Saturday, December 22, 2007

Ron Paul: Seeing Through the Glittering Generalities

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Allow me to preface this article with the statement that I hope Ron Paul wins the Republican primaries. Sometimes we need a Santa Claus to believe in if only to inspire us to hope. Sometimes we need a stooge to show us the way to empower ourselves.

Whether Paul wins the primaries, or not, the American People have won by way of an example as to how to organize and side step the media. That said, I am not naive. I have observed that the organization in support of Ron Paul has not come from the grass roots, but rather from the gold mines, gold merchants and Zionist Hollywood Jews. But do not let me spoil your belief in Santa until we have found a way to replace the illusion with American factories and sound currency issued by the People for the People.

Gold is not sound currency. It is a limited commodity the supply of which can be artificially and privately reduced and increased by way of fraud and collusion. Jewish bankers will demand the "freedom" to treat gold as a privileged commodity, the "freedom" to monopolize it in cartels, etc.

True freedom is best secured by a well educated and prosperous populace, and Ron Paul's domestic policies will not get us there.

I suspect that Ron Paul is running for President for one reason and one reason only. He is a tool of the Jewish bankers and their goal is to make us clamor for "banking reforms" which they have drafted and which will grant the bankers amnesty and/or immunity for their crimes; and which will bail the bankers out at the expense of the taxpayer; and which will secure debts owed to the bankers with hard, seizable assets and make them profits off of precious metals and allow the international Jewish bankers to continue to control the American money supply, regulate price levels, govern international trade, hinder or stimulate growth, etc.

Jewish organizations, Jewish controlled politicians and the Jewish controlled media are undermining our civil liberties, making us desperate to secure our natural rights which are recognized in the Constitution. Since Jewry has made us clamor to protect our rights, they are using Ron Paul to forward a deceptive message that the Constitution is our guarantee of rights and that it must be strictly adhered to in terms of Ron Paul's interpretation of it. They have created a dilemma and they are proposing their solution to the dilemma that they have deliberately created.

Our rights are secured by our existence and our ability to defend them, not by Ron Paul or the Constitution. The Constitution is rather a social contract which recognizes our natural rights and serves as an enforceable agreement. If the courts and other branches of the government are corrupt, the Constitution is not a protection, but only a guide, and the contract has been breached. However, our rights and other means of enforcing our rights remain.

I believe that Paul is wrapping himself in the Constitution for one reason and one reason only. He, and those who pull his strings, want us to interpret the following part of the Constitution to mean that we should operate our economy on gold based currency:

"Article 1, Section 10 - Powers prohibited of States

No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility."

This is why Paul speaks in glittering generalities of "freedom" and honoring the Constitution. In fact, he wants to take away our freedom to issue our own money through our government and without the intercession of the Jewish gold merchants. He wants to take away our freedom to recover our losses from the Jewish bankers. He cowers from confronting the traitorous Jewish fifth column which is stealing away our civil liberties.

If we truly want to secure our liberties and enforce those rights iterated in the Constitution, then we have to fight back against organized Jewry. This does not interest Paul. For him all that glitters in his glittering generalities is gold, and our fundamental human rights are only props on the stage.

It appears that Ron Paul's goals are to secure the interests of the bankers, not our freedom. As the Jewish bankers maintain control over our economy and monetary system, they will maintain control over our lives. We have to fight for our rights, not by enslaving ourselves to gold, but by bettering ourselves through education and hard work, through savings and personal and social discipline; and by confronting our enemy directly and unapologetically.

World Jewry has brought us into perpetual war, which nets them profits and forwards their Zionist agenda for Mid-East hegemony and World rule. By controlling the cast of candidates for US President, Jewry has left us shredded on the two horns of another dilemma. We can elect their openly warmongering candidates, or we can elect their gold plated stooge. Our interests are not served by either side of the bull charging from behind to gore us in the rear.

We already elected a supposedly anti-war Congress and they have betrayed us. This traitorous Jewish controlled Congress can declare war at any time, no matter who is, or is not, elected President. We have to raise our voices in outrage and demand our government serve our interests. We have to demand the Congress prosecute the criminals Bush and Cheney. Then we will have power.

Electing Ron Paul gives him power, not us. We will have power when we exercise it directly through boycott, demonstrations, public debate, civil disobedience, etc. I do not see Ron Paul organizing such action which empowers the People, but then he is a politician trying to get elected and what he is doing is working.

I wish him success. Perhaps, if by hook, crook or miracle, Paul wins the Republican primary, or even if he gives a strong showing, some genuine candidate will appear to run as a third party candidate. In any event, it will be healthy for Americans to become enthused about having alternatives, if only in an illusion. This will make it easier for others to enter the arena, but I caution against the hero worship which is being so heavily promoted.

Ron Paul is not a great man. His policies are unoriginal, scripted, simplistic and little more than disingenuous gimmicks to win support from the gullible and uninsightful for the Jewish bankers to again seize control of our money supply. By wrapping himself in the Constitution without enunciating sound policy, Paul is just like Huckabee, who is trying to win and serve Jewish interests by standing on the cross. We need to elevate the debate so that we can empower ourselves, not childishly worship the rather mediocre Ron Paul and play follow the leader.

Let Paul continue with his glittering generalities—that is politics in Jewish controlled America. We have to raise the level of debate among ourselves. No one will do it for us, and we have to defeat those who stand in our way.

The Dangerous Shabbas Goy John Robert Bolton

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Why is it that the talentless warmongering snake John Bolton has been so successful and slithered up the sandy slopes to the highest levels of international politics? Why are his villainous face and treacherous voice all over the Jewish controlled media?

In search of an answer, consider John Robert Bolton's ties to Zionist Jewry and their leash on him:

Bolton back on JINSA board

John R. Bolton

Without Jewish control over the mass media and the US Government, Bolton would be ignored as the sick joke that he is; but then again, if Jews did not control the media and American Government, it is doubtful that a sycophant like Bolton would be dancing to their tune.

Friday, December 21, 2007

A Self-Proclaimed Zionist Jew Attacks the Character of Armenians

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

In an article "From the mountains of Ararat", which was published on the Israeli news journal, James R. Russell states,

"[O]ne needs to recognize that there is real anti-Semitism in the Armenian community, and scapegoating of Israel and Zionism often goes well beyond the issues and becomes a cover for deeper hatreds. The Dashnaks, Hitler's wartime buddies, who are still a presence both within Armenia and in the diaspora, have jumped on the anti-Israel bandwagon, championing the Palestinian cause on American campuses."

Russell does not mention why some Armenians oppose Zionism. He merely implies that critics of Zionism are, merely by virtue of their criticism of Zionism, racists. He does not acknowledge that Zionism is itself widely considered to be a racist and ethnocentric ideology.

Furthermore, while attacking Armenians, Russell does not mention the reasons why Armenians have reacted to the Jewish campaigns to exterminate them and remove the Armenians from their ancestral homeland. Indeed, Russell makes no mention of the Jewish role in the Armenian genocide, instead scapegoating Moslems.

Portraying Jews as if perpetual innocent victims, Russell attacks the Armenian revolutionary party of the Dashnaks and implies that they pose a danger to Jews. However, he fails to discuss the Jewish revolutionary parties which genocided 1.5 million Armenians, which Jewish mass murderers were led by the Jew Talaat Pasha.

A correspondent for the Times of London wrote in an article, "THE ARMENIAN MASSACRES: EXTERMINATING A RACE: A RECORD OF HORRORS", which was published on 8 October 1915, on page 5,


It is said by the Turks in their defence that the decision to deport the Eastern Armenians was only arrived at after the discovery of an Armenian plot in Constantinople and after the Van outbreak. But the Armenians executed in Constantinople in April were men of the Hintchak society who had been in prison for over a year, and the deportation or massacre of Armenians had begun at many places before the Van Armenians were criminal enough to help themselves. There can be no doubt that Enver, who has never shrunk from violent methods, approved of the policy that was adopted. Commanding officers in the provinces received orders in April and May authorising them to deport all individuals or families whose presence might be regarded as politically or militarily dangerous, and in the case of some of the Cilician Armenians, deportation had begun earlier. But Talaat, who was in all probability the chief mover in the expulsion of Greeks from Western Anatolia, who has never scrupled to lie to an Ambassador or to encourage pro-Turkish intrigue in the dominions of friendly Powers, is the chief author of these crimes. 'I intend to prevent any talk of Armenian autonomy for 50 years' and 'The Armenians are a. . . race; their disappearance would be no loss' are sayings attributed to him on excellent authority. He has had worthy supporters among the extremists of the Committee of Union and Progress, such as Mukhlis Bey, Carusso Effendi and his Jewish revolutionary supporters, Midhat Shukri and others, among officials such as the Valis of Diarbekr and Angora, and among the officers of gendarmerie, who, if one-tenth of the tales told by European and American refugees is true, have cast off all trace of the European training which French and British officers laboriously tried to instil in them and have too often become little better than licentious banditti.



It remains to describe Talaat Bey's methods in detail. Massacre was followed by a crueller system of persecution than Abdul Hamid ever invented. The Red Sultan's abominations were seldom accompanied by the wholesale deportation of the survivors; the violation and abduction of women and the conversion of children, though sadly frequent in some places, were by no means general in the massacres of 1894-1896. Then the wild beast was allowed to run amok for 24 hours, and was then usually chained up.

In Talaat Bey's campaign the preliminary massacre, which was sometimes omitted, was followed by the separation of the able-bodied men from their women folk. The former were drafted into labour battalions or simply disappeared. The women, children, and old men were next driven slowly across country. They were permitted to take no carts, baggage animals, or any large stock of provisions with them. They were shepherded from place to place by gendarmes, who violated some of the women, sold others, and robbed most. Infirm or aged folk, women great with child, and children were driven along till they dropped and died by the way. Gendarmes who returned to Alexandretta described with glee to Europeans how they robbed the fugitives. If these refused to give up their money their escort sometimes pushed them into streams or abandoned them in desolate places.

A European who witnessed the exodus of some of the Armenians of Cilicia says that most were footsore, all looked half starved, and no able-bodied man could be seen among them. At Osmanic on the road between Aleppo and Adana they were given only 8 hours' notice by the town crier to make ready for their departure. The French and British refugees from Urfa saw the bodies of "hundreds" of women and children lying by the road and met another of these lamentable half-starved caravans. An American who accompanied a group of Armenian exiles from Malatia reports that the road to Urfa was marked all along its course by the bodies of those who had died. Travellers by the Anatolian Railway report that the hills near Bilejik Geive, and other stations in the hinterland of Brusa were crowded with Armenians from Brusa, Ismid, and other settlements near Constantinople, who had no shelter and were begging their bread. Large bodies of the exiles are said to have been simply led into the desert south of the Euphrates and left there to starve.


The attempts of the American Ambassador to procure some alleviation of the lot of the Armenians have thus far proved unsuccessful. Mr Morganthau, in the opinion of good observers, wasted too much diplomatic energy on behalf of the Zionists of Palestine, who were in no danger of massacre, to have any force to spare. Talaat and Bedri simply own that persecuting Armenians amuses them and turn a deaf ear to American pleadings. German and Austro-Hungarian residents in Turkey at first approved of the punishment of Armenian 'traitors', but the methods of the Turkish extremists have sickened even Prussian stomachs. True the Jewish Baron von Oppenheim, now in Syria, has been preaching massacre, and the German Consular officials al Aleppo and Alexandretta have followed suit, perhaps with the idea of planting German colonists in the void left by the disappearance of the Armenians when the war is over. [colored emphasis added]" /

On 9 August 1911, on page 3, The London Times published a Letter to the Editor from the Time’s Constantinople Correspondent, under the heading "JEWS AND THE SITUATION IN ALBANIA", which stated,

"I will merely remark that, according to information which I have received from genuine Freemasons, the majority of the lodges founded under the auspices of the Grand Orient of Turkey since the revolution were, at the outset, avatars of the Committee of Union and Progress, that they have not yet been recognized by British Freemasonry, and that the first 'Supreme Council' of the G. O. of Turkey appointed in 1909, contained three Jews (Carasso, Cohen, and Faraggi) and three Doenmes (Djavid Bey, S. Kibar, and Osman Talaat). [colored emphasis added]"

Marcelle Tinayre published an article in L’Illustration in December of 1923, which was translated into English and published as "Saloniki", The Living Age, Volume 320, Number 4156, (1 March 1924), pp. 417-421, at pages 419-420,

"The Jewish community, driven from Aragon in the sixteenth century, settled in Saloniki, where it has never ceased to grow and multiply. The Turks always showed themselves less anti-Semitic than the Greeks. They let the Jews of Saloniki grow rich and troubled them with no competition, because 'business'—that is to say, the manipulation of other people's money—is forbidden or at least not favored by the Koran, which prohibits taking pledges and receiving interest. Nevertheless the agreement between the masters of the sword and the masters of the gold, between the koniak and the money bench, was disturbed in the seventeenth century. A cabalist and a charlatan, a kind of Simon the Magician, passed himself off as the Messiah for whom Israel still waits and will be waiting to the end of time.

Sabbetai Sevi struck the fancy of the Israelitish throng to such an extent that the Sublime Porte was disturbed. An envoy of the Sultan requested the pretended Messiah to make a choice between the bowstring and recantation. Sabbetai Sevi, not quite sure that he was divine after all, chose to recant, and with great courage became a Mussulman. His disciples followed his example by hundreds, but neither the Prophet nor his disciples gave Mohammed anything more than words and gestures. They had Mussulman tongues but Israelitish hearts. Under the shelter of the turban and the fez, beneath a Turkish name worn as a mask, they remained what they always were and what they still are. Their women cover themselves with the tcharchaf, their children learn to read the Koran, their young men enter Government offices,—sometimes, though more rarely, the army,—but when they are twelve years old these deunmehs, or converts, receive the revelation of their secret or Hebrew names. They are initiated into the mysterious rites established by Sabbetai Sevi. They learn the whereabouts of that famous hidden temple which is said to be in old Saloniki, which neither Christian nor Moslem has ever approached.

The double faith makes double souls, and this age-long imposture behind true Mussulman beards prepares conspirators and revolutionists. The deunmehs of to-day, affiliated with Free Masonry, instructed in Occidental universities, often professing total atheism, have given leaders to the Young Turk revolution. Talaat Bey, Djavid Bey, and many other members of the Committee of Union and Progress were deunmehs from Saloniki. Long ago the great Turkish families were split in twain, one party being these modern Turks who deal with the foreigner, and these hanoums—who walk the streets with unveiled faces and set young officers, if they have been reading Pierre Loti, to dreaming—bear in their faces proof enough of their lineage. [colored emphasis added]"

Inspector-General of the Turkish Forces in Armenia and Military Governor of Egyptian Sinai during the First World War, Rafael De Nogales wrote in his book Four Years Beneath the Crescent,

"Among the civil members of [the Committee of Union and Progress], only one was conspicuous by force of personality. That was the renegade Hebrew (donme) of Salonika, Talaat, the principal organizer of the massacres and deportations, who, fishing in muddy waters, succeeded in raising himself from the humble rank of postal clerk to that of Grand Vizier of the Empire. [clolored emphasis added]"

Instead of attacking the Armenians, Russell should be apologizing to them for the genocide which racist Jews committed against Armenians.

Thursday, December 20, 2007

In Order for Ron Paul to Win, His Supporters Must Take the Offensive

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Ron Paul's base appears to be a bit naive when it comes to politics. Politics is a dirty business. To win, you have to fight.

For example, when Ron Paul is attacked as if a racist, his supporters should point out that the media is largely silent on Mitt Romney's Mormonism. They should expose the racist beliefs of that religion, and its ties to Zionism. Let people know that Glenn Beck and many other Zionists are Mormons. The media will lose credibility, as it should. Romney will lose support, as he should. And Ron Paul's fans will defend him by taking the offensive.

If people accuse you of making religion an issue, tell them that they have confused you with Mike Huckabee. And why hasn't the Zionist media slammed Huckabee for pimping religion at a time of crisis in American politics? Why haven't they raked Zionist John Hagee over the coals for stating that Jesus was not the Messiah and did not come to be the Messiah?

Paul supporters can point out how racist Zionism is and that the media, which is in Zionist hands, is silent on that issue. Demonstrate their hypocrisy, instead of apologizing to them.

When Ron Paul is attacked as if a conspiracy theorist, his supporters should point out that John McCain is Islamophobic and believes that Moslems are responsible for all the woes which Bush's Islamophobia has caused. They are the real conspiracy theorists, and the media does not report on it. The media instead sponsor these Islamophobic conspiracy theories, which have caused the deaths of millions of innocent Moslems and cost us lives and 3.5 trillion dollars. Talk about George Bush's conspiracy theory that Iran has a nuclear weapons program, a theory he still advances even after the NIE debunked it. Accuse McCain of McMadness for sponsoring this lie and calling for us to "Bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb, Iran!"

When Ron Paul is attacked for his associations, point out Rudy Guilian's associations. For example, point out Guiliani's support for former New York Police Commissioner Bernard Kerik. Accuse Romney, Guiliani and McCain of disloyalty to America for their associations with top Zionists.

When Paul is attacked for allegedly not being a Republican, point out that John McCain is endorsed by the liberal Democrat Joe Lieberman. Why? Because they are both agents of the Israeli Government.

Prove to people the Zionist corruption of Romney, McCain and Guiliani. Emphasize their warmongering rhetoric. Show their speeches at Jewish organizations and messages to Herzliya.

In sum, it is not enough to cheerlead for Ron Paul. You also have to discredit his opponents. It is important to not fall back on your heels, but rather to charge forward. Do not appear to be on the defensive, but rather force the openly Zionist candidates to defend themselves and their traitorous support of racist Israel. In this way, even if Ron Paul does not win, his candidacy will accomplish a great deal and it will show the power of the American People to counter-attack against the Israeli fifth column that is destroying America. If they want to make racism the issue, it will be easy to bring down Romney, McCain and Guiliani and in so doing expose racist Zionism and the Israeli infiltration of American politics.

Wednesday, December 19, 2007

Ron Paul, Friend or Foe? Part 2

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Back on 10 May 2007, I published a blog entitled Ron Paul, Friend or Foe? in which I noted the reasons why I do not trust Ron Paul, together with the reasons why I find his candidacy appealing. A known subversive, who often attempts to parrot my statements when it serves his agenda, has taken to reiterating some of my arguments as to why we need to examine Ron Paul's positions.

The fact that this known saboteur and provocateur is attacking Paul may, at first glance, appear to be a good reason to support Ron Paul. This mindless blowhard often sends the same signals as Fox News, though basing his message on a supposedly anti-Zionist position. He has teamed up with a Jewish banker who attacks Capitalism from a Marxist-lite perspective. It appears that this man, who is trying to gin up a nihilistic revolution, wants to dupe real anti-Zionists into serving Zionist interests. However, this known smear monger makes it a habit to defame everyone and sow the seeds of discord, so little can be gleaned from his attack on Ron Paul, other than that it is a part of an overall strategy to render anti-Zionists confused and politically fragmented.

I like Ron Paul's open opposition to American aggression. He is the only serious candidate to consistently oppose aggressive war. The President does have a bully pulpit and can affect foreign policy. However, it is Congress which declares war.

Ron Paul's positions on immigration are too shallow for my liking. But what really worries me are his sympathies with the Libertarian Party and with Ludwig von Mises.

The production and promotion of the film Freedom to Fascism by the Zionist Jew Aaron Russo, the Christian bashing though inexplicably philo-Judaic film Zeitgeist, and slew of internet propaganda promoting the institution of the gold standard, all coinciding with the presidential race and the melt down of the dollar is a bit too coincidental for my liking. It is reminiscent of the orchestrated meltdown of 1907, which was followed by the "banking reforms" of 1913, which were promoted by Sen. Nelson Aldrich. Paul appears to me to be another Aldrich, but there are worse parasites than an Aldrich. The other candidates have each openly declared their aggressive stance toward Iran and unquestioning loyalty to Israel.

Whatever Ron Paul's sincere beliefs and motivations may be, the Libertarian's ties to Ludwig von Mises and Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi are troubling. Coudenhove-Kalergi promoted the idea of a European Union and a pan-American Union. Rothschild and Warburg sponsored him. Coudenhove-Kalergi also stated that the Jews are a superior race which should lead the World, but that all the other races should be mixed, which according to him would result in the manifestation of the worst traits and the disappearance of the best traits in the Gentile races.

Coudenhove-Kalergi wanted the different "races" to mix in intermarriage so that the children of these unions would be inferior to their parents and would lose any sense of cultural and ethnic heritage. He wanted to then substitute a new culture of obedience and servitude among this new degenerated "race", subservience to a ruling Jewish elite. He would have the Jews remain nobly segregated. It is a fact that many of Coudenhove-Kalergi's policies have been instituted.

Paul does not appear to support these policies, but instead opposes them. It is very important to note this fact. However, Paul would empower these forces by instituting the Ludwig von Mises monetary policy. Ludwig von Mises was an Austrian Jew who was close friends with Coudenhove-Kalergi.

Paul wants to eliminate taxes from gold and silver exchanges, thereby artificially creating a privileged commodity and business class. This makes him the darling of gold merchants, and of certain Zionist Jews, like the late Aaron Russo. Indeed, Paul has been embraced by the Israelis and received their seal of approval. He has also found support among media Jews who comment on the financial markets.

Paul and von Mises essentially proposed a banker bailout of the current system, which would indemnify the Jewish bankers, effectively grant them amnesty, and pass along the burden of their theft to the American taxpayer, all in the name of combating the bankers—very Aldrichesque methodology. The bankers hold much of the gold, and we would have to borrow it from them at interest to finance a gold based currency, thereby placing us in unpayable debts and excusing them for their fraud against the American People.

Another real danger of the disastrous Paul and von Mises plan is the ability it would give the Jewish bankers to control our money supply and create deadly deflation at their whim by melting coin and shipping it overseas. So that this does not appear to be a personal prejudice of mine, I will quote from two authors who opposed the Jewish bankers, L. B. Woolfolk, and Denis Fahey, who wrote in his book, The Rulers of Russia, Third Edition, Revised and Enlarged, USA, (1986), 93-96:

"Lest some of my readers may think that I have insisted too much upon the disastrous effects of the monetary system associated with the gold-standard, a few words may be helpful. Money or token-wealth has been invented, to use St. Thomas's expression, for the convenience of exchange and as a measure of things saleable. Thanks to it, families can procure, by the process of exchange, far more easily than by barter, that sufficiency of nature's goods or real wealth needed by their members for a virtuous life. The fact is, however, that the gold-standard system does not aim at the distribution of socially-produced wealth but at making money a source of revenue to the issuers and a means of arriving at the greatest possible control for them by the creation and perpetuation of debt. As a measure of things saleable, money is meant to be stable. The yard measure and the pound avoirdupois may not be altered arbitrarily. Yet 'we are in an age of monetary policy,' writes Professor Soddy, 'when the value of it is continually altered by the means well-known to the banking profession, to make it worth less or more, thus to raise the price level or to lower it. . . In all this there is not given a moment's consideration to the most elementary principles of justice to the owners of the money, who have a right to receive again value equivalent to that which they have given up.'[Footnote: The Role of Money, p. 85 'A sane money system is one that aims at keeping in circulation the largest volume of money that can be absorbed without inflation of the price level . . . the principle of control of the currency of New Zealand should be changed from stability of the exchange rate with sterling to stability of the internal price level.'—(A. N. Field, in Examiner, May, 1939.)] Arbitrary changes in the volume of currency cause prices to rise or decline; and these arbitrary changes affect the welfare of every citizen. How are they effected? By the contraction and expansion of credit due to movements of gold. Thus we have fixed foreign exchanges with fluctuating internal price-levels. Those who control gold can manipulate the volume of credit, thus controffing the price-level in different countries. And this power can be used to acquire mortgages not only over entire industries but over whole countries. We read in The Builders' Merchants' Journal (January, 1939): 'For instance, by the judicious transference of (say) ten millions of gold from France to England, a systematic depreciation of probably ten times that amount could be brought about in the market value of French securities without undue difficulty, and a corresponding rise effected on the English Exchange. By then transferring the same amount of gold from London to New York, a similar double effect could again be achieved. Next, by transferring the gold from the U.S.A. to (say) Belgium and the Netherlands, the process could be once more repeated. Then by switching the bullion across to England, a similar rise and fall would result. Finally, by shipping the gold from London back to its original resting-place in Paris, French securities would be restored to normal, and British stock values again depressed. The alteration in market values in the case of every gold transfer as above outlined would probably be at least ten times the amount of the bullion actually shipped, and the astute individuals engaged in the execution of this interesting financial roundabout might within the space of two or three years amass (via nominees) anything from (say) £100,000,000 to £500,000,000 by judiciously exploiting the possibilities of the markets—and without arousing outcry or general suspicion amongst the investing public. No wonder it becomes possible for banks and other big financial interests to hold 'blanket' mortgages not only (in effect) over entire industries, but also (to all practical intents and purposes) over whole countries.'

A concrete example of the swindling depicted by The Builders' Journal is given by the late Arthur Kitson in his book, The Bankers' Conspiracy, published in 1933. On pages 79 and 80 of that work, we read: 'Some years ago the Bankers' Magazine gave a startling example of the depreciation in the prices of 325 of our representative investments caused by the withdrawal of £11,000,000 in gold from the Bank of England by a group of American financiers. The transfer of this amount from London to New York during a period of a few weeks caused a fall of prices equivalent to £115,500,000! The absorption of the same gold caused a corresponding advance in the prices of certain American securities. By first selling English securities and buying American, they had merely to transfer so much gold and afterwards reverse the transactions by buying and selling respectively and the game was won! As a well-known financial writer stated at the time: 'These speculators were playing upon two tables at the same time—one in London and the other in New York—with the certainty of winning on both.''

When a country has been impoverished and disorganised by a stock-exchange coup such as has just been mentioned, an attack on the property of the Catholic Church and the religious orders can be successfully launched by the Masons and other anti-supernatural elements. A typical example is to be found in Spain between 1834 and 1840. The Rothschilds were anti-Carlist in the war of succession, which was going on, because they feared that the success of Don Carlos would mean that they would lose the famous Almaden quicksilver mines. By a 'bear' operation on the stock-exchange the Rothschilds sent Spanish securities tumbling down. The Prime Minister, Count Toreno, was forced to resign, and the Rothschilds realised a profit far beyond the amount of the bribe they had given him previously. Count Toreno was succeeded by Mendizabal, a Jew by race and religion. He had been speculating in Spanish securities but had 'got the tip' from Nathan Rothschild when the Rothschilds decided to bring about the slump. Mendizabal increased the Spanish deficit. All that and more can be learned from Count Corti's Reign of the Houses of Rothschild. It will serve as a commentary on the laconic information we get in the Catholic Encyclopedia (article on Spain) wherein we read: '. . .the Liberals ruled, except in the provinces occupied by the Carlists, and the moderate ministry of Martinez de la Rosa . . was succeeded by those of Toreno and of Mendizabal, who put up the possessions of the Church for sale (1836).' The Catholic Encyclopaedia omits to say that all the convents, with some exceptions, had been confiscated in 1835.[Footnote: 'More than one hundred years ago, the Church in Spain was disestablished and despoiled of all real property, while the Religious Orders were suppressed and dispersed under the laws framed by Don Jose de Mendizabal, a Finance Minister of that day.' (The Conflict in Spain, by the Marquis de Merry del Val.)] It makes no reference to the collusion between Rothschild and Mendizabal.

Stabilization of the internal price level of countries is one of the most needed social reforms in the natural order. Without it the demand for social justice becomes a mockery. 'Stabilizing money takes the money factor out of price fluctuation and leaves just the non-monetary factors of demand and supply of commodities. As one well-known writer on these subjects has pointed out, the money factor is like the tides of the ocean, and the commodity demand-and-supply factor is like the waves of the sea. . . . The tides are the big factor determining the level of the water, and the waves a comparatively small factor even in the greatest storm. The money factor is like the tides, and is the principal thing in determining the price-level.' [Footnote: A. N. Field in Examiner, May, 1939. He says elsewhere in the same issue: 'Money must be made a just measure of value. If it is not, every money transaction perpetrates injustice, with debts on one level and prices of commodities on another level. And injustice sooner or later means the disintegration of the existing social order.']"

L. B. Woolfolk wrote in his book, Great Red Dragon, or London Money Power: The Foreign Money Power in the United States, George E. Stevens, Cincinnati, (1890), pp. 273-274:

"3. Let us notice the effect upon us of the Money Power withdrawing $1,100,000,000 of gold and silver from the country, and keeping the greenbacks retired from circulation.

1.) By presenting the gold and silver certificates at the Treasury, and drawing the gold and silver they call for, the gold and silver certificates would be withdrawn from circulation.

2.) Then, by withdrawing the rest of the gold and silver, we would be left with nothing but the greenbacks and the National Bank circulation.

3.) But the $346,000,000 of greenbacks have already been, in great measure, retired from circulation. They are all owned in the great money centers, chiefly by the Money Kings, or their agents. When the Money Kings shall be desirous of bringing on a crisis, they will, of course, keep the greenbacks retired.

4.) This would leave us only the National Banking circulation of $239,000,000. By presenting the National Bank circulation at the counters of the banks, and drawing out the gold in their vaults, the Money Kings could compel the National Banks to suspend specie payments, and contract their circulation at least one-half. Then we would be left with only about $120,000,000 of National Bank notes in circulation.

But the greater part of the national banks are owned by the Money Kings, who could withdraw their circulation, if they chose to do so.—It is evident that the Money Kings can, in three months, if they wish, reduce our currency in circulation to less than $100,000,000.

They have got the greenbacks locked up now: and a banker has recently proposed to retire all the greenbacks, and substitute for them silver coin. If this were done, the Money Kings could ship our silver and gold to India, and Africa, and China, and Japan, and South America, to stimulate the industry of those regions, and would leave us almost entirely without currency.

They can easily do this. They only need the excuse of a panic to justify them in doing it. And they could start the panic at any moment by breaking a few National Banks; which can easily be done by drawing out their specie and forcing them to suspend specie payments. In 1837, the Money Kings brought on the panic, by continuing to draw gold from the banks of New York City until they were compelled to suspend specie payments. They brought on the crisis of 1857, by drawing several million dollars of gold from the vaults of the Trust Company Bank in Ohio. That bank was evidently on a sound basis. So now, they can break any or all of our National Banks in a week, and force them to suspend specie payments, or go into bankruptcy.

Our currency is now a trap, with the triggers all set, ready to fall whenever the Money Kings choose to touch it off. The condition of the currency needs to be remedied, or we shall have, some day, the most terrible crisis that ever ruined a country. It will not do to have our currency so completely at the mercy of the Money Kings.

This is the state of things we need to remedy."

While the gold merchants tout gold as if a solution to inflation, deflation is as bad or worse than rampant inflation, in that it cripples growth and makes it easy for the wealthy to purchase all the wealth and businesses of the nations, and leads to starvation. It is the cause of depressions. The Rothschilds were caught creating depressions in the Nineteenth Century, as reported on in The Chicago Tribune.

By robbing a nation of its gold and silver coinage, Jews were able to destroy that nation’s economy by depriving it of its money supply. Jews were also able to increase the value of gold and silver as they accrued a monopoly over it.

The Chicago Tribune, reported on 17 August 1870 on page 4,


Special Despatch to The Chicago Tribune.

NEW YORK, Aug. 16,—A Paris letter to the World remarks that Messrs. de Rothschild are said to lose several thousand dollars a day on the money they keep idle in their safe, or, rather, vault. One of their most lucrative branches of business is dealing in bullion, and melting and refining gold. The government has ordered them to discontinue this business. The Messrs. de Rothschild are not looked upon with a favorable eye by the government. It is notorious that their sympathies are all German. They have not contributed a son to any of the war funds. You know nine-tenths of the banking business of Paris is in the hands of German bankers. The police watch them very closely. It is even rumored that one of the wealthiest of them was arrested yesterday for sending large amounts of money out of France. The Bank of France refuses to touch the paper of men suspected of extorting bullion. At the last discount day one of the firms under this suspicion sent in 600,000 francs worth of paper to be discounted. Every cent of it was returned, refused.

In Switzerland matters are still worse. The banks have suspended specie payments, and have refused to discount any notes except those of manufacturers in the neighborhood, and these only in sums sufficient to keep the manufactories running. The interdiction to export gold from France presses with a heavy weight upon Switzerland. It and the banks’ refusal to discount have forced all commercial firms in Switzerland to suspend payments. Men whose books show them to be worth millions are compelled to suspend payments, because none of their assets are available. It is impossible to get a bill on Paris cashed anywhere, and all but impossible to get a bill on London cashed. Travellers are advised by bankers here to take with them gold enough to pay their expenses.

The outflow of gold from France continues to be enormous, despite all the measures taken. This necessarily so. Last week the French Government was obliged to send $15,000 in gold to Spain to pay for the wheat, wine, oil, brandy, etc., bought there by the government agents."

Legend has it that the Rothschilds demonstrated that they could break the Bank of England at any time by demanding specie payments. The Chicago Daily Tribune published the following article on 21 February 1877 on page 2,



His Little Scrimmage with the Bank of England.

Somewhere near a score of years ago, I think, I read the story, then fresh. It has been recalled to my mind by its telling in my presence to an English gentleman, who assured us that he could personally vouch for its truth, he having had business with the old lady of Threadneedle street while the transaction was in progress; and, from this assurance of an eye-witness, I deem the thing worth repeating. I think I remember it as it was told to me.

A bill of exchange, for a large amount, was drawn by Anselm Rothschild, of London. When the gentleman who held it arrived in London, Nathan was away, and he took the bit of paper to the Bank of England, and asked them there to discount it. The managers were very stiff. With haughty assurance they informed the holder that they discounted only their own bills; they wanted nothing to do with the bills of 'private persons.' They did not stop to reflect with whom they had to deal. Those shrewd old fellows in charge of the change of the realm should have known and remembered that that bit of paper bore the sign manual of a man more powerful than they,—more powerful because independent of the thousand-and-one hampers that rested upon them.

'Umph!' exclaimed Nathan Rothschild, when the answer of the bank was repeated to him. 'Private persons! I will give those important gentlemen to know with what sort of private persons they have to deal!'

And then Nathan Rothschild went at work. He had an object in view,—to humble the Bank of England,—and he meant to do it. He sent agents upon the Continent, and through the United Kingdom, and three weeks were spent in gathering up notes of the smaller denominations of the bank's own issue. One morning, bright and early, Nathan Rothschild presented himself at the bank at the opening of the teller's department, and drew from his pocketbook a five pound note, which he desired to have cashed. Five sovereigns were counted out to him, the officers looking with astonishment upon seeing the Baron Rothschild troubling himself personally about so trivial a matter. The Baron examined the coins one by one, and, having satisfied himself of their honesty in quality and weight, he slipped them into a canvas bag, and drew out and presented another five pound note. The same operation was gone through with again, save that this time the Baron took the trouble to take a small pair of scales from his pocket and weigh one of the pieces, for the law gave him that right. Two—three—ten—twenty—a hundred—five hundred pound notes were presented and cashed. When one pocketbook had been emptied another was brought forth; and when a canvas bag had been filled with gold it was passed to a servant who was in waiting. And so he went on until the hour arrived for closing the bank; and at the same time he had nine of the employes of the house engaged in the same work. So it resulted that ten men of the house of Rothschild had kept every teller of the bank busy seven hours, and had exchanged somewhere about £22,000. Not another customer had been able to get his wants attended to.

The English like oddity. Let a man do something original and piquant, and they will applaud even though their own flesh is pricked. So the people contrived to smile at the eccentricity of Baron Rothschild, and when the time came for closing the bank, they were not a tenth part so much annoyed as were the customers from abroad, whose business had not been attended to. The bank officials smiled that evening but—

On the following morning, when the bank opened, Nathan Rothschild appeared again, accompanied by his nine faithful helpers, this time bringing with him as far as the street entrance four heavy two-horse drays, for the purpose of carting away the gold, for to-day the Baron had bills of a larger denomination. Ah, the officers of the bank smiled no more, and a trembling seized them when the banker monarch said, with stern simplicity and directness:

'Ah, these gentlemen refuse to take my bills. Be it so. I am resolved that I will keep not one of theirs. It is the house of Rothschild against the Bank of England!'

The Bank of England opened its eyes very wide. Within a week the house of Rothschild could be demanding gold it did not possess. The gentlemen at the head of affairs saw very plainly that in a determined tilt the bank must go to the wall. There was but way out of the scrape, and they took it. Notice was at once publicly given that thenceforth the Bank of England would cash the bills of Rothschild as well as its own!—Exchange."

The ancient Jews ruined Rome by syphoning off the gold. Cicero's Pro Flaccus, Chapter 28, states,

"XXVIII. The next thing is that charge about the Jewish gold. And this, forsooth, is the reason why this cause is pleaded near the steps of Aurelius. It is on account of this charge, O Laelius, that this place and that mob has been selected by you. You know how numerous that crowd is, how great is its unanimity, and of what weight it is in the popular assemblies. I will speak in a low voice, just so as to let the judges hear me. For men are not wanting who would be glad to excite that people against me and against every eminent man; and I will not assist them and enable them to do so more easily. As gold, under pretence of being given to the Jews, was accustomed every year to be exported out of Italy and all the provinces to Jerusalem, Flaccus issued an edict establishing a law that it should not be lawful for gold to be exported out of Asia. And who is there, O judges, who cannot honestly praise this measure? The senate had often decided, and when I was consul it came to a most solemn resolution that gold ought not to be exported. But to resist this barbarous superstition were an act of dignity, to despise the multitude of Jews, which at times was most unruly in the assemblies in defence of the interests of the republic, was an act of the greatest wisdom. 'But Cnaeus Pompeius, after he had taken Jerusalem, though he was a conqueror, touched nothing which was in that temple.' In the first place, he acted wisely, as he did in many other instances, in leaving no room for his detractors to say anything against him, in a city so prone to suspicion and to evil speaking. For I do not suppose that the religion of the Jews, our enemies, was any obstacle to that most illustrious general, but that he was hindered by his own modesty. Where then is the guilt? Since you nowhere impute any theft to us, since you approve of the edict, and confess that it was passed in due form, and do not deny that the gold was openly sought for and produced, the facts of the case themselves show that the business was executed by the instrumentality of men of the highest character. There was a hundredweight of gold, more or less, openly seized at Apamea, and weighed out in the forum at the feet of the praetor, by Sextus Caesius, a Roman knight, a most excellent and upright man; twenty pounds weight or a little more were seized at Laodicea, by Lucius Peducæus, who is here in court, one of our judges; some was seized also at Adramyttium, by Cnaeus Domitius, the lieutenant, and a small quantity at Pergamus. The amount of the gold is known; the gold is in the treasury; no theft is imputed to him; but it is attempted to render him unpopular. The speaker turns away from the judges, and addresses himself to the surrounding multitude. Each city, O Laelius, has its own peculiar religion; we have ours. While Jerusalem was flourishing, and while the Jews were in a peaceful state, still the religious ceremonies and observances of that people were very much at variance with the splendour of this empire, and the dignity of our name, and the institutions of our ancestors. And they are the more odious to us now, because that nation has shown by arms what were its feelings towards our supremacy. How dear it was to the immortal gods is proved by its having been defeated, by its revenues having been farmed out to our contractors, by its being reduced to a state of subjection."—M. T. Cicero, Pro Flaccus, Chapter 28; translated by C. D. Yonge, The Orations of Marcus Tullius Cicero, Volume 2, George Bell & Sons, London, (1880), pp. 454-455.

The ancient Jews ruined Egypt by syphoning off the gold. Jews accused themselves of stealing the Egyptians’ gold by asking to borrow it from their trusting Egyptian neighbors, then emigrating without giving it back (Exodus 11:2; 12:35-36). Joseph stole the gold of Egypt and ruined its money, then enslaved the Egyptian People (Genesis 47).

Genesis 47 states:

"1 Then Joseph came and told Pharaoh, and said, My father and my brethren, and their flocks, and their herds, and all that they have, are come out of the land of Canaan; and, behold, they are in the land of Goshen. 2 And he took some of his brethren, even five men, and presented them unto Pharaoh. 3 And Pharaoh said unto his brethren, What is your occupation? And they said unto Pharaoh, Thy servants are shepherds, both we, and also our fathers. 4 They said moreover unto Pharaoh, For to sojourn in the land are we come; for thy servants have no pasture for their flocks; for the famine is sore in the land of Canaan: now therefore, we pray thee, let thy servants dwell in the land of Goshen. 5 And Pharaoh spake unto Joseph, saying, Thy father and thy brethren are come unto thee: 6 The land of Egypt is before thee; in the best of the land make thy father and brethren to dwell; in the land of Goshen let them dwell: and if thou knowest any men of activity among them, then make them rulers over my cattle. 7 And Joseph brought in Jacob his father, and set him before Pharaoh: and Jacob blessed Pharaoh. 8 And Pharaoh said unto Jacob, How old art thou? 9 And Jacob said unto Pharaoh, The days of the years of my pilgrimage are an hundred and thirty years: few and evil have the days of the years of my life been, and have not attained unto the days of the years of the life of my fathers in the days of their pilgrimage. 10 And Jacob blessed Pharaoh, and went out from before Pharaoh. 11 And Joseph placed his father and his brethren, and gave them a possession in the land of Egypt, in the best of the land, in the land of Rameses, as Pharaoh had commanded. 12 And Joseph nourished his father, and his brethren, and all his father's household, with bread, according to their families. 13 And there was no bread in all the land; for the famine was very sore, so that the land of Egypt and all the land of Canaan fainted by reason of the famine. 14 And Joseph gathered up all the money that was found in the land of Egypt, and in the land of Canaan, for the corn which they bought: and Joseph brought the money into Pharaoh's house. 15 And when money failed in the land of Egypt, and in the land of Canaan, all the Egyptians came unto Joseph, and said, Give us bread: for why should we die in thy presence? for the money faileth. 16 And Joseph said, Give your cattle; and I will give you for your cattle, if money fail. 17 And they brought their cattle unto Joseph: and Joseph gave them bread in exchange for horses, and for the flocks, and for the cattle of the herds, and for the asses: and he fed them with bread for all their cattle for that year. 18 When that year was ended, they came unto him the second year, and said unto him, We will not hide it from my lord, how that our money is spent; my lord also hath our herds of cattle; there is not ought left in the sight of my lord, but our bodies, and our lands: 19 Wherefore shall we die before thine eyes, both we and our land? buy us and our land for bread, and we and our land will be servants unto Pharaoh: and give us seed, that we may live, and not die, that the land be not desolate. 20 And Joseph bought all the land of Egypt for Pharaoh; for the Egyptians sold every man his field, because the famine prevailed over them: so the land became Pharaoh's. 21 And as for the people, he removed them to cities from one end of the borders of Egypt even to the other end thereof. 22 Only the land of the priests bought he not; for the priests had a portion assigned them of Pharaoh, and did eat their portion which Pharaoh gave them: wherefore they sold not their lands. 23 Then Joseph said unto the people, Behold, I have bought you this day and your land for Pharaoh: lo, here is seed for you, and ye shall sow the land. 24 And it shall come to pass in the increase, that ye shall give the fifth part unto Pharaoh, and four parts shall be your own, for seed of the field, and for your food, and for them of your households, and for food for your little ones. 25 And they said, Thou hast saved our lives: let us find grace in the sight of my lord, and we will be Pharaoh's servants. 26 And Joseph made it a law over the land of Egypt unto this day, that Pharaoh should have the fifth part; except the land of the priests only, which became not Pharaoh's. 27 And Israel dwelt in the land of Egypt, in the country of Goshen; and they had possessions therein, and grew, and multiplied exceedingly. 28 And Jacob lived in the land of Egypt seventeen years: so the whole age of Jacob was an hundred forty and seven years. 29 And the time drew nigh that Israel must die: and he called his son Joseph, and said unto him, If now I have found grace in thy sight, put, I pray thee, thy hand under my thigh, and deal kindly and truly with me; bury me not, I pray thee, in Egypt: 30 But I will lie with my fathers, and thou shalt carry me out of Egypt, and bury me in their buryingplace. And he said, I will do as thou hast said. 31 And he said, Swear unto me. And he sware unto him. And Israel bowed himself upon the bed's head."

This story taught the Jews that they could ruin any nation if they could control the nation’s money supply. They controlled the money supply by melting down gold and silver and keeping the metals for themselves. Once they had ruined metallic currency, the Jews could then operate on a barter system with the subjugated Gentiles.

Protocol 20 of The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion states:


TO-DAY we shall deal with the financial program, the discussion of which I have postponed until the end of my report because it is the most difficult, conclusive, and decisive point in our plans. In approaching it, I will remind you that I have already intimated that the result of our actions is measured in figures.

When we become rulers, our autocratic government, for the sake of self-defense, will avoid burdening the people with heavy taxes, and it will not forget the role it has to play, namely, that of Father and Protector. But as government organization is costly, it is necessary to raise the means for its maintenance. Consequently, we must carefully work out the plan of a fair distribution of taxation.

In our government the sovereign will have the legal fiction of owning everything in his kingdom (which is easily put into practice), and can resort to legal confiscation of all money in order to regulate its circulation throughout the country. Consequently, the best method of taxation is the levying of a progressive tax on property. Taxes will thus be paid without difficulty or ruin in respective proportion to the amount of property owned. The rich must realize that it is their duty to give a part of their surplus wealth for the benefit of the country as a whole, because the government guarantees inviolability of the remaining part of their property and the right of honest gain. I say honest because the control of property will prevent legal theft.

This social reform must come front above, for the time is ripe and it is becoming necessary as a guarantee of peace.

The tax on the poor is the seed of revolution, and it acts detrimentally to the government, which loses the great in its pursuit of the little. Moreover, the taxation of capital will lessen the increase of wealth in private hands, in which at present we have concentrated it as a counterweight to the governmental power of the Goys, namely, to the state treasury.

Progressive taxation, assessed according to the amount of capital, will produce a much greater revenue than the present system of taxing every one at an equal rate, which is useful to us now only as a means of exciting revolt and discontent among the Goys. The power of our sovereign will rest mainly in equilibrium and in guarantees of peace. For these, the capitalists must cede a part of their income so as to protect the action of the government machine. Public needs must be met by those who can best afford to do so and by those from whom there is something to take.

Such a measure will eliminate the hatred of the poor towards the rich, as they will be regarded as the financial supporters of the state and the upholders of peace and prosperity. The poor will also see that the rich are providing the necessary means to insure this end.

To prevent intelligent taxpayers from being too discontented with the new system of taxation, they will be furnished with detailed reports of the disbursement of public funds, exclusive of such as are appropriated for the needs of the throne and administrative institutions.

The sovereign will not own property, since everything in the state will seem to belong to him and these two conceptions would contradict each other. Private means would eliminate his right to own everything.

The relatives of the sovereign, aside from his descendants who will also be supported by the state, must join the ranks of government officials, or otherwise work for the right of holding property. The privilege of being of royal blood must not entitle them to rob the state treasury.

Sales, profits, or inheritances will be taxed by a progressive stamp tax. The transfer of property, whether in cash or otherwise, without the required stamp, will place the payment of the tax on the original owner, dating from the time of the transfer until the time of the reported failure to record the transaction. Transfer vouchers must be shown weekly at the local branch of the state treasury, together with a statement of the names, surnames, and the permanent addresses both of the original and of the new owner. The recording of the names of those participating in a transaction will be necessary in all transactions involving more than a certain amount for ordinary expenditure. The sale of prime necessities will be taxed only by a stamp tax, which will represent a certain small per cent of the cost of the particular article.

Just calculate how many times the amount received from such taxes will exceed the income of the Goy governments.

The state bank must keep a definite reserve fund, and all sums in excess must be put back into circulation. The cost of public works will be met out of this surplus fund. The initiative of such works emanating from the government will also tie the working class to the interests of the government and the rulers. Some of this money will be allotted to prizes for inventions and for the purposes of production.

Even small sums in excess of a certain definite and broadly calculated fund, should not be allowed to be kept in the state treasury, because money is intended to circulate, and every impediment to circulation is detrimental to the governmental mechanism, which the money lubricates; the congestion of lubricating substances can stop the proper functioning of the mechanism.

The substitution of bonds for a part of the currency has created just such an impediment. The result of this has already become sufficiently evident.

We will also establish an auditing office, so as to enable the sovereign to find at all times a full account of state revenues and expenses, except for the current month not yet made up, and that of the previous month not yet presented.

The only person who will not be interested in robbing the state treasury will be the sovereign, its owner. This is the reason why his control will prevent the possibility of loss or misappropriation.

Receptions for the purpose of etiquette, which waste the valuable time of the sovereign, will be abolished, because the ruler needs time for control and thought. Then his power will not be frittered away on the people surrounding the throne for the sake of appearance and brilliance, and who have only their own and not the public interest in mind.

The economic crises were created by us for the Goys only by the withdrawal of money from circulation. Huge amounts of capital were kept idle and were taken away from the nations, which were thus compelled to apply to us for loans. Payment of interest on these loans burdened the state finances and made the states subservient to capital. The concentration of industry having taken production out of the hands of the artisan and put it into the hands of capitalists, sucked all the power out of the people and also out of the state.

The present issue of money generally does not coincide with the need per capita, and consequently it cannot satisfy all the needs of the working classes. The issue of currency must correspond with the increase in population, and children must be reckoned as consumers from the day of their birth. The revision of the issue of currency is an essential problem for the whole world.

You know that gold currency was detrimental to the governments that accepted it, for it could not satisfy the requirements for money, since we took as much gold as possible out of circulation.

We must issue a currency based on the value of the working power, whether it be of paper or wood. We will issue money in proportion to the normal demands of every subject, adding a certain amount at every birth and decreasing it with every death.

Every department (the French administrative divisions), [Footnote: The words in parentheses would seem to be a comment of Nilus's.] every district, will be in charge of its own accounts.

To avoid any delay in paying government expenses, the terms of such payments will be decreed by order of the sovereign; this will eliminate any favoritism of the ministry (of finance) [Footnote: The words in parentheses are inserted by the editors.] over any other department to the detriment of the others.

The budget of revenues and the budget of expenditure will be placed side by side, in order that they may always be compared with each other

We will present plans for the reform of the Goy financial institutions and of their principles, as planned by us, in such a manner that nobody will be frightened. We will demonstrate the need of reform by the disorderly twaddle produced by the financial disorganization of the Goys. We will show that the first reason for this confusion lies in the drafting of rough estimates for the budget, which increases from year to year. This annual budget is with great difficulty made to last during the first half of the year; then a revised budget is demanded and the funds thus allotted are spent in the next three months, after which a supplementary budget is called for and all this is wound up by a liquidation budget. As the budget of the following year is based on the total expenditure of the preceding year, the divergence from the normal reaches fifty per cent annually, so that the annual budget trebles every ten years. Owing to such a procedure, resulting from the carelessness of the Goy governments, their treasuries became empty. The period of loans followed and used up the remainder and brought all the Goy states to bankruptcy.

You can well understand that such a management of financial affairs as we induced the Goys to pursue cannot be adopted by us.

Every loan proves the impotency of the government and its failure to understand its own rights. Loans, like the sword of Damocles, hang above the heads of the rulers, who instead of placing temporary taxes on their subjects, stretch forth their hands and beg the charity of our bankers. Foreign loans are leeches, which can never be removed from the governmental body until they either fall off themselves or the government itself manages to get rid of them. But the Goy governments instead of throwing them off increase their number, so that these governments must inevitably perish through self-inflicted loss of blood.

Indeed, what is a loan, especially a foreign loan, if not a leech? A loan is the issuance of government obligations which involve the liability to pay interest in proportion to the sum borrowed. If the loan pays five per cent, then in twenty years the government has unnecessarily paid in interest an amount equal to the principal sum borrowed. In forty years it has paid twice; in sixty years it has trebled the sum, while the loan still remains an unpaid debt.

From this calculation it is evident that under the system of universal taxation the government takes the last penny from the poor taxpayers in the form of taxes in order to pay interest to foreign capitalists, from whom the money was borrowed, instead of collecting these same pennies for its needs free from all interest.

So long as the loans were domestic, the Goys only shifted the money from the pockets of the poor into those of the rich; but when we bribed the proper persons to make the loans foreign, then national riches poured into our hands and all the Goys began to pay us the tribute of subjects.

The carelessness of the reigning Goys in statemanship, the corruption of their ministers, the ignorance of other officials of financial problems, has forced their countries into debt to our banks to such an extent that they can never pay off their debts. It should be realized, however, that we have gone to great pains in order to bring about such a state of affairs.

Impediments to the circulation of money will not be allowed by us, and therefore there will be no government bonds, except one per cent bonds, so that the payment of interest should not deliver the power of the state to the sucking of leeches. The right of issuing bonds will be exclusively granted to industrial corporations, which will easily pay the interest out of their profits. The government, however, does not derive profit on borrowed money as these corporations do, since the state borrows money for expenditure and not for production.

Industrial bonds will also be bought by the government, which instead of being, as at present, the payer of tribute on loans, will become a sound creditor. Such a measure will prevent stagnation in the circulation of money, as well as indolence and laziness, which were useful to us so long as the Goys remained independent, but are not wanted by us in our government.

How apparent is the shortsightedness of the purely bestial brains of the Goys! It manifested itself when they borrowed money for at interest. It did not occur to the Goys that, at any rate, this money, with the additional interest on it, would have to be taken from the resources of the country and paid to us. Would it not have been more simple to take the needed money from their own people?

This proves the genius of our distinguished mind, for we were able to present the question of loans to them in such a light that they saw in loans an advantage for themselves.

Our estimates, which we will produce when the time comes, will be based on the experience of centuries, on all those experiments which were conducted by us at the expense of the Goy governments; our estimates will prove to be clear and definite, and will obviously demonstrate the advantage of our new system. They will end all those abuses which made it possible for us to master the Goys, but which cannot be permitted in our reign.

We will so organize the accounting system that neither the sovereign himself nor the most humble clerk will be able to deflect the smallest sum from its destination or direct it into a different channel from that indicated in our original financial plan.

It is impossible to govern without a definite plan. Traveling along a definite road with an indefinite supply of provisions destroys heroes and knights.

The Goy rulers, to whom we once gave advice to neglect governmental duties for grandiose receptions, etiquette, and pleasures, only concealed our rule. The accounts of the powerful favorites who replaced the sovereign were drawn up by our agents, and they always satisfied the shallow minds by promises that in the future there would be savings and improvements. Savings from what? From new taxes? This might have been asked but was not asked by those who read our reports and plans. You know to what their carelessness has led them, what financial disorganization they have reached in spite of the wonderful diligence of their people."

I tend to follow the advice of our Founding Fathers and maintain a distrust of government and those in it, especially career politicians. There are no good candidates in this election who have any chance at winning. Of the bad candidates, Ron Paul is perhaps the best. If he were to win, it would send a signal to the American People that we can change things. Unfortunately, that change is a trap meant to favor the gold merchants and the bankers.

The only way to save the American People from another depression is to educate them as to how they are being set up by friendly foes. The People must have power.

The leaders the Jewish media and Jewish bankers offer us do not work in our interests, but we can insist that the policies they institute work in our favor. So don't childishly cling to Ron Paul as if he is our savior and our fate depends upon him. Also do not flippantly dismiss his candidacy.

We, the American People, can use him just as easily as he intends to use us. What we need to do is impeach Bush and Cheney and then elect an alternative presidential candidate who at least pretends to be outside of the mainstream. Then we need to remain vigilant and insist that our interests are served, not the interests of the Jewish bankers and war profiteers.

Monday, December 17, 2007

More on the Zionist War Criminal Joe Lieberman and the Fulfillment of Protocol III

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Lieberman has openly called for an illegal aggressive American attack on Iran. See:

US should weigh Iran attack: Lieberman

Israeli fifth-columner Joe Lieberman has abused the US Senate as a forum in which to covertly institute Israeli war policy in America. See:

Senate Neocons Provoke Iran

Now that the National Intelligence Estimate has discredited the covert Lieberman-Israeli-fifth-column, the "Jewish State" has let the snake out from under the rock and is openly conspiring with the treacherous Zionist leaders of America, Great Britian and France to gin up a war on Iran based on false pretenses. Israelis know no shame and are a threat to every nation on Earth. See:

Israel unveils new strategy on Iran

Since Zionist puppets like Lieberman and Bush have been thoroughly discredited by the NIE, the Israelis hope that if they directly appeal to World Jewry that Jews who control the press will support their efforts to dehumanize and vilify innocent Iranians to the point where the Zionists will win support for their sinister quest to dump nuclear bombs on human beings guilty only of being Moslem. It is an international cry to the Jewish Tribe to support the homeland and sack Teheran, "Be a good Jew and exterminate the Iranians!"

It is fitting that Judaism has from ancient times chosen the hidden snake as its mascot. Levi Chazen wrote,

"Our rabbis have already told us that the ways of the Redemption and Mashiach are likened to a snake, hidden from all."Levi Chazen, "Vayeshev: The Lessons of the Two Mashiachs",,, (29 November 2007).

Paquita de Shishmareff wrote in her book Waters Flowing Eastward: The War Against the Kingship of Christ, quoting Sergei Nilus, who published The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion in 1905, tens years before The Jewish Genocide of Armenian Christians and 12 years before the Jewish takeover of the Russian Empire,

"II—The Symbolic Snake of Judaism

Protocol III opens with a reference to the Symbolic Snake of Judaism. In his Epilogue to the 1905 Edition of the [Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion] Nilus gives the following interesting account of this symbol:—

According to the records of secret Jewish Zionism, Solomon and other Jewish learned men had already, in 929 B.C., thought out a theoretical scheme for the peaceful conquest of the whole universe by Zion.

As the course of history unfolded, this scheme was elaborated in detail and completed by later generations of men who had been initiated into their secrets. These learned men decided by peaceful means to conquer the world for Zion with the slyness of the Symbolic Snake, whose head was to represent those who have been initiated into the plans of the Jewish administration, and the body of the Snake to represent the Jewish people—the administration was always kept secret, even from the Jewish nation itself. As this Snake penetrated into the hearts of the nations which it encountered it undermined and devoured all the non-Jewish power of these States. It is foretold that the Snake has still to finish its work, strictly adhering to the designed plan, until the course which it has to run is closed by the return of its head to Zion and until, by this means, the Snake has completed its round of Europe and has encircled it—and until, by dint of enchaining Europe, it has encompassed the whole world. This it is to accomplish by using every endeavour to subdue the other countries by economic conquest.

The return of the head of the snake to Zion can only be accomplished after the power of all the Sovereigns of Europe has been laid low, that is to say, when by means of economic crises and wholesale destruction effected everywhere, there shall have been brought about spiritual demoralisation and moral corruption, chiefly with the assistance of Jewish women masquerading as French, Italians, etc. Their example is the surest method of encouraging licentiousness among the leaders of the nations.

A map of the course of the Symbolic Snake is shown as follows:—Its first stage in Europe was in 429 B.C. in Greece, where, about the time of Pericles, the Snake first started eating into the power of that country. The second stage was in Rome in the time of Augustus, about 69 B.C. The third in Madrid in the time of Charles V, in A.D. 1552. The fourth in Paris about 1790, in the time of Louis XVI. The fifth in London from 1841 onwards (after the downfall of Napoleon). The sixth in Berlin in 1871 after the Franco-Prussian war. The seventh in St. Petersburg, over which is drawn the head of the Snake under the date of 1881.

All these states which the Snake traversed have had the foundations of their constitutions shaken, Germany, with its apparent power, forming no exception to the rule. In economic conditions England and Germany are spared, but only till the conquest of Russia is accomplished by the Snake, on which at present (i.e., 1905) all its efforts are concentrated. The further course of the Snake is not shown on this map, but arrows indicate its next movement towards Moscow, Kieff and Odessa.

It is now well known to us to what extent the latter cities form the centres of the militant Jewish race. Constantinople is shown as the last stage of the Snake’s course before it reaches Jerusalem. (This map was drawn years before the occurrence of the ‘Young Turk’—i.e., Jewish—Revolution in Turkey)."—L. Fry, Waters Flowing Eastward: The War Against the Kingship of Christ, TBR Books, Washington, D. C., (2000), pp. 112-113.

Do not let World Jewry lie about this drive to war against Iran, as they have lied about their genocide of the Iraqis. Do not let the snake stay hidden. It is Zionist Jews and the "Jewish State" who are pushing us towards nuclear World War III, and to stop it, we must stop them from achieving their goals.

Protocol 3 states:


TO-DAY I can tell you that our goal is close at hand. Only a small distance remains, and the cycle of the Symbolic Serpent—the symbol of our people—will be complete. When this circle is completed, then all the European states will be enclosed in it as in strong claws.

The modern constitutional scales will soon tip over, for we have set them inaccurately, thus insuring an unsteady balance for the purpose of wearing out their holder. The Goys thought it had been sufficiently strongly made and hoped that the scales would regain their equilibrium, but the holder—the ruler—is screened from the people by his representatives, who fritter away their time, carried away by their uncontrolled and irresponsible authority. Their power, moreover, has been built up on terrorism spread through the palaces. Unable to reach the hearts of their people, the rulers cannot unite with them to gain strength against the usurpers of power. The visible power of royalty and the blind power of the masses, separated by us, have both lost significance, for separated, they are as helpless as the blind man without a stick.

To induce the lovers of authority to abuse their power, we have placed all the forces in opposition to each other, having developed their liberal tendencies towards independence. We have excited different forms of initiative in that direction; we have armed all the parties; we have made authority the target of all ambitions. We have opened the arenas in different states, where revolts are now occurring, and disorders and bankruptcy will shortly appear everywhere.

Unrestrained babblers have converted parliamentary sessions and administrative meetings into oratorical contests. Daring journalists, impudent pamphleteers, make daily attacks on the administrative personnel. The abuse of power is definitely preparing the downfall of all institutions and everything will be overturned by the blows of the infuriated mobs.

The people are shackled by poverty to heavy labor more surely than they were by slavery and serfdom. They could liberate themselves from those in one way or another, whereas they cannot free themselves from misery. We have included in constitutions rights which for the people are fictitious and are not actual rights. All the so-called 'rights of the people' can exist only in the abstract and can never be realized in practice. What difference does it make to the toiling proletarian, bent double by heavy toil, oppressed by his fate, that the babblers receive the right to talk, journalists the right to mix nonsense with reason in their writings, if the proletariat has no other gain from the constitution than the miserable crumbs which we throw from our table in return for his vote to elect our agents. Republican rights are bitter irony to the poor man, for the necessity of almost daily labor prevents him from using them, and at the same time deprives him of his guarantee of a permanent and certain livelihood by making him dependent upon strikes, organized either by his masters or by his comrades.

Under our guidance the people have exterminated aristocracy, which was their natural protector and guardian, for its own interests are inseparably connected with the well-being of the people. Now, however, with the destruction of this aristocracy the masses have fallen under the power of the profiteers and cunning upstarts, who have settled on the workers as a merciless burden.

We will present ourselves in the guise of saviors of the workers from this oppression when we suggest that they enter our army of Socialists, Anarchists, Communists, to whom we always extend our help, under the guise of the rule of brotherhood demanded by the human solidarity of our social masonry. The aristocracy which benefitted by the labor of the people by right was interested that the workers should be well fed, healthy, and strong.

We, on the contrary, are concerned in the opposite—in the degeneration of the Goys. Our power lies in the chronic malnutrition and in the weakness of the worker, because through this he falls under our power and is unable to find either strength or energy to combat it.

Hunger gives to capital greater power over the worker than the legal authority of the sovereign ever gave to the aristocracy. Through misery and the resulting jealous hatred we manipulate the mob and crush those who stand in our way.

When the time comes for our universal ruler to be crowned, the same hands will sweep away everything which may be an obstacle in our way.

The Goys are no longer accustomed to think without our scientific advice. Consequently, they do not see the imperative need of upholding that which we will sustain by all means when our kingdom is established, namely, the teaching in the schools of the only true science, the first of all sciences—the science of the construction of human life, of social existence, which requires the division of labor and, consequently, the separation of people into classes and castes. It is necessary that all should know that equality cannot exist, owing to the different nature of various kinds of work; that there cannot be the same responsibility before the law in the case of an individual who by his actions compromises an entire caste and another who does not affect anything but his own honor.

The correct science of the social structure, to the secrets of which we do not admit the Goys, would demonstrate to all that occupation and labor must be differentiated so as not to cause human suffering by the discrepancy between education and work. The study of this science will lead the masses to a voluntary submission to the authorities and to the governmental system organized by them. Whereas, under the present state of science, and due to the direction of our guidance therein, the people, in their ignorance, blindly believing the printed word, and owing to the misconceptions which have been fostered by us, feel a hatred towards all classes whom they consider superior to themselves, since they do not understand the importance of each caste.

This hatred will be still more accentuated by the economic crisis, which will stop financial transactions and all industrial life. Having organized a general economic crisis by all possible underhand means, and with the help of gold which is all in our hands, we will throw great crowds of workmen into the street, simultaneously, in all countries of Europe. These crowds will gladly shed the blood of those of whom they, in the simplicity of their ignorance, have been jealous since childhood and whose property they will then be able to loot.

They will not harm our people because we will know of the time of the attack and we will take measures to protect them.

We have persuaded others that progress will lead the Goys into a realm of reason. Our despotism will be of such a nature that it will be in a position to pacify all revolts by wise restrictions and to eliminate liberalism from all institutions.

When the people saw that they obtained concessions and license in the name of liberty, they imagined that they were the masters, and rushed into power; but like every blind person, they encountered innumerable obstacles; they rushed to seek a leader, with no thought of returning to the old one, and laid power at our feet. Remember the French Revolution, which we have called 'great'; the secrets of its preparation are well known to us, for it was the work of our hands.

Since then we have carried the masses from one disappointment to another, so that they will renounce even us in favor of a despot sovereign of Zionist blood, whom we are preparing for the world.

At present, as an international force, we are invulnerable, because if we are attacked by one state we are supported by other states. The unlimited baseness of the Goy peoples, who grovel before force, who are pitiless towards weakness, who are merciless to misdemeanors and lenient to crimes, who are unwilling to tolerate the contradictions of a free social structure; patient unto martyrdom in bearing with the violence of daring despotism—this is what helps our independence. They tolerate and permit such abuses from their modern premiers—dictators—for the least of which they would behead twenty kings.

How can such a phenomenon be explained, such an illogical conception on the part of the mass of the people towards events of seemingly the same nature? This phenomenon can be explained by the fact that these dictators through their agents whisper to their people that by these abuses they injure the states for a supreme purpose, namely, for the attainment of the happiness of the people, their universal fraternity, solidarity, and equality. Of course, they are not told that this unification will be achieved only under our rule. Thus, the people condemn the just and acquit the unjust, more and more convinced that they can do what they please. Owing to this, the people destroy all stability and create disorder on every occasion.

The word 'Liberty' brings all society into conflict with all authority, be it that of God or Nature. This is why, at the moment of our enthronement, we shall strike this word from the dictionary as being the symbol of brute power, which turns the masses into bloodthirsty beasts. It is true, however, that these beasts go to sleep as soon as they have drunk blood, and then it is easy to shackle them; but if the blood is not given to them they will not sleep and will struggle."

Jerusalem Joe Lieberman Tells a Typical Zionist Lie

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Joe Lieberman, another formerly leftist Zionist Jew turned hard Zionist Republican-right, has endorsed Republican Zionist madman and longtime Israel-firster John "Bomb Iran" McCain for President. Lieberman stated,

"Being a Republican is important. Being a Democrat is important. But you know what's more important than that? The interest and well-being of the United States of America. Let's put America first again, and John McCain is the man as president who will help us do that."Joe Lieberman,

In the name of putting "America first", Joe Lieberman again puts Israel first. This is a typical Zionist deceit. Zionist Jews take away our liberty in the name of "defending democracy". They deliberately and unnecessarily bring us into aggressive war in the name of "peace". They Judaize Christianity in the name of Jesus. They restrict the press to Jewish control in the name of "freedom of the press". Etc. Etc. Etc.

We learn of Lieberman's Zionist priorities in his endorsement of McCain from one of Lieberman's aides. reports:

"The Connecticut senator decided to endorse McCain because he considers him 'the most capable to be commander in chief on day one of his administration, and the most capable of uniting the country so that we can prevail against Islamic extremism,' a Lieberman aide said earlier.""Lieberman: McCain can reunite our country",,

Jews are taught to pretend be loyal to other nations in order to trick the Goyim into fighting the Jews' wars for them. This behavior is taught in the Jewish book of Esther in the Hebrew Bible.

Joe Lieberman, an Orthodox Jew, originally decided to go out with his second wife, because her name is "Hadassah". In the Hebrew Bible, "Hadassah" is the real name of the crypto-Jew "Esther", who wormed her way into the Persian government so that she could commit genocide against the Amalekites. Hadassah has reportedly stated that one or two of the Lieberman couple's children will move to Israel.

Joe Lieberman was Al Gore's running mate in their 2000 bid to become President and Vice President, in which they essentially handed over their victory to George W. Bush, who then promptly committed genocide against the Iraqis and Afghanistanis in the name of defending Israel. Lieberman has been a strong supporter of Bush and the war on Iraq.

The Jewish war on Islam, led by Israel's fifth column in the American Government and the press, has cost America our morality, our wealth, our economic future, our lives and our reputation. The Jewish war on Islam has poured the blood of innocent millions onto our hands and onto our souls. Israel-first Joe Lieberman wants more of the same. He spews out his Zionist hatred in the name of America. He is deceitful scum of the worst sort, and I am rescued from a redundancy only by virtue of the fact that it is difficult to imagine a worse wretch than Joe Lieberman, except for, perhaps, John McCain; but then you know what they say about birds of a feather. . .