Friday, March 01, 2019

Kindle's Whimsical Approach to Burning Books

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Kindle has yet again refused to state the specific reasons why it has banned my book E = mc2 and the Jewish Question. Though Kindle claims that the "subject matter" of my work is in violation of its "guidelines", Kindle will not and cannot tell me which guideline has been violated because Kindle does not have a guideline which covers the subject of "subject matter". Furthermore, Kindle has refused to define the "subject matter" of my book, and since it has no definition of the subject matter of my book, the subject matter of my book cannot serve as a justification for banning my book. Instead of answering my questions, Kindle has confirmed my assertion that they are selectively and arbitrarily banning my book without due cause based solely on their assumption of the power to whimsically ban books without any means of appeal and without any notice as to the reasons why the book has been banned. That is quite a capricious and cavalier approach to the historically dangerous practice of burning books. Would they banish or burn heretics with an equal lack of policy and process to the way they ban arbitrarily declared heretical books? That type of murder at the stake is what is at stake in our society if we permit this reckless discrimination, persecution and censorship to stand.

Thursday, February 28, 2019

An Open Letter to Jeff Bezos

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

I would like to call your attention to the historical persecution and censorship of Jews, because that will probably pique your interest and it is a safe space for you to rest in without worry that your financial interests are in jeopardy. I won't ask you to think too hard, as I would not want to tax your mind the way heretical books would. The Jews enjoy special privileges in our society, especially as relatable victims, so perhaps portrayals of Jewish victimization will form understandable images in your mind, where the persecution of Whites is a taboo subject banned from your cybershelves. The persecution and censorship of Whites only appears to capture your imagination when your companies engage in it.

The Jews excommunicated the now famous Jewish philosopher Spinoza with the following vicious decree,

"The Lords of the ma'amad, having long known of the evil opinions and acts of Baruch de Espinoza, have endeavoured by various means and promises, to turn him from his evil ways. But having failed to make him mend his wicked ways, and, on the contrary, daily receiving more and more serious information about the abominable heresies which he practised and taught and about his monstrous deeds, and having for this numerous trustworthy witnesses who have deposed and borne witness to this effect in the presence of the said Espinoza, they became convinced of the truth of the matter; and after all of this has been investigated in the presence of the honourable chachamin, they have decided, with their consent, that the said Espinoza should be excommunicated and expelled from the people of Israel. By the decree of the angels, and by the command of the holy men, we excommunicate, expel, curse and damn Baruch de Espinoza, with the consent of God, Blessed be He, and with the consent of all the Holy Congregation, in front of these holy Scrolls with the six-hundred-and-thirteen precepts which are written therein, with the excommunication with which Joshua banned Jericho, with the curse with which Elisha cursed the boys and with all the curses which are written in the Book of the Law. Cursed be he by day and cursed be he by night; cursed be he when he lies down, and cursed be he when he rises up; cursed be he when he goes out, and cursed be he when he comes in. The Lord will not spare him; the anger and wrath of the Lord will rage against this man, and bring upon him all the curses which are written in this book, and the Lord will blot out his name from under heaven, and the Lord will separate him to his injury from all the tribes of Israel with all the curses of the covenant, which are written in the Book of the Law. But you who cleave unto the Lord God are all alive this day. We order that no one should communicate with him orally or in writing, or show him any favour, or stay with him under the same roof, or within four ells of him, or read anything composed or written by him."—Steven M. Nadler, Spinoza's Heresy: Immortality and the Jewish Mind, Oxford University Press, New York, (2001), p. 225.

I am sure you will agree that those Jews who censored Spinoza were following the norms and mores of their time and were just as convinced as you that they were morally superior to the man they sought to silence. After all, the rabbis did not want their fellow Jews to have a bad experience reading the works of Spinoza, so they justifiably banned his works, isn't that so? I could bring up the censorship of Galileo Galilei, but somehow the persecution of Whites does not draw instant sympathy to the extent that tales of the poor suffering Jew do. And while we are all shedding tears for the long dead Spinoza and the injustice done to him, let us bring up the obligatory persecution of the Jews under the Nazis. I could refer instead to the mass murder of the 30 million souls and nearly complete destruction of the intelligentsia of Gentiles in the Soviet Union under the Bolshevik Jews, but who cares about them, right? After all, they were White. So let's talk about the tyranny and censorship imposed on Jews by Germans, so that you can relate to the danger of engaging in censorship.

In May of 1933, the German Student Union set about to burn books as an "Action against the Un-German Spirit", and take note of the fact that it is now considered "un-American" to be pro-White despite the fact that the Founding Fathers specified that America is a White nation and limited immigration to Whites of good character. These Nazis most famously burned books by Jews, because they were convinced by the norms and mores of their society that they were morally superior to the authors whose subversive books they burned. They probably felt just like your workers who banned my book E = mc2 and the Jewish Agenda, and Greg Johnson's book The White Nationalist Manifesto, in order to prevent a bad reading experience by your customers. No, it was not a time to try to argue the issues raised with more free speech, it was time to use the brutal and heavy handed force of absolute censorship, lest society crumble under deceived masses who bothered to read such tripe and were unable to think for themselves, but instead were better off surrendering their right to know to the censors.

As another example of the well meant censorship of Jewish works, the false Jewish messiah Jacob Frank led the Catholic Bishop to demand the destruction of the Talmud, which was far more precious to many Jews than the Torah, itself. And this happened in an open court, unlike the banning of my book by your companies. The Talmud was banned for offending Christians, who did not want to have a bad reading experience while discovering the Jewish view that the Virgin Mary whored herself to Roman soldiers and other such gems of Jewish lore.

So who are you, Mr Bezos? A bookseller, promoter of free speech and purveyor of knowledge vital to the public interest; or a book burner who succumbs to the bullying of special interest groups to silence heretics who dare to speak truths which cannot be refuted by the free exchange of ideas?

Amazon/Kindle's Evasive Non-Response

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Kindle/Amazon has responded by simply repeating themselves without answering my questions. Their redundant statement is so thoroughly generic and non-descriptive that it could apply with equal force to every book that has ever been written, and therefore offers no explanation at all as to why they have banned my book.

Further Examples of the Book Burning Purge at Amazon

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Proof is mounting that Amazon has engaged in a politically motivated purge of a specific class of books, those which advocate the best interests of White People:

In each instance, they have attempted to justify banning these books due to their "subject matter" without further explanation, and directed the authors to their "guidelines" which are not guidelines but simply a statement that Amazon has the power to censor books. Amazon sells countless products which produce negative customer experiences, as evinced by the many millions of negative reviews of products Amazon continues to sell. Their "guidelines" are being employed as a sham device for Amazon to hide behind as it censors books for political reasons.

The Nazis also burned books that they believed would produce a negative customer experience. The Nazis also presumed that they knew best which books to allow the public to read, and also had no regard for the public's right to know facts and opinions which offend special interests. The slippery slope leads to the abyss and we are tumbling down it. Amazon has the power to influence politics and deny us a level playing field to obtain representative government and exercise our fundamental human rights. Amazon is violating our fundamental human rights by selectively discriminating against us.

Kindle burns books! It is my new mantra.

Wednesday, February 27, 2019

Is Kindle's Censorship of My Book Part of an Expanding Purge?

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Amazon has just recently banned Greg Johnson's book The White Nationalist Manifesto:

Like Mr. Johnson, I am unable to determine the basis for the ban of my book. As he has done, I have requested that the ban of my book be lifted. Are amazon and Kindle engaged in selectively enforcing the vaguest of decrees, which though they style them "guidelines" are not guidelines at all, but simply a statement that they have the power to censor?

Does anyone know of other books that have been purged?

This is truly outrageous and very dangerous.

KINDLE Burned My Book Due to Its "Subject Matter"

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

The ebook publisher with the ironic name "Kindle" has effectively burned my book E = mc2 and the Jewish Agenda. The most dangerous monopoly is a monopoly over the marketplace of ideas. Heinrich Heine famously iterated the admonition, "Dort, wo man Bücher verbrennt, verbrennt man am Ende auch Menschen" "Where they burn books, they will also burn people in the end."

Kindle's selective discrimination against my work due to its "subject matter" inhibits my ability to engage in free and fair trade and compete with other authors and booksellers on a level playing field. It also creates a monopolistic hurdle that I cannot overcome, which restricts my ability to engage in interstate and international commerce as effectively as those who have not been censored.

Instead of attempting to refute what I have written with facts and logic, Kindle is censoring me by banning the "subject matter" of my book. Why? Are my words irrefutable? If so, why do they keep the public from knowing what I have said? They are not only violating my fundamental human rights to free speech and my rights to engage in free and fair trade in an open marketplace, they are violating the public's rights to know what I have to say.

But Kindle has not only burned my book, they have also lit a fire in me. I now have an increasingly burning desire to reveal the truth to millions of people, which they cannot extinguish by burning my book.

It is quite disappointing that they have burned my book, rather than kindle ideas.

If anyone knows of publishers who will not censor my book's "subject matter" please let me know.