Saturday, February 02, 2019

Our Rights to Free and Representative Government Versus Orwellian "Quarantine" and "Inoculation"

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

The recent documentary Alt-Right: Age of Rage discusses two extremely troubling and dehumanizing tactics used to subvert our democratic political process. These subversive methods are given the Orwellian labels "Quarantine" and "Inoculation" which liken a certain class of human beings to diseases. The false presumption which is tacitly made by those who ply these subversive arts is that Americans have unequal rights to free and fair representation and this presumption is made under the bizarre pretext that this orchestrated denial of rights to representative government to some, even to a majority, is necessary to ensure free and fair representation for all people in government which has thereby already and deliberately been denied by the forces supposedly seeking its enforcement.

Assuming as a tacit basis for obstructing the rights of some to speak, and the rights of the public to know what they are saying. . . presuming that there exist two classes of human beings, those who agree with those who control the flow of public information and those who disagree with those who control the public flow of information, and that those who control the public flow of information are monolithic at least in their relevant views, organized efforts have been made to limit the public's access to politically relevant information. When those who control the public flow of information wish to censor the views of others with whom they disagree, they believe they are entitled to either "quarantine" their opponents by deliberately preventing exposure of their existence and views in the media, or engage in an unfair and biased propaganda effort through the media to control the minds of the public so as to generate conforming disagreement as an indoctrinated response to favor their biased view. They create a totalitarian mindset through the process of brainwashing the public with an intentionally one sided exposure of the facts and logical arguments, as well as emotional displays of propaganda.

The process of human thought depends upon exposure to information. Neural pathways are formed and the subconscious mind is controlled by the exposure of the brain through the senses to information, which in this instance is controlled by a group that by no means represents the independent views of each and every American. Under our system of government, each and every citizen is entitled to pursue representative government that favors his or her views. Under the law, no citizen has a greater individual right to governmental representation of his views than any other citizen.

Yet this condescending clique, mostly Jewish, presumes that they have the right to limit public discourse to only their views, or the deliberate criticism of the views of their political opponents. They presume that only they have the right to divine the course of government and so abuse the fundamental rights of free speech, private property and public assembly to deny those same rights to others through active collusion to suppress their views from public discourse and thereby deny them representative government. At the same time, they have corrupted the American government and laws to prevent segregation into communities of like-minded individuals who could then seek local representative government that obeyed the views and rights of the segregated community to self determination. In so doing they have monopolized the press, public discourse, public opinion and government to favor their totalitarian control to the fullest extent possible.

We need to start demanding our rights to representative government. We need to take action in the courts to demand remedies to the suppression of our rights to engage in the political process. We need to create our own outlets for public expression and take action in the courts against the monopolies and illegal and underhanded methods employed to suppress our public voice and deny us government representation.

The Myth of the "YouTube Community" Is a Sham Device to Enable Censorship and Selective Enforcement of Sham TOS Agreements

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

YouTube has deleted the popular channel TheRapeofJustice which featured many videos which brought my work to hundreds of thousands of viewers:

For example, the channel, which had about fifty thousand subscribers at the time, mirrored my video presentation

When last I checked, the number of subscribers to TheRapeOfJustice channel had eclipsed fifty thousand. The video as a mirror had achieved more than forty thousand views in a few weeks and was going viral. At that point, utilizing the sham device of the "YouTube Community" as a pretext, YouTube censored the video with a blank screen warning viewers against watching it, and blocking those features which enable videos to go viral.

By falsely attributing their independent action to a mythical "YouTube Community" whose supposed existence contradicts the raw numbers of viewers, likes and subscribers who in fact represent the real community of YouTube, YouTube creates the false impression of a democratic process to cover up what it is in reality corporate collusion with a censorship lobby to regulate the public disclosure of politically important information. The massive numbers of subscribers, likers and viewers rights are denied and their vote through their participation in YouTube and its features as real members of a community is relegated to the trash heap by an organized minority of censors and gatekeepers, who style themselves watchdogs of their perceived self interests. No numbers are publicly tallied to count the representation of voluntary viewers, likes and subscribers versus organized censors who have been schooled on how to obstruct the public disclosure of information through social media. There is no open disclosure of who it is alleged constitutes the "YouTube Community" of (professional?) censors or the nature of their complaints. No explanation is given as to why the rights of the majority are denied or what numerical basis there is for the allegation that the "community" has ruled against what are often millions of members of the verified and counted actual community of viewers and subscribers.

YouTube is fostering a tyranny of an hostile minority over the fundamental human rights of the majority of the verifiable YouTube community. Under the pretext and farce of the sham shadow "YouTube Community" they have violated not only my fundamental human rights to speak freely and the public's fundamental rights to know what I have say; but given that I was promoting my book for sale, they have violated my rights to compete in a free and fair marketplace across State and International lines, thereby violating the spirit of interstate commerce and the Sherman Anti-Trust Act. They have also violated my fundamental human rights to express my political opinions in a fair and free forum and in so doing have corrupted the American political process to render it unrepresentative.

In identifying the effects of the Russian sabotage of the American political process through the means of social media, the American government has officially recognized the fact that social media is a part of the American political system and affords the owners of social media the ability to sway elections to favor those who produce, censor and control its content. The censorship taking place affects the political process, but YouTube does not provide due process to those they victimize with censorship. No fair or equitable process exists for a democratic and open determination of the facts and law which regulate their exercise of dictatorial power to censor. No compensation is given to those whose work is destroyed and who incur damages as a result of the censorship that occurs behind closed doors without public scrutiny or open public disclosure or public process. This organized campaign of censorship is corrupting our political process rendering it unfair and unrepresentative. Our fundamental human rights of representative government, due process, free speech, self determination, public assembly, and free and fair election processes are being trampled by the tyranny of censorship of a monopolistic group of social media barons and fund raising services. Our democracy has been subverted.

What is my government doing to defend my rights and the rights of the public to know my thoughts?

Not only has YouTube censored my work, not only have journals which publish dishonest attacks on me refused to publish my responses, but foreign governments are actively censoring my works and blocking public access to websites which feature them. We live in dangerous times.