Thursday, June 18, 2009

In Rejoinder to Curt Maynard's Response

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Curt Maynard has stated that he had received email from someone pretending to be me and that was the source of his erroneous belief that I had in some way criticized him. If anyone else has received such spurious email, kindly let me know. If you received such email under my name and you have not spoken to me by telephone, and/or you have not received a letter from the regular email accounts posted on my websites, then you have almost certainly received correspondence from someone other than myself. I very seldom respond to the email I receive at those accounts, and with those to whom I have written, I have most often also had telephone contact.

Other than that there is little in Mr. Maynard's response which merits attention despite the unimportant contradictions in some of what he states. He has posed questions to me which were already answered by the blog I posted and to which he has responded (RE: Curt Maynard. . . What? May 22, 2009). Mr. Maynard inquires,

"Being that you've made this an issue, would you kindly provide us [your readers and mine] with additional information, i.e. which grandparents were in fact Jews? I allow commentary on my blog, so feel free to leave a comment. Oh yes, one last thing, you suggest in this post that I misinform my readers about your Jewish ancestry - If I've noted that you're part Jewish and you admit the same, how exactly do you figure that I've misinformed anyone? "–C. Maynard, In answer to Christopher Jon Bjerknes, June 17, 2009

In his commentary which was the source of this exchange, which he has since deleted, Mr. Maynard stated that it was his impression that my father was Jewish. A more careful reading of my initial response to his initial comments should answer his questions.

An as Yet Unrealized Opportunity for Real Reform in Iran

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

When the Jews destroyed Russia by ruining its economy and blaming that destruction on the Czar who tried to prevent it, they placed Kerensky in power only to replace him shortly thereafter with Lenin and more importantly Trotsky who began to slaughter the best of the gentiles. I suspect the Jews have similar designs on Iran and Iranians.

Mir Hossein Mousavi does not represent a real departure from Ahmadinejad and the Jewish revolution begun in Iran is a sham built on discontent with Ahmadinejad, and not any reforms promised by Mir Hossein Mousavi. Since Mir Hossein Mousavi is not promising to make substantial changes, he is instead simply a means for the Jews to destabilize and weaken Iran for attack and for other major destructive changes. The Jews are not out to create a lasting government under Mir Hossein Mousavi, but rather are only using him to dispose of him when the time is right.

Since Mir Hossein Mousavi does not represent any substantial change and certainly does not represent an opportunity for substantial improvement in Iran, there is an opportunity for a genuine reform party and leaders to emerge from the ashes the Jewish flames will cause. Such a movement can also serve to atomize and diffuse the Gang-Green Revolution and point out that it is only a trap and is not of any real substance, but is instead exploiting discontent to only cause Iran and Iranians further harm and despair.

Wealthy Iranians should put some money into creating a real alternative for Iranians to both Ahmadinejad and Mir Hossein Mousavi. Mousavi at any rate is a big step in the wrong direction. He is a phoney like Obama who promises change without change. He is as shallow and insubstantial as the green paint on his supporters' signs. He is as monochromatic and dull as his Jewish color revolution. It is time to add some real color to the debate.

The Unsustainable Nature of the Present Economy: Gambling With Monopoly Money, While Trying to Save It

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

The American economy remains afloat on two tenuous and opposing tendencies among American consumers. On the one hand, Americans feel a pressure to buy while their purchasing power retains its value. In other words, Americans are worried that hyperinflation will soon strike, and that the American dollar will fail. As such, Americans are buying goods now which they believe will tend to retain their value and depreciate less than other goods. This affords some measure of protection against rising prices. Down the road, as prices rise, they will have on hand those items whose prices will likely increase at the fastest pace.

On the other hand, Americans feel an enormous pressure to hold onto cash for fear that their wages will decrease or disappear altogether, and knowing that higher taxes have already begun to take a bite out of their income and will only increase in the future. This encourages Americans to save, which has also kept the banks from completely collapsing.

There will be a tipping point when inflation escalates and the banks fail to provide a return on savings that even begins to match the rate of inflation, when Americans will be forced to dump their cash holdings in favor of hard assets likely to depreciate least in adjusted dollars. At this point when the savings versus spending conundrum collides with itself, the economy will completely crash as will the currency, because the banks will fail, credit will disappear, and there will be no means nor incentive to produce all the goods and services needed to keep an economy running as money finds fewer and fewer avenues of expression. The game of gambling with monopoly money between savings and spending will end in a bloody whirlwind flushed down the toilet of history.

Therefore, we must go after the Jews and foreigners who are today hoarding hard assets and land and take them back. But we must be extremely vigilant to not fall into the trap of Jewish revolution promising debt forgiveness and land ownership at no cost in labor or production.

Lenin and Trotsky promised debt forgiveness and land ownership to the Russians in exchange for destroying Russia for the benefit of the Jews. When the Russians found themselves with no debts they also found themselves with no credit. When the Russians found themselves with land, they discovered that they were slaves who were forced to work it for the Jews who owned the land through the State. Soon after the Jewish Bolshevik Revolution, the Jews shipped the gold of Russia to the Jewish bankers who had financed and orchestrated the Jewish takeover.

The same will happen here in America. In fact, the Chinese and other foreigners are already buying our land, land which we defend with our blood and treasure. This land will be used to fund a foreign State which in turn is under the control of the Jews.

The American worker will only enslave himself by succumbing to the promises of a Jewish revolution (observe that the Gang-Green Revolution in Iran is a Jewish revolution as are most if not all revolutions). The Jewish Ron Paul Revolution offers the same trap, just as Boris Yeltsin again entrapped the Russians when Communism was eliminated in Russia. Ron Paul will open the door for the Jews to rape our land and industry for their profits, while degrading our environment, selling us drugs, alcohol and tobacco (the Jews have been destroying the Slavs for centuries by forcing them to buy and consume Jewish manufactured liquor), and lowering our wages and deflating our currency so that all our wealth will flow overseas into Jewish coffers. It is always heads you lose, tails the Jews win, with any Jewish revolution.

It will not be enough to simply replace our currency and eliminate the Fed. The POWER PARTY will also go after the Jewish criminals and seize the assets they have stolen from us, wherever they are around the globe. We will also make it illegal for foreigners to own or even lease land which we hold to be our territory. We will also make it illegal for our citizens to lower our wages by sending our jobs overseas and by schemes meant to deflate or hyperinflate our currency.

We must wage total and absolute war on Jewry if we are to succeed in breaking the Jewish yoke and rescuing the hurting Earth for our children a thousand generations from today.

Wednesday, June 17, 2009

Beware Recount Chicanery

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Ahmadinejad must beware recount chicanery. A single real or fabricated instance of fraud or miscount will be misrepresented by Mir Hossein Mousavi and the international Jewish press as if proof that the entire election was a sham. It is a virtual certainty that Mir Hossein Mousavi and his backers have engineered some fraud into the election through agents provocateur which they can point to in order to claim the election was rigged, since they have probably rigged some part of it to favor Ahmadinejad.

I also anticipate that the Jewish media, and the Jewish controlled Christian Zionist media will start to trot out Iranians and feature their contrived testimonials against Ahmadinejad and the election. Ahmadinejad's supporters should feature testimonials of appreciation for what he has done to head off this move, and display them on YouTube. The Iranians should have started fighting the propaganda war long ago. These must be well done so they cannot be easily ridiculed. In addition, they must discredit Mir Hossein Mousavi.

Jerusalem Jane Harman Revisited: Jewish Fingerprints on the Gang-Green Revolution in Iran

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

The Armenian Genocide denying Jew, the Jew who works to rob us of our most fundamental rights, the Jewish traitor who sells us out to Israel, Jerusalem Jane Harman provides evidence of the Jewish fingerprints on the Gang-Green Revolution in Iran:

Harman expresses Regret: Congresswoman retracts statement on dividing Iran

A Green Revolution for Iran?

Tuesday, June 16, 2009

Why Would Mousavi Slip a Noose Around His Own Neck?

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

We know that there are external forces behind Mir Hossein Mousavi, and we know that he has rich backers in Iran who were able to garner him a surprising 1/3 of the vote. But money can only buy you so much love with the public.

So why is Mousavi pushing so hard for things he cannot achieve through normal means? He cannot expect that Ahmadinejad will surrender his victory. Mousavi cannot expect that a recount will favor him.

Are Mousavi and his backers aiming for a revolution, a civil war, a coup d'etat, or a foreign attack and/or invasion? How can they hope to survive this without a "regime change" in Iran? What do they know that we do not, that they take such enormous risks?

What members of the military are on their side? If they were able to muster 1/3 of the Iranian electorate to their cause, and can marshal large crowds even after some have been killed, what support do they have in the military? What is it that they are planning to achieve and how do they plan to achieve it? Who are they betraying and who will betray them?

Ahmadinejad has to be careful not to slide into paranoia and accuse innocents of treachery, but he also has to be vigilant. One wonders at what point he will declare that his rivals have committed sedition and execute them in the public square. One wonders at what point the plans of Mousavi and his backers will unfold.

None of this is good for Iran, or for the World. It is a real shame that the Iranians are forced to choose between bad and worse.

Mousavi and his backers have crossed the Rubicon and there is no turning back for them now. They must be waiting for some form of coup, because there is no chance for their efforts to overturn the election results to succeed. They must also have friends in the theocracy. Are assassinations in the works? Will the CIA and Mossad bring in troops to aid a coup? Will Israel bomb Tehran?

Why do we human beings endure all this mayhem and misery so that 15 million Jews can play god? Why do not we simply get them out of our lives? None of this would be going on today if the Jews were removed from influence in the World.

Diffusing the Gang-Green (Gangrene) Revolution in Iran

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

As went the Ukraine and Georgia, so goes Iran, Rose, Orange and now the gangrene of the Gang-Green? Back on 29 September 2006, I predicted that the CIA and Mossad were arranging a coup d'etat in Iran in the following blog:

Coup d'Etat, September 29, 2006

"It smells like a coup is brewing in Iran. Iran's neighbors have recently met with Washington. Plans have been discussed. Deals have been made. Both Ahmadinejad and Chavez have met with their contacts in America. Ahmadinejad may have outlasted his usefulness. The press is beginning to talk a little bit more about "Tehran" and a little bit less about Ahmadinejad. In the eyes of Israelis, it is the Syrians who are encroaching upon the ancient lands of the Israelite tribes. A coup in Iran could place Syria in a precarious position. Then there are the Kurds, who are allies of the Israelis, and who would be strengthened by a weakened Syria and Iran, and seize the opportunity to make their bid for independence and secession from Iraq, Turkey, Syria and Iran—this could spark the broad war the Israelis have been trying desperately to foment.

If it becomes overly obvious to the Iranians that Ahmadinejad is leading them over a cliff, a true leader might emerge and take charge of the nation. Jewish leaders do not like to wait. It leaves them doubting. It confuses them. Dissensions arise. Deadlines approach. Expenses increase. Public opinion changes. More and more people become involved in the planning, which inevitably increases the risks of detection and failure. Within Iran the populace is growing impatient with its crypto-Jewish theocratic leadership. There is a massive amount of oil at stake. Pressures are mounting, but are they mounting a coup? The Mossad and the CIA must reason that if their boys in charge of Iran today are to be ousted, it would be best to find suitable replacements and install them before control is lost."

Ahmadinejad is also working for the Jews as are his crypto-Jewish theocratic bosses. They created the conditions for the Gang-Green Revolution. The Jews are practicing their old Parvusian strategy of "perpetual revolution" in Iran, whereby the Jews maintain control by creating civil war and revolution on the premise of an ever changing perpetual enemy among the People itself who must be destroyed in order for the revolution to be fulfilled leaving room for a paradise on Earth. This Jewish Gang-Green Revolution feeds off the Iranians' discontent with Ahmadinejad, not the love of Mir Hossein Mousavi, who is a mere symbol of that discontent.

It is a protest against Ahmadinejad which does not identify the true enemy, not a thorough proposal for reform, and therefore forms a shallow and easily diffused basis for a true revolution. Just as the Communists promised paradise if the Shah could be deposed, Mousavi promises paradise if Ahmadinejad can be deposed. This will not solve Iran's problems which are external as well as internal.

Iran, like America, needs a political party and candidates who are honestly opposed to World Jewry, not working for it. That said, Ahmadinejad could easily diffuse the contrived movement following Mousavi in several ways. He must provide an outlet for the youthful energy which is being focused at him in a negative way and capture that energy to better the nation. A leader must act like a parent of the nation and provide the child with direction and perspective. Ahmadinejad needs to lead rather than react. Recounting only buys time for Ahmadinejad, but it also buys time for Mousavi.

Ahmadinejad needs to subvert the cult of personality building around Mousavi by introducing confusion into the dissent. He needs to have other dissenting voices which disagree with Mousavi and introduce them into debates he oversees as leader, in the interest of the nation. This will atomize the resistance and he can then capture it for his own purposes. For example, after I announced the formation of the POWER PARTY the Jews introduced competing parties hoping to steal my thunder, my ideas and channel it towards their objects. I will profit from their efforts and ultimately consolidate all they have done under my umbrella. Ahmadinejad should do the same, but he must lead, not react.

He should raise doubts about Mousavi not in a reactive and angry fashion, but with humor which will make it uncool for the youth to follow such a jackass as Mousavi. He should follow the money and organization trail and it will reveal many crypto-Jews and CIA operatives. He should offer rewards for information that reveals the organizers of this Jewish revolution, which is working towards a civil war. Most importantly he should always position himself as the defender and leader of the Iranian People. Mousavi is really in a weak position and the cult surrounding him is an illusion built of discontent not substance.

This is a propaganda war at this stage, and Ahmadinejad is playing it badly.

Monday, June 15, 2009

Could Be We Are Getting Close

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

The Jews are delighted that Ahmadinejad won the election in Iran. The Jews are also delighted that supporters of Mir Hossein Mousavi are protesting Ahmadinejad's victory. These events weaken Iran both externally and internally and the Jewish vampires smell the blood.

As Iran grows weaker, the Jews become less dependent on Arab support, and more dependent on Israeli public opinion as a necessary precondition for an aggressive attack on Iran. As a result, Arabs in the pockets of the Jews can pretend to reject Netanyahu, which strengthens his hand with the Israeli People. Now, Netanyahu can claim that the Arabs refuse to make peace with the Jews, increasing Jewish paranoia and the Jews' desire to attack Iran, which nation Netanyahu claims aids the enemies of Israel and is about to produce nuclear bombs.

These conditions make it even easier for the Jews to attack the Muslims than the previous necessity of allying with the Arabs against the Persians, to then turn on the Arabs. If Iran can be provoked into revolution and then attacked from Israel, the Mossad will have an even easier time provoking revolutions in Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, Turkey, Pakistan, Indonesia, etc.

Ahmadinejad should turn the destructive energies in Iran into constructive energies, and offer Mir Hossein Mousavi some kind of post and offer to create for his followers some means of participating in the government and improving the lot of all Iranians, not because the election was rigged, but because he loves all of the Iranian People and wants to see Iranians united and working together for the benefit of all. Ahmadinejad would be wise to first attempt to placate this group, rather than polarize Iran. If that fails, then there are other options.

Should Mousavi spit on Ahmadinejad's overtures, then it will look bad for Mousavi in the eyes of most Iranians.

Should the Instability in Iran Increase, the Israelis May Seize the Opportunity to Attack

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

If Iran were to descend into chaos, the Jews would have an open window of opportunity in which to attack. Facing domestic turmoil, it would be difficult for Iranians to initiate a counter-attack against the Israelis.

The Jews would face many fronts around the World, but the counter-attack would be weakest if they were to strike while Iran is in tumult. I suspect the Israeli generals are chomping at the bit for Ahmadinejad to declare martial law and for Iran to fall apart, so that they can send their bombers to Tehran. Netanyahu need only win popular support for such an attack among the Israeli population.

Sunday, June 14, 2009

Crucifying the Christ: As Obama's Star Fades, the Arabs Will Meet Their Graves

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

The Jews know that the crashing economy and increasingly destabilizing World will eventually turn the American public against the Jewish puppet Obama. They have carefully planned for that day, which is why they are aligning Obama with the Arabs, whom the Jews are about to betray.

Netanyahu spoke of a Palestinian State and called on the Arabs to join with the Israelis in a quest for peace. When such a Jew speaks of peace, we know that war is coming, and Netanyahu's statements are code for an Arab alliance with Israel against Iran, whom he blames for alleged Palestinian violence against Israel.

The Arabs' new false messiah, Obama, is preparing to betray them. At the same time as Obama's popularity declines, the Jews will whip up the Christian right to embrace their old friend Netanyahu. But Israel and Iran are separated by Arab nations and the Jews want the Arabs to help them slaughter Muslims in Iran and spark a regional conflict. Once this starts, Netanyahu is positioned to be the one who warned us about Obama and how his policies would fail. Netanyahu will also cry to Israelis that we poor Jews are again alone in the World and must defend ourselves, for who came to our rescue in the camps, or in our wars against the Arabs, not even the US!

Netanyahu is appealing to Israelis and Arab leaders to attack Iran. I suspect his appeal will be successful and Obama and the Congress will be on the side of the Jews, as they always are, but the wicked guile of the Jews will have the American People crying out for war and blaming Obama for what the Jews have wrought upon the World, just as they put Obama in power by blaming Bush for what the Jews had done.

Obama's popularity was great enough to enable the Jews to steal trillions from taxpayers. His star will fade and the Americans do not have the stomach for war, so the Israelis and Arabs must be talked into it in the name of "peace" and "Palestinian sovereignty". That is what these games are all about at present.

I suggest Netanyahu follow his own advice and disarm Israel and recognize the Palestinians' right to exist on their own land. That would be a true move towards a more peaceful World.

I Really, Really, Really Hate to Say, "I Told You So!", But I Did!

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

When you predict that the Jews are leading us towards a nuclear World War Three, it is really painful to be proven right:

NKorea warns of nuclear war amid rising tensions

I could say that it did not take long for my prediction of this Korean threat to come about, given my blog:

Chinese Checkers and the Star of David, June 13, 2009

but I have been predicting these events for years, in, among other places, my blog of 15 October 2006:

Japan and South Korea Are in a Vise, October 15, 2006

I do hate to say, "I told you so!", but the truth is, I did, long ago. . .

I Predicted a False Flag Attack Back on June 17, 2008, But Do NOT Believe von Brunn Is It

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

I predicted that there would be a false flag attack meant to discredit the Anti-Zionist Movement, in, among other places, a blog I posted way back on 17 June 2008:

Will There Be a False Flag Attack Meant to Destroy the Anti-Zionist Movement and Breach the First Amendment? June 17, 2008

I still expect the attack is coming, probably several, but I do not believe that von Brunn's alleged assault on the Holocaust Museum was a false flag attack. I again repeat that I do NOT condone von Brunn's alleged illegal acts.

There are some strange things about the story coming out of the media. The media claim that von Brunn used an ancient slide/pump action rimfire .22 cal. shooting gallery type rifle--hardly an assault rifle! But, if true, a .22 (long rifle?) is very light recoiling, especially in such a rifle--just what such an old man would need. A pump is somewhat difficult for an 88 year old man to operate, especially under stress, but those old Winchesters were smooth out of the factory and loosen up even more with time.

Brunn is a convicted felon, which would make it difficult for him to obtain a firearm, which may explain the rifle. He is also quite old and unlikely to have contacts in the gangbanging community who could supply him with arms. Perhaps we will learn how he acquired the gun, why he chose it, etc. My guess is it was an unregistered antique (clearly pre-1968) an old man could pick up, or store for decades, without any red flags going up. If von Brunn was out to make a statement, anything that went bang would suffice.

A .22 rimfire has been known to drop deer, but is not a particularly lethal round, especially in long, or short versions, as opposed to some of the hot new .22 long rifle high velocity loads. Before the days of antibiotics, people used to dread being shot by the dirty greased bullets typical of a twenty-two because they could kill days later from infection, rarely having the power to make it through the body. Quick kills with a .22 rimfire are rare even with the magnum version, which was not what von Brunn used. This opens up a can of worms, but the death of the security guard may explain many other anomalies and I have learned to wait for further reports and not rely on news reports or the first thing the cops say. I hope there is a trial and we hear what von Brunn has to say.

Contrary to the legend some of the Jews (not Hoffman) who claim von Brunn was an agent of Jewry want to build, von Brunn did not appear from nowhere. He attempted to arrest members of the Fed decades ago, and was well known for his anti-Jewish sentiments for a very long time and was known for his book which was copyrighted in 1999. He served a long stretch in prison. Was his prior attempt to arrest members of the Fed a false flag attack? I doubt it. The website featuring his writings is typical of such websites belonging to, or dedicated to old men who did most of their work before the age of the internet, again contrary to the legends the Jews are attempting to craft of a supposed contrived website meant to deceive. It is not surprising that it was immediately taken down given the heat was turned up to solar degrees.

The Jew Michael Hoffman calls von Brunn a "Manchurian Candidate" and quotes, in full, one of von Brunn's anti-Christian writings, which has since been pulled off the web by the Ron Paul supporter who had originally allowed it on his website:

James von Brunn hated Christianity

which includes von Brunn's article CHRISTIANITY and the HOLOCAUST that originally appeared here:

A good many highly intelligent German scholars have agreed with von Brunn in this article both as to the subversive nature of Christianity and the heinous nature of Jewry. Hoffman's shallow and disappointing analysis is contradicted by an eminent Jew named Disraeli, whose freely given statements vouched for every one of von Brunn's main contentions and arguments against the Jews and the child of Judaism which destroyed Rome and held back all of Europe, Christianity. Disraeli wrote, in contradiction to the shallow sophistry and converted Christian religious fanaticism of the Jew Hoffman:

"Nor is it indeed historically true that the small section of the Jewish race which dwelt in Palestine rejected Christ. The reverse is the truth. Had it not been for the Jews of Palestine the good tidings of our Lord would have been unknown for ever to the northern and western races. The first preachers of the gospel were Jews, and none else; the historians of the gospel were Jews, and none else. No one has ever been permitted to write under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit except a Jew. For nearly a century no one believed in the good tidings except Jews. They nursed the sacred flame of which they were the consecrated and hereditary depositories. And when the time was right to diffuse the truth among the ethnicks, it was not a senator of Rome or a philosopher of Athens who was personally appointed by our Lord for that office, but a Jew of Tarsus, who founded the seven churches of Asia. And that greater church, great even amid its terrible corruptions, that has avenged the victory of Titus by subjugating the capital of the Cæsars and has changed every one of the Olympian temples into altars of the God of Sinai and of Calvary, was founded by another Jew, a Jew of Galilee.


They may be traced in the last outbreak of the destructive principle in Europe. An insurrection takes place against tradition and aristocracy, against religion and property. Destruction of the Semitic principle, extirpation of the Jewish religion, whether in the Mosaic or in the Christian form, the natural equality of man and the abrogation of property, are proclaimed by the secret societies who form provisional governments, and men of Jewish race are found at the head of every one of them. The people of God co-operate with atheists; the most skilful accumulators of property ally themselves with communists; the peculiar and chosen race touch the hand of all the scum and low castes of Europe! And all this because they wish to destroy that ungrateful Christendom which owes to them even its name, and whose tyranny they can no longer endure.

When the secret societies, in February 1848, surprised Europe, they were themselves surprised by the unexpected opportunity, and so little capable were they of seizing the occasion, that had it not been for the Jews, who of late years unfortunately have been connecting themselves with these unhallowed associations, imbecile as were the governments the uncalled for outbreak would not have ravaged Europe. But the fiery energy and the teeming resources of the children of Israel maintained for a long time the unnecessary and useless struggle. If the reader throws his eye over the provisional governments of Germany, and Italy, and even of France, formed at that period, he will recognise everywhere the Jewish element. Even the insurrection, and defence, and administration of Venice, which, from the resource of statesmanlike moderation displayed, commanded almost the respect and sympathy of Europe, were accomplished by a Jew—Manini, who by the bye is a Jew who professes the whole of the Jewish religion, and believes in Calvary as well as Sinai, 'a converted Jew', as the Lombards styled him, quite forgetting, in the confusion of their ideas, that it is the Lombards who are the converts—not Manini.


Is it therefore wonderful, that a great portion of the Jewish race should not believe in the most important portion of the Jewish religion? As however the converted races become more humane in their behaviour to the Jews, and the latter have opportunity fully to comprehend and deeply to ponder over true Christianity, it is difficult to suppose that the result will not be very different. Whether presented by a Roman or Anglo-Catholic, or Geneveve, divine, by pope, bishop, or presbyter, there is nothing one would suppose very repugnant to the feelings of a Jew when he learns that the redemption of the human race has been effected by the mediatorial agency of a child of Israel; if the ineffable mystery of the Incarnation be developed to him, he will remember that the blood of Jacob is a chosen and peculiar blood, and if so transcendent a consummation is to occur he will scarcely deny that only one race could be deemed worthy of accomplishing it. There may be points of doctrine on which the northern and western races may perhaps never agree. The Jew, like them, may follow that path in those respects which reason and feeling alike dictate; but nevertheless it can hardly be maintained that there is anything revolting to a Jew to learn that a Jewess is the queen of heaven, or that the flower of the Jewish race are even now sitting on the right hand of the Lord God of Sabaoth.

Perhaps too in this enlightened age as his mind expands and he takes a comprehensive view of this period of progress, the pupil of Moses may ask himself, whether all the princes of the house of David have done so much for the Jews as that prince who was crucified on Calvary? Had it not been for Him, the Jews would have been comparatively unknown, or known only as a high oriental caste which had lost its country. Has not He made their history the most famous in the world? Has not He hung up their laws in every temple? Has not He vindicated all their wrongs? Has not He avenged the victory of Titus and conquered the Cæsars? What successes did they anticipate from their Messiah? The wildest dreams of their rabbis have been far exceeded. Has not Jesus conquered Europe and changed its name into Christendom? All countries that refuse the cross wither while the whole of the new world is devoted to the Semitic principle and its most glorious offspring the Jewish faith, and the time will come when the vast communities and countless myriads of America and Australia, looking upon Europe as Europe now looks upon Greece and wondering how so small a space could have achieved such great deeds, will still find music in the songs of Sion and solace in the parables of Galilee.

These may be dreams, but there is one fact which none can contest. Christians may continue to persecute Jews and Jews still persist in disbelieving Christians, but who can deny that Jesus of Nazareth, the Incarnate Son of the Most High God, is the eternal glory of the Jewish race?"--B. Disraeli, Lord George Bentinck: A Political Biography, Chapter 24, Third Revised Edition, Colburn, (1852), pp. 485, 497-498, 505-507.

I do not condone what von Brunn has done, and it has thus far proven to have been counter-productive especially with the help of the Jews who have attacked his historical arguments, but between Hoffman and the other Jews, and von Brunn, von Brunn clearly has the better mind and more lucid and historically accurate arguments. But as I predicted, any kind of illegal action will prove counter-productive.

Those Jews aside, I suspect there are some who do not want von Brunn to become a martyr or to spark any kind of mass movement. I suspect there are some who do not want von Brunn's written work to become popular–quoting it to attack it does not tend to make it more popular, though it does afford one the opportunity to read it!

Much more interesting than the Holocaust Museum incident was von Brunn's attempt to make a citizen's arrest. I do not condone it. It does, however, raise interesting questions. When, as is the case, a hostile and alien power subverts the nation and controls the law enforcement powers of the State, what recourse does a citizen have to secure the interests of the nation, and defend the nation from illegal attack?

I think rather than acting alone as individuals, we should pass laws which empower the People to indict by means of a million signature or more petition. Any person so indicted must then be subjected to a trial by the People and be sentenced by the People. Since a corrupting organization which has subverted the State has the means to prevent the enactment of laws which proscribe its criminal behavior, the People shall have the power to make law in the Petition for Indictment and the power to enforce it and to sentence by it, and the accused shall be denied recourse to an ex post facto defense.

A Heads Up on Internet Versions of Woolfolk's "Red Dragon"

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Back on 30 September 2007, I linked to an online version of L. B. Woolfolk's Great Red Dragon, or London Money Power: The Foreign Money Power in the United States in the following blog:

A Good Book on How the Rothschilds Subvert the Best Interests of Humanity, September 30, 2007

with the following link:

L. B. Woolfolk, Great Red Dragon, or London Money Power: The Foreign Money Power in the United States, George E. Stevens, Cincinnati, (1890).

A couple of days after I posted this blog and added the book to the books page of my website, a mindless parrot who follows me around echoing my work added a copy of the book to his website, which after mine had incorporated a books page that largely mirrored mine and which would sometimes subsequently add the books I added or mentioned on my blog. So much the better, for it is an important set of books!

However, a problem arises in that the version of Woolfolk's book to which I linked, and which was copied by my faithless parrot, is an incomplete version of the book. I have the full book, and can therefore state that the part which is missing is a very important part of the work. I want to let people know this and encourage someone with the time, which I do not have at the moment, to scan this missing part of the book and make it available to all. The book is in the public domain.

Eventually, if no one has the means or desire to do this, I will do it myself, but it may be quite some before I am able to do so.

A pdf of the much abbreviated versions appears here:

L. B. Woolfolk, Great Red Dragon, or London Money Power: The Foreign Money Power in the United States, George E. Stevens, Cincinnati, (1890);

I would also like to add that I recall that there was a redacted version of one of Benjamin Freedman's speeches on the web for years before the parrot reposted it. He also posted a full version, but I suggested to him that the redacted version was easier to sit through and contained the most vital information. Freedman's most substantive contribution by far was to expose to the broad public the quid prod quo deal between the Zionist Jews and the British Government by means of which the Jews brought America into the First World War on the side of the British at a time when the Jews pulled Russia out of the war, hurting the British, in exchange for the Balfour Declaration.

Freedman explained quite well the "Mrs. Peck" scandal which the Jews used to blackmail President Wilson. On other issues, Freedman's work is less reliable and he appeared on the scene to lay the groundwork for McCarthy and Roy Cohn to force the Jews out of International Communism and into Zionism just as the Jewish State was created out of terrorism and political corruption. At the same time, Joseph Stalin also helped the Jews to motivate Jews to abandon Communism in favor of Zionism.

I wonder if my insights on these issues will now crudely and cruelly cackle through the hooked beak of my parrot as if his own?