Friday, October 17, 2008

The Evil Spirit in America Need Not Last Forever

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

The Jews have covered America with a toxic rain which drips from their venomous tongues and bloody hands and flows like a serpent through the gutters and sewers winding its way underground to poison the well where we drink. They drape lead curtains between our souls and the Sun, cast a prison gate over our thoughts and sew shut our eyes to hope like a mortician readying the corpse for burial.

The Jews want us to forget that we are one nation, that we can work together for our mutual benefit and that government can be a positive force in our lives. Jews are revolutionaries. Their mission is to destroy, to burn the corn and wheat so that they can plant a Jewish cemetery in the charred fields which once gave us life. They want us to forget how good life can be when we help each other.

Death's cloak has an old and moldy smell. It has been dragging in the dust for two-thousand-five-hundred years stirring up the worms and rats and clouding the wind with churning flecks of ash. The Tribe has carried Death's coat on their bony shoulders from country to country around the globe and now wrap their leprous arms around this infant nation America and blow an infectious cough deep into our lungs.

The Jews are waging war on us and recruit us into two camps to fight ourselves. With lies, impostures and staged battles, they provoke Americans to destroy one another. They want us to fight each other, to mock decency and to embrace the sick whore of Babylon in a last sour kiss of Death.

They are killing our economy, but they have also been changing us from within, like a drunk screaming in the streets, they have been pouring evil spirits down our throats that for decades have been eating at our guts and changing us cell by cell into a dirty, cursing, bitter bag of hate that cannot walk straight or hold down a healthy meal. We fight each other like bums tumbling on the boardwalk and tug at one anothers torn cloths with dirty fists and scraped knuckles, while the Jews butter one anothers bread with honey and wrap golden necklesses around their childrens' fat necks.

I worry for the other children who begin their lives in an America without a sip of pure water unflavored by Jewish immorality, Jewish hatred, Jewish bloodlust or Jewish degeneracy. And this worry is one more toxic taste tainting life, which the Jews serve to us on splintered shingles from our fathers' fallen barn, as the Jews cut the throats of our cattle and serve up our blood in crystal cups, congratulating one another on their legendary "cleverness" and mocking the Goys' stupidity for ever trusting them.

Yes, America may be one more coffin tied to Death's heel with a rusty chain as the Jews wander around the Earth sniffing the weeds and picking humanity's pocket, one more box of bones rattling across the grass. But only if we forget, forget that we can unite and fight, unite and build, unite and raise new barns where the Jews have burned down our forefathers' homes and forests.

We must not let the Jews control our images and thoughts of tomorrow, or today, nor our memories of yesterday. We must leave the noise of the city and walk in the woods, hear our human nature singing like a child alone, dancing to her own happy song. We must let ourselves be left alone for a few moments to reflect on what we really are and how we can return to beauty, to love, and romance the future as human beings are meant to do.

Thursday, October 16, 2008

Jews Are Planning Another Exodus: Ron Paul Is Setting Up America for the Great Jewish Gold Heist

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

The Jews have long known that they can destroy a nation, steal its wealth, and enslave its People by deflating the currency and limiting credit. They do this by hoarding and holding the money. They cannot do this in a fiat system which is not under their direct control, because the government need only issue more money, but they can do this to a gold standard system which is not under their control, because the government cannot print gold.

The Jewish book of Genesis, chapter 47, verses 13-25 teaches the Jews to corrupt the leaders of other nations so that they welcome the Jews into the nation and let them settle in the best places, as happened in many of the nations of Europe, England under Cromwell, Holland, Russia, etc. Genesis informs the Jews that they should then gather the money of nation together and hold it so that the economy fails. Jewish Genesis shows the Jews that the Gentiles will then trade off everything they have for food, including their freedom, and then thank the Jews for enslaving them.

Genesis 47:13-25:

"13 And there was no bread in all the land; for the famine was very sore, so that the land of Egypt and all the land of Canaan fainted by reason of the famine.

14 And Joseph gathered up all the money that was found in the land of Egypt, and in the land of Canaan, for the corn which they bought: and Joseph brought the money into Pharaoh's house.

15 And when money failed in the land of Egypt, and in the land of Canaan, all the Egyptians came unto Joseph, and said, Give us bread: for why should we die in thy presence? for the money faileth.

16 And Joseph said, Give your cattle; and I will give you for your cattle, if money fail.

17 And they brought their cattle unto Joseph: and Joseph gave them bread in exchange for horses, and for the flocks, and for the cattle of the herds, and for the asses: and he fed them with bread for all their cattle for that year.

18 When that year was ended, they came unto him the second year, and said unto him, We will not hide it from my lord, how that our money is spent; my lord also hath our herds of cattle; there is not ought left in the sight of my lord, but our bodies, and our lands:

19 Wherefore shall we die before thine eyes, both we and our land? buy us and our land for bread, and we and our land will be servants unto Pharaoh: and give us seed, that we may live, and not die, that the land be not desolate.

20 And Joseph bought all the land of Egypt for Pharaoh; for the Egyptians sold every man his field, because the famine prevailed over them: so the land became Pharaoh's.

21 And as for the people, he removed them to cities from one end of the borders of Egypt even to the other end thereof.

22 Only the land of the priests bought he not; for the priests had a portion assigned them of Pharaoh, and did eat their portion which Pharaoh gave them: wherefore they sold not their lands.

23 Then Joseph said unto the people, Behold, I have bought you this day and your land for Pharaoh: lo, here is seed for you, and ye shall sow the land.

24 And it shall come to pass in the increase, that ye shall give the fifth part unto Pharaoh, and four parts shall be your own, for seed of the field, and for your food, and for them of your households, and for food for your little ones.

25 And they said, Thou hast saved our lives: let us find grace in the sight of my lord, and we will be Pharaoh's servants."

Ron Paul wants us to use gold as money, because that will enable the Jews to privately control our money supply and drive us into a depression at any time they choose by gathering together the gold and holding it until the economy fails. The Jews will then be able to trade food from other nations under their control for all the wealth of America and they will take all the gold in payment of American debts, which debts they themselves have caused.

The Old Testament repeatedly teaches Jews to steal from Gentile nations who treat them well, and to steal from their generous and loving Goy neighbors. Ron Paul wants to enable them to do this. The Jewish book of Exodus 11:2-3; 12:35-36 states:

"11:2 Speak now in the ears of the people, and let every man borrow of his neighbour, and every woman of her neighbour, jewels of silver, and jewels of gold.

11:3 And the LORD gave the people favour in the sight of the Egyptians. Moreover the man Moses was very great in the land of Egypt, in the sight of Pharaoh's servants, and in the sight of the people. [***] 12:35 And the children of Israel did according to the word of Moses; and they borrowed of the Egyptians jewels of silver, and jewels of gold, and raiment:

12:36 And the LORD gave the people favour in the sight of the Egyptians, so that they lent unto them such things as they required. And they spoiled the Egyptians."

Johannes Buxtorf warned Christians that Jews were out to destroy them, and that they ought not to stumble over the stumbling stones the Jews threw on their path. Johannes Buxtorf wrote in the preface of his Synagoga Judaica: Das ist Jueden Schul ; Darinnen der gantz Juedische Glaub und Glaubensubung. . . grundlich erklaeret, Basel, (1603); as translated in the 1657 English edition, The Jewish Synagogue: Or An Historical Narration of the State of the Jewes, At this Day Dispersed over the Face of the Whole Earth, Printed by T. Roycroft for H. R. and Thomas Young at the Three Pidgeons in Pauls Church-Yard, London, (1657),

"The Nations or Gentiles ought onely to be these accursed vassals, and to give up their desire, that is their silver and gold unto the Iews, and that they should be constrained to submit themselves unto them after the manner of beasts prepared to the slaughter, rather then they will relinquish one whit of this their assertion, they will not refuse wittingly to be damned eternally."

The Jewish books of Isaiah and Haggai teach the Jews, who believe they are themselves God, that all the gold and silver in the World belongs to the Jews. Haggai 2:7-8 states:

"7 And I will shake all nations, and the desire of all nations shall come: and I will fill this house with glory, saith the LORD of hosts. 8 The silver is mine, and the gold is mine, saith the LORD of hosts."

Ron Paul would help the Jews consolidate and gather the gold and silver by forcing us to use these metals as money. He will help the Jews harvest the gold and silver of their American hosts. And harvest it they will. Higger wrote in his The Jewish Utopia, and note that the Jews pretend they are being good to the Gentiles by stealing from them just as they pretend that they are good to Americans by stealing from them with the "Rescue Package" and just as they pretended they were good to the Egyptians when the Jews forced the Egyptians to trade their freedom for food,

"All the treasures and natural resources of the world will eventually come in possession of the righteous. This would be in keeping with the prophecy of Isaiah: 'And her gain and her hire shall be holiness to the Lord; it shall not be treasured nor laid up; for her gain shall be for them that dwell before the Lord, to eat their fill and for stately clothing.[Isaiah 23:18]'20 Similarly, the treasures of gold, silver, precious stones, pearls, and valuable vessels that have been lost in the seas and oceans in the course of centuries will be raised up and turned over to the righteous.21 Joseph hid three treasuries in Egypt: One was discovered by Korah, one by Antoninus, and one is reserved for the righteous in the ideal world.22 [***] Gold will be of secondary importance in the new social and economic order. Eventually, all the friction, jealousy, quarrels, and misunderstandings that exist under the present system, will not be known in the ideal Messianic era.319 The city of Jerusalem will possess most of the gold and precious stones of the world. That ideal city will be practically full of those metals and stones, so that the people of the world will realize the vanity and absurdity of wasting their lives in accumulating those imaginary valuables.320"--M. Higger, The Jewish Utopia, Lord Baltimore Press, Baltimore, (1932), pp. 12-13, 57.

I often wonder if the dogmatic and fanatical fans of Ron Paul ever even begin to consider the consequences of their intended actions, or are their heads so filled with gold gilted greed and hero worship that there is no room left for logic or circumspection? I suspect that many of these fanatics themselves hold gold and silver and are willing to trade away America's future and our freedom for a much hoped for short term immense profit on the metals. They have a definite conflict of interest and are not to be trusted.

Ron Paul is a pied piper with a silver and golden flute trying to lure America, like the Egyptian army, into a red sea of debt to drown. Our children will then be held in a cave of debt as the Jews demand a ransom of gold. The Jews are readying to leave America and take all of our wealth with them, leaving us their slaves.

Wednesday, October 15, 2008

My Pauline Muse Has Returned with More Fodder for Thought

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

My correspondent supporter of Ron Paul has again written to me. I will present the anonymous author's arguments and inquiries and respond to them.

While stringing together defamatory statements, my correspondent asks why I do not allow comments on my blog. He/she should consider the fact that I would not wish to be a party to the publication of defamatory statements, nor do I wish to waste my time policing and/or responding to the comments of others, other than at my discretion and for the benefit of my audience. In addition, I do not wish to demean myself by allowing myself to be drawn into childish spats with smearmongers.

My correspondent contends that in "99%" of cases, fiat currency is inflated and that we have seen a constant rise in the money supply since 1971. By this argument, the Ron Paul supporter asserts that Ron Paul is honest in asserting that fiat money of necessity causes inflation and, I assume, my correspondent feels that Ron Paul is justified in making such sweeping statements while failing to mention that these inflationary rises are due to choices made by individuals, but that those same individuals could as easily have elected to deflate the currency.

I maintain that it is dishonest to mislead people into believing that a fiat currency can only cause inflation, because it is a fact that it can be used to produce deflation, which fact my correspondent acknowledges. I further assert that during the instances under consideration, World Jewry, not the American People at large represented by persons loyal to the United States, were in control of the supply of US dollars. Beyond this, I state that mild inflation is often a good thing, while deflation is more often destructive. In addition, I avow that a rise in money supply commensurate to or slightly exceeding economic growth is often a good thing.

I do not feel obliged to justify the criminal actions of the Jewish bankers in charge of the American money supply, because I do not support or endorse them. I merely point out that they were not necessities under a fiat system, which is the lie that Ron Paul repeatedly tells, thereby scapegoating the system for the actions of criminals and deflecting attention away from the prosecutable offenses which the Jewish bankers have committed. A well regulated fiat money system can produce deflation should deflation be a desirable outcome, which it rarely is. More importantly, it can quickly reduce the money supply in order to maintain stable price levels and encourage and reward savings.

My correspondent expresses irrational absolutes and declares that governments "always" desire to spend beyond the restrictions of tax revenues, and therefore manufacture inflated paper currency. My correspondent next confuses correlation with causation and asserts that because the means exists to hyperinflate a fiat currency, hyperflation is "inevitable". My correspondent leaves unaddressed the fact that a gold standard can be inflated, I assume because he or she continues to confuse the promises of a politician with the fundamental nature of a monetary system, thereby irrationally excluding the possibility that the politician might be lying, might be mistaken, might not be all powerful or all present, and might not have the means to accomplish the stated goals--but I do not wish to have to belabor the obvious or to repeat myself ad nauseam on points that I have already proven.

My correspondent quoted my factual statement that,

"Fiat money can be used to create stability, or deflation, or inflation. My statement was factual. A government acting on behalf of its citizens has the incentive to do that which will benefit the People. A fiat money system is the most easily regulated monetary system, and can therefore best provide for the needs of the People."

My correspondent then argued that government cannot know what is in the best interest of the People and cannot act in the interests of the People due to an alleged necessary corruption (note my correspondent's complete faith in the politician Ron Paul but irrational mutually exclusive concurrent belief that all government is corrupt). My correspondent implies by this argument that it is better to have a static money supply, or at least one limited to the ability of human beings to mine the limited supply of gold, then it is to allow human beings to attempt to regulate their fate through their elected representatives by scientific means.

I disagree. I think there are means to monitor the money supply and to rationally decide whether or not it is likely to be a benefit or a harm to change it. I contend that it invites corruption by private interests, namely the Jews, who are tribal by religion and tradition, to create a system where they can privately regulate the money supply of any given nation by importing, holding or exporting gold, as they have often done in the past. Witness Genesis 47 and Cicero's Pro Flaccus, Chapter 28, which states,

"XXVIII. The next thing is that charge about the Jewish gold. And this, forsooth, is the reason why this cause is pleaded near the steps of Aurelius. It is on account of this charge, O Laelius, that this place and that mob has been selected by you. You know how numerous that crowd is, how great is its unanimity, and of what weight it is in the popular assemblies. I will speak in a low voice, just so as to let the judges hear me. For men are not wanting who would be glad to excite that people against me and against every eminent man; and I will not assist them and enable them to do so more easily. As gold, under pretence of being given to the Jews, was accustomed every year to be exported out of Italy and all the provinces to Jerusalem, Flaccus issued an edict establishing a law that it should not be lawful for gold to be exported out of Asia. And who is there, O judges, who cannot honestly praise this measure? The senate had often decided, and when I was consul it came to a most solemn resolution that gold ought not to be exported. But to resist this barbarous superstition were an act of dignity, to despise the multitude of Jews, which at times was most unruly in the assemblies in defence of the interests of the republic, was an act of the greatest wisdom. 'But Cnaeus Pompeius, after he had taken Jerusalem, though he was a conqueror, touched nothing which was in that temple.' In the first place, he acted wisely, as he did in many other instances, in leaving no room for his detractors to say anything against him, in a city so prone to suspicion and to evil speaking. For I do not suppose that the religion of the Jews, our enemies, was any obstacle to that most illustrious general, but that he was hindered by his own modesty. Where then is the guilt? Since you nowhere impute any theft to us, since you approve of the edict, and confess that it was passed in due form, and do not deny that the gold was openly sought for and produced, the facts of the case themselves show that the business was executed by the instrumentality of men of the highest character. There was a hundredweight of gold, more or less, openly seized at Apamea, and weighed out in the forum at the feet of the praetor, by Sextus Caesius, a Roman knight, a most excellent and upright man; twenty pounds weight or a little more were seized at Laodicea, by Lucius Peducaeus, who is here in court, one of our judges; some was seized also at Adramyttium, by Cnaeus Domitius, the lieutenant, and a small quantity at Pergamus. The amount of the gold is known; the gold is in the treasury; no theft is imputed to him; but it is attempted to render him unpopular. The speaker turns away from the judges, and addresses himself to the surrounding multitude. Each city, O Laelius, has its own peculiar religion; we have ours. While Jerusalem was flourishing, and while the Jews were in a peaceful state, still the religious ceremonies and observances of that people were very much at variance with the splendour of this empire, and the dignity of our name, and the institutions of our ancestors. And they are the more odious to us now, because that nation has shown by arms what were its feelings towards our supremacy. How dear it was to the immortal gods is proved by its having been defeated, by its revenues having been farmed out to our contractors, by its being reduced to a state of subjection."--M. T. Cicero, "Pro Flaccus", Chapter 28; translated by C. D. Yonge, The Orations of Marcus Tullius Cicero, Volume 2, George Bell & Sons, London, (1880), pp. 454-455.

Of course, causing deflation by exporting gold is only one means the Jews have at their disposal to destroy a nation. Hyperflation is another means, but unlike my correspondent, I hold hope that a Gentile nation can purge itself of the Jewish corruption that causes hyperflation and I do not hold that hyperinflation is a necessary consequence of fiat money, rather Jewry has used hyperinflation as a means to destroy nations and Jewry have used deadly deflation as a means to destroy nations from the very beginnings of the Tribe. Jewry is the problem, not fiat money. In the case of gold, Jewry and the very nature of the limitations of a commodity currency are problematic. Fiat currency is indeed vulnerable to corruption calling for hyperinflation, but so is gold, a fact my correspondent repeatedly ignores by irrationally denying the reality that governments overspend through the use of credit and do not need to have money on hand to overspend, and by sidestepping the fact that hard money systems can be and are debased, which fact my correspondent dodges by changing the subject and claiming that his hero would do no such thing, this while arguing that all politicians are corrupt and inevitably overspend.

Alas, quoting my statement, "It does not occur to this person that gold can be borrowed", my correspondent responds, "gold borrowed with what money? The money that's already in supply, and not money that you can print, that's the difference." There is nothing other than political restraints and the inability to obtain credit, which inhibits a government's ability to borrow money beyond that which is already in the money supply. If the politicians ask for a loan, and can find a lender, they can borrow as much gold as they want at interest. How can a nation maintain a money supply under such conditions, when the gold in circulation must be returned, and new gold must be acquired to pay the interest on the loan? My correspondent has no response, other than to irrationally deny the reality that governments can and do borrow money and/or gold against their credit, whether or not they are on the gold standard, and in some cases whether or not they have the means to pay off the loan.

Next my correspondent responds to my statement, "or a nation can simply go into debts which it does not have the means to pay." by asserting that the loans under a gold standard have to be paid back with gold and accuses me of lying and ignoring this argument. In fact, I have already addressed this when I wrote in the initial blog which is the subject of this discussion that,

"Should the government, under its Jewish control, elect not to debase a hard money system, while at the same time fighting wars and running up other debts for Jewry, then the taxpayer is required to surrender his wealth to Jewish gold merchants abroad to pay the debts which cannot by paid with extant American coinage, which again results in a wealth transfer to Jewry."

My correspondent furthers the interests of the Jewish bankers by enabling them to take the gold out of America in payment of interest on loans, and by allowing them to milk the taxpayer by forcing the taxpayer to come up with gold from abroad, or from goldmongers, to pay taxes on interest. My correspondent evidently laments the actions of the Government under Nixon. Would my correspondent prefer it if all the gold of the United States were sent overseas in exchange for paper dollars? And what are Americans to use as money should the gold disappear overseas? Or is my correspondent a Utopian who would pin America's future on the frail hope that America will never need borrow on credit just because Ron Paul says so? And how is it that we will pay off our present debt, by converting to gold and raping all our reserves to immediately hand that gold over to World Jewry? Is that what my correspondent is hoping for? Does my correspondent hold gold, and hope that the value will escalate should we take our gold reserves and convert them to money, thereby hyperinflating the already unimaginably large debt into incredibly expensive gold? What will happen to the American People under such a system, where they will have to surrender tens of thousands of dollars for an ounce of gold, and then surrender all of the Nation's gold, and with it all of the Nation's money supply, to the Jewish bankers, and to foreign nations? And what do we do then, other than borrow more gold at interest to create an unsustainable money supply for which the gold does not exist to pay the interest on the loan, and for which the money supply itself must be returned?

Indeed, my correspondent's plan is to convert all of our gold reserves into our money supply, which would hyperflate the present dollar because there is not much gold in reserve, and there is a tremendous debt in dollars. We then face enormous deflation as the money supply disappears and with it our gold reserves.

My correspondent rambles on and on making false assertions which depend upon the fallacies and falsehoods I have already addressed. As a result, I do not feel it would be productive to address those issues which are rotten at their foundation. I will note that my correspondent believes that deflation is a good thing. So many have shown how destructive deflation often is, that I do not feel obliged to repeat those arguments here, other than to point out that prices in slums and slum nations tend to be low, while prices in prosperous neighborhoods and nations tend to be high. I will also suggest that my correspondent consider that wages tend to fall more sharply than prices, and that artificially low prices across the board are an invitation to colonialism and other forms of foreign exploitation and tend to produce famine, unemployment and national bankruptcy.

P.S. I should add that my correspondent argues that Ron Paul would veto Congressional declarations of war, but I merely need point out that such a veto would likely raise the ire of the American People and that Congress could override such a veto and impeach Paul. My correspondent further contends that no nation would ever start a war with the US. I need only ask that he or she recall Pearl Harbor, and consider the fact that the US is declining rapidly.

Monday, October 13, 2008

A Typical Ron Paul Supporter Writes Me a Mindless, But Nevertheless Useful, Letter

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

I received an insulting, emotional and vulgar letter from a Ron Paul supporter, which takes issue with my exposure of Ron Paul's lies in the following blog which I published on 1 October 2008:

On the Sophistry of Ron Paul and the Other Jewish Controlled Gold Bugs

This letter quotes some of my statements and then attempts to refute them. I will repeat the quotations of my statements and then capsulize the counter-arguments from my correspondent and demonstrate that they are based on fallacies.

I stated that,

"Paul lies and states that a fiat money system intrinsically causes inflation, when in fact it can as easily cause deflation."

My correspondent argues that fiat money causes inflation because it can, while acknowledging the fact that it can also cause deflation. My correspondent attempts to justify this irrationality by arguing that there is an incentive for government to generate inflation and therefore inflation is a necessary consequence of fiat money. This argument is fallacious. It is based on the false premise that there is always an incentive to generate inflation, and the argument confuses possibility with necessity. Fiat money can be used to create stability, or deflation, or inflation. My statement was factual. A government acting on behalf of its citizens has the incentive to do that which will benefit the People. A fiat money system is the most easily regulated monetary system, and can therefore best provide for the needs of the People.

I wrote that,

"Paul lies and claims that a gold standard prevents inflation by preventing government from spending beyond the limitations of the money supply."

My correspondent irrationally raises a straw man to argue against as if arguing against my factual statement. This correspondent argues that a nation must mine more gold in order to print more money. It does not occur to this person that gold can be borrowed, or a nation can simply go into debts which it does not have the means to pay. These are factual statements which are not refuted by such a straw man argument, which fallacious argument is also based on false premises. Just as a person can run up debts which he cannot pay, a nation can run up debts which exceed its supply of gold. In fact, to simply create a gold standard money supply, a nation must often borrow the gold at interest, which immediately creates debts for which the nation does not have the gold to pay and must instead run up deeper debts and sacrifice more of its national wealth to the Jewish usurers who love the gold standard system. I will not here address the issues related to corruption, such as fractional reserve banking which functions well under a gold standard to create debts for which the gold does exist to pay off the debt. Yet again, the Ron Paul supporter made a rabid personal attack against me for merely stating facts. I have found such behavior to be typical of Ron Paul supporters.

I stated,

"The deliberate lie that a gold standard inhibits overspending is a myth spread by many agents of the Jewish bankers. It is an obvious absurdity on its face, just as the false claim that a credit card holder's ability to pay his or her debts is an absolute bar to overspending. A credit card holder can run up unpayable debts, as can a government. When such overspending creates unpayable debts, all a gold standard accomplishes is increased profits for gold holders and the ability of the Jewish bankers to bleed off more American wealth."

My correspondent counters that Ron Paul is opposed to overspending. The correspondent evidently confuses his/her trust in Ron Paul with the creation of a bullet proof system. Ron Paul's assertions of his intentions are irrelevant to the fact a nation can run up debts through overspending, whether or not that nation is on the gold standard, just as a person can overspend without counterfeiting money. It evidently eludes this person that a nation can go into debt even if Ron Paul promises that he won't do it. I guess my correspondent has never witnessed a politician lie, and is unaware that Ron Paul is not God nor an absolute dictator, or that Ron Paul and his promises are not a government or a monetary system. The potential to overspend and/or go into debt exists whether or not Ron Paul promises not to fall into the pitfall. In addition, it is not always a mistake to go into debt. Businesses do it all the time with great success. My correspondent also mistakenly claims that a nation can only manufacture unpayable debt when it prints money to cover overspending. This person evidently does not realize that a nation can fail and go bankrupt just as an individual can fail and go bankrupt, whether or not that nation is on a gold standard. In fact, the gold standard makes it easier for Jewry to bring a nation into bankruptcy because gold can be melted down and exported and/or held thereby contracting the money supply and tightening credit. My correspondent ought to consider the present credit crisis in order to understand how devastating it is when the Jews contract the money supply of a gold standard nation. A nation using fiat currency can increase the money supply when Jewish bankers attempt to tighten credit and restrict the money supply from outside the government. A nation can deflate the currency by retiring it or holding it. While Jewry can effectively control a gold standard system through private machinations and cartels, they cannot privately control the money supply of a Gentile nation on a fiat system which does not permit Jewish corruption.

I wrote,

"In fact, overspending can result in unpayable debt under a gold standard more easily than under a fiat system. The solution to overspending is political, and going to a gold standard in no way inhibits the government from overspending. Overspending can be stopped under a fiat system or gold standard through legislation and/or political pressure which reins in those who would run us into debt to the Jewish bankers."

My correspondent echoes Ron Paul's myth that a nation on the gold standard cannot overspend. It eludes this person that a nation on the gold standard must have credit and collateral, that is the ability to tax, lands, etc., and can spend and overspend based on that credit whether or not the nation is on a gold standard. Nations on gold standards can and do borrow against their credit and can and do overspend. This results in inflation and/or the transfer of wealth to Jews in exchange for more Jewish held gold. It is true, and I stated this fact in my article, that political restrictions can be made against overspending, but this is not an intrinsic factor of a gold standard system.

I stated in my article that,

"Governments operating on a gold standard often run up unpayable debts, often as a result of Jewish instigated wars. Ron Paul would have us enter into such a dilemma by having us adopt a gold standard at a time when we have unpayable debts."

My correspondent counters with an allegation that Ron Paul would nullify some of our debt when adopting a gold standard, but leaves unexplained how Ron Paul will cheat Shylock out of his pound of flesh, while concurrently borrowing such large sums of gold from the bankers as to create a monetary system. My correspondent further contends that Ron Paul would end Jewish instigated wars. Has my correspondent considered the fact that our Jewish controlled Congress has the power to declare war? Has my correspondent considered the fact that Jewry can incite another nation to attack the United States and that we would be compelled to fight back?

I wrote,

"Of course, inflation can occur as easily under a gold standard as it does with fiat money. The government need only debase the hard money coinage by decreasing the percent of precious metals in the coins, and/or reducing their weight for a given face value."

My correspondent confuses his/her impression of Ron Paul's policies with the fundamental nature of the gold standard and argues that Ron Paul would never allow the debasement of the coinage. My statement was factual and Ron Paul regularly lies about this fact. Inflation can and does occur under gold standards. Ron Paul is not the gold standard, even should he elect to place political restrictions on coinage. As I stated in my argument, these are political decisions which can be made under a gold standard.

I argued that,

"Should the government, under its Jewish control, elect not to debase a hard money system, while at the same time fighting wars and running up other debts for Jewry, then the taxpayer is required to surrender his wealth to Jewish gold merchants abroad to pay the debts which cannot by paid with extant American coinage, which again results in a wealth transfer to Jewry."

My correspondent again confuses Ron Paul with the fundamental nature of the gold standard, and claims that Ron Paul is not Jewish controlled and will not fight Jewish wars, while leaving unexplained what Ron Paul will do should the US be attacked, or should the Jewish controlled Congress declare war, or should there be a need for growth in the United States that demands a larger money supply, or should the Jewish bankers melt down the gold coin and limit credit and cause deadly deflation as they have so often done to nations on the gold standard in the past, the US included. . . . Alas, I have come to expect such ignorance, stupidity, gullibility and lack of foresight from Ron Paul supporters. That is the crowd to which he holds the greatest appeal, stupid people who think they are smart.

My correspondent next quotes my statement that,

"Surely Ron Paul is not so naive, uninformed or stupid as to be unaware of these facts. Surely, he is a willing agent of the Jewish bankers, another Nelson W. Aldrich of another stripe working for criminal Jewish bankers as a controlled opposition leader."

To which my correspondent responds with insults instead of facts, sophistry instead of reasoned argument. Such is the sorry state of the root stock of the Jewish controlled "Ron Paul Revolution". But there must be some worthwhile people in that movement who could convince the many twits to rise to the occasion and support an authentic anti-Zionist candidate. I note that the supposed Jew hater who wrote me ignored, or was unaware of the revelations I have made of Ron Paul's ties to the Jewish bankers.

Encouraging More Theft: Rewarding and Indemnifying the Jewish Bankers Is a Bad Mistake

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

It is a terrible mistake to reward thieves and/or indemnify them, which rewards for criminal behavior encourages the banks to make further risky loans at the ultimate expense of the taxpayer and the World economy. World Jewry has already reaped enormous profits making loans to unworthy borrowers and speculating on worthless paper. World Jewry has now used its fifth column in the United States Government to cut itself a check for 850 billion dollars, this on top of the recent Jewish trillion dollar theft from the American taxpayer to pay for the Jewish wars on Iraq and Afghanistan. In both instances, the Jewish fourth estate of the Jewish controlled press encouraged these criminal abuses. Now World Jewry has opened the gates to a new round of abuse. It has led the governments to write the banks blank checks.

European governments are guaranteeing loans from one bank to another bank. This will supposedly free up credit to business. A more rational way to give credit to business would be to do so directly, or through legitimate private loan institutions to business, not from crazy bank to crazy bank in the hopes that the free taxpayers' money will find its way to the taxpayer whose credit is being used to manufacture the money and guarantees. The Jewish controlled governments are giving bankrupt spenders blank checks and limitless credit cards and guaranteeing to pay the bills when the boozers fall off the wagon and imbibe.

These new guarantees are highly risky investments that pay no returns which could not be more rationally achieved by direct action outside of the banking industry. They are playing with our currency as if it were monopoly money and it will soon become just that, with the banking industry paying itself for stealing our money. The Jews own the media and control our government and they are exploiting the situation to steal our money and our future in the hopes that in our weakened state they will then at long last be able to kill us off. That is the cost of Gentile cowardice and complacency in the face of an ancient Jewish war against them.

Instead of paying the Jewish bankers to steal from us, we should be confiscating their assets, and ripping their clawed hands from our media and government. We should declare war on the enemy nation of Israel. We should make peace with the rest of humanity. We should fund our own businesses in ways that produce a future for us all. The Jews' solutions are a prescription for a heavy dose of expensive poison followed by eternal rest.

To Where Will the Money Flow?

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Long ago, I predicted that there would be bank bailouts, for example, here:

Banking Reforms, or Bank Bailouts? How the American People Will Suffer the Fate of the Third World If We Are Not Vigilant Monday, December 03, 2007:

I will reproduce that blog here in red, which article is now almost one year old:

I have observed several monetary reform movements in the "Patriot Community" which hype "banking reforms". These take two general forms. One proposes that we go on the "Gold Standard" and permit specie payments. The other proposes a fiat money system run by the government. Both, as commonly proposed, serve the interests of the bankers, and not the interests of the American People.

If we were to go on the Gold Standard, then we would first have to obtain the gold. This can only be done by borrowing the gold at interest, or confiscating it. If we borrow the gold needed to create the money supply, at interest, we cannot pay back the loan because we will have to borrow more gold simply to pay the interest on the debt, and we require the initial gold which we borrowed in order to have a money supply, in order to maintain the money supply.

In addition, the Gold Standard affords the bankers with the opportunity to hoard the gold and ship it out of the country, causing deflation in America and inflation and positive growth in some other land or lands. The bankers would then be able to buy our goods, services and property at artificially low prices, and they would have the means to destroy our economy by restricting our money supply by melting and shipping off gold and by cutting back on loans. By simply holding gold and cutting back on loans, they would lose the interest on those loans, but would gain much greater benefits than their losses, from the reduced prices and foreclosures they would artificially manufacture.

Those pushing for a fiat money system, run by the government, would, on the face of it, appear to be working for the interests of the American People. However, they often state that we cannot and should not prosecute the bankers for their crimes against us, when that is exactly what we ought to do. They also protect the interests of the banks, not the People, by means of the mechanisms which they propose to put money into circulation, in effect bailing out the banks at the expense of the taxpayer. For example, one such group proposed that we pay off the national debt with debt free fiat money manufactured by the Federal Government.

This would cause massive inflation. Their "solution" is to bail out the banks and make the wealthy wealthier by paying off the national debt almost all at once, and the debts of the banks, with "government money", thereby passing on the debts the banks have created through fractional reserve banking onto the American taxpayer, much as the IMF and World Bank have passed along the debts of the Third World onto the American taxpayer, which useless and unproductive debts they deliberately created, and through which debts they profit.

This group justifies their proposal to bail out the banks as one means to contract the money supply, which they would grossly increase, by converting the fractional reserve system into one in which the banks would be required to maintain full reserves, but they accomplish this end by giving the banks the money with which to fill their reserves and freeing them of their criminal responsibility to pay back America the wealth they have fleeced from us through fractional reserve banking. In addition, this group would profit the bankers by paying off the debts which never should have accrued, and which were created by corrupt means. It is the wealthiest few who would profit from this system of paying off the national debt. They hold the title to it. This group who would be our "saviors" is no friend of the American People.

Another such group pushing for fiat money profits the bankers by paying off the national debt, granting the bankers immunity for their crimes, and giving the elite complete control over the issuance of money by means of putting government money into circulation on their terms. Always watch out for the proposals of our "saviors" and how they secure "our" debts with real assets, and how they propose that money be put into circulation. This is where you will find their true allegiance to the bankers.

For example, they will propose that debt free fiat money manufactured by the Federal Government be put into circulation by means of the government purchase of corporate bonds, or other such means which would provide their agents in the government with the ability to regulate business in America and provide them with a means to obtain inside information for the purposes of corrupt "speculation", which would no longer be speculation, but a rigged system. It is crucial for us to watch out for their proposed means of circulating money.

Watch how they protect the banks as a means of circulating money, and how they keep money out of the hands of the poor and middle class by proposing that it circulate through civil works projects, which appear on their face to be philanthropic. They appear to be philanthropists who propose that new money be circulated by giving it to local governments for projects which build infrastructure, etc.

However, they are in fact using the same corrupt means to fleece the American citizen that the World Bank and IMF used to fleece the Third World and the American taxpayer. They want to have the American People produce wasteful projects which profit them, not us, and to have us pay for their gains. It is a form of banker welfare, proposed as if philanthropic projects for Americans.

The Rothschilds raped the America People, and the Chinese and East Indians, in this very way in the 19th Century, having us pay for their railway systems and other projects, which were pitched to us as if philanthropic enterprises.

There are reasonable ways of introducing a fiat money system, but I do not intend to explore them here, rather, I wish to point out the traps which are being set for us by our "friends" and "saviors" in the "Patriot Movement". Much more needs to done than merely securing a stable debt free money supply. We need to recover monies which the bankers have stolen from us. We also need to distribute the wealth more equitably. We also need to improve the quality of our people and facilitate the growth of our economy in sustainable ways. Money is the grease, not the machine.

Hustlers in the "Patriot Movement" pitch us the snake oil panacea proposal that all our problems will be solved by simply reforming the banking system. They want to profit and immunize the banks in one way or another. We have to profit the American People and secure our future for generations to come, or we will be left as the Third World has been left, impoverished and debt ridden.

For example, we could reduce the tax burden by passing legislation which would make "social injustice" a cause of action for civil suit, quite literally instituting "class action law suits". Those who find themselves impoverished could sue the wealthy classes for damages. However, we ought to require that judgements for such claims take the form of interest bearing loans, which would compel the plaintiff-poor awarded judgements to perform certain equitable requirements meant to ensure their ability to pay back the loans to the wealthy-defendants. For example, the recipients of awards must make an honest effort to obtain work training and perform community service in order to receive payments, which will be obtained in judgements and held in trust to be distributed as the recipient becomes more productive and can put this capital to use with a reasonable expectation of success. They must also then make an honest effort to pay back the loans.

This system is a superior means of wealth transfer to taxation, in that; it taxes the wealthiest in order to provide justice to the poorest; it creates an incentive to the rich to improve the lot of the poor, and thereby reduce the rich elite's own burden, by providing the rich with a means to recoup their losses/investment through increasing the production and wealth of the poor so as to enable the poor to repay the loans; it prevents the creation of a welfare state; it creates an incentive for the poor to become more productive and provides them with the means to do so; etc.

We also have to drive a stake through the heart of the Israeli fifth column which is destroying our nation. We should create exceptions to the provisions of the ex post facto defense, where it can be shown that the normal functions of government to protect the citizens from criminal activity were circumvented by individuals or organizations. For example, if the Israeli fifth column in the United States has lobbied or otherwise engaged in pressuring the Congress and/or the President to prevent legislation which was necessary to protect the interests of the American People, and there are then laws passed or civil suits filed which prosecute the Israeli fifth column for criminal behavior which was "legal" when committed, but which was known to the fifth column to be against the interests of Americans at large, as proven by their lobbying and other efforts, then the fifth column should not be entitled to claim ex post facto provisions as a defense.

The same exceptions should apply to their traitorous warmongering campaigns. The fifth column knew well what behaviors were proscribed by the standards of that which is in the interests of the American People, which is why they lobbied to short circuit the mechanisms of government in the first place. Therefore, it cannot legitimately be claimed that they lacked knowledge of that which is proscribed by law given that they deliberately corrupted the process of the dutiful creation and potential execution of the law.

This issue is crucial to securing our economic future. World Jewry is destroying our future with its usury which employs war as a means of generating debt.

We have to recapture our wealth from the bankers and we can do this through taxation, law suit and by making it an issue of national security. But we also have to better ourselves so that we are more competitive and productive as a nation. We have to provide incentives to rich and poor for the equitable distribution of wealth. We have to ensure that the bankers do not exploit us, as they have exploited the Third World, with their agents posing as if enemies of the banks but who propose "reforms" drafted by the bankers themselves.

Almost one year after I typed out the above words, the Jewish controlled governments of the World are stealing the wealth of the World and giving it to the Jewish bankers. This theft will have long term disastrous consequences. It is important to watch where this money will flow.

Protocol Number 4 of The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion states, inter alia

"In order that the minds of the Goys may have no time to think and notice things, it is necessary to divert them in the direction of industry and commerce. Thus all nations will seek their own profit, and while engaged in the struggle they will not notice their common enemy. But in order that liberty should finally undermine and ruin the Goy's society, it is necessary to put industry on a basis of speculation. The result of this will be that everything, absorbed by industry from the land, will not remain in the hands of the Goys, but will be directed towards speculation; that is, it will come into our coffers.

The intense struggle for supremacy, the shocks to economic life, will create, moreover have already created, disappointed, cold, and heartless societies. These societies will have complete disgust for high politics and religion. Their only guide will be calculation, i.e., gold, for which they will have a real cult because of the material delights which it can supply. It will be at that stage that the lower classes of the Goys, not for the sake of doing good, nor even for the sake of wealth, but solely because of their hatred towards the privileged, will follow us against our competitors for power, the intelligent Goys."

World Jewry has completely controlled our Presidential election. We must today choose between their puppet Barack Obama, or their puppet John McCain. In either event, the man who is elected will be the most popular as a result of the election process. No matter which one of the two is elected, he will seek to pump money into the banks, and into the hands of debt ridden Americans, which will increase his short term popularity as a leader. The Jews need a popular President in order to launch new wars. They have not yet attacked Iran, because George Bush is a terribly unpopular President. Should they manufacture a popular President, they will then manufacture a new war.

One of the pitfalls of Jewish Capitalism, which is based upon speculation, is that money does not flow into the proper channels to create and maintain a sound economic recovery. Rather, money flows in the direction of relative safety, or to risky "junk" investments with high profit potential, depending upon the investor. Investment is not directed in a logical way towards the most productive venues which provide the greatest benefit to the majority of humanity over the long term. The Jewish Capitalism of the likes of the schools of Milton Friedman, Ludwig von Mises, Ayn Rand, Allen Greenspan, and Leo Strauss profits Jewry, while undermining the interests and welfare of the vast majority of human beings. It is, as Jews are wont to say, "good for the Jews"; but bad for almost everyone else.

On the reverse side of the Jewish coin, Jewish Socialism depends upon chaos and calamity to pave the way for "reforms". Jews believe they are duty bound to tear everything down in order to leave room for their "Utopia" of a Jewish run World Government. It is easier for a tiny minority to rule and destroy the majority, when the majority is weak, confused, intimidated and tightly controlled by the State. Jewish Socialists tear down the strong on the false premise that doing so builds up the weak. What they are really doing is weakening their Goy competition so that they can steal everything from the Gentiles, and inhibit their progress, preventing them from recovering from the Jewish attack and taking control over their own destiny, perhaps even taking reparations from the Jews who have robbed them.

It is a mistake to pump money into the banks and to risk enormous losses by guaranteeing the assets of faltering institutions. The Jews are throwing all the money into educating the retarded student, while pulling money away from the gifted student. It is a profitable game for the few who profit from it, but it is not a sustainable way to recover from a financial crisis, and will not build a bright future for humankind. The money is not likely to flow quickly and efficiently into the proper sectors of our economy to create a cycle of sustainable growth and economic progress. It will flow into debt reduction and highly risky speculation as the craps players try to win back their losses, and the average man seeks shelter from the storm.

What is needed is an organized effort to bring investment into the proper channels which will build our future, punishment of the Jewish bankers for their theft and corruption of our government and press, to recover international good will by recognizing that Israel is our enemy and cutting off the parasite and demanding reparations from it, and a new system of producing Greenbacks and putting them into circulation in ways which profit Americans and preserve our sovereignty and the strength of our nation. We need a government and a press which function in our interests, which means we must purge ourselves of the Israeli fifth column and fourth estate which are bleeding us dry.