just complaining, we must lead and govern our own fate. We must cease to be sheep baying that the shepherd is leading us to slaughter. We must instead stop following him into the abyss and provide our own leadership. It is not our fate to be forced to choose between two agents of Jewry seeking our demise. It is our fate to reject enemy leadership and lead ourselves. We need only fulfill our fate and we have a tremendous opportunity to do so.

Now That Trump Is Claiming to be Christ. . .

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Now that Trump is pretending to be the King of Israel, we ought to reconsider his ability to remain President of the United States. For one thing, titles of nobility don't sit well on any American, let alone a President. For another, Trump has openly displayed his disloyalty to the United States of America. Jesus said in Matthew 6:24:

"No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon."

Likewise, Donald Trump cannot serve Americans and our enemies the Israelis. He has declared himself to be our enemy by accepting the throne of Israel, if only jokingly. Trump has quite seriously declared that American Jews are disloyal if they are not loyal to Israel, when the contrary case is true. American Jews are disloyal if they are loyal to Israel, for they cannot love America and our enemy Israel. Therefore, they, like Trump, are disloyal to the US if they are loyal to Israel.

We have a domestic enemy as President and he ought to be impeached for the offense of treason. It is the Constitutional duty of the Congress to impeach Trump and then remove him from office. Of course, they, like him, are faithful to Israel not America, so it will not happen.

Trump Got It Wrong, Twice

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

US President Donald Trump boldly declared that Jews who vote for Democrats are disloyal, because according to Trump all Jews ought to be loyal to Israel and the Democrats oppose Israel. It is not worth rebutting Trump's patently false claim that the Democrats, including Israel-firsters like Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer, are in any way anti-Israel. The more pressing issue is the obvious fact that those American Jews who are loyal to Israel are those Jews whom the American President should identify and condemn as "disloyal" because they are disloyal to America.

Trump is terribly confused as to the Constitutional role of the American President. His statements disqualify him to be our President. Our President should not promote disloyalty to the United States.

Christian Zionists are also disloyal to America and to Christianity. Trump today donned the crown of the anti-Christ by sacrilegiously promoting the belief that he is the second coming of Christ. The Jews are upset, because they do not want a Goy claiming to be their King. They had Jesus crucified for the claim that he was King of the Jews, and Jesus was a Judean, INRI.

But the Christian Zionists do not condemn Trump for his blasphemous statements. The Christian Zionists have been following an anti-Christ agenda for centuries and so are quite comfortable with judaizing heresies. It is only the Jews who are outraged at Trump's sacrilege for claiming the throne of David. Israel is a Jews-only State and Trump offends them with his pretense to the throne.

Friday, August 16, 2019

The Statue of Liberty Is a Deliberate Subversion of American Sovereignty Which Was Crafted by Judeo-Freemasonry to Foster the Exodus of Eastern European Jews to America

The Founding Fathers were clear in their mandates for immigrants seeking to become Americans. The Founders expressly stated that only Whites of good character were eligible for citizenship.The Founders of the United States of America expressly stated:

"United States Congress, 'An act to establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization' (March 26, 1790).

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, That any Alien being a free white person, who shall have resided within the limits and under the jurisdiction of the United States for the term of two years, may be admitted to become a citizen thereof on application to any common law Court of record in any one of the States wherein he shall have resided for the term of one year at least, and making proof to the satisfaction of such Court that he is a person of good character, and taking the oath or affirmation prescribed by law to support the Constitution of the United States, which Oath or Affirmation such Court shall administer, and the Clerk of such Court shall record such Application, and the proceedings thereon; and thereupon such person shall be considered as a Citizen of the United States. And the children of such person so naturalized, dwelling within the United States, being under the age of twenty one years at the time of such naturalization, shall also be considered as citizens of the United States. And the children of citizens of the United States that may be born beyond Sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural born Citizens: Provided, that the right of citizenship shall not descend to persons whose fathers have never been resident in the United States: Provided also, that no person heretofore proscribed by any States, shall be admitted a citizen as aforesaid, except by an Act of the Legislature of the State in which such person was proscribed.

United States Congress, 'An act to establish an uniform rule of Naturalization; and to repeal the act heretofore passed on that subject' (January 29, 1795).

For carrying into complete effect the power given by the constitution, to establish an uniform rule of naturalization throughout the United States:

SEC.1. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, That any alien, being a free white person, may be admitted to become a citizen of the United States, or any of them, on the following conditions, and not otherwise: --

First. He shall have declared, on oath or affirmation, before the supreme, superior, district, or circuit court of some one of the states, or of the territories northwest or south of the river Ohio, or a circuit or district court of the United States, three years, at least, before his admission, that it was bona fide, his intention to become a citizen of the United States, and to renounce forever all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty whatever, and particularly, by name, the prince, potentate, state or sovereignty whereof such alien may, at that time, be a citizen or subject.

Secondly. He shall, at the time of his application to be admitted, declare on oath or affirmation before some one of the courts aforesaid, that he has resided within the United States, five years at least, and within the state or territory, where such court is at the time held, one year at least; that he will support the constitution of the United States; and that he does absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty whatever, and particularly by name, the prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty, whereof he was before a citizen or subject; which proceedings shall be recorded by the clerk of the court.

Thirdly. The court admitting such alien shall be satisfied that he has resided within the limits and under the jurisdiction of the United States five years; and it shall further appear to their satisfaction, that during that time, he has behaved as a man of a good moral character, attached to the principles of the constitution of the United States, and well disposed to the good order and happiness of the same.

Fourthly. In case the alien applying to be admitted to citizenship shall have borne any hereditary title, or been of any of the orders of nobility, in the kingdom or state from which he came, he shall, in addition to the above requisites, make an express renunciation of his title or order of nobility, in the court to which his application shall be made; which renunciation shall be recorded in the said court.

SEC. 2. Provided always, and be it further enacted, That any alien now residing within the limits and under the jurisdiction of the United States may be admitted to become a citizen on his declaring, on oath or affirmation, in some one of the courts aforesaid, that he has resided two years, at least, within and under the jurisdiction of the same, and one year, at least, within the state or territory where such court is at the time held; that he will support the constitution of the United States; and that he does absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty whatever, and particularly by name the prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty, whereof he was before a citizen or subject; and moreover, on its appearing to the satisfaction of the court, that during the said term of two years, he has behaved as a man of good moral character, attached to the constitution of the United States, and well disposed to the good order and happiness of the same; and when the alien applying for admission to citizenship, shall have borne any hereditary title, or been of any of the orders of nobility in the kingdom or state from which he came, on his moreover making in the court an express renunciation of his title or order of nobility, before he shall be entitled to such admission; all of which proceedings, required in this proviso to be performed in the court, shall be recorded by the clerk thereof.

SEC. 3. And be it further enacted, that the children of persons duly naturalized, dwelling within the United States, and being under the age of twenty-one years, at the time of such naturalization, and the children of citizens of the United States, born out of the limits and jurisdiction of the United States, shall be considered as citizens of the United States: Provided, That the right of citizenship shall not descend to persons, whose fathers have never been resident of the United States: Provided also, That no person heretofore proscribed by any state, or who has been legally convicted of having joined the army of Great Britain during the late war, shall be admitted a citizen as foresaid, without the consent of the legislature of the state, in which such person was proscribed.

SEC. 4. And be it further enacted, That the Act intituled, 'An act to establish an uniform rule of naturalization,' passed the twenty-sixth day of March, one thousand seven hundred and ninety, be, and the same is hereby repealed."

The Jews sought to move millions of Eastern European Jews to America in preparation for the formation of a Jewish State in Palestine and the spread of international communism. They used their disproportionate influence to change the laws of the United States to favor that invasion. The Statue of Liberty was a significant part of their propaganda campaign to destroy the intentions and laws of the Founders. We should demand that the statue be brought down. It was crafted by Satanist Freemasons and the oft repeated and anti-American slogan inscribed on it was written by a Sephardic Jewess named Emma Lazarus, who wanted to open our gates to an Eastern European Jewish invasion,

"Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, the wretched refuse of your teeming shore. Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me, I lift my lamp beside the golden door!"

Lazarus did not warn us that the Jews she was guiding to our doorstep in the Trojan Horse of the Statue of Liberty sought to enslave us. And they soon did. Many warned of the dangers of the invasion. They told us that we must not lose Harvard University, the press and the government to the Jews. Alas, our forefathers were duped and their kindheartedness and philanthropy was employed against them to open our shores to the Jewish invasion that has since caused us so much harm.

The Jews are busy tearing down all of our monuments to our great American leaders. The Statue of Liberty is an idol of our enslavement. We should demand it be removed and place in its stead a tribute to our Founders inscribed with their ideals for our nation.

I Warned You that Trump Is a Bolshevik

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Donald Trump is vividly displaying his commie red colors. He sides with the Chinese communists against the Hong Kongese, Americans and our allies. The "Don", who is a puppet working for the Jewish mafia, sides with the North Koreans against Americans, the South Koreans and our allies. He takes KGB Putin's side against America, NATO and our other allies.

Now, Bolshevik Trump is threatening to commit Red Terror against American citizens. Trump is attacking the First Amendment with his support for capital "Hate Crimes" laws which proscribe criticism of the Jews on pain of death, with his attacks on the free press, with his promotion of the genocidal Noahide laws, and with his use of State powers to discourage organized dissent to oppose his dangerous tyranny.

The First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America states:

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

Just as the rules employed by social media oligarchs to silence us on the internet are vague, arbitrary and draconian, so too is Trump's campaign to silence us. These forces which pretend to oppose one another are a saw blade suspended as a pendulum which swings back and forth cutting away at our rights, our human dignity, and soon our necks. This ever increasing set of anti-American regulations are intended to cause us to self censor out of fear of retaliation for speaking the truth and defending our selves, our neighbors and our nation.

Just as social media is prompting us to self censor for fear of being removed from the public arena and just as antifa and Jewish alphabet non-governmental and now governmental agencies attempt to intimidate us into silence for fear of losing our means to earn a living and enduring dishonest public shame; Donald Trump is now threatening our very lives with capital punishment for speaking the truth and defending our rights. He is now threatening to deny our fundamental constitutional rights to freedom of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, freedom of the press, and the right to keep and bear arms. He is also calling for the summary execution of the accused under his Bolshevik laws which proscribe free speech on pain of gun confiscation and death. And Trump not only desires to murder the free, but their families as well, a classic Bolshevik tactic to destroy the genetic material of freedom loving human beings.

Lenin, Trotsky and Stalin immediately proscribed free speech and "anti-Semitism" when they took over Russia and mass murdered 30 million people by 1923. Trump has done the same. He is just as much a Bolshevik as were they.

He has created a climate of fear and governmental intimidation, whereby citizens now have to weigh the consequences of speaking out against him and his Jewish agenda of murdering all those who speak the truth and defend their rights. Trump has now placed a breeding pressure on European civilization, whereby the cowards and stupid will thrive and the best, most courageous, honest and noble who are willing to defend their fellows are murdered by the State.

The State is now hobbling the citizenry, which it views as its slaves. And it is Trump, not the phantom "Deep State" who is doing it. Behind Donald Trump stands Chabad Lubavitch, Zionism, Israel and international communism, in other words World Jewry. The misdirection of a supposed "Deep State" is a delusion behind which Trump hides the fact that he is controlled by Jewish leaders and always has been. He is implementing their Jewish agenda to enslave and exterminate us. He is openly threatening our lives and we must organize to speak out against him in the public square.

Donald Trump has not only trampled on the First Amendment, he seeks to shred the Second, which secures our rights to keep and bear arms, and he does it in the name of silencing dissent against disproportionate and tyrannical Jewish power. Trump is another Trotsky and he is aiming the State at us with the open threat of our genocide.

Sunday, August 11, 2019

Jeffrey Epstein: At What Point Does the "Witness Protection Program" Become an Obstruction of Justice?

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Many are floating the theory that Jeffrey Epstein's "suicide" was staged and that he is still alive and part of the witness protection program. If that is true, and Epstein is prevented from testifying in the civil suits that have been filed related to his sex trafficking, such an act would obstruct justice in those cases. So we must ask, can a crucial witness be withheld from those seeking justice in the court system? And we must further wonder what criminal justice is to be had for his victims? Beyond all of that, who watches the watchers who may well have conflicts of interest leading them to seek to suppress Epstein's testimony by any and all means?

Did Epstein Secret Away Files on All the Pedophiles He Covertly Filmed and Photographed?

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Jeffrey Epstein obviously ran his pedophile ring as a blackmail trap. A blackmailer protects himself by storing his material at various locations around the world with instructions that it be released in event he is killed. Epstein surely would have done this.

So now that he is allegedly deceased, why have not these files depicting the pedophiles he filmed been released as punishment for his murder? Why has there been no immediate retaliation? Is Epstein still alive? If so, that would explain why no one feared to stage his death. It would be better to stage it, than commit it, because if Epstein played a part in the charade, there would be no incentive for him or those he entrusted to release compromising material.

On Jeffrey Epstein's Alleged Suicide

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

I have been patiently waiting for the response of Jeffrey Epstein's lawyers to his reported death before weighing in on the matter. After being found wounded in his cell, one would expect that if Epstein believed he was in mortal danger, he would have communicated that fact to his very competent legal team and they would have informed the press and the court. One would also expect that if Epstein were suicidal, his lawyers may have been cognizant of the fact and would have taken steps to acquire medical treatment for him. Would not Epstein have alerted his lawyers that he was in danger, if he believed that he was? Perhaps he did, perhaps not.

One of his lawyers, expressly speaking on his own behalf and not as Epstein's counsel, has issued a statement calling for an investigation into Epstein's death:

https://twitter.com/jriley8832/status/1160246629359935489

Epstein's lawyers may well know more than they have yet publicly disclosed. There may be forthcoming lawsuits seeking damages for Epstein's death, whether it be ruled a suicide, murder, accident, or other cause. Thus far, the cards are being held relatively close to the vest. This is an under-reported aspect of this case.

If Epstein did not tell his lawyers that he believed he was in mortal danger or that he felt suicidal, then perhaps something else happened to Epstein, which he expected would occur and which he wanted to occur. Perhaps, like Pollard, he had friends in Israel who sought to provide him with sanctuary from American justice.

I suspect books are already being written on the matter, but the story has yet to be told. Epstein's lawyers will likely have their own story to tell.

Friday, June 21, 2019

Not Out of the Iranian Woods, Yet

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

President Trump reportedly called off a retaliatory strike against Iran. That was a wise choice, but does it signify that the likelihood of war is now far less than it was? I doubt it.

Every day that passes without a war is a good day. That said, we should watch what happens in the coming weeks for signs of a troop build up surrounding Iran. It would be stupid to hit Iran without first massing troops around the nation. Furthermore, the US would be ill advised to instigate a war without generating popular support among the American People and the allies of the United States, which does not presently exist.

Before waging war in the Persian Gulf, the Allies of America would probably begin to massively increase their reserves of oil and secure the Saudi Arabian military. An increase in oil shipping would indicate that this is occurring. America would also likely increase domestic oil production.

The winds of war are still whirling. If Iran is in on the game, they will begin threatening not only the US, but Israel, as well. And they will boast of their enrichment of weapons grade nuclear materials.

Israel will probably use the situation as a pretext to demand more military handouts from America. The news cycles will rock back and forth to play upon the emotions of the American public and make it impossible for them to decipher what is real and what is not. It is a process of attrition. The constant barrage takes it toll on the psyche of the American People and the lulls only intensify the magnitude of the horrific moments.

They are obviously trying to amplify the impatience of the world for some final result to occur. The odds that it will be peace seem low at this time, most unfortunately.

Wednesday, June 19, 2019

Is the Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia Mohammad bin Salman Being Pressured to Attack Iran?

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Agnes Callamard of the United Nations stated that there is credible evidence that the government of Saudi Arabia committed the premeditated murder of Jamal Khashoggi. She calls for a criminal investigation into the matter:

This places the Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia Mohammad bin Salman in a very awkward position. The government of the United States and the press could exploit this opportunity to pressure the Crown Prince into attacking Iran. They could potentially promise him that they would use their influence to suppress this proposed United Nations investigation and/or its findings if, and only if, he wages war against Iran. Recall that the United States pressured Saddam Hussein into attacking Iran and then Kuwait.

Friday, June 14, 2019

CNN Article Pointing to Iran

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

A recent CNN article by Nic Robertson is drawing the conclusion that the circumstantial evidence surrounding the recent bombings of ships in the Gulf of Oman points to Iran. I would like to point out that the Gulf War was very good business for CNN and established the network as a major player in mass media. The Wikipedia article covering CNN states,

"The first Persian Gulf War in 1991 was a watershed event for CNN that catapulted the channel past the "Big Three" American networks for the first time in its history, largely due to an unprecedented, historical scoop: CNN was the only news outlet with the ability to communicate from inside Iraq during the initial hours of the Coalition bombing campaign, with live reports from the al-Rashid Hotel in Baghdad by reporters Bernard Shaw, John Holliman and Peter Arnett."

There is an obvious conflict of interest in the mass media which forces us to question everything they say that generates war fever. Wars are very good business for the mass media, which creates an incentive for them to generate wars. We face this dilemma at the precise time that the social media oligarchs are partnering with organized Jewry to promote mass media reporting over independent media reporting, even going so far as to censor independent journalists.

I do not believe it is mere coincidence that false flag attacks are wrongly being attributed to Iran at the precise time that the mass media are being resuscitated and the independent media are being purged from the internet. They have largely silenced all the voices who would likely attribute these recent attacks to false flags operations.

A war on Iran would be a golden opportunity for the mass media to reestablish itself as the framer of public opinion in the climate of absolute censorship of independent media. The American People will clamor for news, and only the mass media will be allowed to deliver it with their uniform and scripted voice. Left and Right mass media will speak with one voice on issues of importance to Israel, and the American People will be deluded into committing mass suicide by waging war on Iran.

Monday, May 27, 2019

The Jewish Hypocrisy of Tyrannical Anti-BDS Laws

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Zionists are aggressively combating the Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) movement by attempting to proscribe it by law. This violates the fundamental human rights of freedom to choose among products, freedom of speech, freedom of assembly and the right to self defense. The international Zionist organizations behind these laws are also violating the sovereignty of the nations where they seek to impose these tyrannical proscriptions on the citizenry and government.

What is more, these Jews are absolute hypocrites. The Jews heavily organized to boycott Russian and Polish goods, and to block the Tsars' access to the money markets for loans. In this way, they so weakened the Russian Empire that they rendered it ripe for the Bolshevik Revolution during which they seized control of the empire and promptly mass murdered 30 million of its best citizens. Having destroyed Tsarist Russia and lacking the bogey of fabricated Tsarist oppression, they placed Adolf Hitler in power to oppress German Jews.

After the big Jews accomplished the creation of a new Pharaoh, Hitler, the Jewish masses set out to boycott German goods internationally and thereby overthrow the Hitler regime and wreck Germany. The big Jews opposed these boycotts, but seized upon the opportunity as a pretext for the Transfer Agreement which would enable them to found the nation of Israel.

Samuel Untermyer formally established this pretext for sincere Nazis to acquiesce to the Transfer Agreement by pronouncing a worldwide boycott of German goods and services. Not only that, he called for an official religious "Cherem" to be placed on all German goods. Rabbi Mendelson then performed the Jewish rite imposing the Herem on German goods. This meant that no Jew could touch these goods upon punishment of excommunication. Edwin Black described these events in his book The Transfer Agreement, at pages 350-353:

"So in the first days of September, spontaneous calls went out in various countries to compel the Zionist Organization to stop its deals with Germany.16 If not? Cherem. For centuries, the cherem had been the curse of untouchability imposed against the Jewish people's greatest enemies and most reprehensible sinners. Once pronounced by a rabbi against a non-Jew or inanimate object, the person or object became untouchable for Jews. Once pronounced against a Jew, the Jew was either excommunicated or shunned or both. Anyone breaching the cherem would himself fall under the cherem. [***] The second speaker was Untermyer, who denounced those bargaining with Adolf Hitler to salvage 'a few possessions' belonging to German Jews. Untermyer told the rabbis that a cherem was the only answer to such traitors. [***] The solemn ritual began when two tall black candles were set on a table several feet apart, then lit. A rabbi wearing the traditional talis or prayer shawl, blew three times on the shofar, the twisted ram's horn sounded on the Day of Atonement. Following the shofar blasts, the rabbi of Newark, Rabbi B. A. Mendelson, chanted the decree in Hebrew, 'In the name of the Assembly of Hebrew Orthodox Rabbis of the United States and Canada and other rabbinical organizations that join us in our beliefs, we take upon ourselves. . . as leaders of Israel, to decree a cherem on everything manufactured in Hitler's Germany. From today on we are to refrain from dealing in all basic materials such as metals, textiles, and other things. . . which come to us from the Nazis. . . We urge all to not knowingly violate this boycott which we have this day decreed.'20 Rabbi Mendelson then took his gavel and ritually extinguished the candle flames. As the flames turned to smoke, many in the room were heard to mutter softly, 'Like this for Hitler.'21"

Invoking this Herem on Germany was a declaration of genocidal war and the symbolic extinguishing of the flame of the German life force. The Old Testament calls for Herem against the Canaanites and the other peoples the ancient Jews demanded be exterminated. The Herem as a method of censure and exclusion from the community inevitably becomes the Herem as a war of extermination.

So as the Jews commit genocide against the Palestinians, they deny the world the human right of boycott to stop them. They are not only oppressing the Palestinians in this way, they are viciously oppressing every human being on earth by denying us our fundamental human rights of protest, free unbridled expression and boycott. They are absolute and genocidal tyrants, as well as complete hypocrites. Their ability to control our leaders to subvert our fundamental human rights is firm proof of their grossly disproportionate international power, which they justify with their religious mythology that they are divine and the Gentiles, satanic beasts.

Thursday, May 23, 2019

"Fight censorship! Distribute this video and break the social media monopoly."

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

I would like to ask for your help in a new campaign I would like to start to combat censorship and fight back against the information monopoly. When time permits, I am going to upload my banned and censored videos to platforms less prone to censorship. This is not enough, because I have the fundamental right to the full benefits that all others enjoy from every social media platform. As a method of protest and to gain awareness of the criminal censorship and of my work, I ask that you burn DVDs and thumb drives of my videos and those of Adam Green of Know More News.

I will create an intro video describing how the information monopoly has repeatedly censored me and denied me my fundamental human rights to free and fair political expression and scholarly research. We can take a totally neutral position and simply state that the videos are being distributed to promote free speech and counter organized censorship.

We should really produce a compilation DVD with many voices decrying censorship and demanding fair and equal treatment in social media. Let's see if we can create a new form of viral media in a permanent form that can be collected in personal libraries and shared among friends and strangers alike.

We should send members of Congress Adam Green's latest video. A cover letter should demand that our Congress instigate an investigation into Israeli violations of our fundamental rights to free speech, freedom from discrimination, freedom from intimidation and threats, freedom to assemble, and privacy.

We can label every DVD, "Fight censorship! Distribute this video and break the social media monopoly."

Tuesday, May 21, 2019

"Treat It as Your Greatest Patriotic Duty Not to Go to War"

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

A listener of the Adam Green show "Know More News" has corresponded with me. He tipped me off to the work of Grzegorz Braun:

I was struck by this man's talk on two significant points. First, he asserts that Chabad Lubavitch is creating sovereign zones within sovereign nations, States within States. The Jews had long sought autonomous zones within Polish sovereign territory, and spread lies around the globe of exaggerated pogroms and persecutions in order to secure it. This is documented in my book Warnings to the Jews: Premonitions of the Holocaust. Having been driven from Poland and the Ukraine by the Zionist Nazis, after being warned to cease this subversive activity or face a massive pogrom, the Jews are now returning to Poland and the Ukraine and reasserting self-sovereignty with growing outposts of Israel. Braun fears they may instigate a war between Poland and the Ukraine.

Secondly, Braun demands that the Poles see it as their patriotic to NOT go to war. Only by maintaining peace can the nation and the people survive this foreign attack. Therefore, the best interests of the nation and the people compel peace.

This is the exact message we should be giving to the American people with respect to the bellicose rhetoric and threatening actions of the Netanyahu-led Trump administration. It is our patriotic duty to NOT go to war with Iran. Only in this way can we save ourselves and our country. Netanyahu has been waging war against America for decades by instigating us to fight self-destructive wars which benefit Israel and Russia, but which destroy America and Muslim nations. It is our greatest patriotic duty to NOT go to war, unless it is against our real enemy who is goading us to fight others who have done us no harm.

Saturday, May 18, 2019

Are They Blackmailing Trump With the Threat of Impeachment?

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Every time Trump iterates bellicose rhetoric against Iran, the calls for impeachment quiet. Every time Trump backs off the war agenda, the calls for impeachment intensify. The same is true of potential charges against his family members.

It could be that Trump is being blackmailed into attacking Iran.

The Israelis Now Claim God Given Rights, Whereas Before Their Claims Were Political

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

The Israelis used to claim their supposed right to exist were based upon such mundane instruments as the Balfour Declaration and United Nations Resolution 242. They have changed tactics. They now claim a biblical right to exist.

This enables the Israelis to assert ancient rights to vastly greater territories and justify the land grabs as fulfillment of their god's covenant with them. This also justifies, in their minds, their fulfillment of Jewish messianic prophecies.

The shift from political justifications for their existence to religious justifications is a quite significant and immensely dangerous one worth taking note of. They are using it to make the Talmud the law of the land in Israel. That means they intend to govern the world under Talmudic law.

Tuesday, May 14, 2019

We Must Remain Vigilant That There Not Be a Saudi-Iran War, Like the Iran-Iraq War

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

It is wonderful to learn that the momentum is turning against Trump, Netanyahu and Putin and their plans for an American attack on Iran. But the danger of war has by no means passed.

The last time the Israelis, Americans and Russians conspired to bring war to Iran, they used Iraq as a proxy army. This time they are gearing up to use Saudi Arabia.

The Saudis are itching for the fight, too. They have been for quite some time and they have bought up large amounts of armaments in preparation for it.

If Saudi Arabia manages to instigate a war with Iran, it will be different from the Iran-Iraq War in many respects. The alliances are now stronger. The oil disruption will be worse, and other countries will certainly be drawn into the conflict.

The Carter Doctrine states,

"Let our position be absolutely clear: An attempt by any outside force to gain control of the Persian Gulf region will be regarded as an assault on the vital interests of the United States of America, and such an assault will be repelled by any means necessary, including military force."

This will be used as a pretext for America and Europe to join in the fight, which may expand to Lebanon, Syria and other nations. We need to expose any Saudi false flags immediately and forcefully and deflate any cries for war.

Great News! Bernie Sanders and the EU have Come Out Against Trump's War

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

It will not take a great effort to end Trump's (Netanyahu's) push for war against Iran. It is so stupid a move, that it is not difficult to convince the American People to oppose it. The opposition is mounting at home and abroad:

Bernie Sanders says war with Iran would be "many times worse than the Iraq War"

Former Bush Aide Shocked at Iran Troop Deployment Report, Says We've Learned Nothing From Iraq Invasion

British general in Iraq says no elevated Iran threat

Trump Will Use the War on Iran to Gain Reelection

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

If Trump succeeds in his quest to gin up a war against Iran, he then will use the war he needlessly started as a campaign issue to win reelection. This is an old tactic. Incumbents invoke the old proverb, "Don't change horses in midstream."

When Abraham Lincoln ran for his second term during the Civil War, he said it was, "no time to swap horses!" During the Iraq War, George W. Bush made the same pitch, and it won him reelection.

Franklin Delano Roosevelt and Barack Obama also said, "Don't change horses in midstream," claiming that they needed a second term to fix the economy. I suspect that Trump will attempt to employ the same strategy. He will then fight WW III.

Of course, the mere fact that Trump is trying to instigate a completely unnecessary and utterly self-destructive war with Iran is reason enough to vote him out of office. But logic has little to do with politics and the media will cheer on this war with Iran, if Trump and Netanyahu can get it started. Organized Jewry has been pushing for this war for decades in America, and for thousands of years in their religious literature.

I have heard many prominent Jews call for a nuclear attack on Tehran. Let us hope that it was impassioned rhetoric and not insider knowledge of what has been planned.

Let's Petition Trump

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

The First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America states in the relevant part, "the right of the people [***] to petition the Government for a redress of grievances". The White House affords us with this option to petition the President:

https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/

We should start petitioning the White House to stop serving Israel and Russia. I suggest we instigate a petition demanding that the President not take military action against Iran and stop threatening Iran with a show of force.

We should also petition Trump end all forms of censorship and the violations of fundamental rights which exists in all "anti-Semitism" legislation.

It should be easy to start a petition demanding, "No War on Iran!"

Monday, May 13, 2019

Where Are the Polls?

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Typically, the news media would conduct polls at times like these, to determine whether or not the American People want to go to war with Iran, North Korea and/or Venezuela. So where are they? What are the numbers? Why are they waiting?

It could be that is exactly what they are doing, waiting for "some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor" to quote from PNAC, before gauging the popular sentiment for war, or lack thereof. Then, after such an event, they would be more certain that there is popular support for war. Someone, please conduct a poll now, before the false flag event, on whether or not Americans want to wage war on Iran. I know that we do not.

The Theaters Opening Up to Stage World War III

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Why are we being simultaneously led to pull our military forces away from the United States and Europe? The Communists and Israelis, with Trump on their leash, are drawing us towards conflicts in Iran, North Korea and Venezuela. Each of these nations has close ties to Russia, just like our President.

Iran and Venezuela are also oil producing nations. What will happen if we go to war with all three countries at once? Our land, sea and air forces will be spread thin and wide, far from home. Energy prices will skyrocket, providing Russia with massive revenue with which to build weapons of war, as our Western economies crumble.

Europe and America will grow ever weaker and more in debt. Our military resources will be exhausted. And what will happen if we "win" these wars? Will we occupy each of these nations and further deplete our vital resources and will to fight?

What if Saudi Arabia joins in our war on Iran? Will Russia use it as pretext to war against us? Will the entire Muslim world erupt in internecine warfare between Sunnis and Shia? Will the Persian Gulf become engulfed in war and disrupt energy supplies to the West?

What if China again joins with North Korea, this time fully supported by Russia? What will become of Japan, Australia and the United States, as China invades Australia as we fight in Korea and Japan?

And China has its sights aimed at South America, too. If we are drawn to fight there, they will have a pretext to follow us and shred the last remaining scraps of the Monroe Doctrine.

This is a very bad mix for us. It is extremely advantageous to Russia, China and Israel. That cannot be a coincidence. This is all still avoidable, but no one can help prevent it but you. You must become politically active and let the Congress know that the American People do not want these wars. We want to defend our homeland and preserve our military and our will to fight for that purpose.

If we fail to stop these relatively minor wars, Russia and China will build their forces as ours are depleted. Then they will strike, with Israel at their side, when we are weak and war weary. It is easy to act now. We must do so. If we do, we will succeed.

The Convergence of Laws Proscribing Anti-Semitism, the Coming War on Iran, Etc.

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Despite the easily demonstrably fact that neo-Conservative Jews instigated and led the war on Iraq, organized Jewry now claims that the Jews were opposed to the war on Iraq. Benjamin Netanyahu has been attempting to provoke a war between the United States and Iran for decades. He has lied over and over again falsely claiming that Iran is an imminent threat, which will allegedly shortly possess nuclear weapons. His hysterical rants against Iran have never been retracted, though they have been repeatedly proven to have been deliberate lies.

If the anti-Semitism laws the Jews seek to enact become law, then all information about the Jewish involvement in 9/11 will be scrubbed. Any mention of Jewish messianic prophecies and their impact on non-Jews will be proscribed by law. I suspect they want to make it illegal to speak about the fact that Benjamin Netanyahu has led us to wage war on Iran. But that is only the beginning. The war on Iran will provide an opportunity for Israel to bring down the Dome of the Rock and Al Aqsa Mosque. The Jews will then begin to construct the Third Temple of Solomon and anoint their King.

Christians and Muslims will proclaim that the anti-Christ and al-Dajjal has arrived. Organized Jewry want to make it illegal to make such claims, and will define them as "classical anti-Semitism" of a "world Jewish conspiracy". They won't be able to stop people from saying these things, but they will use artificial intelligence and secret internet police to keep you from ever seeing or hearing them. And they will use real world police to arrest those speaking the truth.

So say it now, and say it loud, it is Jewry which is provoking war with Iran! We can and must stop this war before it begins, and before organized Jewry succeeds in proscribing free speech. "No More Wars for Israel!" It is the recurrent mantra, because Israel demands permanent war until all the nations succumb to death.

Christians and Muslims should find common cause in rejecting these wars. Christians and Muslims should find common cause in preventing the destruction of the Dome of the Rock and al-Aqsa Mosque. Christians and Muslims should find common cause in eroding the Israeli domination of American foreign policy. Time is growing shorter. We can do this. We have succeeded in the past. Contact your Congressional representatives and let them know that you do NOT want to fight another Middle Eastern war. Demand that they do NOT impose any restrictions on free speech. Iran is not a threat to the United States. Israel is!

We can and must stop this war. The only way to do it is to demonstrate to the politicians that we do not support it and not reelect them if they do.

The USS Liberty Attack and the "Sabotaged" Saudi Oil Tankers

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

In 1967, the Israelis launched a false flag attack on the USS Liberty. The Israelis wanted America to think that Egypt had sunk the vessel and then declare war on Egypt.

This was yet another attempt to provoke an American war by attacking a ship. The supposedly sabotaged Saudi oil tankers may well fit into this pattern of deception. Both Saudi Arabia and the United States are eager to instigate a war against Iran at the behest of Israel. They lack only a pretext which will rally their peoples to wage war. Nothing threatens Saudis like an attack on their oil trade. This will have the Saudi public riled up and ready to fight. This fight will have a powerful religious element to it that will spread across the Middle East and the world. It will also potentially isolate America and Europe from major oil suppliers, which will hurt us and benefit Israel and Russia by raising energy prices and availability.

When you look at the attacks on the Saudi oil tankers, and the coming attacks on other ships, remember the USS Liberty, the Maine, the Lusitania, Pearl Harbor, the Gulf of Tonkin incident, etc. It is a centuries' old tactic to provide a pretext for war and the public outrage needed to support it.

"Remember the Maine! To hell with Spain!"

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

The United States of America has repeatedly used attacks on ships as a pretext for war. The sinking of the USS Maine led to the Spanish-American War in 1898. The sinking of the Lusitania served as one of the justifications for America's entrance into the First World War. The Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, which many had predicted and of which President Roosevelt had foreknowledge, brought us into World War Two. The Gulf of Tonkin incident precipitated the Vietnam War.

This tried and true tactic of manufacturing a pretext for war is now being tried against Iran. I suspect it will succeed, and soon.

The best time to launch an anti-war protest is before the war begins. We have stopped the Zionists from instigating a war against Iran many, many times in the past. We can stop them now, if we can demonstrate that there is strong will not to go to war with Iran and not to fight another Middle Eastern war. We have to publicly show that the American People do not support a war against Iran. We must do this now, before the war starts.

Thursday, May 09, 2019

This Is What Might Happen If We Are Silent About Our Fundamental Rights to Free Speech

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

I suspect the Congress is going to try use the public outrage at the billionaire social media oligarchs to slip in legislation proscribing criticism of Jews, Judaism, Zionism and Israel. In the name of free speech, they are asking for the power to proscribe certain classes of speech, which have been defined by the Jewish lobby. They will sell this to conservatives as legislation protecting the rights of the Alex Joneses of the world. They will sell these laws to liberals as breaking the back of the monopolies.

We must contact our representatives in Congress and insist that no laws be passed which create privileged classes, or in any infringe upon our Constitutional rights to free speech. If they render social media platforms into utilities, we must carefully read the legislation and oppose any attempts to use the power of the State to impose sanctions on anyone violating rules which proscribe any form of free speech. They will attempt to create a police force and methods of imposing sanctions. This will be the "thought police". In the name of ending the thought police of the billionaire social media oligarchs, they will create a State "thought police" force.

As Alex Jones always said, "problem, reaction, solution". They created the problem by declaring Jones "dangerous". The reaction was to oppose this suppression of free speech. The proposed solution will be for the State to takeover the policing of public discussion and free up Alex Jones, and those like him, while proscribing and slipping in punishments for criticizing Jews, Judaism, Zionism and Israel.

Such illegal legislation violates the First Amendment on its face, and is therefore void on its face. It is also irrational; in that it presumes that Jews, Judaism, Zionism and Israel can do no wrong and therefore there can be no legitimate basis for criticism against them–but that is a separate issue from the issue of basic freedom of speech. There is no need to justify free speech. No one can proscribe it whether they agree with it, or not; whether they find it legitimate, or not. It is the speaker's choice what he or she wishes to say, and no one elses.

We have foolishly allowed some exceptions to the absolute right of free speech. The classic example is that it is illegal to scream out, "Fire!" in a crowded theater when there is no reason to believe a fire exists. But it is never illegal to scream out, "Fire!" when there are reasons to believe that a fire exists.

Therefore, it is irrational to ban certain classes of speech in order to shield special interest groups or sets of beliefs from criticism. It must never be illegal to warn the public about threats emanating from any group or set of beliefs. To argue otherwise is to irrationally and with no basis in fact claim that there can be no conflicting interests between groups in our society, and that certain protected classes and belief systems can never be considered dangerous or come to be scrutinized. It is to argue that theaters can never burn, and that enemies of privileged class are not enemies, despite the fact that someone believes that they are and wants to talk about the danger.

It is time to be vigilant and to be heard!

Does Anyone Remember Rev. Ted Pike's One Man War Against "Hate Crimes" Laws?

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Rev. Ted Pike almost single handedly stopped numerous attempts in the Congress of the United States of America to pass "hate crimes" legislation. He did this by setting up a website with the names and telephone numbers of the offices for each person in Congress. He went on numerous talk shows and asked everyone to call each member of Congress. He then issued a clear and concise statement for people to quote when calling asking that this legislation not be passed, and stating why it should not be passed.

Rev. Pike went on every talk show that would listen, and spread his message at key junctures in the voting cycles. People responded very positively and the movement he set in motion succeeded over and over again. This man saved us from "hate crimes" laws many times over the course of many years.

We have an opportunity to mirror what Pastor Pike did with regards to internet censorship and monopolies owned by billionaire social media oligarchs. We especially need to focus on free speech issues and let our voice be heard by our members of Congress. Remember, Rev. Pike succeeded, so this has a history of working that we can build upon. The Zionists have the power of their money, but politicians still need votes and if they sense that they will be outed if they do not respond to the wishes of their constituencies they will take that into consideration.

Here is what we need to do:

We need a website with the names and telephone numbers for the offices of each member of both the Senate and House broken down by district and State. We need a clear and concise message stating our demands that our rights to free speech be respected by law, and that the monopolies be broken apart. Once this is established we need every voice we can summon to go on internet talk shows and ask people to call and iterate the statement to their Congressional representatives and direct them to the website with names and phone numbers, as well the message to be read verbatim.

Both the Left under Elizabeth Warren and the Right under Donald Trump are speaking out against the billionaire social media oligarchs. This creates the chaos they want to exploit to impose laws against us. We need to have our voice heard in this debate and demand laws that respect the American way and protect free speech.

In the news today:

Facebook co-founder calls for the company to be broken up and says Zuckerberg has 'unilateral control over speech'

Facebook co-founder says Zuckerberg 'not accountable,' calls for government break up

Monday, May 06, 2019

We Need Anti-War Protests and We Need Them Now!

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

I had a premonition that they were going to escalate hostilities with Iran in the near future. A decade ago, I revealed the prophetic ambitions of Judaism to wage war on Iran:

The Jews Have Been Planning to Attack Iran for at Least 700 Years in Order to End the World in Fulfilment of Jewish Messianic Prophecy

In writing my books on Hitler regarding the First and Second World Wars, several things struck me as relates to WW III and how it will likely unfold if it is staged to mirror Jewish messianic prophecy. I contacted Adam Green and informed him that I would like to discuss this. A few days later, he granted me the opportunity and a few hours after our live interview, the press began to report that Trump is sending a large naval and air force to intimidate Iran. That opens the door to false flag attacks and escalating tensions which might lead to war.

In my interview with Adam, I explained the Jewish messianic prophecies calling for war with Iran, and the fact that these wars are meant to destroy the West and Christendom, as well as Islam. Another war, especially one in the oil rich region of Iran, will have devastating consequences for America, which is already under the yoke of crushing debts, and which has lost its status as the moral leader of the world. We need to protest this drive to war with Iran.

So will the alt-right abandon its Trump worship and actually put America first by protesting this drive to war? Who will take to the streets and demonstrate to oppose this bellicose posturing, which is already costing us massive amounts of money?

Trump is sending forces to a region where they are not needed. They would be better positioned near North Korea and Red China, or South America.

Trump is using our military to serve Israel and guard its strategic interests in the event of war. He is not protecting America or Japan from the active and very real threats from Communist China and North Korea. Trump is putting Israel and Russia first, and setting America up for destruction.

We can stop this drive towards war with Iran, as we have already done many times by protesting it in the past. We need to let the government know that we will not support another war for Israel. The alt-right needs to end its Trump hero worship and stand for the best interests of America and humanity. If the alt-right comes out strongly against this warmongering maneuver, it may well shift the balance and end this drive to war.

Thursday, May 02, 2019

What Is to be Done About the Un-American Social Media Oligarchs?

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Facebook has just banished Louis Farrakhan, Paul Nehlen, Alex Jones, Milo Yiannopoulos and Laura Loomer. Turn about is fair play. Facebook is owned by the Billionaire Social Media Oligarch Mark Zuckerberg. He loves to talk! More than that, he loves to heard! But he hates my American values which honor free speech for all. So by his own standards, he should be banished and muzzled, but how? How do you compete with billionaires who hold all the advantages and impose their own unfair rules against them?

Their power is now both clerical and profane. They have become the Church and the State. These Billionaire Social Media Oligarchs are assuming all the rights and privileges of the Monarchs of old, and of the Church. They are imposing punishments, engaging in banishment and setting an arbitrary standard of morality and behavior, any breach of which results in censorship and exile. Tyranny by State, Church or Billionaire Social Media Oligarch is still tyranny.

Is Zuckerberg free to be a dictatorial tyrant and inhibit my ability to engage in the political process in the same fashion as any other human being? Does he have the fundamental human right to corrupt our political process to favor his personal agenda and that of his tribe? I say that he does not.

His freedom ends where it conflicts with my rights to freedom of speech, assembly and my rights to engage in a political process which affords me the same rights and opportunities as every other citizen on a level and fair playing field. Zuckerberg seeks to make it impossible for anyone he would silence to use the political process in an equitable way to reinstate the system of government and the social contract established by the Founding Fathers. Zuckerberg has labeled the beliefs of the Founding Fathers "dangerous" and banned them from his services. He has contradicted their beliefs in the absolute right to free speech.

Zuckerberg has created a public space in cyberspace and imposed his tyrannical will on who is, and who is not, permitted to speak in it. That is every bit as corrupting, unfair and oppressive as if the State were to do the same. It has the same force to prevent my rights to participate in the political process as if the State were to do the same. So we are obliged and within our rights to enact laws which prohibit the Billionaire Social Media Oligarchs from interfering with our political and personal rights.

Only I have the right to determine my morality. Only I have the right to determine what I think, believe and say. If I decide to think and say something which Zuckerberg deems "hateful" then too bad for him. He has no right to impose his will on me, or my thoughts and expressions. He is not my King, nor is he my church father. He cannot tell me what to think, believe or say. Does he grant me the same authority to silence and banish him for hating the beliefs of our Founding Fathers, as he exercises to keep me from expressing those same beliefs? What gives him greater political rights than me? Does he fancy himself the new Torquemada as he engages with the Facebook secret police to search out every blasphemous statement I may make of which he disapproves, so that he may publicly humiliate, banish and silence me?

This is identical to the tyranny of Nazi Germany and Bolshevik Russia. Why did we oppose those tyrannical regimes? Was it to let Billionaire Social Media Oligarchs create secret police and artificial intelligence programs to engage in surveillance over us so that we learn to watch our step and obey, or be punished and censored? Did our forefathers fight and die to give us freedom only to have a handful of billionaires take it away and publicly shame us for not obeying their religious codes? They even have the public pillory of putting accounts in limbo for periods of punishment under threat of deleting them for disobedience. They are treating us like animals and robbing us of our human dignity.

We should enact laws against this oppression, so that the State can regain its authority to secure our liberty. We should utilize the powers of the State to restrain these tyrants from unfairly imposing their will on American citizens.

Lord Acton wrote in his correspondence the famous lines,

"But if we might discuss this point until we found that we nearly agreed, and if we do agree thoroughly about the impropriety of Carlylese denunciations and Pharisaism in history, I cannot accept your canon that we are to judge Pope and King unlike other men, with a favourable presumption that they did no wrong. If there is any presumption it is the other way, against the holders of power, increasing as the power increases. Historic responsibility has to make up for the want of legal responsibility. Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost always bad men, even when they exercise influence and not authority, still more when you superadd the tendency or the certainty of corruption by authority. There is no worse heresy than that the office sanctifies the holder of it. That is the point at which the negation of Catholicism and the negation of Liberalism meet and keep high festival, and the end learns to justify the means.--Letter from Lord Acton to Mandell Creighton (5 April 1887), published in Historical Essays and Studies,Mamillan and Co., London, (1907), p. 504.

These Billionaire Social Media Oligarchs have far too much power over us. We have to take it away from them through the power of the State and our laws. They are pretending that if they silence everyone who they want to quiet, then the world will be a safe place for all. The fact is that their power to oppress us is the greatest danger we face. Benjamin Franklin said, "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." The Social Media Oligarchs claim that the means of banishment and forced silence are justified by the end of public safety, but who is safe from them, when anyone who speaks out against their oppression disappears from the public arena they control? How can we have free and fair elections when the public forums for political discussion are controlled by the enemies of freedom, and make no mistake about it, those who banish and silence the political views of men and women who speak the same words as the Founding Fathers of America are the enemies of our freedom.

Tuesday, April 30, 2019

Available in Paperback and Ebook: ADOLF HITLER: BOLSHEVIK AND ZIONIST, VOLUME III, WORLD WAR I

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

My new book Adolf Hitler: Bolshevik and Zionist, Volume III, World War I is now available in paperback and as an Ebook. The description reads as follows:

Volume III of ADOLF HITLER: BOLSHEVIK AND ZIONIST is a thorough analysis of the causes, consequences and aims of the First World War. Walther Rathenau described the First World War as a "World Revolution". Jacob Henry Schiff accomplished what Hitler and Napoleon could not. Schiff defeated Russia through revolution and installed his own government to rule the nation. During the war, General Erich Ludendorff promoted the Communist cause around the globe. Ludendorff helped to put both Lenin and Hitler in power. Of the three cousins who instigated the war, Tsar Nicholas II, Kaiser Wilhelm II and King George V, two lost their thrones. The war was a Socialist Revolution that unseated the Monarchies of Continental Europe and enthroned Socialist dictatorships. The war also produced the Balfour Declaration and enabled the British to take Palestine from the Ottoman Empire. Communists and Zionists predicted the world war in the 1800's and welcomed the opportunities it would bring them, which they accurately forecast.

Sunday, April 28, 2019

Friday, April 19, 2019

We Must Take Them to Court

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

The Federal Government of the United States of America is violating the fundamental Constitutional rights of American citizens by means of the Global Anti-Semitism Review Act of 2004, the Office to Monitor and Combat Anti-Semitism and House Resolution 41 - "Rejecting White nationalism and White supremacy."

In violation of the 1st, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th, 9th, 10th and 14th Amendments to the Constitution of the United States of America, the government is violating the fundamental constitutional rights of American citizens to engage in normal conduct, by de facto criminalizing and otherwise proscribing normal conduct. Jews have been expelled from dozens of countries. Jesus Christ, St. Paul, Strabo, Tacitus, Martin Luther, Johannes Eisenmenger, Johannes Buxtorf and numerous other knowledgeable, prominent, respected and authoritative historical figures have iterated scathing criticisms of the Jewish hatred of humanity and of Christians. It is normal conduct to oppose disproportionate Jewish influence and Jewish supremacism. It is normal and legal conduct to engage in self defense, promote international law and oppose foreign intrusion into American politics.

In violation of the 1st, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th, 9th, 10th and 14th Amendments to the Constitution of the United States of America, the government is violating American citizens fundamental constitutional rights of due process and equal protection. Without lawful Constitutional authority, trial, the presentation of a defense or judgement by one's peers, the government is defaming, condemning and causing other harms to specific classes of American citizens who are alleged to have engaged in the entirely legal conduct of criticizing Jews, Judaism and the Nation of Israel, thereby sanctioning them without trial, the right of appeal or any due rights to present a defense. The government is using the power of the State to harass, tyrannize, stigmatize, intimidate, threaten, belittle, alienate and discourage a targeted class engaging in entirely legal conduct, in favor of a privileged class of domestic and foreign Jews and Israeli foreign nationals. The government is favoring foreign nationals over American citizens, and granting foreign nationals privileges by tampering with the rights of American citizens to engage in legal conduct without the intrusion of the State to spy on them, intimidate them, defame them, alienate them and otherwise use the might of the State to discourage legal conduct, including legal political conduct. It is treasonous for government entities to wage war on the American People in favor of a foreign and openly hostile power.

Wednesday, April 17, 2019

Religion as a Weapon of War

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

I do not know what caused the fire at Notre Dame. Maybe it was an electrical short. My memories of it are also aflame. I seem to recall that it would have been easy for someone to scale the structure near the flying buttresses, or to launch some sort of incendiary missile from outside the building into the bell tower, but these are vague and old memories.

I have many memories of Europe and its churches and Gothic cathedrals. I remember how Christians are scapegoated for the war in Cologne and Berlin. The Kaiser Wilhelm Memorial Church was never rebuilt so as to serve as a perpetual and permanent reminder that Christians are supposedly evil warmongers. The Kölner Dom, saved by Providence, is covered in soot which they will not clean off to likewise blame Christians for the war. The message is clear and not subtle, despite how offensive it is to use religion in this way as a propaganda weapon.

The Bolshevik Jews destroyed many Christian churches, and converted others into pig barns. They left synagogues intact.

But maybe Jews had absolutely nothing to do with the holocaust of Notre Dame. Maybe it was cosmic Karma arising to serve justice upon Mrs. O'Leary's Roman Catholic cow, which kicked over a lantern and started the Great Chicago Fire of 1871. Or maybe someone just wanted to burn the idols of the saints in the crematorium that Our Lady became, because the Jews declared long ago that idol worship is forbidden, Christians must be beheaded, and no representation of their eternal god can be made of perishable materials. Maybe, just maybe, as Adam Green has discussed, it is retaliation for the destruction of the Temple by Rome. The Vatican is a likely target for Israeli nuclear bombs.

It would be awfully convenient for the Jews if Notre Dame led to conflict where some Christian could be blamed for destroying Al Aqsa or the Dome of the Rock in retaliation. Let us hope it does not happen, for it would provide the pretext for building a Temple of Solomon while Christians and Muslims combated each other rather than joining forces against the anti-Christ/al Dajjal.

Monday, April 15, 2019

Historian David Irving Discusses the Jewish Bankers Who Financed Hitler

TheRapeOfJustice YouTube channel was taken down shortly after it mirrored my video introducing my book Warnings to the Jews: Premonitions of the Holocaust. He brought me over 40k views in a short span of time and the video was starting to go viral. I suggest you check out his bitchute channel and subscribe to it. He has put a lot of work into disseminating this forbidden knowledge and has helped me tremendously over the course of many years:

https://www.bitchute.com/channel/therapeofjustice-deletedyoutubevideos/

In 1921, Nazi Party Member Ernst Ehrensperger Denounced Adolf Hitler as a Traitor and Jewish Puppet

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

In my book Adolf Hitler: Bolshevik and Zionist, Volume 1, Communism, I translated a brochure entitled "Adolf Hitler--Traitor?" which Nazi Party member Ernst Ehrensperger published denouncing Hitler as a traitor and Jewish puppet, who sought to undermine the NSDAP and derail it to serve Jewish interests. The source for the original German text is E. Dauerlein, Der Aufstieg der NSDAP in Augenzeugenberichten, Second Edition, Munich, (1976), pp. 138-140. You can read my English translation by selecting the "Look inside" option on the kindle version of my book, near the very end of the sample text:

Adolf Hitler--Verräter?

Machtdünkel und persönlicher Ehrgeiz haben Herrn Adolf Hitler nach seiner sechswöchentlichen Reise von Berlin, über deren Zweck er sich bis heute noch nicht ausgesprochen hat, auf den Posten gerufen. Er glaubt die Zeit für gekommen zu erachten, um im Auftrag seiner dunklen Hintermänner Uneinigkeit und Zersplitterung in unsere Reihen zu tragen und dadurch die Geschäfte des Judentums und seiner Helfer zu besorgen. Es zeigt sich immer mehr, daß sein Zweck kein anderer war, als die Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei nur als Sprungbrett für unsaubere Zwecke zu benützen, um deren Führung vollständig an sich zu reißen und sie im geeigneten Augenblick auf ein anderes Gleis zu schieben. Das beweist am besten ein Ultimatum, das er vor einigen Tagen an die Parteileitung stellte und in dem er u. a. vollständige alleinige Diktatur und den Rücktritt des Ausschusses und des Gründers und Führers der Partei, Werkzeugschlosser Anton Drexler, als i. Vorsitzenden forderte. Diesen Posten verlangte er für seine Person; ferner verlangte er, daß innerhalb der nächsten sechs Jahre keinerlei Einigungsverhandlungen mit den übrigen Nationalsozialisten und Deutschsozialisten geführt werden. Diese Forderungen allein schon bedeuten weiter nichts, als die Partei klein zu erhalten und ihr einen weiteren Ausbau unmöglich zu machen. Welche Geldgeber ihn dabei stützen, ist unbekannt. Tatsache ist nur, daß Hitler, der Österreicher ist, mit den dortigen Kaiser-Karl-Kreisen in Verbindung steht. Er wurde bereits vor längerer Zeit einmal öffentlich als "Karlist" bezeichnet, stellte damals zum Schein Klage und zog diese wieder zurück.

Ein weiterer Punkt ist seine Berufs - und Geldfrage. Auf Fragen seitens einzelner Mitglieder, von was er eigentlich lebe und welchen Beruf er früher gehabt habe, geriet er jedesmal in Zorn und Erregung. Eine Beantwortung dieser Fragen ist bis heute noch nicht erfolgt. Sein Gewissen kann also nicht rein sein, zumal doch sein übermäßiger Damenverkehr, bei denen er sich des öfteren schon als "König von München" bezeichnete, sehr viel Geld kostet.

Ein weiterer Punkt ist sein schon lange bestehender Kampf gegen den Gründer und Führer der Partei, den Werkzeugschlosser Anton Drexler. Obwohl Hitler genausogut wie jeder andere Mensch weiß, mit welchen Idealen Drexler beseelt ist, obwohl er genau weiß, daß an Drexlers Charakter nicht das geringste auszusetzen ist, bezeichnete er ihn in der letzten Zeit des öfteren mit Ausdrücken wie "charakterlos", "gemeiner Hund", "Idiot" und änlichen Namen mehr. Und warum? Weil Hitler genau weiß, daß die Bewegung so lange eine gesunde bleibt, als Drexler die Aufsicht führt, weil er ganz genau weiß, daß sein Verräterspiel erfolglos bleiben wird, da Drexler ein Mann so stark wie eine Eiche ist.

Und wie führt er den Kampf? Echt jüdisch. Er verdreht alle Tatsachen und stellt die Sache so hin, als ob Drexler nicht revolutionär genug sei und ins parlamentarische System zurückfallen werde. Was ist die Tatsache? Drexler ist noch keinen Finger breit von seinen Anschauungen abgewichen, die er bei der Gründung schon betonte. Wohl will Drexler neben der revolutionären Tätigkeit zugleich auch dem deutschen Arbeiter den Weg zeigen, welchen er gehen muß, um seine Ziele zu erreichen, d. h. er will neben einer beißenden Kritik an den jetzigen unsauberen Verhältnissen gleichzeitig auch Wirschaftspolitik treiben.

Bei seinen Umtrieben hat Hitler einen Kampfgenossen gefunden, Herrn Esser. Dieser Mann, der nachgewiesenermaßen ein Spitzel der Sozialdemokratie ist, den Hitler selbst wiederholt schon als Schädling der Bewegung bezeichnete, um seinen Sturz herbeizuführen, der bei Drexler schon wiederholt den Sturz Hitlers forderte, der ferner dem "Völkischen Beobachter" durch seinen Sauhirtenton das Verbot trotz wiederholter polizeilicher Verwarnung absichtlich zuführte, diesen Mann nahm sich plötzlich Hitler, um seine dunkeln Pläne durchzuführen. Das merkwürdigste ist, daß Hitler selbst wiederholt erklärte, was unter Zeugen festgestellt werden kann: "Ich weiß, daß Esser ein Lump ist, aber ich behalte ihn nur so lange, als ich ihn brachen kann!"

Nationalsozialisten! Urteilt selbst über solche Charaktere! Laßt Euch nicht irreführen, Hitler ist Demagoge und stützt sich nur auf seine Rednergabe, er glaubt damit, das deutsche Volk irrezuführen und Euch besonders Dinge aufzuschwätzen, die alles andere sind als die Wahrheit!

Protestiert dagegen, daß man es mit der ehrlichen Gründung der NSDAP auch so machen will, wie es früher mit den anderen Parteien gemacht worden ist, sie durch einen zugelaufenen Größenwahnsinnigen und Sprüchmacher in ein anderes Gleis zu schieben!

Zeigt, daß es noch eine ehrliche deutsche politische Partei gibt, die den Mut hat, auch Fehler einzugestehen und Schädlinge zu beseitigen, die sie früher für ehrliche Menschen gehalten hat.

Nur auf diese Weise wird es gelingen, im deutschen Volke wieder Vertrauen zu erwecken, das es gerade durch derartige Hitler-Charaktere verloren hat.

Stützt Eure Ehre und die Wahrheit, die nach Überstehung von einigen aufgepeitschten Kämpfen doch zum Siege führen wird!

Mit deutschem Heilgruß!

Die Nationalsozialisten Münchens

Saturday, April 13, 2019

Social Media Oligarchs and Their Destruction of Our Democracy

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

The social media oligarchs have begun to rule over us and have subverted our democracy. They employ such sham devices as the "YouTube Community" and Terms of Service agreements to enforce the tyranny of the majority over the minority, and the tyranny of the minority over the majority in ways which the United States Constitution does not allow. They have created secretive kangaroo courts with unknown laws where star chambers impose their will over the masses and over vulnerable minorities.

The claim that there is police force of a "YouTube community" which objects in a very partisan manner to any videos which criticize Jewry is suspicious on its face. In what form does this "Community" exist and why is its often minority voice employed to deny the rights of the majority? I have seen videos with a 95% plus favoritabilty rating of likes over dislikes removed pursuant to the whims of a secret police force of a "YouTube community" and the judgement of YouTube employees working in collusion with them as anonymous judges in a secret court. There is no right to confront the accuser, and the accuser is never identified, so there is no means to demonstrate their bias, organization and political affiliation. There is no right of appeal. Evidence cannot be presented. Only the side of the secret police is given a hearing. There is no due process and no defense is allowed, let alone the commonly asserted defenses of selective enforcement, malicious prosecution or the assertion of fundamental human rights as a defense, including the right of free speech and rights to representative government. No clear definitions exist of proscribed conduct, so insufficient notice is given of the laws being enforced. They are too vague to be meaningful or enforceable, and therefore are enforced arbitrarily and selectively.

These quasi-governmental agencies, who by their own policies act as police, prosecutors, jailors and courts, violate all the most fundamental precepts of justice, fairness and equality. They are instead dictatorial oligarchs imposing their will and political agenda on our nation and our citizenry. They rule with their money, not their ideas, which they ban us from challenging.

We must not allow these billionaire social media oligarchs to subvert our democracy. They have already taken away our freedom. They have already engaged in banishing us, defaming us and alienating us from the political process without affording us any hearing or due process to defend ourselves from their attacks, or a means by which we can assert our fundamental human rights. They have created their stand alone governments, replete with police, courts and prisons in violation of the sovereignty of the United States of America and have used these quasi-governmental offices to destroy and violate our most precious rights, rights necessary to guarantee our lives, liberty and pursuit of happiness. They are not only unAmerican in their existence, policies and practices, they are anti-American and tyrannical to an extent that compels the American Government to take action against them. So why is it not?

Like Municipalities and Public Utilities, Social Media Platforms Have Become Quasi-Governmental Agencies Engaging in the Formal Political and Voting Process and Must Therefore Be Impartial

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

The Federal Government of the United States of America has declared that the Russian Government has utilized social media platforms to illegally undermine the fair and free election process of the United States. The Federal Government has thereby acknowledged that social media platforms are public and quasi-governmental agencies engaged in the formal political process of the United States. Free and fair access for all to these social media platforms is essential to the political process and any restrictions imposed on individuals, groups or points of view inhibits the rights of all Americans to representative government, in favor of totalitarian special interests with the disproportionate financial means to undermine our democracy.

Social media platforms are presently employing selective enforcement of their Terms of Service agreements which are imposed without negotiation, and have rendered those TOS agreements waivers of rights and the biased enforcement of particular political viewpoints. This constitutes a totalitarian political system which is proscribed by the Constitution of the United States of America. We need new laws which compel social media outlets which serve as quasi-governmental agencies and public spaces to operate without bias and with complete impartiality granting free access to all without restrictions on points of view or limits to the rights of free expression. These social media outlets which are an integral part of our formal political process must allow all citizens to engage in the public discussion on a level and fair playing field.

The Need for New Laws to Proscribe the Violation of Our Fundamental Rights in Social Media and in the Government

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

It is vitally important that we break the cycle of "propaganda of the deed" and secure our fundamental rights to freedom in this age of high technology. There are proven instances of terrorists committing acts of violence in the hope that the governments will use their violence as a pretext to further restrict our rights. They further intend that this increased oppression will inspire others to commit acts of violence out of frustration, which will then serve as the pretext for further governmental encroachments on our fundamental human rights, in a compounding and escalating vicious cycle of violence and repression. They do this with the intent of destabilizing society and promoting violent revolution and civil war.

Intelligence agencies around the world have an easy time creating and maintaining agents provocateur who engage in destructive acts meant to increase the tyranny of government so as to inspire more violence, which then triggers the programmed and planned response of ever increasing governmental oppression. They are deliberately trying to create instability in Western Civilization by denying us our fundamental rights to freedom of speech and to keep and bear arms, while employing terrorists to provide the illegitimate pretext for their intrusion on our inviolable rights.

Any political party which denies the absolute right to free speech is not a political party, but a totalitarian dictatorship in the making. We presently live in an Orwellian world, where the Federal Government of the United States of America is arbitrarily, selectively and illegally condemning certain sectors of the population and openly pitting itself against its own citizens to intimidate, repress, stigmatize and defame them. This is an intolerable encroachment on our right to representative government for all American citizens on a fair and level playing field. Each and every American has the same fundamental and inviolable right to hold whatever views he or she chooses to hold, and to express them without the power of the State bearing down on them to imprison, defame or intimidate them. The State is presently selectively and arbitrarily stigmatizing, attacking and condemning groups. This constitutes a governmental sanction without trial or due process of law, without any Constitutional authority to do so, and in direct violation of the First, Second, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, Eighth, Ninth and Tenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States of America. This is designed to have a chilling effect on the free expression of opinions and implies that the State is planning to use its overwhelming force to attack those of its own citizens it has declared enemies. No member of these repressed groups was ever given a fair trial by a jury of their peers and due process of law to defend themselves and their rights, before the Government took the illegal step of publicly condemning them and imposing the sanction upon them of publicly defaming them and shaming them for holding their views. The Government of the United States of America has no legal authority to engage in the orchestrated defamation and public shaming of its citizens.

All this being the case, we can campaign on the platform that our political opponents do not represent American political parties, but instead foreign interests attempting to impart a totalitarian regime within our disrespected borders, in order to render the Constitution of the United States invalid and thereby break the contract between the People and the Government and in the absence of its safeguards against tyranny and oppression impose their biased and foreign will upon the American People.

The American Federal Government has openly acknowledged that social media are a vital and influential part of the American political process. We therefore require new laws which safeguard our rights to freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, the rights to be heard and to hear, the rights to representative government and to engage in the political process on a level and fair playing field and in a manner and with the views each individual citizen deems fit without restrictions arbitrarily and selectively imposed by politically biased entities in control of social media. These laws must secure our rights to be free from attacks on our person, rights and identity by groups, individuals and artificial intelligence programmed as a weapon to remove us from public view and the public arena. It is the absolute right of each and every American to formulate his or her own views without coercion, duress or the undue influence of anyone else. No one has the right to restrict or define for anyone else what views they may hold and/or express. Social media platforms do not have the lawful authority to selectively prohibit political views in services they offer to the public at large. No one has the right to inhibit the free expression of political views in public platforms which have become an integral part of the political process.

Social media are utilizing special interest groups and artificial intelligence programs to selectively identify, alienate, stigmatize, intimidate, obstruct and destroy the identity and public face of targeted groups and individuals. These special interest groups and the artificial intelligence programs so employed are weapons used to commit assault against American citizens and destroy their reputations, identities and rights. This must become specifically proscribed in the Federal laws of the United States of America. We can campaign on the platform that social media, including publishing outlets, be proscribed by law from employing these highly destructive weapons against anyone, any group, or any set of views. We should legally define deliberate attempts to make a person vanish from public view and the public records, as criminal attempts to commit assault, and as new forms of criminally proscribed assassination and banishment.

There is also the demonstrated need for new Federal laws barring the Government from defaming, stigmatizing or otherwise inhibiting the political rights of its citizens by formally condemning their views. This is demonstrably necessary to break the totalitarian State now being employed against American citizens which has illegally defined by Government proclamation what it arbitrarily and with intended bias deems acceptable and unacceptable political viewpoints. Any attempt by the Government or the quasi-government of social media to tip the scales in favor of one political viewpoint or another is the overt manifestation of totalitarianism.