Friday, September 15, 2006

The Pope's Eleatic and Cabalistic Tirade Against the Moslems, and What to Make of it

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

On Tuesday, 12 September 2006, the Pope presented a lecture to the Aula Magna of the University of Regensburg. In his lecture, the Pope began by defaming Moslems. I will analyze the apparent purpose of the lecture, its true intent, and I will open questions as to how and why it came about.

The Pope opens his lecture by defaming Islam with the smear that all which is new in the religion is "evil and inhuman" and that Mohammed allegedly commanded that the faith he taught be spread by the sword—as opposed to the humane "reason" which is the basis of Christianity. The Pope makes no mention of the historical actions of the Roman Catholic Church to spread Christianity by the sword, nor does the Pope acknowledge the evil and inhumanity present in other religions, but instead directly targets Islam for an unsubstantiated assault. The Pope does not present any evidence to support the conclusion to which he leads his listeners, by quoting a Fourteenth Century source hostile to Islam, nor does the Pope repudiate the empty assertions he has parroted.

Why was it necessary to defame Islam in this way in this lecture? The Pope attempts to justify his attack, but concedes the contrived nature of his justifications. The Pope states that he was reminded of his theme that Christianity depends upon a form of reason which is broader than the positivistic restrictions of empirical science, reminded only "recently" when he read Theodore Khoury's edition of a Fourteenth Century dialogue between the Byzantine Emperor Manuell II Paleologus and his "Persian interlocutor". What occasioned this reading?

The Pope immediately dismisses the bulk of the conversation, but instead focuses on a sole issue which can used to defame Moslems, an issue the Pope concedes is "rather marginal to the dialogue as a whole", but which can be used to open the Pope's open assault on the Moslems of the world. The argument the Pope presents to shroud his vicious attack on Moslems in a cloak of scholarly pontificating, whom the Pope effectively dubs non-European and antagonistic to reason, progress and the mighty European way, whom the Pope subtly implies by trickery of language are hellish idol worshipers; the argument is that reason is Godly and that the essence of reason is far broader than the narrow restrictions of empirical science, which requires that a theory be falsifiable through physical experiment.

The Pope is excusing blind faith as a reasonable belief, which need not be proven beyond its internal logical consistency, and which cannot be contradicted by physical facts. This is all well and good, though it is presented in a typically unenlightened and sophomoric appeal to the trite proclamations of the Eleatics and Cabalistic writers, such as Parmenides who both said that God is, and God is all, which outright pantheism Cabalistic Judaism repeats, and which Eleatic belief in the unity of all things in time was copied by ancient Jews in the proclamation of their God, "I am". Parmenides also entreated us to accept that the rational is the real, and the real is the rational—another theme adopted in the Cabalistic Zohar, and reiterated by Hegel—a more modern advocate of the Logos as the basis of knowledge and substance.

The Pope reflects upon the true meaning of John's opening words which declare that God is the Logos; which word has been incorrectly translated as "word", as in the Bible as God. The Pope, however, restores some of the import to the word "Logos" by giving the classic neo-Platonic definition of the term as "reason", while neglecting the dialectic Heraclitian definition which preceded and which superceded the Platonic, that of unity in contradiction and of perpetual change, whereby the term Logos is defined as never ending fire and change. Suffice it to say that the Pope's arguments are trite and shallow and nothing more than an excuse to hide behind while defaming Moslems. His reference in such a context to the Fourteenth Century dialogue is not even obscure, rather his subsequent diatribe is meant to obscure his attack in a cowardly and vicious manner, and to add fuel to the fire by offering the Pope the opportunity to smear Moslems as if non-European irrational barbarians, who allegedly act and think "contrary to God's nature."

The Pope appears to be steering the Catholic Church towards the Cabala, which itself is a rather primitive rehashing of Eleatic pantheism. The Pope appears to be steering the Catholic Church towards the Noahide Laws. The Pope is obviously spreading hatred and fomenting conflict. But why is the Pope acting like a Cabalistic Jew? Could it be that when the Rothschild's took over Rome, the Vatican and the Catholic Church, through debt and with the intent to destroy it and bleed off the wealth of Catholic nations like France, could it be that they also bought the loyalty and the voice of the Papacy?

The Chicago Tribune reported on 27 February 1867 on page 2,

"The Rothschilds of Rome.
[Rome Correspondence of the London News.]

Who, whether he has set foot in the Eternal City or no, has not heard of the Torlonias—the Rothschilds of Rome? In the course of last summer, when the monetary crisis here was at its height, Don Alessandro Torlonia—the acting head of the house—won extraordinary popularity by writing a letter to the Pope, in which he offered to buy up the unconvertible Government paper, and substituting a metal currency in its place, providing that the existing managers of the Roman Bank, with Cardinal Antonelli's brother at their head, were sent about their business, and the direction confided to himself. At that time it was quite impossible to get notes converted into coin at any price for the simple reason that there was no coin in the bank. Even now, when things have improved somewhat, it is with the utmost difficulty that you can get change for a scudi note, even at shops in the Corso, and there is not a hotel keeper or a tradesman in Rome who would even look at a five scudi note if you were sufficiently ignorant of the state of things here to present it in payment in the expectation of getting any change out. Of the small pieces of silver, which you obtain with no little difficulty, many are so worn and thin that they seem in a sort of transition state between sliver and paper, and have long since lost all trace of any image or superscription whatever.

So rolling in wealth is Don Alessandro Torlonia that his riches are admitted to be literally untold, and only this much is known certain, that everything in Rome worth having, except the Pope and St. Peter's, already belongs to him. No wonder then that at the Vatican Don Alessandro should be looked upon as a hardly less dangerous character than Victor Emanuel himself, and that the insulting offer which he made last summer to buy up the Holy Father, and add him so his possessions, should have been decidedly rejected, though it had not entailed the removal of an Antonelli from a lucrative place. On his first appearance in public after making the above mentioned patriotic offer, Don Alessandro received such an ovation as has not been witnessed in Rome since those of which Pius IX. was himself the object, when he gave the first impulse to the Italian Revolution in 1846. This Don Alessandro is the same Torlonia who risked his whole fortune on the gigantic enterprise of draining the Fucine Lake, the issue of which struggle with nature was so long doubtful that it became a common saying in Rome, 'Either Torlonia will drain the Fucine Lake, or the Fucine will drain Torlonia.' In the end, however, Torlonia got the better of the lake, and redeemed about one hundred thousand acres of land for cultivation. Over what was a few years ago a barren waste of waters, flourishing crops may now be seen waving every harvest time, and with last year's produce Don Alessandro had a scheme of feeding the now almost starving Roman people by selling them bread of his own baking at a reduced rate. Such, at least, was the account of the story given me by a patriotic and exceedingly liberal Roman, who made a severe case against the Government out of the stoppage of Torlonia's extensive bread baking-by-machinery works, which threw some two hundred workmen out of employment just a fortnight ago. I am bound, however, to add that, on proceeding to the spot and making inquiries, I learned quite a different version of the affair, entirely exculpating the Government from any direct interference in the matter. Only this much is certain, that the works are stopped, and that the Roman people stand little chance, at present, of getting their bread at reduced rates."

On 2 June 1867, The Chicago Tribune reported on page 3,


For fifteen centuries the Jews have been cursed by the Pope, and persecuted by the Roman Church. There is no more revolting chapter of horrors in history than that of the treatment of the Jews at the hands of the Pontiffs. In all lands where the Roman religion is dominant the children of Israel have been treated with barbaric rigor—allowed few privileges, denied all rights, looked upon as a people accursed of God, and set apart by divine ordination to be trampled upon by the church. In Rome, at the present day, the Jews are confined to the Ghetto; they are not allowed to set up a shop in any other part of the city; they cannot leave the city without a permit; they can engage only in certain trades; they are compelled to pay enormous taxes into the Papal treasury; the are subject to a stringent code of laws established by the Pope for their special government; they are imprisoned and fined for the most trivial of offences. They cannot own any real estate in the city; cannot build or tear down or remodel any dwelling or change their place of business, without Papal permission. They are in abject slavery, with no right whatever, and entitled to no privileges, and receive none, except upon the gracious condescension of the Pope. In former times they were unmercifully whipped and compelled to listen once a week to the Christian doctrine of the priests. But time is bringing changes. The Pope is in want of money; and the house of the red shield has money to lend on good security. The house is always ready to accommodate Governments. Italy wants money, so she sells her fine system of railroads to the Rothschilds. The Pope wants money, and he sends his Nuncio to the wealthy house of the despised race, offers them security on the property of the church, the Compagna, and receives ten million dollars to maintain his army and Imperial State. That was in 1865. A year passes, and the Pontificial expenditures are five million more than the income, and the deficit is made up by the Rothschilds, who take a second security at a higher rate of interest. Another year has passed and there is a third great annual vacuum in the Papal treasury of six million, which quite likely will be filled by the same house. The firm can do it with as much ease as your readers can pay their yearly subscription to the weekly Journal. When will the Pope redeem his loan at the rate he is going? Never. Manifestly the day is not far distant when these representatives of the persecuted race will have all the available property of the Church in their possession. Surely time works wonders."

On 24 December 1893, The Chicago Daily Tribune reported, on page 6,


Economy Necessary Because of the Continual
Decrease in the Revenues.

Since the heavy losses made by the Pope a year or more ago the finances of the Vatican have been superintended with great care. 'It is known,' says a Paris paper, 'that a committee of prelates and several Cardinals exists at Rome whose duty it is to regulate the use of the sums of money which flow into the treasury of the Vatican. These sums come principally from two sources: The revenues of the property possessed by the Pope and the gifts of the faithful, known as Peter's Pence. The property of the Vatican is of various kinds, but the greater part of it consists of money or bonds, placed in England and France, under control of the Paris house of Rothschild. Peter's Pence is an annual revenue which far from being fixed. In good years the total of the sum received from all countries of the world reaches 8,000,000 francs. Sometimes it is as low as 6,000,000 and even 5,000,000. This has been the case for the last five years. This diminution is due, in great part, to the discord between the Royalists and the French Catholics produced by the republican policy of the Pope. France alone furnished two-thirds and often three-quarters of Peter's Pence. And in France it is the royalists who prove themselves most generous. But since the adhesion of Leo XIII. to the republic many of them, more Royalist than Catholic, have closed their purses to the Pope. However, despite all this, French Bishops still forward the largest sums to his Holiness. Thus, the Bishop of Nante sent a few days ago 100,000 francs from his flock as their gift to the Vatican treasury.

'Italy,' adds the Journal, 'contributes only a small part of the revenue—a few hundred thousand francs a year. The Romans show themselves in this regard less generous than other Italians. On the other hand, the Anglo-Saxon countries—England, Ireland, Australia, and the United States—begin to send important sums. If Catholicism continues to grow in these countries, it is easy to see that in time the Vatican will draw considerable sums from them.

'Again, there are the royal courts, such as that of Austria, which send annually rich presents to the Pope. This is even true of princes of ancient Italian families. Francis II., ex-King of Naples, and Maria Theresa, formerly Grand-Duchess of Tuscany, never fail to send their offerings, which consist of several thousands of francs. The Comte de Chambord was accustomed to give annually 50,000 francs; the Count of Paris sends the same sum.

'The expenses of the Vatican,' continues the writer, 'amount annually to more than 7,000,000 francs. They are regulated as follows: for the personal wants of the Pope, 500,000 francs; for the Cardinals, 700,000; for poor dioceses, 400,000; administration of the Vatican, 1,800,000; Secretary of State, 1,000,000; employés and ablegates, 1,500,000; support of schools and poor, 1,200,000.

'The Cardinals at Rome live at the expense of the Pope. The income of each from this source is at least 22,000 francs. The Secretary of State is charged with upholding relations with foreign governments by the mediation of nuncios. The four most important—Paris, Vienna, Madrid, and Lisbon—each receive an allowance of 60,000 francs a year.

'The last jubilee of Pope Leo XIII. brought to the Vatican 3,000,000 francs. At the first, celebrated five years ago, 12,000,000 francs were received. In the course of years the Pope has introduced a number of economies in the different branches of the Vatican service, and for that reason he has been called miserly. This accusation is not merited; the economies became necessary in a State whose expenses are considerable and whose revenues continue to diminish. Leo XIII. has many reasons to follow the example of his illustrious predecessor, Sixtus, as it is difficult in the present time to count on the generosity of the faithful.'"

The utter hypocrisy of the Pope's attack on the Moslems of the world, and the many logical failures of his arguments, are not worth addressing in detail at this time.

Thursday, September 14, 2006

The Zionist Plague on America

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

We are approaching an economic collapse. Our loss will be a tremendous gain for Jewish financiers. Throughout America's history, Jewish bankers have deliberately created economic calamities in America for their personal gain. Bernard Baruch boasted, in reference to the Depression of 1893,

"I had never experienced a depression before. But even then I began to grasp dimly that the period of emergence from a depression provides rare opportunities for financial profit.

During a depression people come to feel that better times never will come. They cannot see through their despair to the sunny future that lies behind the fog. At such times a basic confidence in the country's future pays off, if one purchases securities and holds them until prosperity returns.

From what I saw, heard, and read, I knew that was exactly what the giants of finance and industry were doing. They were quietly acquiring interests in properties which bad defaulted but which would pay out under competent management once normal economic conditions were restored. I tried to do the same thing with my limited means."—B. M. Baruch, Baruch: My Own Story, Henry Holt and Company, New York, (1957), p. 92. See also page 191.

Jewish exploitation of the generosity of their Gentile neighbors is not a new phenomenon. Jews are in fact taught to deceive their neighbors, to spread plagues upon them, to steal from them, and to enslave them. The Jews are told that their ancestors played on the kindness of the Egyptians and borrowed their gold and silver, then stole it when they fled the nation. Exodus chapter 11 states,

"1 And the LORD said unto Moses, Yet will I bring one plague more upon Pharaoh, and upon Egypt; afterwards he will let you go hence: when he shall let you go, he shall surely thrust you out hence altogether. 2 Speak now in the ears of the people, and let every man borrow of his neighbour, and every woman of her neighbour, jewels of silver, and jewels of gold. 3 And the LORD gave the people favour in the sight of the Egyptians. Moreover the man Moses was very great in the land of Egypt, in the sight of Pharaoh's servants, and in the sight of the people. 4 And Moses said, Thus saith the LORD, About midnight will I go out into the midst of Egypt: 5 And all the firstborn in the land of Egypt shall die, from the firstborn of Pharaoh that sitteth upon his throne, even unto the firstborn of the maidservant that is behind the mill; and all the firstborn of beasts. 6 And there shall be a great cry throughout all the land of Egypt, such as there was none like it, nor shall be like it any more. 7 But against any of the children of Israel shall not a dog move his tongue, against man or beast: that ye may know how that the LORD doth put a difference between the Egyptians and Israel. 8 And all these thy servants shall come down unto me, and bow down themselves unto me, saying, Get thee out, and all the people that follow thee: and after that I will go out. And he went out from Pharaoh in a great anger. 9 And the LORD said unto Moses, Pharaoh shall not hearken unto you; that my wonders may be multiplied in the land of Egypt. 10 And Moses and Aaron did all these wonders before Pharaoh: and the LORD hardened Pharaoh's heart, so that he would not let the children of Israel go out of his land."

Jewish leaders are today borrowing the treasure of the American People and running our nation into unpayable debt and inevitable ruin. They will walk away with our wealth and take as many "righteous Jews" with them as will go. They did it to the Germans. They did it to the Russians. They did it to the Spanish. They did it to the Romans. By their own spurious accounts, they did it to the Egyptians.

Jewish leaders are also scapegoating America for the atrocities Jewish leaders are covertly perpetrating around the world. It is a part of their ancient plan to ruin and discredit all Gentile government and religion. They call it their "Jewish mission" to destroy and defame all other peoples, cultures and religions. They often accomplish their objectives by covertly causing nations to take self-destructive actions, and then heap scorn and condemnation on the very nations they have deliberately and actively led into ruin, pretending that they themselves are forever the victims of all other peoples of the earth.

The ancient Jews tell that they had another gift for the Egyptians, who housed and helped them. The ancient Jews proudly claimed that they ruined the currency and economy of Egypt and stole its wealth. Jewish leadership is today actively ruining American currency and the American economy. Our debt is their gain. Through debt, they have enslaved us. Genesis chapter 47 states,

"1 Then Joseph came and told Pharaoh, and said, My father and my brethren, and their flocks, and their herds, and all that they have, are come out of the land of Canaan; and, behold, they are in the land of Goshen. 2 And he took some of his brethren, even five men, and presented them unto Pharaoh. 3 And Pharaoh said unto his brethren, What is your occupation? And they said unto Pharaoh, Thy servants are shepherds, both we, and also our fathers. 4 They said moreover unto Pharaoh, For to sojourn in the land are we come; for thy servants have no pasture for their flocks; for the famine is sore in the land of Canaan: now therefore, we pray thee, let thy servants dwell in the land of Goshen. 5 And Pharaoh spake unto Joseph, saying, Thy father and thy brethren are come unto thee: 6 The land of Egypt is before thee; in the best of the land make thy father and brethren to dwell; in the land of Goshen let them dwell: and if thou knowest any men of activity among them, then make them rulers over my cattle. 7 And Joseph brought in Jacob his father, and set him before Pharaoh: and Jacob blessed Pharaoh. 8 And Pharaoh said unto Jacob, How old art thou? 9 And Jacob said unto Pharaoh, The days of the years of my pilgrimage are an hundred and thirty years: few and evil have the days of the years of my life been, and have not attained unto the days of the years of the life of my fathers in the days of their pilgrimage. 10 And Jacob blessed Pharaoh, and went out from before Pharaoh. 11 And Joseph placed his father and his brethren, and gave them a possession in the land of Egypt, in the best of the land, in the land of Rameses, as Pharaoh had commanded. 12 And Joseph nourished his father, and his brethren, and all his father's household, with bread, according to their families. 13 ¶ And there was no bread in all the land; for the famine was very sore, so that the land of Egypt and all the land of Canaan fainted by reason of the famine. 14 And Joseph gathered up all the money that was found in the land of Egypt, and in the land of Canaan, for the corn which they bought: and Joseph brought the money into Pharaoh's house. 15 And when money failed in the land of Egypt, and in the land of Canaan, all the Egyptians came unto Joseph, and said, Give us bread: for why should we die in thy presence? for the money faileth. 16 And Joseph said, Give your cattle; and I will give you for your cattle, if money fail. 17 And they brought their cattle unto Joseph: and Joseph gave them bread in exchange for horses, and for the flocks, and for the cattle of the herds, and for the asses: and he fed them with bread for all their cattle for that year. 18 When that year was ended, they came unto him the second year, and said unto him, We will not hide it from my lord, how that our money is spent; my lord also hath our herds of cattle; there is not ought left in the sight of my lord, but our bodies, and our lands: 19 Wherefore shall we die before thine eyes, both we and our land? buy us and our land for bread, and we and our land will be servants unto Pharaoh: and give us seed, that we may live, and not die, that the land be not desolate. 20 And Joseph bought all the land of Egypt for Pharaoh; for the Egyptians sold every man his field, because the famine prevailed over them: so the land became Pharaoh's. 21 And as for the people, he removed them to cities from one end of the borders of Egypt even to the other end thereof. 22 Only the land of the priests bought he not; for the priests had a portion assigned them of Pharaoh, and did eat their portion which Pharaoh gave them: wherefore they sold not their lands. 23 Then Joseph said unto the people, Behold, I have bought you this day and your land for Pharaoh: lo, here is seed for you, and ye shall sow the land. 24 And it shall come to pass in the increase, that ye shall give the fifth part unto Pharaoh, and four parts shall be your own, for seed of the field, and for your food, and for them of your households, and for food for your little ones. 25 And they said, Thou hast saved our lives: let us find grace in the sight of my lord, and we will be Pharaoh's servants. 26 And Joseph made it a law over the land of Egypt unto this day, that Pharaoh should have the fifth part; except the land of the priests only, which became not Pharaoh's. 27 ¶ And Israel dwelt in the land of Egypt, in the country of Goshen; and they had possessions therein, and grew, and multiplied exceedingly. 28 And Jacob lived in the land of Egypt seventeen years: so the whole age of Jacob was an hundred forty and seven years. 29 And the time drew nigh that Israel must die: and he called his son Joseph, and said unto him, If now I have found grace in thy sight, put, I pray thee, thy hand under my thigh, and deal kindly and truly with me; bury me not, I pray thee, in Egypt: 30 But I will lie with my fathers, and thou shalt carry me out of Egypt, and bury me in their buryingplace. And he said, I will do as thou hast said. 31 And he said, Swear unto me. And he sware unto him. And Israel bowed himself upon the bed's head."

Many Jews believe that they are justified in using America as their slaves, soldiers and treasury. It is our blessing from their Isaac onto his son Esau to be the slave and soldier of Jacob, the Jews.

"25:23 And the LORD said unto her, Two nations are in thy womb, and two manner of people shall be separated from thy bowels; and the one people shall be stronger than the other people; and the elder shall serve the younger. [***] 27:38 And Esau said unto his father, Hast thou but one blessing, my father? bless me, even me also, O my father. And Esau lifted up his voice, and wept. 27:39 And Isaac his father answered and said unto him, Behold, thy dwelling shall be the fatness of the earth, and of the dew of heaven from above; 27:40 And by thy sword shalt thou live, and shalt serve thy brother; and it shall come to pass when thou shalt have the dominion, that thou shalt break his yoke from off thy neck. 27:41 And Esau hated Jacob because of the blessing wherewith his father blessed him: and Esau said in his heart, The days of mourning for my father are at hand; then will I slay my brother Jacob."

Many Jews believe they are entitled to steal the land of Lebanon, and to use America as their battering ram to put the fear of God in all the peoples they want to kill, whatever the cost to Americans and the rest of the world. Deuteronomy 6:10-11 and 11:24-25 (see also: Joshua 1:2-5) states,

"6:10 And it shall be, when the LORD thy God shall bring thee into the land which He swore unto thy fathers, to Abraham, to Isaac, and to Jacob, to give thee—great and goodly cities, which thou didst not build, 6:11 and houses full of all good things, which thou didst not fill, and cisterns hewn out, which thou the didst not hew, vineyards and olive-trees, which thou didst not plant, and thou shalt eat and be satisfied— [***] 11:24 Every place whereon the sole of your foot shall tread shall be yours: from the wilderness, and Lebanon, from the river, the river Euphrates, even unto the hinder sea shall be your border. 11:25 There shall no man be able to stand against you: the LORD your God shall lay the fear of you and the dread of you upon all the land that ye shall tread upon, as He hath spoken unto you. [version of the Jewish Publication Society]"

Wednesday, September 13, 2006

Syria's Guardian Angel

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Israel has been desperately attempting to drag Syria into a war. Israel is committing genocide against the Palestinians, and laid Lebanon to waste, in large part in the hope that Syria would feel compelled to war with the barbaric Israelis and rescue fellow Arabs from Jewish genocidal murder. Israel went so far as to openly threaten Syria's borders. In spite of all the Israeli provocation, Syria miraculously avoided a suicidal counter-attack. The warmongering Jewish controlled American media and government lamented the fact that they could not drag Syria into war. Never did they call for or celebrate peace. This alone ought to wake Americans up to the fact that leading Jews want to involve America in unnecessary genocidal, and ultimately suicidal, war for the sake of disloyal Jewish leadership.

The recent "terrorist" attack on the United States Embassy in Syria may well have been a staged event meant to initiate World War III. What are the odds of such an attack occuring in Syria, a primary target of the Bush Administration, on the day after September 11, on the day of key elections? The timing and place of this event could only favor warmongering Zionists. Thankfully, Syria's guardian angel again intervened. Again, instead of rejoicing that American lives had been spared, the American media largely buried the story and when it did mention the attack, the American media took the opportunity to defame Moslems in general terms, and to call for war with Syria and Iran. This attack likely either was instigated by agents provocateur who coached fools to attack, or directly by agents of the Zionist warmongers. One analyst attempted through the American media to scapegoat the Syrians for the attack and claimed they were able to counteract it because they were in fact behind it. It seems a rather obvious point that were the Syrians behind the attack, they would not have allowed any of the attackers to have survived. In addition, we have the somber, as opposed to celebratory, attitude of the Israel-firsters in the Bush regime, and the media, when they ought to have instead hyped the fact that "terrorists" had been defeated and been delighted that American lives were spared.

The quiet in the media hides the tremendous import of this failed attack, which was likely intended to create a pretext for an American attack on the Moslem world. We have very narrowly escaped a nuclear war Jewish leaders plan to artificially cause. Note that just as the Jews of Israel used the capture of two intruding Israeli soldiers as a pretext to commit an unprovoked genocidal attack in which the Jews of Israel hacked Lebanon to the ground, and which Israeli attack would have continued until Lebanon was completely annihilated had not world public opinion intervened, this failed attack on the US could well have been used a pretext to attack the Moslem world with nuclear weapons—we just don't have the troop strength or the funds to commit genocide in any other way, or so will our Israel-first leaders "reason". The truth is they want to take the lives of what they consider to be sub-human idol worshippers and concurrently fulfill the religious myths of Judaism.

It is truly the people of the world who are under attack and we cannot depend upon our leaders or our media, because both have made it painfully obvious that their goal is nuclear world war. Who is it that staffs and owns these warmongering media outlets? Why is their agenda war instead of peace, hatred instead of harmony? What is the common link? Would it be impossible to trace the backgrounds of the stars of the warmongering media? Would be impossible to put pressure on their paying sponsors to end the warmongering, race baiting and religious intolerance? Could not one billion Moslems have an influence? It is no more their duty than ours in general, but they will be the first murdered and the sights of leading Jews are trained between Moslem eyes.

Syria Says US Behind Attack On Own Embassy

Syria says US behind Damascus embassy attack

Zionist Treachery and Warmongering: How Leading Jews Have Cursed America

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Treacherous Zionist Jews brought America into the First World War in exchange for the Balfour Declaration on a quid pro quo basis. Political Zionist leader Samuel Landman wrote in 1936,

"During the critical days of 1916 and of the impending defection of Russia, Jewry, as a whole, was against the Czarist regime and had hopes that Germany, if victorious, would in certain circumstances give them Palestine. Several attempts to bring America into the War on the side of the Allies by influencing influential Jewish opinion were made and had failed. Mr. James A. Malcolm, who was already aware of German pre-war efforts to secure a foothold in Palestine through the Zionist Jews and of the abortive Anglo-French démarches at Washington and New York; and knew that Mr. Woodrow Wilson, for good and sufficient reasons, always attached the greatest possible importance to the advice of a very prominent Zionist (Mr. Justice Brandeis, of the US Supreme Court); and was in close touch with Mr. Greenberg, Editor of the Jewish Chronicle (London); and knew that several important Zionist Jewish leaders had already gravitated to London from the Continent on the qui vive awaiting events; and appreciated and realised the depth and strength of Jewish national aspirations; spontaneously took the initiative, to convince first of all Sir Mark Sykes, Under-Secretary to the War Cabinet, and afterwards Monsieur Georges Picot, of the French Embassy in London, and Monsieur Goût of the Quai d'Orsay (Eastern Section), that the best and perhaps the only way (which proved so to be) to induce the American President to come into the War was to secure the co-operation of Zionist Jews by promising them Palestine, and thus enlist and mobilise the hitherto unsuspectedly powerful forces of Zionist Jews in America and elsewhere in favour of the Allies on a quid pro quo contract basis. Thus, as will be seen, the Zionists, having carried out their part, and greatly helped to bring America in, the Balfour Declaration of 1917 was but the public confirmation of the necessarily secret 'gentleman's' agreement of 1916 made with the previous knowledge, acquiescence and/or approval of the Arabs and of the British, American, French and other Allied Governments, and not merely a voluntary altruistic and romantic gesture on the part of Great Britain as certain people either through pardonable ignorance assume or unpardonable ill-will would represent or misrepresent.

Sir Mark Sykes was Under-Secretary to the War Cabinet specially concerned with Near Eastern affairs, and, although at the time scarcely acquainted with the Zionist movement, and unaware of the existence of its leaders, he had the flair to respond to the arguments advanced by Mr. Malcolm as to the strength and importance of this movement in Jewry, in spite of the fact that many wealthy and prominent international or semi-assimilated Jews in Europe and America were openly or tacitly opposed to it (Zionist movement), or timidly indifferent. MM. Picot and Goût were likewise receptive.

An interesting account of the negotiations carried on in London and Paris, and subsequent developments, has already appeared in the Jewish press and need not be repeated here in detail, except to recall that immediately after the 'gentleman's' agreement between Sir Mark Sykes, authorized by the War Cabinet, and the Zionist leaders, cable facilities through the War Office, the Foreign Office and British Embassies, Legations, etc., were given to the latter to communicate the glad tidings to their friends and organizations in America and elsewhere, and the change in official and public opinion as reflected in the American press in favour of joining the Allies in the War, was as gratifying as it was surprisingly rapid. [***] In Germany, the value of the bargain to the Allies, apparently, was duly and carefully noted. In his 'Through Thirty Years' Mr. Wickham Steed, in a chapter appreciative of the value of Zionist support in America and elsewhere to the Allied cause, says General Ludendorff is alleged to have said after the War, that: 'The Balfour Declaration was the cleverest thing done by the Allies in the way of propaganda, and that he wished Germany had thought of it first.' [Footnote: Volume 2, page 392.] As a matter of fact, this was said by Ludendorff to Sir Alfred Mond (afterwards Lord Melchett), soon after the War. The fact that it was Jewish help that brought U.S.A. into the War on the side of the Allies has rankled ever since in German—especially Nazi—minds, and has contributed in no small measure to the prominence which anti-Semitism occupies in the Nazi programme."—S. Landman, Great Britain, the Jews and Palestine, New Zionist Press (New Zionist Publication Number 1), London, (1936), pp. 4-6.

Tuesday, September 12, 2006

Louis Brandeis: A Frankist Jew

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Racist Zionist United States Supreme Court Justice Louis Dembitz Brandeis was a Frankist Jew. Frankist Jews were committed to the destruction of Gentile society. They deliberately wormed their way into positions of power in order to subvert Gentile religions and governments and bring them into war and ruin. Brandeis brought America into the First World War in a quid pro quo deal with the British in exchange for the Zionist Balfour Declaration by blackmailing Woodrow Wilson with love letters Wilson had written to Mrs. Peck. Brandeis and his leading Jewish friends instituted Rothschild's banking system in America, which led to the Great Depression. Brandeis was known as the most deceitful lawyer in America. His appointment to the United States Supreme Court was the most scandalous event in the Court's history. Like all Frankist Jews, Brandeis returned Gentile generosity with treachery. Arthur Hertzberg discussed Brandeis' Frankist roots,

"On the surface Brandeis was a strange kind of leader for the Zionists. Born in Louisville, Kentucky, in 1856 to recent immigrants from Bohemia, who were not much involved in Jewish life, Brandeis had a brilliant career at Harvard Law School, and by the late 1880s had become a successful Boston lawyer. True, many of his initial clients were 'German Jews' to whose social set he inevitably belonged, but he was even more peripheral to the Jewish community than the most assimilated among them. There was some memory in his family of its origins in Prague in a circle that still harbored loyalty to the memory of Jacob Frank, the false messiah who had appeared in Poland in the latter half of the eighteenth century. Brandeis's mother was very opposed to Jewish particularism. In his earliest Boston years, he was to be found, at least once, on the list of contributors to the First Unitarian Church. On the other hand, he had been deeply influenced in his earliest years by an uncle, Louis Dembitz (whose family name he adopted as his own middle name), a learned, Orthodox Jew."—A. Hertzberg, The Jews in America: Four Centuries of an Uneasy Encounter: A History, Simon and Schuster, New York, (1989), p. 218.

Sunday, September 10, 2006

What Jews Think of Jesus and of Christians: A Warning to Christian Zionists

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Christian Zionists ought to know what it is that they are supporting. Jews believe that Jesus was the son of a prostitute and a Roman soldier, who learned witchcraft in Egypt and who beguiled Jews to worship him as an idol. While this myth is more fully enunciated in the Toledoth Jeshua, the Talmud also iterates similar beliefs in Shabbath104b (see especially endnote 19) and in Sanhedrin106a-b,

"Balaam also the son of Beor, the soothsayer, [did the children of Israel slay with the sword].3 A soothsayer? But he was a prophet! — R. Johanan said: At first he was a prophet, but subsequently a soothsayer.4 R. Papa observed: This is what men say, 'She who was the descendant of princes and governors, played the harlot with carpenters.'5 Did the children of Israel slay with the sword among them that were slain by them.6 Rab said: They subjected him to four deaths, stoning, burning, decapitation and strangulation.7"—I. Epstein, Sanhedrin 106a-b, "Sanhedrin II", The Babylonian Talmud, Volume 28, The Soncino Press, London, (1935), pp. 721-729, at 725.

Jesus ridiculed the scribes and Pharisees (Matthew 22; 23. Mark 7; 12:38-40. Luke 11. John 8). That was just one of the reasons why the Jews killed Jesus in the New Testament story, and that is one of the reasons why the Jewish Talmud says that Jesus is boiling in excrement in hell. The Jewish Talmud, in the book of Erubin 21b, states,

"[A]s to the laws of the Scribes, whoever transgresses any of the enactments of the Scribes incurs the penalty of death. [***] This8 teaches that he who scoffs at the words of the Sages will be condemned to boiling excrements. [***] [F]or [neglecting] the words of the Rabbis3 one deserves death[.]"—I. Epstein, Erubin 21b, "Erubin", The Babylonian Talmud, Volume 9, The Soncino Press, London, (1938), pp. 148-151, at 149-150.

The Jewish Talmud states in Rosh Hashanah 17a that all Christians are going to burn in hell forever,

"But as for the minim11 and the informers and scoffers,1 who rejected the Torah and denied the resurrection of the dead, and those who abandoned the ways of the community,2 and those who 'spread their terror in the land of the living', 3 and who sinned and made the masses sin, like Jeroboam the son of Nebat and his fellows—these will go down to Gehinnom and be punished there for all generations, as it says, And they shall go forth and look upon the carcasses of the men that have rebelled against me4 etc."—I. Epstein, Rosh Hashanah 17a, "Rosh Hashanah", The Babylonian Talmud, The Soncino Press, London, (1938), pp. 64-67, at 64-65.

The Jewish Talmud in the book of Shabbath 116a instructs Jews to burn all Christian books,

"Come and hear: The blank spaces5 and the Books of the Minim6 may not be saved from a fire, but they must be burnt in their place, they and the Divine Names occurring in them. Now surely it means the blank portions of a Scroll of the Law? No: the blank spaces in the Books of Minim. Seeing that we may not save the Books of Minim themselves, need their blank spaces be stated?—This is its meaning: And the Books of Minim are like blank spaces."—I. Epstein, Shabbath 116a, "Shabbath", The Babylonian Talmud, Volume 8, The Soncino Press, London, (1938), pp. 567-571, at 569.

The Jewish Talmud tells Jews in Gittin 57a that Jesus is boiling in hell in hot excrement and semen, which is his curse for questioning Jewish authority,

"He then went and raised Balaam by incantations. He asked him: Who is in repute in the other world? He replied: Israel. What then, he said, about joining them? He replied: Thou shalt not seek their peace nor their prosperity all thy days for ever.[Footnote: Deut. XXIII, 7.] He then asked: What is your punishment? He replied: With boiling hot semen.[Footnote: Because he enticed Israel to go astray after the daughters of Moab. V. Sanh. 106a.] He then went and raised by incantations the sinners of Israel.[Footnote: {MS.M. Jesus}.] He asked them: Who is in repute in the other world? They replied: Israel. What about joining them? They replied: Seek their welfare, seek not their harm. Whoever touches them touches the apple of his eye. He said: What is your punishment? They replied: With boiling hot excrement, since a Master has said: Whoever mocks at the words of the Sages is punished with boiling hot excrement. Observe the difference between the sinners of Israel and the prophets of the other nations who worship idols."—I. Epstein, Gittin 57a, "Gittin", The Babylonian Talmud, Volume 21, The Soncino Press, London, (1936), pp. 261-265, at 261.

The Jewish Talmud in the book of Shabbath folio 32b promises the Jews 2,800 Gentile slaves per Jew in the Jewish End Times,

"Resh Lakish said: He who is observant of fringes will be privileged to be served by two thousand eight hundred slaves, for it is said, Thus saith the Lord of hosts: In those days it shall come to pass, that ten men shall take hold, out of all the languages of the nations, shall even take hold of the skirt of him that is a Jew, saying, We will go with you, etc.5"— I. Epstein, Shabbath 32b, "Shabbath", The Babylonian Talmud, Volume 7, The Soncino Press, London, (1938), pp. 147-150, at 149.

In the Jewish End Times, according to the Jewish Talmud in the book of Sanhedrin 57a-60b, all Gentiles must obey the Noahide Laws. In other words, Christians will be beheaded when the Jewish Temple replaces the Dome of the Rock and Al Aqsa Mosque and the Jewish King ascends his throne in Jerusalem.

The Jewish Talmud in Hagigah 27a states that Jews, and especially Rabbis, never go to hell—so don't waste your breath,

"R. Abbahu said that R. Eleazar said: The fire of Gehinnom4 has no power over the Scholars. It is an ad majus conclusion [to be drawn] from the salamander.5 If now [in the case of] the salamander, which is [only] an offspring of fire, he who anoints himself with its blood is not affected by fire, how much more so the Scholars, whose whole body is fire, for it is written: Is not My word like as fire? saith the Lord.6 Resh Lakish said: The fire of Gehinnom has no power over the transgressors of Israel. It is an ad majus conclusion [to be drawn] from the altar of gold. If the altar of gold, on which there is only a denar thickness of gold,7 is not affected through so many years by the fire, how much less so the transgressors of Israel, who are full of good deeds8 as a pomegranate [is of seeds]; for it is written, Thy temples are like a pomegranate split open.9 Read not 'thy temples' [rakkathek] but 'thy worthless ones' [rekanim shebak].10"—I. Epstein, Hagigah 27a, "Hagigah", The Babylonian Talmud, Volume 14, The Soncino Press, London, (1938), pp. 170-171, at 171.

The Jewish Talmud in Gittin 57b claims that the Romans murdered four billion Jews,

"The voice is the voice of Jacob and the hands are the hands of Esau:3 'the voice' here refers to [the cry caused by] the Emperor Hadrian4 who killed in Alexandria of Egypt sixty myriads on sixty myriads, twice as many as went forth from Egypt. 'The voice of Jacob': this is the cry caused by the Emperor Vespasian5 who killed in the city of Bethar four hundred thousand myriads, or as some say, four thousand myriads. 'The hands are the hands of Esau:' this is the Government of Rome which has destroyed our House and burnt our Temple and driven us out of our land."—I. Epstein, Gittin 57b, "Gittin", The Babylonian Talmud, Volume 21, The Soncino Press, London, (1936), pp. 265-268, at 266.

and Gittin folio 58a falsely records that the Romans rolled 64 million Jewish children in their scrolls and burned them,

"Rab Judah reported Samuel as saying in the name of Rabban Simeon b. Gamaliel: What is signified by the verse, Mine eye affecteth my soul, because of all the daughters of my city?6 There were four hundred synagogues in the city of Bethar, and in every one were four hundred teachers of children, and each one had under him four hundred pupils,7 and when the enemy entered there they pierced them with their staves, and when the enemy prevailed and captured them, they wrapped them in their scrolls and burnt them with fire."—I. Epstein, Gittin 57b, "Gittin", The Babylonian Talmud, Volume 21, The Soncino Press, London, (1936), pp. 268-272, at 269-270.