Saturday, May 23, 2009

The False Dilemma: "Zionism versus Bolshevism"

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Winston Churchill was a radical Zionist, by his own admission. Like the radical Zionist Jew Chaim Weizmann, Churchill offered a false dilemma to the World and demanded that normal human beings accept Zionism, or be destroyed by Jewish Bolshevism. The false dilemma of "Zionism versus Bolshevism" neglects the other options of assimilation, re-education, defeat in war, quarantining, imprisoning or eliminating Jewry. The choice between Bolshevism and Zionism is also an Hobson's choice, as well as a false dilemma, in that both supposed options produce the same result, a Jewish World Order as foretold in the Old Testament.

Though many careless and uninformed readers have misinterpreted Winston Churchill's article of 8 February 1920, "Zionism versus Bolshevism", originally published in the Illustrated Sunday Herald, on page 5, as if an anti-Zionist statement, it is in fact an endorsement of Zionism containing the threat of Bolshevism as a sweetener. Churchill's article appears in full in my book The Manufacture and Sale of Saint Einstein, in chapter 7, section 6, on pages 1579-1582.

Both Zionism and Bolshevism are direct paths to the fulfillment of Judaism, Jewish World rule and the destruction of humanity. The choice between the two is an Hobson's choice stated as a false dilemma, as Adolf Hitler came close to pointing out in his book of 1924, Mein Kampf,

"Slowly the fear of the Marxist weapon of Jewry descends like a nightmare on the mind and soul decent people.

The begin to tremble before the terrible enemy and thus have become his final victim.

The Jew's domination in the state seems so assured that now not only can he call himself a Jew again, but he ruthlessly admits his ultimate national and political designs. A section of his race openly owns itself to be a foreign people, yet even here they lie. For while the Zionists try to make the rest of the world believe that the national consciousness of the Jew finds its satisfaction in the creation of a Palestinian state, the Jews again slyly dupe the dumb Goyim. It doesn't even enter their heads to build up a Jewish state in Palestine for the purpose of living there; all they want is a central organization for their international world swindle, endowed with its own sovereign rights and removed from the intervention of other states: a haven for convicted scoundrels and a university for budding crooks."--A. Hitler, English translation by Ralph Manheim, Mein Kampf, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, New York, (1971), pp. 324-325.

Does this not prove that Hitler was an enemy of the Political Zionists? No, on the contrary, Hitler was in agreement, as was so often the case, with the most vocal of Political Zionists, at the same point in history. Israel Zangwill, at precisely the same time, was also denouncing the Political Zionism for which he was the most outspoken advocate in the English language. See: I. Zangwill, "Is Political Zionism Dead? Yes", The Nation, Volume 118, Number 3062, (12 March 1924), pp. 276-278.

After the publication of Mein Kampf, Hitler accepted the Jews' money and it was only with the Jews' money that the NSDAP went from a declining, insignificant party, to a victorious and ruling party. As Eustace Mullins and Douglas Reed have pointed out, the Jewish bankers even marched in Hitler's parades carrying signs which read, "Throw us out!" So the sequence in time is that Hitler first denounced Zionism, not because it would create a Jewish nation, but rather that it would fail to create a Jewish nation in which the Jews largely resided, then later openly joined forces with it. This was the same complaint of the Zionists at the time, who were forced to concede to their reluctant Jewish brethren that they could remain in their lives of luxury in America and Europe, while Rothschild imported bribed Jewish ne'er-do-wells from Russia into Palestine to build palatial estates for rich Jews. In Mein Kampf, Hitler was effectively parroting the Zionists' own words of the time.

When the Zionists (Jewish bankers) decided to place Hitler in power to chase the reluctant Jews into Palestine, Hitler took their money. Hitler then participated in the Transfer Agreement with the Jews. So we see that Hitler's active and open collaboration with the Jews came after the publication of Mein Kampf and therefore Hitler's statements in Mein Kampf contradict his later actions.

It was only after the Transfer Agreement proved a failure, that Hitler ended the public collaboration with the Jews. Here again, Hitler was doing exactly what the Jewish Political Zionists were doing at the same time. The Jewish Zionists of England and America were standing in the way of Jewish emigration to Palestine, because the Jews who went there largely soon left. The Zionist project in which Hitler was a participant, had failed, and the Jews knew that they had to terrorize the Jews of the World through Hitler in order to leave them no choice but to emigrate to Palestine. Even after the war, in places like Iraq, the Jews continued to terrorize other Jews to chase them to Palestine.

Hitler was a fairly consistent mirror of the Jewish Political Zionists, and again and again forwarded their agenda. It is also worth pointing out that the NSDAP created a revised Uganda (Jewish Zionist) plan for the Jews which sought to create a Jewish nation in Madagascar. This plan can legitimately be described as a Zionist plan. The Jews also sought to establish a Jewish state in the Soviet Union at the same time as Hitler discounted the plan for Palestine in Mein Kampf. The Jews ultimately succeeded in creating a Jewish Oblast in the Soviet Union. All of these facts are discussed in my above mentioned book of 2006. Hitler, Stalin, Lenin and Trotsky each forwarded the Zionist agenda, even if they would sometimes speak out against it. It was the Jewish agenda, and they were each paid agents of Jewry, which is an indisputable historic fact.

There were, however, sincerely anti-Jewish members of the NSDAP, and the Jews were forced to teach the Nazis monetary policies which would capitalize the expulsion of Jews from Europe. We can learn from these measures and need not hesistate to learn from the NSDAP and employ effective measures which they proved were successful.

Friday, May 22, 2009

RE: Curt Maynard. . . What?

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Someone named "Curt Maynard" has written some strange accusations against me. In his blog,

"Mike Delaney of Prothink Denounces Ernst Zundel and Kevin Macdonald; Shills For Eric Hufschmidt"

in the comments section, Maynard writes, inter alia,

"Christopher Bjerknes had a [vulgarity deleted] for me about 18 months ago, gave me a lot of [vulgarity deleted] for supporting Ron Paul and a monetary standard based on precious metals."

Maynard continues to misinform his readers with incorrect information about my ancestry. In fact, my mother's father, who died long before I was born, was at least half Jewish. My mother died when I was 8 years old. On the basis of the fact that there is Jewish blood in my veins, and despite the fact that I have done more to oppose World Jewry than he is capable of doing, Maynard distrusts me. I have much more scientific reasons for distrusting him, based on his claims which are odd and inaccurate.

When did I ever criticize Curt Maynard? I don't ever remember uttering the man's name, let alone criticizing him. Has Maynard written to me anonymously and elicited a response from me in that manner? I do recall some anonymous psychotic rants from an obvious lunatic to which I responded, but have not a clue as to who wrote them.

I have never asked Curt Maynard for his opinion nor for his trust and have no use for either. He is speaking out against Eric Hufschmid and Daryl Bradford Smith, as I have long done. We both oppose their false dialectic. But I must ask myself, why is Mr. Maynard acting like they act? Does he wish to add new episodes to the soaps operas of his fellow drama queens and spread them across the internet by attacking people who have never attacked him?

Thursday, May 21, 2009

Why the Jews Do Not Want Me Quoting the Old Testament

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Perhaps history's most articulate authority on the Jews, Eugen Karl Duehring wrote in his transformative monumental work The Jewish Question: A Racial, Moral and Cultural Question With a World-Historical Answer, first published in 1881 with several subsequent editions,

"Accordingly, one need not hesitate in the least–with regard to the activity of the Jews which is precisely against the purely human and historically better traits of Christianity–to take the Old Testament as the real Jewish original document and as the characterising mark of the Jewish race and its religion. The predilection with which one has advanced the Talmud exclusively as a self-depiction of the Jewish morality is explained by the constitution of the parties by which the Jews upto now have been most attacked externally and through agitations. Since indeed, here, not just the conservative, but, drastically expressed, the reactionary elements of all sorts not merely predominate but were at first almost alone on the spot, there stood against an uninhibited and thorough judgement of the Jews, partly, real religious prejudices, but, chiefly, the political principles of taking into consideration the would-be Christian people and, accordingly, of leaving the Bible out of consideration in the determination of the Jewish character. But thereby one has oneself closed off the most natural, truest, and most popular way to a criticism of the Jews and robbed oneself of the most powerful instrument which alone can last in the long run. How does it help to cite the Talmud? Our modern national society does not, fortunately, read this work; indeed the Jews themselves satisfy themselves with extracts from this colossal collection of glosses filled with trivialities and trifles. On the other hand, from the Bible, and indeed precisely from the biblical history, through the school instruction among us and in the different nations, much is still retained in our memory, so that one needs only to awaken the natural understanding in order to show how one may penetrate with well-known facts into the original character of the Jewish people. The Bible is really not uninteresting if it helps in this way to a better explanation of the Jews. Many a person to whom it is at hand will, through occasional reference to the same, learn and grasp things in this direction which lie far beyond the horizon of common understanding.


The small group of people in the corner of the world called Palestine however had, from the beginning, instincts and laws which announced basic disregard and hostility against the rest of the human race. One has brought forth places from the Talmud in order to demonstrate tangibly that the Jews are authorised by their religion to betray and harm non-Jews. But we do not need the Talmud at all to get this insight. If it did not exist at all, the Jewish ethics would not be better for it and would not be less documented. What we observe here in the actual communication are really not other characteristics than those which were embodied already even in the Mosaic times. The Old Testament is a sufficient mirror of the Jewish nature. One must only watch objectively and one will once again recognize the little chosen people of today in their involuntary self-characterisation of that time. How often is that not expressly allowed to the Jews against foreigners which is forbidden to be practised among themselves! Even the Old Testament recommendation of a sort of love of one's neighbour is expressly limited to the Jews among Jews."--E. K. Dühring, Die Judenfrage als Racen-, Sitten- und Culturfrage: mit einer weltgeschichtlichen Antwort, H. Reuther, Karlsruhe, (1881); English translation by A. Jacob, Eugen Dühring on the Jews, Nineteen Eighty Four Press, Brighton, England, (1997), pp. 77-78, 89.

Duehring points out that many self-deluding Christians have stood in the way of a solution to the Jewish question. Several Jews have asked me to stop quoting the Old Testament and restrict myself to the works of the Rabbis. I will do no such thing. Unlike them, I want to solve the Jewish problem so that humanity can live in peace. The Jewish problem is at least 2,500 years old and was recorded by the ancient Egyptians, Greeks and Romans, who observed what a sickening religion Judaism has always been.

The Jews do not want me to reveal these facts to you, because they want your critiques of the Jews to be obscure and ridiculous on their face, inaccessible to those who are not already initiated into the ranks of the awakened. In this way, the Jews subvert our efforts to grow our numbers.

The Jews want you to make asses of yourselves by demonstrating what ineffectual cowards you are as you speak of "Ashkenazis" and "Zionists", couching your arguments in euphemisms so as not to upset the enemy, too frightened to call the Jews, "Jews" and asinine and childish enough to resort to obscurities to hide behind in your fear and insecurity–you dare not offend the enemy, lest you might actually start to fight back and begin to win major victories against the Jewish aggressor.

What the Jews are doing to you today, they did to your ancestors long ago. The Jews wormed their way into Germany and England by bribing officials and clergymen to deceive the good people of their nations into welcoming the hostile Jewish invader, because, so they were paid to claim, these were the good Jews of the Bible whom god so loved and if they blessed these murderous Jews, then the Jewish god would bless them. The Jews are playing the same game on you today when they insist you call the Jews by euphemistic names, while disclaiming everything you say against the enemy by stating that not all Jews are involved and that the Jewish attack against you is not religious, because religious Jews are the saints of the World.

The enemy has you dancing on its strings, and many of you are too stupid to realize it. Shame on you. You are dead weight that has been attached as a poisonous corpse, you are a disease spreading cowardice and self-defeat to the rest.

Mike Rivero of Should Stop Trying to Sell Us on an Israeli Attack on Iran

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

For some time now, I have observed that Mike Rivero of has been trying to sell us on an Israeli attack on Iran, in that he responds to articles discussing the Israeli desire for an attack on Iran by commenting that the Israelis should go ahead and attack Iran but should leave the United States out of it. His approach to the problem is wrongheaded at best. Typical of Rivero's comments is his statement of 20 May 2009,

"[. . .] It seems to be yet another trial balloon for American consumption, threatening that if the US won't knock out yet another of Israel's "existential threats" (just like Saddam and Iraq's non-existent nukes), Israel will go ahead and knock Iran over the head militarily.

And you know what?? Let's just let them do just that, and sit this one out. Our military has its hands full with Iraq, Afghanistan, and (very soon) Pakistan. [. . .]"

Israel has no right to wage aggressive war on Iran and Mike Rivero must know that, so why is he encouraging such an attack? Is he being sarcastic? If so, I am not an unsophisticated reader, and do not detect it.

I am reminded that some White Nationalist websites and posters on message boards often state that we should let the Jews and the Muslims fight it out. I guess we are to abandon morality and to ignore our own interests in preventing a war which will likely escalate to involve us and which will likely escalate into a nuclear World War Three, by Jewish design.

Rivero is not a white nationalist, but is the descendant of Marrano Jews. Why would he want Israel to attack Iran? What has Iran ever done to Mike Rivero?

Wednesday, May 20, 2009

On the Zionist Myth that the Formation of a Jewish State Would Cure the Jews of Their Perverse Mentality

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

The leadership of the Jews created the mythology of Zionism as a means to cover up the fact that they were deliberately and artificially fulfilling the religious prophecies of the Jews. The Jews knew that Christians and Muslims would oppose the Jewish takeover of Palestine, because the Christians and Muslims would recognize this devilish genocide of the indigenous peoples from the Nile to the Euphrates as the fulfilment of the prophecies of the rise of the Anti-Christ/Al-Dajjal. So, the deceitful Jews created an apparently secular movement meant to rid the World of the perverse Jews and free the Goyim from the yoke of Jewish tyranny by unseating the subversive and hateful Jews from among the host nations and planting them in Palestine.

It is factually incorrect to claim that the top leaders of the Jews, past or present, were or are "Zionists". These Jewish leaders created the ideology of "Zionism" just as they created the ideology of "Communism", but the top Jewish leaders are not now, nor have they ever themselves been Zionists or Communists. Instead, they are just Jews in the worst sense of the term, the ancient sense of the Torah with its hatred of the human race and desire to exterminate humanity and replace it with Jewry.

The Jews put forth the Zionist myth that the Jews were such wretched beings because they were obliged to live in foreign nations with normal human beings, who were unlike Jews, and that Jews pretended to be like the Goyim, which pretense made the Jews into duplicitous snakes. The Jews put forth the myth that the Jews would be cured of the perverse Jewish mentality if only the Jews could have a nation of their own. The Jews, or so goes the Zionist myth, would then take pride in being Jews and leave the poor Goyim in peace.

In fact, now that the Jews have stolen the land of Palestine, the Jews as a people are even more perverse than ever before. The Jews now want to destroy the Earth with a nuclear World War Three, are constantly genociding their neighbors, and have more deeply than ever before subverted the governments of the Goyim, the nations of Gentiles.

Far from becoming normal human beings, the Israeli Jews agitate in every nation for war and revolution. They steal monies from the American People. They kidnap, enslave, murder and rape the women of Eastern Europe. They slaughter and poison their neighbors and constantly strive to bring the World into murderous chaos.

The Zionist myth, never believed by the Jewish leaders who invented Zionism from Judaism, that Jews would become normal human beings after the formation of a Jewish State, has been proven false by the fact that the Jews are now more perverse than ever. This is one of the reasons why the POWER PARTY will NOT seek to segregate Jews, but rather to isolate and quarantine Jews, not in Ghettoes, and certainly not in a World Ghetto of Israel, but instead place them in absolute isolation from other Jews so that the perversion of the Jews knows no comfort or mutual support. Let the Devil of the Jewish god be forgotten, and let the Devil's army be disbanded forever.

Segregating and concentrating Jewry only leads to intensified Jewish perversion. Tolerance of the Jews among the nations only leads to the subversion and ruin of those nations. Jewish leaders have always known that the secularist myths of Communism and Zionism would accomplish the goals of Judaism, and Jewish leaders have always been faithful Jews and never were Communists or Zionists.

Tuesday, May 19, 2009

Douglas Reed on the Torah

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

There is a group of Jewish disinformation specialists headed by a CIA agent, who are falsely claiming that Judaism has nothing to do with Zionism, the Talmud, or Cabalah; and that Mosaic law is a benefit to humankind. This group falsely claims that Talmudism is substantively different from the Torah and that Talmudism is not Judaism. They often falsely state that Ashkenazi Jews created the Talmud.

One need only consider the fact that the goal of Zionists was identical to the goal of Torah, that is to steal the land of the ancient Canaanites and create a Jewish empire on this stolen land, to see that Zionism is Torah doctrine. Mosaic law is not merely the plagiarized ten commandments, but is the law of the entire Pentateuch, the Old Testament books of Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers and Deuteronomy. Mosaic law established the doctrines reiterated in the Talmud, that Jews are a divine master race which must steal the land today called "Israel" after the Old Testament thief Jacob. Mosaic law expressly instructs the Jews to use usury as a weapon against non-Jews with which to take over the entire World. Mosaic law instructs the Jews to commit genocide against several nations, and to absolutely exterminate "Amalek". Mosaic law is the source of Jewish tribalism, the false Jewish claim that Jews are the rightful owners of "Greater Israel", that non-Jews are not human, and that Jewish law, Mosaic law, applies only to Jews, for how can the Jews claim that murder is wrong, yet insist upon genocide, unless those they mass murder are not subject to the protections of Mosaic law and are not human?

Ashkenazi Jews did not create the Talmud. Sephardic Jews are not, in large part, the descendants of the Judeans who created the Pentateuch and the Talmud. The Talmud is the highest authority in Judaism and the racism expressed in the Talmud is a mere echo of the racism of Mosaic law found in the Pentateuch. Jews believe that the Talmud is also Mosaic law and a part of the Torah given to Moses on Sinai.

The CIA agent spouting these myths claims to have read Douglas Reed's book The Controversy of Zion. If he had in fact read it, then he would have read the following from pages 13 and 14,

"During the hundred years that followed the Assyrian conquest of Israel, the Levites in Judah began to compile the written Law. In 621 BC they produced Deuteronomy and read it to the people in the temple at Jerusalem.

This was the birth of 'the Mosaic law', which Moses, if he ever lived, never knew. It is called the Mosaic law because it is attributed to him, but the authorities agree that it was the product of the Levites, who then and later repeatedly made Moses (and for that matter, Jehovah) say what suited them. Its correct description would be 'the Levitical law' or 'the Judaic law'.

Deuteronomy is to formal Judaism and Zionism what the Communist Manifesto was to the destructive revolution of our century. It is the basis of the Torah ('the Law') contained in the Pentateuch, which itself forms the raw material of the Talmud, which again gave birth to those 'commentaries' and commentaries-on-commentaries which together constitute the Judaic 'law'.

Therefore Deuteronomy is also the basis of the political programme, of worldly dominion over nations despoiled and enslaved, which has been largely realized in the West during this Twentieth Century. Deuteronomy is of direct relevancy to the events of our day, and much of the confusion surrounding them disperses if they are studied in its light.

It was read, in 621 BC, to so small an audience in so small a place that its great effects for the whole world, through the following centuries into our time, are by contrast the more striking.

Before Deuteronomy was compiled only the 'oral tradition' of what God said to Moses existed. The Levites claimed to be the consecrated guardians of this tradition and the tribespeople had to take their word for it (their pretensions in this respect chiefly caused the anger of the Israelite 'prophets'). If anything had been written down before Deuteronomy was read, such manuscripts were fragmentary and in priestly keeping, and as little known to the primitive tribesmen as the Greek poets to Kentucky hillsfolk today.

That Deuteronomy was different from anything that had been known or understood before is implicit in its name, which means 'Second Law'. Deuteronomy, in fact, was Levitical Judaism, first revealed; the Israelites (as already shown) 'were not Jews' and had never known this 'Law'.

Significantly, Deuteronomy which appears as the fifth book of today's Bible, with an air of growing naturally out of the previous ones, was the first book to be completed as a whole. Though Genesis and Exodus provide the historical background and mount for it, they were later produced by the Levites, and Leviticus and Numbers, the other books of the Torah, were compiled even later.

Deuteronomy stood the earlier tradition on its head, if it was in harmony with the moral commandments. However, the Levites were within their self-granted right in making any changes they chose, for they held that they were divinely authorized to amend the Law, as orally revealed by God to Moses, in order to meet 'the constantly changing conditions of existence in the spirit of traditional teaching' (Dr. Kastein).

For that matter, they also claimed that Moses had received at Sinai a secret oral Torah, which must never be committed to writing. In view of the later inclusion of the Old Testament in one volume with the Christian New Testament, and the average Gentile's assumption that he thus has before his eyes the whole of 'the Mosaic Law', this qualification is of permanent interest."--D. Reed, The Controversy of Zion, Veritas Publishing Company Pty. Ltd., Australia, (1985), pp. 13-14.

If you are to awaken and want to fight back, you must stop listening to the lying Jews who would lull you back to sleep with their deceitful apologies for Jews and for Judaism.

Monday, May 18, 2009

Revealing the Nature of the Enemy

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

I suggest someone create a website dedicated to testimonials which disclose the inhuman, disgusting, subversive, racist and aggressive nature of the Jewish People. The website could post links to videos on Israeli white slavery operations, where women describe how the Jews enslaved and raped them. Adjacent to such posts, the website could include a comment section so that others can reveal their testimonials. Such videos already exists, and it would be a benefit to the human race to produce more and interview victims of Jewish perversion and barbarity.

There are already videos on Jewish child abuse and ritual murder of infants. The website could link to these, and again allow a comments section.

The website should document the Jewish genocide of the Palestinians and offer a comments section for Palestinians to record Jewish attacks against them. The comments sections will afford victims the opportunity to document the Jewish war on mankind, and create interest in the subject as people discuss these issues and convey their personal experiences with the enemy.

The website and each entry should include some sort of disclaimer and cautionary advisory that the Jews have always sought to sabotage, subvert and discredit such revelations of Jewish atrocities against the human race, by themselves acting as agents provocateur and impostors. That way, when the Jews commit such duplicitous, deceitful and utterly dishonest actions, it will work against them, not against non-Jews. The Jewish subversion will then only serve as another example of what wretched creatures the Jews have always shown themselves to be.

Since the Jews insist upon destroying humanity in almost every way imaginable, the potential threads of testimonials against Jewish criminality are nearly endless. I suspect such a website would attract great attention and accomplish much. I do not have the time to create it–too many irons in the fire already. I merely put out the idea as a possibility.

When the American People learn what vile and murderous people are the modern Jews and the identical historical Jews, the awareness will trigger their will to survive and their desire to fight back against the aggressor, lest we all face the fate of the Palestinians, Iraqis, Armenians, Ukrainians, etc.

Sunday, May 17, 2009

Indictments and Rallies Against the Jews

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

I believe we need to organize rallies against the Jews. It would be good to begin this process with some form of internet rally. We need an army to battle back the Jew, and we must develop the mass psychology in our people that recognizes we are under attack and that we are united in our defense.

Rather than childishly, sheepishly and euphemistically calling hostile Jews, "Zionists", we should instead call them "enemy Jews", or "members of the Israeli fifth column". Rather than ascribing enemy Jews' behavior and psychology to a "Zionist" mind set, we should correctly ascribe it to the "perverse Jewish mentality".

We should point out that the Jews have always been tribal, loyal only to each other, and hateful towards all non-Jews. We should point out that disproportionate Jewish influence, wherever it appears, is a sure indication that the Jews are practicing their ancient supremacist arts to the detriment of the majority. Not only are the Jews corruptly undemocratic, they are also antagonistic to the majority. They are the enemy, by their choice, through their actions, and no one else's.

Our language and our actions must reflect the fact that the Jews are waging war against us, and that we have begun to fight back against them. Identifying the Jew as the enemy has a unifying effect. It promotes commonality, clarity and urgency of purpose among normal human beings.

For example, pointing out that a member of the government is a Jew carries with it the history, connotation and understanding that the Jews have from the beginning of the Jewish tribe declared that the Jews are a master race above all others and are engaged in an aggressive perpetual war against the human race with the stated objective of exterminating all non-Jews, that Jews are united against all others, that Jews believe that they should lie to, cheat and murder non-Jews, that Jews believe that they should subvert every non-Jewish government, that Jews believe that they must always do what is good for the Jews and no other, and that the Jews believe that they must use usury to enslave non-Jewish humanity. It is the Jews who chose to war against humanity. Humanity will now solve the problem for the benefit of the present and all future generations.

I suggest that we generate interest in rallies against the Jews by means of testimonials, open and anonymous. We could create simple video testimonials of how the Jews have harmed us. People could speak of Communist atrocities, economic atrocities, political atrocities, etc. that they have personally experienced, or that they have learned of from relatives, friends, co-workers, etc. People could tell how Jews have cheated, connived, lied, etc. Journalists, and even YouTubers and message boarders, could relay their experiences with Jewish censorship. Politicians could speak of how the Jews have exercised undue influence to corrupt the political process. Doctors, lawyers, and researchers could disclose the tribalism of the Jews in the professions and universities. The idea is to get people talking, to let people know they are not alone and need not be afraid, and to create a common understanding of the war being waged against us and the fact that we are now fighting back.

I also suggest we generate interests in rallies against the Jews by preparing indictments of the Jewish People. I suggest we break the indictments down into categories and subcategories, including Jewish mass murder, Jewish subversion of governments, Jewish murders and intimidation of religious prophets and other religious figures and historical instances of the Jewish subversion of other religions, Jewish corruption of the professions, Jewish corruption of the courts, Jewish corruption of the universities and peer review processes, Jewish corruption of business interests, Jewish corruption of the press, etc.

I will get the ball rolling by preparing tentative lists of these crimes, and naming sources who have leveled these accusations against the Jews through the millennia. I ask my readers to email me additions, preferably with sources. Please date stamp your submissions and if you would like your name to be identified when your submission is published to the public, then so indicate. One of my goals here is to demonstrate that the Jews are not just individuals, but a history of a parasitic, racist tribe waging war on the human race. The Jews must be viewed in the historical context of the Jewish war on humanity. We must defend ourselves, in part, by recognizing what the Jews have already done to destroy us and elevate themselves; and by acknowledging the historical and proven fact that the Jews are still a hostile tribe waging aggressive war on mankind.

Another of my goals is to prepare evidence for the court of public opinion as to the threat that the Jews pose to us all, and to awaken the public to the Jewish attack and the substance and form that it has traditionally taken. If I can attract interest in these projects, they will themselves become a sort of rally against World Jewry, but I envision something far greater in the near future as mankind suffers the "birthpangs of the Jewish messianic era", suffering the Jews are deliberately bringing to the human race.

Our political army should rise up organically as an immunological reaction on a societal level to a foreign and fatal infection. Our purpose should be to identify the enemy, use political means to quarantine it and prevent it from doing further harm, and to prevent its access to the body of our nation and the organs of power. We should adopt something like a uniform, with the anonymity (both through numbers and through cover), power and common purpose that a uniform implies. But that will come a little later as the political army forms.

First we must trigger the will to survive of our People. We must awaken them, organize them and direct them.