Friday, April 19, 2019

We Must Take Them to Court

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

The Federal Government of the United States of America is violating the fundamental Constitutional rights of American citizens by means of the Global Anti-Semitism Review Act of 2004, the Office to Monitor and Combat Anti-Semitism and House Resolution 41 - "Rejecting White nationalism and White supremacy."

In violation of the 1st, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th, 9th, 10th and 14th Amendments to the Constitution of the United States of America, the government is violating the fundamental constitutional rights American citizens to engage in normal conduct, by de facto criminalizing and otherwise proscribing normal conduct. Jews have been expelled from dozens of countries. Jesus Christ, St. Paul, Strabo, Tacitus, Martin Luther, Johannes Eisenmenger, Johannes Buxtorf and numerous other knowledgeable, prominent, respected and authoritative historical figures have iterated scathing criticisms of the Jewish hatred of humanity and of Christians. It is normal conduct to oppose disproportionate Jewish influence and Jewish supremacism. It is normal and legal conduct to engage in self defense, promote international law and oppose foreign intrusion into American politics.

In violation of the 1st, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th, 9th, 10th and 14th Amendments to the Constitution of the United States of America, the government is violating American citizens fundamental constitutional rights of due process and equal protection. Without lawful Constitutional authority, trial, the presentation of a defense or judgement by one's peers, the government is defaming, condemning and causing other harms to specific classes of American citizens who are alleged to have engaged in the entirely legal conduct of criticizing Jews, Judaism and the Nation of Israel, thereby sanctioning them without trial, the right of appeal or any due rights to present a defense. The government is using the power of the State to harass, tyrannize, stigmatize, intimidate, threaten, belittle, alienate and discourage a targeted class engaging in entirely legal conduct, in favor of a privileged class of domestic and foreign Jews and Israeli foreign nationals. The government is favoring foreign nationals over American citizens, and granting foreign nationals privileges by tampering with the rights of American citizens to engage in legal conduct without the intrusion of the State to spy on them, intimidate them, defame them, alienate them and otherwise use the might of the State to discourage legal conduct, including legal political conduct. It is treasonous for government entities to wage war on the American People in favor of a foreign and openly hostile power.

Wednesday, April 17, 2019

Religion as a Weapon of War

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

I do not know what caused the fire at Notre Dame. Maybe it was an electrical short. My memories of it are also aflame. I seem to recall that it would have been easy for someone to scale the structure near the flying buttresses, or to launch some sort of incendiary missile from outside the building into the bell tower, but these are vague and old memories.

I have many memories of Europe and its churches and Gothic cathedrals. I remember how Christians are scapegoated for the war in Cologne and Berlin. The Kaiser Wilhelm Memorial Church was never rebuilt so as to serve as a perpetual and permanent reminder that Christians are supposedly evil warmongers. The Kölner Dom, saved by Providence, is covered in soot which they will not clean off to likewise blame Christians for the war. The message is clear and not subtle, despite how offensive it is to use religion in this way as a propaganda weapon.

The Bolshevik Jews destroyed many Christian churches, and converted others into pig barns. They left synagogues intact.

But maybe Jews had absolutely nothing to do with the holocaust of Notre Dame. Maybe it was cosmic Karma arising to serve justice upon Mrs. O'Leary's Roman Catholic cow, which kicked over a lantern and started the Great Chicago Fire of 1871. Or maybe someone just wanted to burn the idols of the saints in the crematorium that Our Lady became, because the Jews declared long ago that idol worship is forbidden, Christians must be beheaded, and no representation of their eternal god can be made of perishable materials. Maybe, just maybe, as Adam Green has discussed, it is retaliation for the destruction of the Temple by Rome. The Vatican is a likely target for Israeli nuclear bombs.

It would be awfully convenient for the Jews if Notre Dame led to conflict where some Christian could be blamed for destroying Al Aqsa or the Dome of the Rock in retaliation. Let us hope it does not happen, for it would provide the pretext for building a Temple of Solomon while Christians and Muslims combated each other rather than joining forces against the anti-Christ/al Dajjal.

Monday, April 15, 2019

Historian David Irving Discusses the Jewish Bankers Who Financed Hitler

TheRapeOfJustice YouTube channel was taken down shortly after it mirrored my video introducing my book Warnings to the Jews: Premonitions of the Holocaust. He brought me over 40k views in a short span of time and the video was starting to go viral. I suggest you check out his bitchute channel and subscribe to it. He has put a lot of work into disseminating this forbidden knowledge and has helped me tremendously over the course of many years:

https://www.bitchute.com/channel/therapeofjustice-deletedyoutubevideos/

In 1921, Nazi Party Member Ernst Ehrensperger Denounced Adolf Hitler as a Traitor and Jewish Puppet

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

In my book Adolf Hitler: Bolshevik and Zionist, Volume 1, Communism, I translated a brochure entitled "Adolf Hitler--Traitor?" which Nazi Party member Ernst Ehrensperger published denouncing Hitler as a traitor and Jewish puppet, who sought to undermine the NSDAP and derail it to serve Jewish interests. The source for the original German text is E. Dauerlein, Der Aufstieg der NSDAP in Augenzeugenberichten, Second Edition, Munich, (1976), pp. 138-140. You can read my English translation by selecting the "Look inside" option on the kindle version of my book, near the very end of the sample text:

Adolf Hitler--Verräter?

Machtdünkel und persönlicher Ehrgeiz haben Herrn Adolf Hitler nach seiner sechswöchentlichen Reise von Berlin, über deren Zweck er sich bis heute noch nicht ausgesprochen hat, auf den Posten gerufen. Er glaubt die Zeit für gekommen zu erachten, um im Auftrag seiner dunklen Hintermänner Uneinigkeit und Zersplitterung in unsere Reihen zu tragen und dadurch die Geschäfte des Judentums und seiner Helfer zu besorgen. Es zeigt sich immer mehr, daß sein Zweck kein anderer war, als die Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei nur als Sprungbrett für unsaubere Zwecke zu benützen, um deren Führung vollständig an sich zu reißen und sie im geeigneten Augenblick auf ein anderes Gleis zu schieben. Das beweist am besten ein Ultimatum, das er vor einigen Tagen an die Parteileitung stellte und in dem er u. a. vollständige alleinige Diktatur und den Rücktritt des Ausschusses und des Gründers und Führers der Partei, Werkzeugschlosser Anton Drexler, als i. Vorsitzenden forderte. Diesen Posten verlangte er für seine Person; ferner verlangte er, daß innerhalb der nächsten sechs Jahre keinerlei Einigungsverhandlungen mit den übrigen Nationalsozialisten und Deutschsozialisten geführt werden. Diese Forderungen allein schon bedeuten weiter nichts, als die Partei klein zu erhalten und ihr einen weiteren Ausbau unmöglich zu machen. Welche Geldgeber ihn dabei stützen, ist unbekannt. Tatsache ist nur, daß Hitler, der Österreicher ist, mit den dortigen Kaiser-Karl-Kreisen in Verbindung steht. Er wurde bereits vor längerer Zeit einmal öffentlich als "Karlist" bezeichnet, stellte damals zum Schein Klage und zog diese wieder zurück.

Ein weiterer Punkt ist seine Berufs - und Geldfrage. Auf Fragen seitens einzelner Mitglieder, von was er eigentlich lebe und welchen Beruf er früher gehabt habe, geriet er jedesmal in Zorn und Erregung. Eine Beantwortung dieser Fragen ist bis heute noch nicht erfolgt. Sein Gewissen kann also nicht rein sein, zumal doch sein übermäßiger Damenverkehr, bei denen er sich des öfteren schon als "König von München" bezeichnete, sehr viel Geld kostet.

Ein weiterer Punkt ist sein schon lange bestehender Kampf gegen den Gründer und Führer der Partei, den Werkzeugschlosser Anton Drexler. Obwohl Hitler genausogut wie jeder andere Mensch weiß, mit welchen Idealen Drexler beseelt ist, obwohl er genau weiß, daß an Drexlers Charakter nicht das geringste auszusetzen ist, bezeichnete er ihn in der letzten Zeit des öfteren mit Ausdrücken wie "charakterlos", "gemeiner Hund", "Idiot" und änlichen Namen mehr. Und warum? Weil Hitler genau weiß, daß die Bewegung so lange eine gesunde bleibt, als Drexler die Aufsicht führt, weil er ganz genau weiß, daß sein Verräterspiel erfolglos bleiben wird, da Drexler ein Mann so stark wie eine Eiche ist.

Und wie führt er den Kampf? Echt jüdisch. Er verdreht alle Tatsachen und stellt die Sache so hin, als ob Drexler nicht revolutionär genug sei und ins parlamentarische System zurückfallen werde. Was ist die Tatsache? Drexler ist noch keinen Finger breit von seinen Anschauungen abgewichen, die er bei der Gründung schon betonte. Wohl will Drexler neben der revolutionären Tätigkeit zugleich auch dem deutschen Arbeiter den Weg zeigen, welchen er gehen muß, um seine Ziele zu erreichen, d. h. er will neben einer beißenden Kritik an den jetzigen unsauberen Verhältnissen gleichzeitig auch Wirschaftspolitik treiben.

Bei seinen Umtrieben hat Hitler einen Kampfgenossen gefunden, Herrn Esser. Dieser Mann, der nachgewiesenermaßen ein Spitzel der Sozialdemokratie ist, den Hitler selbst wiederholt schon als Schädling der Bewegung bezeichnete, um seinen Sturz herbeizuführen, der bei Drexler schon wiederholt den Sturz Hitlers forderte, der ferner dem "Völkischen Beobachter" durch seinen Sauhirtenton das Verbot trotz wiederholter polizeilicher Verwarnung absichtlich zuführte, diesen Mann nahm sich plötzlich Hitler, um seine dunkeln Pläne durchzuführen. Das merkwürdigste ist, daß Hitler selbst wiederholt erklärte, was unter Zeugen festgestellt werden kann: "Ich weiß, daß Esser ein Lump ist, aber ich behalte ihn nur so lange, als ich ihn brachen kann!"

Nationalsozialisten! Urteilt selbst über solche Charaktere! Laßt Euch nicht irreführen, Hitler ist Demagoge und stützt sich nur auf seine Rednergabe, er glaubt damit, das deutsche Volk irrezuführen und Euch besonders Dinge aufzuschwätzen, die alles andere sind als die Wahrheit!

Protestiert dagegen, daß man es mit der ehrlichen Gründung der NSDAP auch so machen will, wie es früher mit den anderen Parteien gemacht worden ist, sie durch einen zugelaufenen Größenwahnsinnigen und Sprüchmacher in ein anderes Gleis zu schieben!

Zeigt, daß es noch eine ehrliche deutsche politische Partei gibt, die den Mut hat, auch Fehler einzugestehen und Schädlinge zu beseitigen, die sie früher für ehrliche Menschen gehalten hat.

Nur auf diese Weise wird es gelingen, im deutschen Volke wieder Vertrauen zu erwecken, das es gerade durch derartige Hitler-Charaktere verloren hat.

Stützt Eure Ehre und die Wahrheit, die nach Überstehung von einigen aufgepeitschten Kämpfen doch zum Siege führen wird!

Mit deutschem Heilgruß!

Die Nationalsozialisten Münchens

Saturday, April 13, 2019

Social Media Oligarchs and Their Destruction of Our Democracy

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

The social media oligarchs have begun to rule over us and have subverted our democracy. They employ such sham devices as the "YouTube Community" and Terms of Service agreements to enforce the tyranny of the majority over the minority, and the tyranny of the minority over the majority in ways which the United States Constitution does not allow. They have created secretive kangaroo courts with unknown laws where star chambers impose their will over the masses and over vulnerable minorities.

The claim that there is police force of a "YouTube community" which objects in a very partisan manner to any videos which criticize Jewry is suspicious on its face. In what form does this "Community" exist and why is its often minority voice employed to deny the rights of the majority? I have seen videos with a 95% plus favoritabilty rating of likes over dislikes removed pursuant to the whims of a secret police force of a "YouTube community" and the judgement of YouTube employees working in collusion with them as anonymous judges in a secret court. There is no right to confront the accuser, and the accuser is never identified, so there is no means to demonstrate their bias, organization and political affiliation. There is no right of appeal. Evidence cannot be presented. Only the side of the secret police is given a hearing. There is no due process and no defense is allowed, let alone the commonly asserted defenses of selective enforcement, malicious prosecution or the assertion of fundamental human rights as a defense, including the right of free speech and rights to representative government. No clear definitions exist of proscribed conduct, so insufficient notice is given of the laws being enforced. They are too vague to be meaningful or enforceable, and therefore are enforced arbitrarily and selectively.

These quasi-governmental agencies, who by their own policies act as police, prosecutors, jailors and courts, violate all the most fundamental precepts of justice, fairness and equality. They are instead dictatorial oligarchs imposing their will and political agenda on our nation and our citizenry. They rule with their money, not their ideas, which they ban us from challenging.

We must not allow these billionaire social media oligarchs to subvert our democracy. They have already taken away our freedom. They have already engaged in banishing us, defaming us and alienating us from the political process without affording us any hearing or due process to defend ourselves from their attacks, or a means by which we can assert our fundamental human rights. They have created their stand alone governments, replete with police, courts and prisons in violation of the sovereignty of the United States of America and have used these quasi-governmental offices to destroy and violate our most precious rights, rights necessary to guarantee our lives, liberty and pursuit of happiness. They are not only unAmerican in their existence, policies and practices, they are anti-American and tyrannical to an extent that compels the American Government to take action against them. So why is it not?

Like Municipalities and Public Utilities, Social Media Platforms Have Become Quasi-Governmental Agencies Engaging in the Formal Political and Voting Process and Must Therefore Be Impartial

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

The Federal Government of the United States of America has declared that the Russian Government has utilized social media platforms to illegally undermine the fair and free election process of the United States. The Federal Government has thereby acknowledged that social media platforms are public and quasi-governmental agencies engaged in the formal political process of the United States. Free and fair access for all to these social media platforms is essential to the political process and any restrictions imposed on individuals, groups or points of view inhibits the rights of all Americans to representative government, in favor of totalitarian special interests with the disproportionate financial means to undermine our democracy.

Social media platforms are presently employing selective enforcement of their Terms of Service agreements which are imposed without negotiation, and have rendered those TOS agreements waivers of rights and the biased enforcement of particular political viewpoints. This constitutes a totalitarian political system which is proscribed by the Constitution of the United States of America. We need new laws which compel social media outlets which serve as quasi-governmental agencies and public spaces to operate without bias and with complete impartiality granting free access to all without restrictions on points of view or limits to the rights of free expression. These social media outlets which are an integral part of our formal political process must allow all citizens to engage in the public discussion on a level and fair playing field.

The Need for New Laws to Proscribe the Violation of Our Fundamental Rights in Social Media and in the Government

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

It is vitally important that we break the cycle of "propaganda of the deed" and secure our fundamental rights to freedom in this age of high technology. There are proven instances of terrorists committing acts of violence in the hope that the governments will use their violence as a pretext to further restrict our rights. They further intend that this increased oppression will inspire others to commit acts of violence out of frustration, which will then serve as the pretext for further governmental encroachments on our fundamental human rights, in a compounding and escalating vicious cycle of violence and repression. They do this with the intent of destabilizing society and promoting violent revolution and civil war.

Intelligence agencies around the world have an easy time creating and maintaining agents provocateur who engage in destructive acts meant to increase the tyranny of government so as to inspire more violence, which then triggers the programmed and planned response of ever increasing governmental oppression. They are deliberately trying to create instability in Western Civilization by denying us our fundamental rights to freedom of speech and to keep and bear arms, while employing terrorists to provide the illegitimate pretext for their intrusion on our inviolable rights.

Any political party which denies the absolute right to free speech is not a political party, but a totalitarian dictatorship in the making. We presently live in an Orwellian world, where the Federal Government of the United States of America is arbitrarily, selectively and illegally condemning certain sectors of the population and openly pitting itself against its own citizens to intimidate, repress, stigmatize and defame them. This is an intolerable encroachment on our right to representative government for all American citizens on a fair and level playing field. Each and every American has the same fundamental and inviolable right to hold whatever views he or she chooses to hold, and to express them without the power of the State bearing down on them to imprison, defame or intimidate them. The State is presently selectively and arbitrarily stigmatizing, attacking and condemning groups. This constitutes a governmental sanction without trial or due process of law, without any Constitutional authority to do so, and in direct violation of the First, Second, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, Eighth, Ninth and Tenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States of America. This is designed to have a chilling effect on the free expression of opinions and implies that the State is planning to use its overwhelming force to attack those of its own citizens it has declared enemies. No member of these repressed groups was ever given a fair trial by a jury of their peers and due process of law to defend themselves and their rights, before the Government took the illegal step of publicly condemning them and imposing the sanction upon them of publicly defaming them and shaming them for holding their views. The Government of the United States of America has no legal authority to engage in the orchestrated defamation and public shaming of its citizens.

All this being the case, we can campaign on the platform that our political opponents do not represent American political parties, but instead foreign interests attempting to impart a totalitarian regime within our disrespected borders, in order to render the Constitution of the United States invalid and thereby break the contract between the People and the Government and in the absence of its safeguards against tyranny and oppression impose their biased and foreign will upon the American People.

The American Federal Government has openly acknowledged that social media are a vital and influential part of the American political process. We therefore require new laws which safeguard our rights to freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, the rights to be heard and to hear, the rights to representative government and to engage in the political process on a level and fair playing field and in a manner and with the views each individual citizen deems fit without restrictions arbitrarily and selectively imposed by politically biased entities in control of social media. These laws must secure our rights to be free from attacks on our person, rights and identity by groups, individuals and artificial intelligence programmed as a weapon to remove us from public view and the public arena. It is the absolute right of each and every American to formulate his or her own views without coercion, duress or the undue influence of anyone else. No one has the right to restrict or define for anyone else what views they may hold and/or express. Social media platforms do not have the lawful authority to selectively prohibit political views in services they offer to the public at large. No one has the right to inhibit the free expression of political views in public platforms which have become an integral part of the political process.

Social media are utilizing special interest groups and artificial intelligence programs to selectively identify, alienate, stigmatize, intimidate, obstruct and destroy the identity and public face of targeted groups and individuals. These special interest groups and the artificial intelligence programs so employed are weapons used to commit assault against American citizens and destroy their reputations, identities and rights. This must become specifically proscribed in the Federal laws of the United States of America. We can campaign on the platform that social media, including publishing outlets, be proscribed by law from employing these highly destructive weapons against anyone, any group, or any set of views. We should legally define deliberate attempts to make a person vanish from public view and the public records, as criminal attempts to commit assault, and as new forms of criminally proscribed assassination and banishment.

There is also the demonstrated need for new Federal laws barring the Government from defaming, stigmatizing or otherwise inhibiting the political rights of its citizens by formally condemning their views. This is demonstrably necessary to break the totalitarian State now being employed against American citizens which has illegally defined by Government proclamation what it arbitrarily and with intended bias deems acceptable and unacceptable political viewpoints. Any attempt by the Government or the quasi-government of social media to tip the scales in favor of one political viewpoint or another is the overt manifestation of totalitarianism.

Wednesday, April 10, 2019

The Dehumanization of Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

I have always found it a bit pretentious when others refer to themselves in the third person. But now that I have not only been censored, but rendered illegal, I feel I have earned the right to talk about the much maligned Christopher Jon Bjerknes, persona non grata, as if someone other than myself, someone under a spotlight, a searchlight and a microscope.

Caught in the crosshairs of Jewish power, my work is so effective, that legal action was taken against it within 5 days to shut it down. It is so offensive to liars because it is so demonstrably true to neutral observers. If the powers that be were able to refute what I have said, they would try. They cannot, but instead of conceding that I have spoken the uncomfortable and needed truth, which could potentially help save billions of lives from the coming catastrophe, they nevertheless feel justified and compelled to impose their criminal tyranny over me with their Bolshevik oppression, and formally censor my words. I have not only failed to win the Nihil Obstat of the Church of Jewish privilege, I am officially banned from the public forums of humanity.

This follows decades of uncivilized censorship. Though my critics are afforded page after page in the mainstream press to spread their lies about me and my work, my responses in defense of the truth have always been suppressed, utterly unwelcome in the Jewish controlled press. This flies in the face of the best traditions of Western Civilization, but is in perfect conformity with Jewish law, which forbids Gentiles to examine the facts of things Jewish, let alone render judgement upon them.

Learn from me, friend and foe alike, that America is a beautiful and glorious place, a bastion of human dignity where freedom is enshrined in the Bill of Rights of the Constitution of the United States of America. Do not listen to any KGB shill calling itself a White Nationalist or Alt-Rightist, who urinates on the bill of rights, while lauding Bolshevik Vladimir Putin who likewise censors all truths uncomfortable to Jewish power. They seek only to wet the fire of freedom with the rains of disingenuous Jewish tears and extinguish its revealing light.

Learn from me, friend and foe alike, that we must fight without ceasing until our freedoms are universal and secure. The dark obfuscations of Bolshevism and Zionism are snaking their way around the globe and your saviors are demons sinking their fangs into the neck of your freedom to draw the blood of liberty out of your lives and leave you a dry corpse preserved in an enshrined cocoon of carefully spun lies.

Censored Again on YouTube

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

YouTube has again censored me:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=egtsc-Gz35o

They do not want me discussing Hitler's Bolshevism and Zionism, or revealing the cabalistic origins of the six million figure. To overcome this censorship, I need your help. The best means to combat the censorship is to spread the word about my book. This will attach a price to their actions and punish them for what they have done.

I am working on volumes 2 & 3 of Adolf Hitler: Bolshevik and Zionist and need income to fund my endeavor. They are obstructing my ability to earn the income I need so that I can devote the time needed to write these research intensive books. I am also obliged to buy rare books, which I cannot afford.

My YouTube appearances featuring my books Adolf Hitler: Bolshevik and Zionist, Warnings to the Jews: Premonitions of the Holocaust and The Jewish Genocide of Armenian Christians have been extremely popular and in each instance started going viral just before YouTube censored them. The public wants to know what I have to say. Will you help?

Sunday, March 24, 2019

In Print: ADOLF HITLER: BOLSHEVIK AND ZIONIST VOLUME I COMMUNISM

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

I have just released a new book which is certain to shake things up. I am interested in doing interviews to discuss this new work Adolf Hitler: Bolshevik and Zionist Volume I Communism:

Volume I of a planned multi-part series compiles mountains of evidence, including scarce sources and new translations, to explain:

Why Hitler hid the fact that he worked for Kurt Eisner's revolutionary government and was an elected liaison and propagandist for the Communist Soldiers' Councils of the Bavarian Soviet Republic.

Why Hitler was a Communist informant, intelligence agent for the Reichswehr and spy.

Why Captain Karl Mayr and General Erich Ludendorff chose Lance Corporal Adolf Hitler to lead an anti-Semitic and anti-Bolshevik National-Socialist party, and how they made him into a "German Joan of Arc", dangerous demagogue and belligerent dictator.

Why Hitler infiltrated the German Workers' Party, changed its name to the National Socialist German Workers' Party and replaced its leader Anton Drexler.

Why Hitler let the British escape at Dunkirk, why he lost the Battle of Britain and why he opposed Operation Sea Lion.

Why Hitler collaborated with the Soviet Union, then attacked it and ensured his own defeat.

Why Hitler, who never declared wars, declared war on America.

Why Hitler wanted Lebensraum in the East as living space for his dead German soldiers.

Why Hitler let Hermann Goering deliberately lose the war he helped Hitler deliberately start.

Why Hitler repeatedly sacrificed his soldiers to the Soviets and provided Stalin with foreknowledge of his plans.

Why Hitler refused to negotiate a peace at war's end and instead issued the Nero Order calling for the suicidal destruction of Germany by Germans.

Find the unexpected answers to these and countless other conundrums in Adolf Hitler: Bolshevik and Zionist.

Saturday, March 16, 2019

The CIA Should Investigate Brenton Tarrant's Ties to Russian Agents

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Brenton Tarrant's manifesto The Great Replacement might as well have been crafted by the FSB/KGB. As I explain in my book Putin's Reign of Terror Putin is behind ISIS and has sponsored global terrorism to sway elections and provide him with a pretext to invade other countries. Putin wants to drive a wedge between Turkey and NATO. Putin wants to Balkanize America and is behind the separatist movements in California and Texas. Putin wants a revolution in America and sponsored the alt-right versus antifa wars in our streets. Putin is pitting Muslims against Whites and Whites against Muslims, for the benefit of Israel. Putin sponsors the Zionist cause by agitating for anti-Semitism in the West to inspire Jews to either emigrate to Israel or Russia. Putin has called for Jews to come to Russia, where they will be safe. Russian Jews want Israel to shift its main alliances from America to Russia.

Brenton Tarrant is a globe trotter, and therefore an ideal candidate for Russian influence. Tarrant's terrorist attack was an attack on the American political system by a foreign agent. Tarrant openly stated in his manifesto that it is his aim to drive America into a civil war and Balkanize the nation. He attacked Muslims to accomplish his ends, so as to drive a wedge between Muslims and Whites in their common cause to end Jewish oppression. Tarrant is Zionist who want Jews to move to Israel. Tarrant is an anti-Capitalist Communist who admittedly engages in propaganda of the deed. Tarrant claims to be a "Fascist" and Communists have long created the false opposition of Fascism to serve as their Bogeyman.

Tarrant engineered his attack to drive a wedge between Turkey, America and NATO. Tarrant's manifesto takes a page directly out of the FSB/KGB playbook, when it states:

"To add momentum to the pendulum swings of history, further destabilizing and polarizing Western society in order to eventually destroy the current nihilistic, hedonistic, individualistic insanity that has taken control of Western thought. To drive a wedge between the nations of NATO that are European and the Turks that also make a part of the NATO forces, thereby turning NATO once more into a united European army and pushing the Turkey once more back to the true position of a foreign, enemy force. Finally, to create conflict between the two ideologies within the United States on the ownership of firearms in order to further the social, cultural, political and racial divide within the United states. This conflict over the 2nd amendment and the attempted removal of firearms rights will ultimately result in a civil war that will eventually balkanize the US along political, cultural and, most importantly, racial lines. This balkanization of the US will not only result in the racial separation of the people within the United States ensuring the future of the White race on the North American continent, but also ensuring the death of the 'melting pot' pipe dream. Furthermore this balkanization will also reduce the USA's ability to project power globally, and thereby ensure that never again can such a situation as the US involvement in Kosovo ever occur again(where US/NATO forces fought beside muslims and slaughtered Christian Europeans attempting to remove these Islamic occupiers from Europe).

Tarrant's terrorist attack was NOT a White Nationalist attack. It was a Russian Communist attack on Western Civilization. He is a Russian agent trying to destabilize the West, especially America, for the interests of Russia and Israel. If the CIA scratches around a little, they will certainly turn up a nest of Russians who crafted Tarrant's agenda and set him up to knock us down.

So why am I telling you all this surrended by a sea of silence from the media and our government? These things are obvious! Just as I warned the world that Trump was working for the Russians and publicly called for the CIA, FBI and Congress to investigate Trump and the alternative media years before they did so, I am publicly calling for the CIA, FBI and Congress to investigate Brenton Tarrant with a special emphasis on turning up the Russian influence that created his terrorism and anti-American agenda. Tarrant definitely had Russian advisors.

I have heard the same anti-Western Russian agenda iterated by several "alt-right" stooges for the FSB/KGB. They generate self defeating hatred of Muslims. They say all Jews should move to Israel. They want Turkey to leave NATO and become a Russian ally. They demand the Balkanization of America, which would spell the death of Whites, etc. Why isn't our government protecting us from all of this, instead of using it as a pretext to strip us of our rights?

Whites and Muslims, if you think Putin is your friend, you are sadly deluded. He is pitting you against each other so that you destroy each other.

Friday, March 15, 2019

Brenton Tarrant's Propaganda of the Deed

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Brenton Tarrant murdered 49 people in an attempt to take away our gun rights. Tarrant anticipates that his terrorism will provoke the government to deprive us of our rights to keep and bear arms. He believes that this will prompt the American people to revolt against an increasingly tyrannical government. He is engaging in classic communistic and anarchistic "propaganda of the deed." His manifesto The Great Replacement is Zionist, anti-Capitalist and calls for the Balkanization of America.

The New Zealand government has taken the bait and done exactly what Tarrent wanted them to do. They are moving to take away their people's rights to keep and bear arms. His attack has been a complete success.

He is following the Communist playbook to gin up revolutions and provoke a race war. Putin must be delighted by all of this. If Tarrant is not working directly for the Russians, he is working indirectly for them by succumbing to their agenda and forwarding it. He is also a Zionist who wants all Jews to move to Israel. And Tarrant claims to be a member of the Knights Templar, all of which recalls Anders Breivik and his rampage of murder. It is also reminiscent of Charles Manson's false flag murders meant to spark a race war.

The mass media are responding exactly as Tarrant predicted they would. There will probably be more book burnings and social media is already becoming more discriminatory against Whites. The more restrictive they make the means of communication to achieve political parity and representative government, the more the media and corporations will inspire such insane acts of violence. As they make it impossible for politics to succeed in giving Whites a voice, the more they will drive Whites to engage in public violence in acts of desperation and protest, despite the fact that it is morally wrong and politically counterproductive to do so. John F. Kennedy said, "Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable."

The media are in love with the story because it fits in perfectly with their agenda, but only because Tarrant wanted it to fit their oppressive agenda and deliberately engineered his violence to achieve that end. The mass media will never discuss how censorship and repression are inspiring these horrible acts and are in part to blame for this horrific mayhem. They also falsely and generally accuse White Nationalists, as if they are collectively to blame for Tarrant's insane acts, this as they violently oppose generalizations which collectively blame Muslims for acts of terrorism committed by insane individuals.

The media are also not addressing the violence in movies and video games, which is turning masses of people into psychopaths. They want easy answers which strip of us our rights and impose government and corporate tyranny on Whites, which only compounds the problem, and which will inevitably inspire more violence as a response to the increasing repression. That is what Tarrant wants. He wants Whites to face increasing restrictions on their rights, so that they will violently rebel against the increasing oppression in a self feeding cycle of violence and tyranny.

Instead of restricting our means of communication and political activity, corporations and the mass media should be affording us greater freedom of communication and augmenting the public debate with a level and fair playing field. Every human being shares the same rights to freedom of expression, self determination and representative government. If the corporations and mass media continue to presume they have the right to selectively silence individuals with differing views, those with pro-White views, then they will increasingly inspire unstable individuals to express themselves through violence because they will not have the option of civil discourse. The hysterical mass media and the corrupt corporations make Brenton Tarrant's propaganda of the deed a success, and therefore encourage more of it to the detriment of us all.

In order to better understand how "propaganda of the deed" works, consider the increase in Muslim terrorism that would occur if the Koran were banned from all the major booksellers. Further image that Muslims were banned on all major social media outlets and artificial intelligence was used to delete anything and everything they wrote and said. What would happen if every foul act committed by a Muslim was used to justify the elimination of civil rights for all Muslims. That is exactly what governments, the mass media and corporations are doing to Whites. Since they are making it impossible for Whites to engage in civil public discourse about their own destiny and rights, they are inspiring unstable Whites to express themselves with violence, having no other public means to express themselves. It is a predictable response and Tarrant predicts more to come. The media, despite their pretense of sophistication, has been taken in by a sick terrorist and was outclassed. They have no clue as to what just really happened, but Brenton Tarrant does. His propaganda of the deed was a stunning success, most unfortunately.

Monday, March 04, 2019

Contact Information for the Federal Trade Commission

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

The FTC investigates potential antitrust violations. The Federal Trade Commission has published a brochure in pdf format which you can download here:

https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/attachments/competition-counts/pdf-0116_competition-counts.pdf

Page seven of the brochure provides the following contact information:

E-mail: antitrust@ftc.gov

If you wish to submit confidential information, send it by mail and mark it "Confidential."

Mail: Federal Trade Commission

Bureau of Competition-H374

Washington, D.C. 20580

Telephone: 1-202-326-3300

Everyone is equally free to confidentially inform the FTC of potential monopolies and other antitrust violations which obstruct free and fair trade.

Friday, March 01, 2019

Kindle's Whimsical Approach to Burning Books

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Kindle has yet again refused to state the specific reasons why it has banned my book E = mc2 and the Jewish Question. Though Kindle claims that the "subject matter" of my work is in violation of its "guidelines", Kindle will not and cannot tell me which guideline has been violated because Kindle does not have a guideline which covers the subject of "subject matter". Furthermore, Kindle has refused to define the "subject matter" of my book, and since it has no definition of the subject matter of my book, the subject matter of my book cannot serve as a justification for banning my book. Instead of answering my questions, Kindle has confirmed my assertion that they are selectively and arbitrarily banning my book without due cause based solely on their assumption of the power to whimsically ban books without any means of appeal and without any notice as to the reasons why the book has been banned. That is quite a capricious and cavalier approach to the historically dangerous practice of burning books. Would they banish or burn heretics with an equal lack of policy and process to the way they ban arbitrarily declared heretical books? That type of murder at the stake is what is at stake in our society if we permit this reckless discrimination, persecution and censorship to stand.

Thursday, February 28, 2019

An Open Letter to Jeff Bezos

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

I would like to call your attention to the historical persecution and censorship of Jews, because that will probably pique your interest and it is a safe space for you to rest in without worry that your financial interests are in jeopardy. I won't ask you to think too hard, as I would not want to tax your mind the way heretical books would. The Jews enjoy special privileges in our society, especially as relatable victims, so perhaps portrayals of Jewish victimization will form understandable images in your mind, where the persecution of Whites is a taboo subject banned from your cybershelves. The persecution and censorship of Whites only appears to capture your imagination when your companies engage in it.

The Jews excommunicated the now famous Jewish philosopher Spinoza with the following vicious decree,

"The Lords of the ma'amad, having long known of the evil opinions and acts of Baruch de Espinoza, have endeavoured by various means and promises, to turn him from his evil ways. But having failed to make him mend his wicked ways, and, on the contrary, daily receiving more and more serious information about the abominable heresies which he practised and taught and about his monstrous deeds, and having for this numerous trustworthy witnesses who have deposed and borne witness to this effect in the presence of the said Espinoza, they became convinced of the truth of the matter; and after all of this has been investigated in the presence of the honourable chachamin, they have decided, with their consent, that the said Espinoza should be excommunicated and expelled from the people of Israel. By the decree of the angels, and by the command of the holy men, we excommunicate, expel, curse and damn Baruch de Espinoza, with the consent of God, Blessed be He, and with the consent of all the Holy Congregation, in front of these holy Scrolls with the six-hundred-and-thirteen precepts which are written therein, with the excommunication with which Joshua banned Jericho, with the curse with which Elisha cursed the boys and with all the curses which are written in the Book of the Law. Cursed be he by day and cursed be he by night; cursed be he when he lies down, and cursed be he when he rises up; cursed be he when he goes out, and cursed be he when he comes in. The Lord will not spare him; the anger and wrath of the Lord will rage against this man, and bring upon him all the curses which are written in this book, and the Lord will blot out his name from under heaven, and the Lord will separate him to his injury from all the tribes of Israel with all the curses of the covenant, which are written in the Book of the Law. But you who cleave unto the Lord God are all alive this day. We order that no one should communicate with him orally or in writing, or show him any favour, or stay with him under the same roof, or within four ells of him, or read anything composed or written by him."—Steven M. Nadler, Spinoza's Heresy: Immortality and the Jewish Mind, Oxford University Press, New York, (2001), p. 225.

I am sure you will agree that those Jews who censored Spinoza were following the norms and mores of their time and were just as convinced as you that they were morally superior to the man they sought to silence. After all, the rabbis did not want their fellow Jews to have a bad experience reading the works of Spinoza, so they justifiably banned his works, isn't that so? I could bring up the censorship of Galileo Galilei, but somehow the persecution of Whites does not draw instant sympathy to the extent that tales of the poor suffering Jew do. And while we are all shedding tears for the long dead Spinoza and the injustice done to him, let us bring up the obligatory persecution of the Jews under the Nazis. I could refer instead to the mass murder of the 30 million souls and nearly complete destruction of the intelligentsia of Gentiles in the Soviet Union under the Bolshevik Jews, but who cares about them, right? After all, they were White. So let's talk about the tyranny and censorship imposed on Jews by Germans, so that you can relate to the danger of engaging in censorship.

In May of 1933, the German Student Union set about to burn books as an "Action against the Un-German Spirit", and take note of the fact that it is now considered "un-American" to be pro-White despite the fact that the Founding Fathers specified that America is a White nation and limited immigration to Whites of good character. These Nazis most famously burned books by Jews, because they were convinced by the norms and mores of their society that they were morally superior to the authors whose subversive books they burned. They probably felt just like your workers who banned my book E = mc2 and the Jewish Agenda, and Greg Johnson's book The White Nationalist Manifesto, in order to prevent a bad reading experience by your customers. No, it was not a time to try to argue the issues raised with more free speech, it was time to use the brutal and heavy handed force of absolute censorship, lest society crumble under deceived masses who bothered to read such tripe and were unable to think for themselves, but instead were better off surrendering their right to know to the censors.

As another example of the well meant censorship of Jewish works, the false Jewish messiah Jacob Frank led the Catholic Bishop to demand the destruction of the Talmud, which was far more precious to many Jews than the Torah, itself. And this happened in an open court, unlike the banning of my book by your companies. The Talmud was banned for offending Christians, who did not want to have a bad reading experience while discovering the Jewish view that the Virgin Mary whored herself to Roman soldiers and other such gems of Jewish lore.

So who are you, Mr Bezos? A bookseller, promoter of free speech and purveyor of knowledge vital to the public interest; or a book burner who succumbs to the bullying of special interest groups to silence heretics who dare to speak truths which cannot be refuted by the free exchange of ideas?

Amazon/Kindle's Evasive Non-Response

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Kindle/Amazon has responded by simply repeating themselves without answering my questions. Their redundant statement is so thoroughly generic and non-descriptive that it could apply with equal force to every book that has ever been written, and therefore offers no explanation at all as to why they have banned my book.

Further Examples of the Book Burning Purge at Amazon

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Proof is mounting that Amazon has engaged in a politically motivated purge of a specific class of books, those which advocate the best interests of White People:

https://www.amren.com/news/2019/02/press-release-amazon-now-banning-books-based-on-political-content/

In each instance, they have attempted to justify banning these books due to their "subject matter" without further explanation, and directed the authors to their "guidelines" which are not guidelines but simply a statement that Amazon has the power to censor books. Amazon sells countless products which produce negative customer experiences, as evinced by the many millions of negative reviews of products Amazon continues to sell. Their "guidelines" are being employed as a sham device for Amazon to hide behind as it censors books for political reasons.

The Nazis also burned books that they believed would produce a negative customer experience. The Nazis also presumed that they knew best which books to allow the public to read, and also had no regard for the public's right to know facts and opinions which offend special interests. The slippery slope leads to the abyss and we are tumbling down it. Amazon has the power to influence politics and deny us a level playing field to obtain representative government and exercise our fundamental human rights. Amazon is violating our fundamental human rights by selectively discriminating against us.

Kindle burns books! It is my new mantra.

Wednesday, February 27, 2019

Is Kindle's Censorship of My Book Part of an Expanding Purge?

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Amazon has just recently banned Greg Johnson's book The White Nationalist Manifesto:

https://www.counter-currents.com/2019/02/amazon-com-bans-the-white-nationalist-manifesto/

Like Mr. Johnson, I am unable to determine the basis for the ban of my book. As he has done, I have requested that the ban of my book be lifted. Are amazon and Kindle engaged in selectively enforcing the vaguest of decrees, which though they style them "guidelines" are not guidelines at all, but simply a statement that they have the power to censor?

Does anyone know of other books that have been purged?

This is truly outrageous and very dangerous.

KINDLE Burned My Book Due to Its "Subject Matter"

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

The ebook publisher with the ironic name "Kindle" has effectively burned my book E = mc2 and the Jewish Agenda. The most dangerous monopoly is a monopoly over the marketplace of ideas. Heinrich Heine famously iterated the admonition, "Dort, wo man Bücher verbrennt, verbrennt man am Ende auch Menschen" "Where they burn books, they will also burn people in the end."

Kindle's selective discrimination against my work due to its "subject matter" inhibits my ability to engage in free and fair trade and compete with other authors and booksellers on a level playing field. It also creates a monopolistic hurdle that I cannot overcome, which restricts my ability to engage in interstate and international commerce as effectively as those who have not been censored.

Instead of attempting to refute what I have written with facts and logic, Kindle is censoring me by banning the "subject matter" of my book. Why? Are my words irrefutable? If so, why do they keep the public from knowing what I have said? They are not only violating my fundamental human rights to free speech and my rights to engage in free and fair trade in an open marketplace, they are violating the public's rights to know what I have to say.

But Kindle has not only burned my book, they have also lit a fire in me. I now have an increasingly burning desire to reveal the truth to millions of people, which they cannot extinguish by burning my book.

It is quite disappointing that they have burned my book, rather than kindle ideas.

If anyone knows of publishers who will not censor my book's "subject matter" please let me know.

Wednesday, February 06, 2019

The Disuniting State of America: Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham Wants New Mexico to Live Up to Its Name

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

I do not have much time for writing blog posts these days, but I cannot resist the temptation to comment on New Mexican Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham's opportunistic withdrawal of National Guard troops from the border of the United States of America, which was synchronized with Trump's State of the Union address. Grisham evidently takes the title of her State very seriously. She may have to Balkanize the State into New Guatemala, New El Salvador, New Honduras, etc. At some point, the "New" will become meaningless, and sovereignty will be completely lost. Grisham is disuniting the state of America.

New Mexico is a beautiful State. It is a foolish mistake to give it away or allow it to remain a port for illegal entry into the USA.

Saturday, February 02, 2019

Our Rights to Free and Representative Government Versus Orwellian "Quarantine" and "Inoculation"

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

The recent documentary Alt-Right: Age of Rage discusses two extremely troubling and dehumanizing tactics used to subvert our democratic political process. These subversive methods are given the Orwellian labels "Quarantine" and "Inoculation" which liken a certain class of human beings to diseases. The false presumption which is tacitly made by those who ply these subversive arts is that Americans have unequal rights to free and fair representation and this presumption is made under the bizarre pretext that this orchestrated denial of rights to representative government to some, even to a majority, is necessary to ensure free and fair representation for all people in government which has thereby already and deliberately been denied by the forces supposedly seeking its enforcement.

Assuming as a tacit basis for obstructing the rights of some to speak, and the rights of the public to know what they are saying. . . presuming that there exist two classes of human beings, those who agree with those who control the flow of public information and those who disagree with those who control the public flow of information, and that those who control the public flow of information are monolithic at least in their relevant views, organized efforts have been made to limit the public's access to politically relevant information. When those who control the public flow of information wish to censor the views of others with whom they disagree, they believe they are entitled to either "quarantine" their opponents by deliberately preventing exposure of their existence and views in the media, or engage in an unfair and biased propaganda effort through the media to control the minds of the public so as to generate conforming disagreement as an indoctrinated response to favor their biased view. They create a totalitarian mindset through the process of brainwashing the public with an intentionally one sided exposure of the facts and logical arguments, as well as emotional displays of propaganda.

The process of human thought depends upon exposure to information. Neural pathways are formed and the subconscious mind is controlled by the exposure of the brain through the senses to information, which in this instance is controlled by a group that by no means represents the independent views of each and every American. Under our system of government, each and every citizen is entitled to pursue representative government that favors his or her views. Under the law, no citizen has a greater individual right to governmental representation of his views than any other citizen.

Yet this condescending clique, mostly Jewish, presumes that they have the right to limit public discourse to only their views, or the deliberate criticism of the views of their political opponents. They presume that only they have the right to divine the course of government and so abuse the fundamental rights of free speech, private property and public assembly to deny those same rights to others through active collusion to suppress their views from public discourse and thereby deny them representative government. At the same time, they have corrupted the American government and laws to prevent segregation into communities of like-minded individuals who could then seek local representative government that obeyed the views and rights of the segregated community to self determination. In so doing they have monopolized the press, public discourse, public opinion and government to favor their totalitarian control to the fullest extent possible.

We need to start demanding our rights to representative government. We need to take action in the courts to demand remedies to the suppression of our rights to engage in the political process. We need to create our own outlets for public expression and take action in the courts against the monopolies and illegal and underhanded methods employed to suppress our public voice and deny us government representation.

The Myth of the "YouTube Community" Is a Sham Device to Enable Censorship and Selective Enforcement of Sham TOS Agreements

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

YouTube has deleted the popular channel TheRapeofJustice which featured many videos which brought my work to hundreds of thousands of viewers:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXkBbDD--DOuh1M1RlnIiVA

For example, the channel, which had about fifty thousand subscribers at the time, mirrored my video presentation

When last I checked, the number of subscribers to TheRapeOfJustice channel had eclipsed fifty thousand. The video as a mirror had achieved more than forty thousand views in a few weeks and was going viral. At that point, utilizing the sham device of the "YouTube Community" as a pretext, YouTube censored the video with a blank screen warning viewers against watching it, and blocking those features which enable videos to go viral.

By falsely attributing their independent action to a mythical "YouTube Community" whose supposed existence contradicts the raw numbers of viewers, likes and subscribers who in fact represent the real community of YouTube, YouTube creates the false impression of a democratic process to cover up what it is in reality corporate collusion with a censorship lobby to regulate the public disclosure of politically important information. The massive numbers of subscribers, likers and viewers rights are denied and their vote through their participation in YouTube and its features as real members of a community is relegated to the trash heap by an organized minority of censors and gatekeepers, who style themselves watchdogs of their perceived self interests. No numbers are publicly tallied to count the representation of voluntary viewers, likes and subscribers versus organized censors who have been schooled on how to obstruct the public disclosure of information through social media. There is no open disclosure of who it is alleged constitutes the "YouTube Community" of (professional?) censors or the nature of their complaints. No explanation is given as to why the rights of the majority are denied or what numerical basis there is for the allegation that the "community" has ruled against what are often millions of members of the verified and counted actual community of viewers and subscribers.

YouTube is fostering a tyranny of an hostile minority over the fundamental human rights of the majority of the verifiable YouTube community. Under the pretext and farce of the sham shadow "YouTube Community" they have violated not only my fundamental human rights to speak freely and the public's fundamental rights to know what I have say; but given that I was promoting my book for sale, they have violated my rights to compete in a free and fair marketplace across State and International lines, thereby violating the spirit of interstate commerce and the Sherman Anti-Trust Act. They have also violated my fundamental human rights to express my political opinions in a fair and free forum and in so doing have corrupted the American political process to render it unrepresentative.

In identifying the effects of the Russian sabotage of the American political process through the means of social media, the American government has officially recognized the fact that social media is a part of the American political system and affords the owners of social media the ability to sway elections to favor those who produce, censor and control its content. The censorship taking place affects the political process, but YouTube does not provide due process to those they victimize with censorship. No fair or equitable process exists for a democratic and open determination of the facts and law which regulate their exercise of dictatorial power to censor. No compensation is given to those whose work is destroyed and who incur damages as a result of the censorship that occurs behind closed doors without public scrutiny or open public disclosure or public process. This organized campaign of censorship is corrupting our political process rendering it unfair and unrepresentative. Our fundamental human rights of representative government, due process, free speech, self determination, public assembly, and free and fair election processes are being trampled by the tyranny of censorship of a monopolistic group of social media barons and fund raising services. Our democracy has been subverted.

What is my government doing to defend my rights and the rights of the public to know my thoughts?

Not only has YouTube censored my work, not only have journals which publish dishonest attacks on me refused to publish my responses, but foreign governments are actively censoring my works and blocking public access to websites which feature them. We live in dangerous times.